Comments on: Sen. James Inhofe weighs in on polar bear mania

By: Contempo Magazine Blog » Blog Archive » Female Reactions to the Palin Pick

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:44:03 +0000

[...] file suit to block the move. With staunch, sane, principled conservatives like Gov. Palin and Sen. James Inhofe taking a stand, there’s hope–however dwindling–for the GOP [...]

By: Danceswithdachshunds

Danceswithdachshunds — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:58:39 +0000

kurthanson said:

Most polar bears live in Canada, what is the U.S. supposed to do about a Canadian problem? Maybe if the Canadians stop clubbing seals long enough, they will figure out how to deal with the problem.

I think you’re coming on to something here. Hmmm? Let’s see… polar bears eat … SEALS! So that’s the main reason polar bears are threatened; Canadian hunters are ’stealing’ the polar bears’ favorite entrée. Why I’ll even bet those hunters drive SUV’s too.

By: Michelle Malkin » First, the polar bear…now, the Pacific walrus

Michelle Malkin » First, the polar bear…now, the Pacific walrus — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:12:34 +0000

[...] After successfully mau-mauing the government into listing the polar bear as threatened based on dubious data, green lawyers are now filing suit to get the Pacific walrus listed as threatened, [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » You go, girl: Alaska GOP Gov. will sue Bush administration over polar bear listing

Thu, 22 May 2008 04:06:08 +0000

[...] file suit to block the move. With staunch, sane, principled conservatives like Gov. Palin and Sen. James Inhofe taking a stand, there’s hope–however dwindling–for the GOP yet. Keep hope alive: [...]

By: kurthanson

kurthanson — Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:03 +0000

Most polar bears live in Canada, what is the U.S. supposed to do about a Canadian problem? Maybe if the Canadians stop clubbing seals long enough, they will figure out how to deal with the problem.

By: Milwaukee Mike

Milwaukee Mike — Thu, 15 May 2008 17:54:32 +0000

Perhaps over the next 50-100 years, the polar bear pop can increase and migrate down to the our area here in North America (I don’t know if it will still be called the USA), where they can dine on the corpses of people who starved to death because of the mandate to grow crops for fuel.

By: rightwingrocker

rightwingrocker — Thu, 15 May 2008 16:59:35 +0000

Woot! Rightwingrocker: fellow member of the greater Philadelphia area. Dude, I live within about 3 miles of the airport.

Swing by my blog and leave a message with an email address, and I’ll meet up with ya for a brewski!

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

By: rightwingrocker

rightwingrocker — Thu, 15 May 2008 16:55:16 +0000

Scientists, physicists, mathematicians, statisticians — they believe human created global warming disastrous climate change theories more than 10 to 1 (ten believers per skeptic).

This despite the fact that the actual scientific analysis says they didn’t, won’t, and can’t.

I’d say those 10 per 1 are on the dole.

Just a scientific thought.

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

By: Chuck

Chuck — Thu, 15 May 2008 16:10:22 +0000

lgm said:
Scientists, physicists, mathematicians, statisticians — they believe human created global warming disastrous climate change theories more than 10 to 1 (ten believers per skeptic).

That’s a pure lie. Over 19,000 scientists signed on to a protocol refuting the idea (not ‘fact’) that people caused warming. A huge percentage “don’t know for sure what causes it”, and a small, very vocal (”give me the grant money or you’ll all die”) group are riding this pony for all it’s worth. Most noteworthy is James Hansen whose data, models, and conclusions have been found to be BS by dozens of his peers. He’s an incompetent or a liar, or both.

By: Hexadecimal

Hexadecimal — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:54:42 +0000

Woot! Rightwingrocker: fellow member of the greater Philadelphia area. Dude, I live within about 3 miles of the airport.

By: abstractmind

abstractmind — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:49:40 +0000

On May 15th, 2008 at 9:40 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

Thanks for the add, completely agree. The whole junk science involved with this is at best, dubious, and at worst a complete fraud.

By: DaveC

DaveC — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:18:30 +0000

nothing against a good amount of teachers I know.. except for the truly, willfully ignorant teachers like LGM..

By: DaveC

DaveC — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:17:10 +0000

LGM is still proving my point that those who can’t do, teach..

and those who can’t teach, troll..

By: sonofdy

sonofdy — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:17:10 +0000

The problem with science is that it denies faith which actualy hamstrings it sometimes. How amny times have we seen science deny a fact only to have one person with faith in the idea to prove them wrong? Science is the orthodoxy of today. Never to be questioned. Yet they wrong more times than they are right.

By: Misscheryl

Misscheryl — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:09 +0000

I have much respect for science – it’s scientist I have a problem with. IF they would quit presenting science that hasn’t been proven as though it’s fact (evolution for example), I’d probably give an ear more than I do. Scientists simply fill in the gaps when they don’t have all the facts to serve their own political agendas and then present it as though they have discovered yet another secret to the universe. I will not replace my faith in the Lord with a scientist who thinks he’s God! I have zero respect them!