The proud Obamas lash back

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 19, 2008 09:41 AM

You know what I have to say about Barack Obama calling the Tennessee GOP “low-class” and “unacceptable” on Good Morning America because of its ad answering Michelle Obama’s lack of pride in her country?

Barack, sweetie, your conversation with ABC News’s Robin Roberts insisting that your wife’s public remarks on the campaign trail be exempt from public criticism doesn’t help my children.

The proud Obamas claim they want to talk about the “issues,” rather than “distractions.” But when the candidate puts his bitter half on stage and his chief public surrogate, what comes out of her mouth is an issue.

Michelle Obama was asked about the ad on “GMA,” but her husband said, “Let me just interject on this.”

“The GOP, should I be the nominee, I think can say whatever they want to say about me, my track record,” Obama said. “I’ve been in public life for 20 years. I expect them to pore through everything that I’ve said, every utterance, every statement. And to paint it in the most undesirable light possible. That’s what they do.”

“But I do want to say this to the GOP. If they think that they’re going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful. Because that I find unacceptable,” he said.

Obama praised his wife’s patriotism and said that for Republicans “to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her I think is just low class … and especially for people who purport to be promoters of family values, who claim that they are protectors of the values and ideals and the decency of the American people to start attacking my wife in a political campaign I think is detestable.”

Obama later added, “I think that the American people also would like to see some restoration of decency to this process. And when you start attacking family members, there’s a lack of decency there.”

The only ones engaged in distraction are the Obamas when they pout about being held to account for her statements and how they reflect his own ideological underpinnings. The Macho Man act is a poor smokescreen.

If the Missus cannot take the heat, keep her away from the microphone.

***

Rick Moran: More whining.

Ed Morrissey: Toughen up, buttercup.

Rush Limbaugh: Things you can’t say about Obama.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. PAXALLES
  2. Liberty Pundit
  3. The Conservative Pulse: Barack defends Michelle, Constitutional Amendments, Talking with Marxist Children, and more at The Liberty Preservation Alliance
  4. Obama Doesn’t Want Any Of You Talking Smack About His Wife « Beltway Snark
  5. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Blog Archive » Cry baby says what?
  6. Jules Crittenden » Spousal Immunity
  7. Democrat=Socialist
  8. PrestoPundit
  9. How About Some Brie with that Whine? Barack Obama … Lay Off My Wife’s Political Statements … Obama Keep Michelle Obama away from the Microphone | Scared Monkeys
  10. The Playing Field is Level… « The View from Alexandria
  11. Bent Notes » Blog Archive » We knew he was a hard-core Marxist with an America-hating wife and a racist minister; now he adds fool and ass to his bona fides
  12. Big Dogs Weblog
  13. UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Barry Obama: Leave My Little Woman Alone
  14. The Hinge Of Fate » Another Low-Class Critic
  15. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Politics
  16. Theodore's World
  17. Thinkin’bout Stuff » Blog Archive » Are Spouse’s Fair Game?
  18. Obama To Tennessee GOP: Waa Waa Waa! | McCain Blogs
  19. Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » Spousal Immunity, not on this blog! – Screw you Hussein, your wife is fair game!
  20. The Rude News » Blog Archive » Barack Obama & Why Election ‘08 Stinks
  21. Michelle Malkin » Tennessee GOP Sen. Corker tells Tennessee GOP to shut up
  22. Michelle Obama: A Bigger Mouth than a Hooker Short on Rent Money | Euphoric Reality
  23. Obama to Tennessee GOP: Lay Off My Wife
  24. I must confess, this is funny…

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #326806
    On May 19th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, graysonret said:

    This “bozo” for President must have the democratic leadership cringing. I can’t imagine that, even if the leadership had half a brain, they would allow this guy to speak anymore, without the “spin doctors” and speech writers doing it for him. Every time he opens his mouth, the foot finds a nice home. The democrats can’t be really serious about this guy representing the party…can they? I mean, this guy could put McGovern and Dukakis to shame.

  2. #326811
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, Scooter36 said:

    wasnt me Jim, must’ve been someone you know, cuz you sound jealous…and I’m sure you hate yourself for having those thoughts.

  3. #326826
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, Jim M. said:

    Weak. No, pathetic. Do you work for the Obama campaign?

  4. #326827
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:11 pm, lukespapa said:

    I keep my thermostat on 73 and don’t eat arugula…do I pass the obamessiah global test?

    And please bitter michelle o, keep talking.

  5. #326850
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Scooter36 said:

    I know you are weak and pathetic Jimbo, no need to remind everybody here.

  6. #326862
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:43 pm, The_Livewire said:

    #84 “Now remember men, you’re fighting for this woman’s honour. Which is more than she ever did.” – Groucho Marx

  7. #326868
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, The_Livewire said:

    missJustice,
    my worry is exactly what you say. Obama’s charismatic (if not very prepared) and people follow Charisma.

    For every Regean and Thatcher, there’s a Jim Jones, David Koresh, Hitler…

  8. #326870
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Scooter36 said:

    We’ve already had the candidate you’d most like to have a beer with, so lets try for charismatic this time huh?

  9. #326872
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:52 pm, PoliticalDookie said:

    I want more Michelle Obama. She should get her own slot on MSNBC, maybe her and Chris Mathews can discuss the mutual funny feelings that the BO inspires.

  10. #326873
    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:54 pm, Jim M. said:

    On May 19th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Scooter36 said:
    I know you are weak and pathetic Jimbo, no need to remind everybody here.

    Worse that I thought. How much brain damage did you suffer? I suppose that where your head is at most of the time, the assault definitely resulted in some brain trauma.

  11. #326904
    On May 19th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, Lockstein13 said:

    For those who are “shocked, SHOCKED!” :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro

    (sorry to dissapoint, I know it primarily as a cinematic term)

  12. #326926
    On May 19th, 2008 at 7:52 pm, havok said:

    He would have sounded much tougher if he would have threatened to “bust out his 9 and pop a cap in the GOP’s arse Chicago style…”

  13. #326930
    On May 19th, 2008 at 7:54 pm, John Ansell said:

    Havok, or he could threaten to send Ayers after them.

  14. #326933
    On May 19th, 2008 at 7:55 pm, jellibean said:

    Michelle Obama was asked about the ad on “GMA,” but her husband said, “Let me just interject on this.”

    I see what you did there, Obama…

    “to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her I think is just low class”

    Doesn’t he mean “classless?” “Low Class” just sounds… off, especially coming from Obama.

  15. #326966
    On May 19th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, starlightwoman said:

    Jellibean – Maybe he interjected to keep her from opening her vile mouth!

    Talk about a couple of whiners – wonder if they want some cheese to go with that whine???

  16. #326996
    On May 19th, 2008 at 8:34 pm, lonewolf said:

    I gives me great comfort to mingle in this predominately anti-Obama forum. I have a serious question for any of the few mis-guided Obama supporters who enter here. Can you name one positive thing this whiny, ignorant incompetent has done? How can you ignore his associates?
    Think about it. Hating Bush is no reason to subject this grand nation to an Obama suicidal socialist experiment.

  17. #326998
    On May 19th, 2008 at 8:39 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On May 19th, 2008 at 10:40 am, englishqueen01 said:

    I think the Malkinites will be the first enrolled for the re education camp in an Obama presidency.

    No doubt. I can’t find the quote right now, but Obama said something in regards to gay marriage and/or abortion about making opponents to both “see the light” (or something to that affect). Re-education camps are just the begining…

    The liberal infestation, I mean control, of academia is making the need for reeducation camps increasingly unnecessary.

    On May 19th, 2008 at 10:44 am, BrianNY said:

    Just so we’re all on the same page:
    1. We can listen to, but we can’t comment on or respond to Michelle Obama’s political statements.
    2. We can’t reference Barack’s middle name.
    3. We can’t refer to any of Barack’s friends or colleagues.
    4. We can listen to, but we can’t respond to Barack’s positions on foreign policy.

    Am I missing anything here?

    5. We can’t mention his ears.
    6. We can’t mention any of his political affiliations or associate him with the associations.
    7. We can’t reference his political failings or inexperience.
    8. We can’t mention his Muslim father.
    9. We can’t mention his white mother or grandmother.
    10. We can’t mention whatever Muslim upbringing he may have had, no matter how little.
    11. We can’t mention his numerous gaffes (see 7 above)
    12. We can’t mention that he wants to invade Pakistan’s territory in a search for Obama. I mean Osama.
    13. We can’t mention how he might have gotten his presidency of the Harvard Law Review or his performance on it.
    14. We can’t mention Tony Rezko or his affiliation with him.
    15. We can’t mention the cakewalk that was laughingly called his election to the senate.
    16. We can’t talk about his ultraliberal voting record.
    17. We can’t mention that he is half white and apparently ashamed of it.
    18. We can’t mention that the female media is ga-ga over his package.
    19. We can’t mention that many of the male media is too.
    20. We can’t question his patriotism.
    21. We can’t question his huge income, mansion and big gas guzzlers.

  18. #327024
    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:08 pm, undrseige247 said:

    22. We can’t mention he looks a little like Curious George.

  19. #327025
    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:08 pm, Christinewjc said:

    Michele Obama goes out on the campaign trail for her husband. She utilizes her free speech right to criticize and spew hatred towards America – calling it “a downright mean country.” Yet, when others utilize their free speech rights to criticize her comments, Namby Pamby Barrack lectures us that his wife is “off limits.”

    Yep… the liberal dictatorial attitude with Marxist SPIN at it’s best!

  20. #327033
    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, SparkyMcMuffin said:

    Michelle,
    This will probably get lost in the 300 or so comments here, but here goes.

    Somebody needs to point out that the left has a twisted idea of freedom of speech. They believe they should be allowed to speak their minds about any issue they feel passionate about, but without consequences. Freedom of speech to them means “We are free to speak and you better shut up and listen.” Opposing opinions are not allowed. They are instead labeled as bigotry and censorship, and a great deal of effort is made to silence them.

  21. #327052
    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:37 pm, havok said:

    On May 19th, 2008 at 7:54 pm, John Ansell said:
    Havok, or he could threaten to send Ayers after them.

    LOL…indeed. Disagree with me and I will blow you up!!

  22. #327067
    On May 19th, 2008 at 10:10 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    SparkyMcMuffin said:

    Somebody needs to point out that the left has a twisted idea of freedom of speech. They believe they should be allowed to speak their minds about any issue they feel passionate about, but without consequences.

    Yup. Some of the anti-war left will talk about an atmosphere of stifling of dissent of the war. No one is stifling dissent. It’s just that not everyone agrees with the anti-war left, and they think that’s “stifling dissent”. Comical.

    If Obamessiah (PBUH) gets so upset when a fellow American disagrees with him or his wife, what chance does he have against all the whackjob dictators around the world. Maybe he’ll do ok as long as they don’t hurt his feelings. But don’t do that. That’s not acceptable.

  23. #327076
    On May 19th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, libocrat said:

    Can we mention their AFFIRMATIVE ACTION educational oppurtunities??

    Please?

  24. #327111
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:13 pm, Speakup said:

    I think is detestable.

    Well sweetie.

  25. #327121
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:25 pm, vatodio said:

    Since whan does a candidate decide who is off limit and who is not?

    Ever heard the phrase, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen?’

    Everything should be on the table: his associations with unsavory elements of our society, his lack of experience, his courageous “Present” non-votes on many lagislations in Illinois State legislature as well as US Senate, His wife’s observations,….

    To be fair, McCain and his wife must be fully scrutinized too.

    After all, these guys want to be the President of the most powerful nation on earth, and not some community organisation.

  26. #327124
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    Over 300 posts, h ere, sorry, I haven’t read them all , yet – HAS ANYONE ELSE SEEN THE LATEST CARLOS MENCIA ROUTINES ON COMEDY CENTRAL?
    I saw them last night.
    He has some comments about Obama and the Mrs – and the RACE CARDS.

    It is HOT STUFF! Carlos nails the race and Bigotry stuff pretty well most of the time, and he did a great job on the Candidates, too!
    It sure helps me to have someone put it in basic terms that helps me laugh about it – and Carlos does THAT!

  27. #327129
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:35 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    There is only one thing you can say about OBAMA – THANK GOD he isn’t EFFECTIVE in ACCOMPLISHING the DIM SOCIALIST AGENDA LIKE JOHN McCAIN IS.

    WOULD TO GOD that JOHN McCAIN WERE NEARLY AS INEFFECTIVE, TOO!

    WOULD TO GOD that Angels in Heaven would stop the McCAIN TRAIN in its TRACKS immediately.
    I HEAR THERE ARE WINDS OF CHANGE BLOWING THROUGH THIS LAND!

    2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

    MAY THEY STOP ALL THE RINOS AND JOHN McCAIN AND THE RECONQUISTAS IN HIS ORGANIZATION in their tracks!

    AMEN!

  28. #327134
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:41 pm, libocrat said:

    Vatodio, while I agree with you for the most part, I must point out a HUGE DISTINCTION.
    Michelle Obama is out on the campaign stump, giving speeches and expressing the viewpoints of her husbands campaign.
    She is REPRESENTING Mr.Obama explicitly and is doing so FOR HIS CAMPAIGN.
    In doing so, she has become part of the campaign and her words, opinions and rhetoric are part of the campaign and discourse. As such, her words, opinions, and attitudes are subject to scrutiny. That is a choice that she and the Obama campaign made. She has POLITICIZED herself. Her words and obvious GAFFES are PART AND PARCEL of OBAMA’S campaign. She was speaking on his behalf.
    If you are suggesting that both Mrs.McCain and Mrs.Obama should be scrutinized without reference to their relevance to the prospective campaigns, then I disagree.
    This isn’t a personal attack. Michelle Obama is speaking as PART of the campaign, and as such, she has injected herself into the campaign. Mrs. McCain should be scrutinized if and when she injects herself into the discourse.

  29. #327139
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:45 pm, Silkyinfamous said:

    , lonewolf said:
    I gives me great comfort to mingle in this predominately anti-Obama forum. I have a serious question for any of the few mis-guided Obama supporters who enter here. Can you name one positive thing this whiny, ignorant incompetent has done?

    Well, Let me start by saying one positive thing was he wrote a law in Illinois to require the videotaping of interrogations. Passed the IL Senate 35-0. This was good because it protected the rights of the accused. I know its a hard thing to swallow now.

    Another item on the list is he played a major role in the first ethics law in the state in 25 years.

    The Lugar-Obama Act on keeping weapons out of terrorist hands, particulary nuclear arms from old soviet stockpiles.

    Getting rid of no-contract bids with regards to FEMA.

    Work on a public database of all federal spending and contracts.

    Work on the Lane Evans Health Care Benefits Improvement Act for Veterans healthcare when returning and on duty in the war of terror. Yea. All that.

  30. #327143
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:51 pm, atheling said:

    Obama wants to end secret ballots in union voting. Wonder if he harbors greater ambitions regarding the demise of the secret ballot?

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356643,00.html

  31. #327145
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:53 pm, Silkyinfamous said:

    geminicontender said:
    Can Obama save Burma?

    WASHINGTON, DC – The Senate has passed a resolution introduced by Senator John Kerry and a bipartisan group of 19 Senators urging humanitarian aid to the Burmese people following the devastation of the cyclone and accompanying tidal wave. There are currently 100,000 people dead and tens of thousands missing, with disease spreading rampantly throughout the flooded country. The resolution was cosponsored by Foreign Relations Chairman Joe Biden (D-DE), Ranking Member Richard Lugar (R-IN), Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), along with Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Chris Dodd (D-CT), Barack Obama (D-IL), Jim Webb (D-VA), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Bob Menendez (D-NJ.), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Joe Lieberman (D-CT) Chuck Hagel (R-NE), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Elizabeth Dole (R-N.C.)

    He sure is trying. Not seeing McCain on there though.

  32. #327147
    On May 19th, 2008 at 11:54 pm, reland1 said:

    It is my hope, Mr.Iwannabepotus Hussien Obama, Sir, that I, being just a crazyowhitegranma may, ask you a question about your policy of change, Sir? Will this change be simply a name, address, or wardrobe change for yourself and maybe for Mrs. Michelle iwannabeflotus Obama? oops! please .. hopefully no offense taken..Sir…or do WE have to change our names, addresses or wardrobes? Hope notHope not.. Assuming it is you that is going to change…may I be so bold as to ask…what you might change into? Sir? OK. Just asking…cause I get really, really warm in those pretty black robes with scarves and muzzles and everything…hope I’m older…but IF we have to change.. hopefully I may be excused? Sir? Hope so. Hope so.

    So… all we are allowed to speak of is change for change sake…or hope for hope’s sake? Ain’t that somethin! I hope to change into a rabbit!

  33. #327151
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:04 am, Silkyinfamous said:

    atheling said:
    Obama wants to end secret ballots in union voting. Wonder if he harbors greater ambitions regarding the demise of the secret ballot?

    What it does, is it establishes the Union without a secret ballot supervised by the National Labor Relations Board. If a majority of workers in the group sign, then the NLRB recognizes them as a Union and the employer has to negotiate a contract. The usual time between secret ballots and recogniztion of the union is 6 weeks. 6 weeks of hell for the employees and mass firings. I would love to see a Unionized Wal-Mart. How about you?

  34. #327156
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:10 am, JWS said:

    MM, my post was deleted because?

  35. #327161
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:27 am, Dimsdale said:

    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:08 pm, undrseige247 said:

    22. We can’t mention he looks a little like Curious George.

    That cost me a mouthful of some very fine homemade chai, LOL!

    On May 19th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, SparkyMcMuffin said:

    Somebody needs to point out that the left has a twisted idea of freedom of speech. They believe they should be allowed to speak their minds about any issue they feel passionate about, but without consequences. Freedom of speech to them means “We are free to speak and you better shut up and listen.” Opposing opinions are not allowed. They are instead labeled as bigotry and censorship, and a great deal of effort is made to silence them.

    You have just printed the liberal Democrat manifesto! Do you have their playbook by any chance?

    Isn’t it interesting that they are the ones always squealing the loudest about “censorship” and the First Amendment etc., yet examples like this, and political correctness, show them to be the biggest transgressors of the First Amendment.

    Rush is right: Dems always accuse others of what they are most guilty of doing.

  36. #327162
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:28 am, atheling said:

    I would love to see a Unionized Wal-Mart. How about you?

    Nope. Union corruption is worse than WalMart.

  37. #327166
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:36 am, reland1 said:

    atheling & Silkyinfamous ..I’m sorry…jeeez..I thought I was on a conservative website…must haveclicked the wrong url…hmmm…sounds like the Marxists are alive and well Michelle! See ya!

  38. #327169
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:43 am, libocrat said:

    I love a non-unionized Wal-Mart.
    Only a LIBTARD needs someone ELSE to decide what his/her LIBTARD worth is.

    Rodham isn’t a union member.
    Jesus Obama isn’t.
    John Edwards isn’t.
    Ted Kennedy isn’t.

    Yet their followers should be??

    Collectivism. It’s called Socialism, or Marxism.

    Get a clue ass-hats.

  39. #327171
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:45 am, reland1 said:

    #22, #299…BHO DOES look like Curious George…I wish he WAS Curious George…and Michelle BO would probably be happier in BFE!

  40. #327177
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:57 am, Silkyinfamous said:

    reland1 said:
    atheling & Silkyinfamous ..I’m sorry…jeeez..I thought I was on a conservative website…must haveclicked the wrong url…hmmm…sounds like the Marxists are alive and well Michelle! See ya!

    Afraid of a little argument?
    Come on. Lets all get together and hold hands and sing happy peaceful songs.

    Not being serious of course.

    Being on a Conservative Website
    you should have alot more ammo. Don’t give in or up on your ideals or you might be labeled a ___________.

  41. #327178
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:59 am, libocrat said:

    reland1!! References about Michelle “the Mouth” Obama have been deemed….”bad references”.
    She has become a Non-political factor.

    Please refrain from using her name or face the consequences.

    Thank you.
    Signed.
    Big Brutha.

  42. #327209
    On May 20th, 2008 at 3:00 am, RetFireman said:

    On May 19th, 2008 at 3:35 pm, babbledabble said:
    He’s kind of like the “religion of perpetual outrage” – don’t you think????

    You might just be onto someting.

    “Oh Mr, B. Hussein Obama…your years of Islamic brainwa…er…education is showing!

  43. #327242
    On May 20th, 2008 at 8:03 am, Renee_VA said:

    I guess anything to deflect attention from the sorry administration we have now and McShamnesty is good (but I doubt it will hold for the next five months).

  44. #327358
    On May 20th, 2008 at 9:46 am, JT said:

    Well, Let me start by saying one positive thing was he wrote a law in Illinois to require the videotaping of interrogations. Passed the IL Senate 35-0. This was good because it protected the rights of the accused. I know its a hard thing to swallow now.

    Another item on the list is he played a major role in the first ethics law in the state in 25 years.

    The Lugar-Obama Act on keeping weapons out of terrorist hands, particulary nuclear arms from old soviet stockpiles.

    Getting rid of no-contract bids with regards to FEMA.

    Work on a public database of all federal spending and contracts.

    Work on the Lane Evans Health Care Benefits Improvement Act for Veterans healthcare when returning and on duty in the war of terror. Yea. All that.

    Wow!!! Impressive!!! Can’t wait to vote for Obama. I can live without foreign policy experience, government management/budget experience, business experience, military experience, negotiating experience etc.,

    He was an absentee/”present” senator in Ill. And he has spent over half his time at a US Senator running for President.

    He is one the most unqualified Presidential candidates in modern times. Frankly, I don’t want a virtual intern serving as my President.

  45. #327373
    On May 20th, 2008 at 10:04 am, kurthanson said:

    As Harry S. Truman once said, ‘If you don’t like the heat, get out of the kitchen’.”

  46. #327417
    On May 20th, 2008 at 10:40 am, greysheepdog said:
  47. #327486
    On May 20th, 2008 at 11:35 am, drfredc said:

    You may not disagree with the O-BORG-ama.

    Your only choice is assimilation.

  48. #327571
    On May 20th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, atheling said:

    Reland 1 says:
    atheling & Silkyinfamous ..I’m sorry…jeeez..I thought I was on a conservative website…must haveclicked the wrong url…hmmm…sounds like the Marxists are alive and well Michelle! See ya!

    WTF??? I think your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired.

  49. #327697
    On May 20th, 2008 at 2:05 pm, reland1 said:


    atheling said:WTF??? I think your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired.

    You are absolutely right..I DID misinterpret what was written here last night … reread it today … please forgive the stoopid remark! You, too, Silkyinfamous. :-)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Turkeys of the year

November 25, 2009 09:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

65 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

Stanford alumni blow the whistle on Valerie Jarrett

November 15, 2009 10:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

“An educated scoundrel is still a scoundrel.”

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Michelle Obama



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Pundit & Pundette

» How much did that "tent" cost?
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook