Did You Know...


What happens when we win?

By See-Dubya  •  May 26, 2008 10:38 AM

There’s an interesting question posed in this David Ignatius WaPo article about the strategic side of the National Counterterrorism Center–what happens when we beat Al Qaeda?

The analysts discussed several of the “nightmares” that might arise in this world where Muslim rage continued but without the discipline of a controlling central organization.

“My doomsday scenario, aside from weapons of mass destruction, is personalized jihad,” explained one analyst. “Everyone gets to do it on their own. Anyone can take a knife and stab someone in the back.”

A related concern is the devolution of targeting. With al-Qaeda, targets were selected to meet certain criteria of economic and symbolic importance. But as U.S. counterterrorism operations disrupt al-Qaeda, one analyst noted, “that pushes targeting down in the ranks.”

The analysts recall the anxiety produced by the Washington area sniper attacks in October 2002, in which random shootings by John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo created a fear that nearly paralyzed the region. That illustrates the damage that personalized jihad could do.

That excerpt makes it sound like it’s a gloom-and-doom why-even-bother article, but it’s not–these are just fair questions. Administrating the peace is every bit as important as winning the war, as the history of a badly drawn peace after WWI shows.

I tend to think beating Al-Qaeda will have benefits around the world the aren’t immediately apparent. The sort of Muhammad/Malvo “personalized jihad” they mention is horrifying and disruptive, but let’s face it: those two bozos aren’t really capable of stealing a nuclear warhead from Pakistan, shipping it into a U.S. port or urban center undetected, and detonating it (even as a dirty bomb). An international organization like Al Qaeda–when it’s not cowering in caves dodging daisy cutters and trying to stay alive–can.

In other words, I think crippling Al Qaeda is like crippling an undetectable, undeterrable, nearly untraceable nuclear/chem/bio missile launcher aimed at the West, or Israel. By finishing them off, the nuclear tension in the region might be taken down a notch.

Of course, there are many other groups like Hezbollah and Hamas that can move in and take their place…

Al Qaeda’s support flows from deep ideological springs; unless they can be stanched something new will take its place. I’m very glad to see those NCTC eggheads looking beyond the end of Al Qaeda and considering what fresh horror radical Islam may try to release upon the world.

{Post by See-Dubya; hat-tip to…my mom.}

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: War,Al Qaeda

Historic deal partner update: Obama admin blasts ‘unconscionable’ Iran medal ceremony

February 2, 2016 11:32 AM by Doug Powers


And the medal for gullibility goes to…

Don’t make Obama come down there! Gitmo detainee refuses to leave

January 22, 2016 01:45 PM by Doug Powers


“Shawshank Defense” in play

The price of legacy-building: White House admits Iran might use sanction relief funds for terrorism

January 21, 2016 05:48 PM by Doug Powers


In the best of hands

Go figure: Obama admin’s prisoner swap pardonees not super eager to return to Iran

January 20, 2016 10:00 PM by Doug Powers


Cash & Kerry

Obama hails Iran’s release of hostages for 7 prisoners and sanction relief as ‘historic progress’ (a Sunday open thread)

January 17, 2016 10:40 AM by Doug Powers


With “friends” like Iran…

Categories: Feature Story, Barack Obama, Corruption, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Iran

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook