<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo starts the inevitable thrashing of Charles Black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:19:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drfredc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-331012</link>
		<dc:creator>drfredc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-331012</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the thousands of NEA delegates, trial lawyers, MoveOns dominating the Dem&#039;s don&#039;t count for squat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the thousands of NEA delegates, trial lawyers, MoveOns dominating the Dem&#8217;s don&#8217;t count for squat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadsil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330945</link>
		<dc:creator>hadsil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330945</guid>
		<description>But Black is innocent!  It was Pettigrew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Black is innocent!  It was Pettigrew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlightwoman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330788</link>
		<dc:creator>starlightwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330788</guid>
		<description>Whine, Whine, Whine ---- Black is the least of the problems as long as Hernandez is still an advisor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whine, Whine, Whine &#8212;- Black is the least of the problems as long as Hernandez is still an advisor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Mythbusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Bias Roundup - 05/22/08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330696</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Mythbusters Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Bias Roundup - 05/22/08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330696</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin - WaPo starts the inevitable thrashing of Charles Black [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin &#8211; WaPo starts the inevitable thrashing of Charles Black [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Tiger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330334</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330334</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On May 22nd, 2008 at 9:14 am, sonofdy said:

I can’t believe there are no lobbyist on obamas side.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are plenty.  The Democrats call their lobbyists &quot;community activists.&quot;  A turd by any other name is still a turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On May 22nd, 2008 at 9:14 am, sonofdy said:</p>
<p>I can’t believe there are no lobbyist on obamas side.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are plenty.  The Democrats call their lobbyists &#8220;community activists.&#8221;  A turd by any other name is still a turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azygos</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330293</link>
		<dc:creator>Azygos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330293</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But at this point I’m just going to shrug my shoulders and say “whatever”, because we’ve picked a deeply flawed candidate and we’re stuck with him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, I didn&#039;t get to vote for the R candidate. He was chosen by the MSM long before I had a chance to vote. Thats the part of the system that needs fixing. Duncan Hunter or one of the the other true conseratives is a far better choice but the system was rigged by the MSM. Will I vote for McNasty, probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But at this point I’m just going to shrug my shoulders and say “whatever”, because we’ve picked a deeply flawed candidate and we’re stuck with him.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, I didn&#8217;t get to vote for the R candidate. He was chosen by the MSM long before I had a chance to vote. Thats the part of the system that needs fixing. Duncan Hunter or one of the the other true conseratives is a far better choice but the system was rigged by the MSM. Will I vote for McNasty, probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianNY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330277</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330277</guid>
		<description>see-dub said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;No matter how many flags and azaleas the sellers put out on top, the fundamentals aren’t sound and that’s going to give you problems. But we bought it anyway, and we own it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed. McCain will have to bake a lot of bread and open more windows in order to attract the volume of prospective conservative buyers that he will need come November.  Unfortunately, he hasn&#039;t even fired up the oven yet.

lgm said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;JFK was willing to “bear any burden” in the cause of peace.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Unfortunately, this mainly translated into JFK assuming the bottom coital position with every willing participant besides Jackie.

Actually, you may be right, lgm.  Didn&#039;t JFK sit down with Khrushchev in Vienna while hopped up on Dones Back Pills? I believe this &quot;burden&quot; of Kennedy&#039;s ultimately led to Khrushchev viewing him as inexperienced and weak. 

PBS&#039;s documentary &quot;The Kennedys&quot; explained that it was JFK&#039;s inexperienced and flubbed, diplomatic performance in Vienna that led to his immediate face-saving call for an escalation of US troops in the Vietnam theater.

When it comes to liberal diplomacy, be careful what you wish for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see-dub said:</p>
<blockquote><p>No matter how many flags and azaleas the sellers put out on top, the fundamentals aren’t sound and that’s going to give you problems. But we bought it anyway, and we own it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed. McCain will have to bake a lot of bread and open more windows in order to attract the volume of prospective conservative buyers that he will need come November.  Unfortunately, he hasn&#8217;t even fired up the oven yet.</p>
<p>lgm said:</p>
<blockquote><p>JFK was willing to “bear any burden” in the cause of peace.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, this mainly translated into JFK assuming the bottom coital position with every willing participant besides Jackie.</p>
<p>Actually, you may be right, lgm.  Didn&#8217;t JFK sit down with Khrushchev in Vienna while hopped up on Dones Back Pills? I believe this &#8220;burden&#8221; of Kennedy&#8217;s ultimately led to Khrushchev viewing him as inexperienced and weak. </p>
<p>PBS&#8217;s documentary &#8220;The Kennedys&#8221; explained that it was JFK&#8217;s inexperienced and flubbed, diplomatic performance in Vienna that led to his immediate face-saving call for an escalation of US troops in the Vietnam theater.</p>
<p>When it comes to liberal diplomacy, be careful what you wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtsEdge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330243</link>
		<dc:creator>MtsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330243</guid>
		<description>Second look @ post...I thought maybe the Dems crossed over and voted for McCain in the primaries...as opposed to merely using the MSM as the usual lefty tool to drown out every other contender.  Is that what you meant, spo-con? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second look @ post&#8230;I thought maybe the Dems crossed over and voted for McCain in the primaries&#8230;as opposed to merely using the MSM as the usual lefty tool to drown out every other contender.  Is that what you meant, spo-con? <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtsEdge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330230</link>
		<dc:creator>MtsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330230</guid>
		<description>spo-con, thanks...I must be the only person in this country who didn&#039;t know that.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spo-con, thanks&#8230;I must be the only person in this country who didn&#8217;t know that.  <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spo-con</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330219</link>
		<dc:creator>spo-con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330219</guid>
		<description>To MtsEdge..........thats why Rush started Operation Chaos. The MSM more or less propped Juan up for us to vote for. Tit for tat man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To MtsEdge&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.thats why Rush started Operation Chaos. The MSM more or less propped Juan up for us to vote for. Tit for tat man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b4lucy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330172</link>
		<dc:creator>b4lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330172</guid>
		<description>I agree with previous poster, &quot;what&#039;s this we, stuff&quot;...right on...All my favs were gone by the time of our primary....&quot;we&quot; did not pick McMidgit...I&#039;ve been DISENFRANCHISED!!!  This brings up a question...Some are screaming &quot;disenfranchised&quot; about Florida and Mich voters....Many millions of us NEVER get an opportunity to have a say in the primaries as the choice is always determined by those in states like Fl...Mich...Ohio...Ill...and N.Y...For the first time in my adult life, I am prou...no, wait..uh...For the first time in my adult life, Florida and Mich. are NOT among the choosers of the nominees...How is this such a problem?? Can someone enlighten me??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with previous poster, &#8220;what&#8217;s this we, stuff&#8221;&#8230;right on&#8230;All my favs were gone by the time of our primary&#8230;.&#8221;we&#8221; did not pick McMidgit&#8230;I&#8217;ve been DISENFRANCHISED!!!  This brings up a question&#8230;Some are screaming &#8220;disenfranchised&#8221; about Florida and Mich voters&#8230;.Many millions of us NEVER get an opportunity to have a say in the primaries as the choice is always determined by those in states like Fl&#8230;Mich&#8230;Ohio&#8230;Ill&#8230;and N.Y&#8230;For the first time in my adult life, I am prou&#8230;no, wait..uh&#8230;For the first time in my adult life, Florida and Mich. are NOT among the choosers of the nominees&#8230;How is this such a problem?? Can someone enlighten me??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtsEdge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-330091</link>
		<dc:creator>MtsEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-330091</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s like buying a house with foundation problems and a damp, creepy basement in a cruddy neighborhood. No matter how many flags and azaleas the sellers put out on top, the fundamentals aren’t sound and that’s going to give you problems. But we bought it anyway, and we own it.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Who&#039;s to say the Dems didn&#039;t do an Operation Chaos of their own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s like buying a house with foundation problems and a damp, creepy basement in a cruddy neighborhood. No matter how many flags and azaleas the sellers put out on top, the fundamentals aren’t sound and that’s going to give you problems. But we bought it anyway, and we own it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who&#8217;s to say the Dems didn&#8217;t do an Operation Chaos of their own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-329986</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-329986</guid>
		<description>dunno why I responded to someone who drops, squats and leaves...  

LGM is worse than a dog laying a lawn sausage in some else&#039;s yard..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno why I responded to someone who drops, squats and leaves&#8230;  </p>
<p>LGM is worse than a dog laying a lawn sausage in some else&#8217;s yard..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rinoalert</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-329946</link>
		<dc:creator>Rinoalert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-329946</guid>
		<description>Charles Black has been a part of every GOP presidential campaign since Ronald Reagan&#039;s nomination run in 1976.

He is credited with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/04/26/20080426black0426.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;saving&lt;/a&gt; McCain&#039;s flailing campaign last summer.  Why would a movement conservative want to do this?  McCain&#039;s continued problems with the base indicate that either Black is no longer a conservative or that he has no influence on policy steering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Black has been a part of every GOP presidential campaign since Ronald Reagan&#8217;s nomination run in 1976.</p>
<p>He is credited with <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/04/26/20080426black0426.html" rel="nofollow">saving</a> McCain&#8217;s flailing campaign last summer.  Why would a movement conservative want to do this?  McCain&#8217;s continued problems with the base indicate that either Black is no longer a conservative or that he has no influence on policy steering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abstractmind</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/comment-page-1/#comment-329943</link>
		<dc:creator>abstractmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/wapo-starts-the-inevitable-thrashing-of-charles-black/#comment-329943</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On May 22nd, 2008 at 9:38 am, lgm said&lt;/blockquote&gt;

honestly, i&#039;m not going to stop you from beating on mcshamnesty this time...he&#039;s earned it.  hammer away.

the dealing with israel/syria falls into a slightly different catagory.  Geographically, israel is practically surrounded by its enemies.  It would be the same(difference scope, but same idea) if the US and the USSR were in close border proximity during the Cold War.

In Israel&#039;s case, they have a vested interest to talk to their neighbors and try to keep things peaceful. they&#039;ve got no real allies on either border, and the Med on their west.  It is because they are locked into place, and its good policy to get along with your neighbors as best you can, that they are doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On May 22nd, 2008 at 9:38 am, lgm said</p></blockquote>
<p>honestly, i&#8217;m not going to stop you from beating on mcshamnesty this time&#8230;he&#8217;s earned it.  hammer away.</p>
<p>the dealing with israel/syria falls into a slightly different catagory.  Geographically, israel is practically surrounded by its enemies.  It would be the same(difference scope, but same idea) if the US and the USSR were in close border proximity during the Cold War.</p>
<p>In Israel&#8217;s case, they have a vested interest to talk to their neighbors and try to keep things peaceful. they&#8217;ve got no real allies on either border, and the Med on their west.  It is because they are locked into place, and its good policy to get along with your neighbors as best you can, that they are doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
