Did You Know...

   

Report: U.N. wasting billions on carbon offset scam

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  May 27, 2008 10:15 AM

The U.N. wasting money? This is, of course, no surprise coming from the same ninnies who brought the world the oil-for-food debacle and whose idea of humanitarian aid is sending condoms to cyclone victims. But I digress. The Guardian reports on the latest mass squandering of U.N. funds on the carbon offset scam (hat tip – Sweetness and Light):

Billions of pounds are being wasted in paying industries in developing countries to reduce climate change emissions, according to two analyses of the UN’s carbon offsetting programme.

Leading academics and watchdog groups allege that the UN’s main offset fund is being routinely abused by chemical, wind, gas and hydro companies who are claiming emission reduction credits for projects that should not qualify. The result is that no genuine pollution cuts are being made, undermining assurances by the UK government and others that carbon markets are dramatically reducing greenhouse gases, the researchers say.

The criticism centres on the UN’s clean development mechanism (CDM), an international system established by the Kyoto process that allows rich countries to meet emissions targets by funding clean energy projects in developing nations.

Credits from the project are being bought by European companies and governments who are unable to meet their carbon reduction targets.

The market for CDM credits is growing fast. At present it is worth nearly $20bn a year, but this is expected to grow to over $100bn within four years. More than 1,000 projects have so far been approved, and 2,000 more are making their way through the process.

A working paper from two senior Stanford University academics examined more than 3,000 projects applying for or already granted up to $10bn of credits from the UN’s CDM funds over the next four years, and concluded that the majority should not be considered for assistance. “They would be built anyway,” says David Victor, law professor at the Californian university. “It looks like between one and two thirds of all the total CDM offsets do not represent actual emission cuts.”

Carbon debits, anyone?

***

What does John McCain, whose eco-policies support the carbon offset scam, have to say about this?

Ask him.

But remember: No points for you!

***

Related: Coming soon…carbon ration cards?

blog comments powered by Disqus

His contrails will go on: DiCaprio takes private jet from France to NYC to accept environmental award (Open thread)

May 22, 2016 10:06 AM by Doug Powers

kerrydicaprio

Hypocrite parade: Powered by dreams and jet fuel

Fear factor: Forum at MIT examines if a certain phobia is worsening global warming

May 10, 2016 10:36 AM by Doug Powers

kerryclimate

Is it hot in here or is this crazy?

John Kerry should tell the White House about his ‘borderless world’ prediction

May 8, 2016 11:08 PM by Doug Powers

kerryfootball

Whatever

Tale of 2 tribes: “Climate refugees” vs. EPA victims

May 4, 2016 07:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

Hillary Clinton sorry if any coal workers believed what she said about putting them out of business

May 3, 2016 12:44 PM by Doug Powers

hillarycoal

“Clarification,” Clinton-style!


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, Feature Story, Hillary Clinton, 2016 Campaign

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook