About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

SPC Kate Norley speaks truth to Obama; Sens. Lieberman and Graham step down from Vets for Freedom

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 29, 2008 07:36 AM

In case you haven’t yet seen the latest powerful ad from Vets for Freedom:

Senator Obama: When will you finally visit Iraq?

Vets for Freedom is releasing a second ad, featuring Iraq war veteran and Vets for Freedom member, Specialist Kate Norley. Kate, who served 16 months on the front lines as a combat medic, asks Senator Obama two simple, but powerful, questions:

1. Senator Obama, when will you finally decide to go back to Iraq, to see the progress first hand?

2. And when will you finally decide to meet one-on-one, unconditionally, with General Petraeus?

And now, wonder of wonders, Barack Obama is “considering” a trip to Iraq after scoffing at John McCain’s suggestion that they travel to the frontlines together.

Vets for Freedom is effective.

The Left doesn’t like effective, independent voices in the political arena.

As a result of the McCain camp’s self-imposed hamstringing, two US Senators who served on the VFF advisory board have stepped down:

Senators Joseph I. Lieberman and Lindsey Graham, prominent surrogates for Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign, stepped down Wednesday from their positions with an independent group that released a pair of Internet advertisements attacking Senator Barack Obama on Iraq.

Mr. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, and Mr. Graham, Republican of South Carolina, were both on the policy advisory board to the organization, Vets for Freedom, which on Wednesday released its second Web advertisement in less than a week attacking Mr. Obama.

The senators’ positions with the group, which describes itself as a grass-roots advocacy organization pushing for victory in Iraq and Afghanistan, seemed to place them in contravention of new conflict-of-interest rules released by Mr. McCain’s campaign that specifically prohibit anyone “with a McCain campaign title or position” from participating in a “527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate.”

After inquiries from reporters, the senators released a joint letter to Vets for Freedom on Wednesday saying they had requested a leave from their positions to come into compliance with the new policy.

“This is obviously something we’re working through,” said Brian Rogers, a spokesman for the McCain campaign. “This is the kind of thing that happens when you have the strictest possible policy on these issues.”

The new policy was meant to head off embarrassing questions about connections of members of the McCain campaign to special interests that run counter to Mr. McCain’s reformist reputation. But adhering to that standard has proved complicated.

Look for increased attacks on VFF. Send them your support.

Posted in: Barack Obama, Iraq

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Vets For Freedom Ask Senator Obama To Visit Iraq : BigMouthFrog
  2. The Radio Patriot
  3. Jules Crittenden » Visit Sunni Iraq
  4. When Senator Obama? « PaulSwansen’s Weblog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: [1] 2 »

  1. #1
    On May 29th, 2008 at 7:47 am, Bittertruth said:

    What are you saying? McCain and his surrogates are abandoning a group advocating victory in Iraq? I am Shocked!

  2. #2
    On May 29th, 2008 at 7:47 am, kcnut said:

    Let them hate as long as they fear. Right now they fear the truth.

  3. #3
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:01 am, Barry F. said:

    The Left doesn’t like effective, independent voices in the political arena.

    If you aren’t with them, you are wrong. I believe they have that written in their rule book in crayon somewhere. ;-)

  4. #4
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:03 am, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 7:47 am, Bittertruth said:

    …McCain and his surrogates are abandoning a group advocating victory in Iraq?…

    What? Surely not. A politician that says one thing and does another? When did that start happening?

    /sarcasm off

  5. #5
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:03 am, terrig said:

    This won’t help Michelle Obama’s children.
    Please give to this great organization. Even if it’s only 5 or 10 dollars. They need every cent they can get.

  6. #6
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:04 am, terrig said:

    Should be sarc off after first statement.

  7. #7
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:05 am, LifeTrek said:

    Obama’s whole campaign is based on his magic judgment in his, “Dumb War,” speech in 2002. But does that judgment make the grade?
    http://rotstar.blogspot.com/2008/05/does-judgment-make-grade.html
    DKK

  8. #8
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:08 am, singlemalt_18 said:

    “This is the kind of thing that happens when you have the strictest possible policy on these issues.”

    The new policy was meant to head off embarrassing questions about connections of members of the McCain campaign to special interests that run counter to Mr. McCain’s reformist reputation. But adhering to that standard has proved complicated.

    Is this a new strain of political correctness run amuk? I do not understand this new fear of free speech. Or this need to run-for-cover-with-your-tail-tucked-between-your-legs-where-your-BALLS-BELONG when someone states a position of intellectual check?

    …but then again, it is against the Obamessiah!

    It is going to be a long election.

  9. #9
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:09 am, TMoney said:

    Attack? They call this commercial an attack?
    He is only being confronted with the truth of his own short-comings and asked to re-assess his position on a couple of key issues.

    But I can see why the Senators might step down; they don’t want to upset their new boss. (Hill McBama)

  10. #10
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:12 am, Chief RZ said:

    Magic something, but apparently wrong.
    Now it remains to be seen if this socialist can say he was wrong.

  11. #11
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:14 am, tarpon said:

    McCain still thinks the drive-by media will vote for him.

  12. #12
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:15 am, deepdiver said:

    “Look for increased attacks on VFF.” From McAmnesty? It is incredible to think he may become president simply because his horrible policy making and infringement of freedoms is only less abhorrent than Barack’s horrible policy making and infringement of freedoms. Iraq just goes on the list of things that Obama is ignorant about along with geography, solemn American holidays, WWII history and the US Constitution.

  13. #13
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:17 am, ajmontana said:

    great ad.
    everyone knows he’d rather go to cuba to sleep in a comphy bed, eat his dainty food and feel like king tut.

  14. #14
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:21 am, Texas Tiger said:

    Great ad! Obama should go back to Iraq. If he’s truly worried about his safety–after all Michelle said he could be shot just because he’s (sorta) black–the Army could let him drive around in an M1 tank. Of course, they’d have to modify a tanker’s helmet to accommodate his Dumbo ears.

    As for Lieberman and Graham stepping down from VFF’s advisory board–much ado about nothing.

  15. #15
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:21 am, lgm said:

    Some mis-statements in the ad:

    “The Iraqi government has come together” — Major Sunni parties and some Shia are boycotting the government.

    “Al Qaeda has been decimated”: There never was much and there still isn’t

    “Come to Iraq and see”: visitors leave the Green zone only under heavy armed guard and don’t get to see much. Mostly they get powerpoint briefings inside the green zone that are equally available in the US.

    “The surge worked”: what worked was paying Sunni militia not to attack the US. The US would be even harder to attack if they weren’t there.

  16. #16
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:25 am, Truesoldier said:

    I sent the McCain campaign an email awhile back urging him to challenge the winner of the Democratic Primary to a debate in Iraq with the troops asking the questions. You can go to this link where I posted the idea on another blog the same day I emailed the McCain camp.

  17. #17
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:29 am, Truesoldier said:

    LGM,

    I would love to see your facts to back up your statements, but then again I don’t really expect to see you do it.

  18. #18
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:35 am, NY Andy said:

    Truesoldier,

    As a good liberal, lgm equates feelings with facts. It’s very convenient for them as they never have to produce proof, they just need an emotional belief to show the veracity of their claims.

  19. #19
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:36 am, undrseige247 said:

    lgm said:

    “The Iraqi government has come together” — Major Sunni parties and some Shia are boycotting the government.

    According to NPR that’s true moron.

    “Al Qaeda has been decimated”

    Al Qaeda is alive and well that’s why every major city in the Western World is in smoldering heaps.

    Come to Iraq and see”: visitors leave the Green zone only under heavy armed guard and don’t get to see much. Mostly they get powerpoint briefings inside the green zone that are equally available in the US.

    Hillary said it’s much safer than the sniper fire she received while in Bosnia with Jesse Ventura and Arnols Schwartzenagger on a classified mission.

    “The surge worked”

    I have no reason to believe General Petraues is lying.

  20. #20
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:38 am, terrig said:

    Little Girly Man, you don’t have to go to Iraq, others go in your stead. My husband’s back and he sees a BIG difference from when he left in 06. I don’t expect you to believe that though because you think he’s a killer and should rot in hell, right? You believe Olberdouche instead and the MSM before you’d believe someone who has been there and sees a difference albiet not fast enough for your little triatholon standards. I guess a little history lesson on the early governments of this country would be lost on such an “esteemed” academic as you belive yourself to be. A little appreciation instead of denigration would be nice from you and your fellow travelers to those who put themselves out there to serve instead of being called “killers” with your phrase “some say the Army is full of killers” garbage. It’s a sad fact of life that you have any influence over the young skulls full of mush. It’s really a tragedy.

  21. #21
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:38 am, Jim M. said:

    So, exercising one’s right to free speech is now verbotten in the McCain camp?

    I would dare say if this “policy” was enforced as written, McCain would be left with an organization populated by individuals incapable of forming an opinion or too timid to stand up and be heard. Leaders need not apply, but followers are welcome. Heck of a message to send. And it does not reflect well on Senators Leiberman and Graham when they fall meekly into line and willingly discard free speech as some meaningless piece of unwanted baggage.

    A ride on the “Straight Talk Express” appears to be a one way ticket.

  22. #22
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:41 am, DesertLover said:

    McCain’s new campaign theme song …

    Simon and Garfunkel’s “Sound of Silence” …

  23. #23
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:45 am, iamsaved said:

    lgm - I’d hate for you let facts get in the way of your regurgitation of the MSM’s take on the Iraq war. They’ve even stopped their rhetoric because the success in Iraq has silenced them.

    Does someone pull a string in your back that makes you spout little, liberal cliches?

    B. Hussein “the appeaser” Obama(nation) doesn’t want to go to Iraq because he’s like 2 of the 3 monkeys - Hear no evil and see no evil. He’d lose a major pillar of his candidacy if saw and recognized the truth by actually going there.

  24. #24
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:50 am, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:21 am, lgm said:

    Some mis-statements in the ad:

    And, you know this from firsthand experience or just more liberal talking points?

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:29 am, Truesoldier said:

    LGM,

    I would love to see your facts to back up your statements, but then again I don’t really expect to see you do it.

    I know I’m not holding my breath waiting on such from him, TS.

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:38 am, terrig said:

    It would appear to be his way for compensating for an apparent inferiority complex, terrig. I don’t think he can help himself. ;-)

  25. #25
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:51 am, airbrush101 said:

    Wow…That must have be worth a lot of McCain points for Lieberman and Graham..

  26. #26
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:53 am, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:45 am, iamsaved said:

    lgm - I’d hate for you let facts get in the way of your regurgitation of the MSM’s take on the Iraq war. They’ve even stopped their rhetoric because the success in Iraq has silenced them.

    Does someone pull a string in your back that makes you spout little, liberal cliches?

    Would that be cliChés he spouts? ;-)

  27. #27
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:56 am, lgm said:

    NY Andy said (#18):

    As a good liberal, lgm equates feelings with facts. It’s very convenient for them as they never have to produce proof,

    I assumed people followed this stuff, but one reliable source has headlines:

    Sunni Arabs Pull out of Talks with al-Maliki;
    Bush Benchmark in Doubt;
    Marines Proselytize Sunnis with Gospel

    But the bigger picture is that Bushies have been declaring “Mission Accomplished” for years, each time with some new statistic. But Iraq still fails to have a functioning government or economy (oil and electricity production are below pre invasion levels). Bushies want to keep troops in Iraq because they fear all heck would break loose if we left. But Mission Accomplished means coming home having accomplished something.

  28. #28
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:56 am, Marshall Russ said:

    What I got from the story is that Senators Lieberman and Graham had to step down so that Vets for Freedom could continue with this campaign. This is very effective and I hope it continues. The complications are because of McCain’s own campaign finance reform idiocy.

  29. #29
    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:58 am, dj said:

    lgm just proved the point I was about to make: it won’t matter if BO goes to Iraq, because no matter what he actually sees there, he will lie/gaffe/misremember about the facts and spin it as a complete failure anyway, just like lgm. But he will say it really pretty in his dulcet tones, so we will all be mesmerized. Facts mean nothing to libs, and that is why they will never learn or change, regardless of the truth.

  30. #30
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:00 am, Storm Chaser said:

    Even Al Qaeda says the surge is working. Their own captured statistics show sharp declines in terrorist activity. They are not defeated, but the terrorists will likely concentrate most of their activities in Pakistan or other more favorable places.

    I understand the McCain strategy assuming that is what he plans. If his campaign has no visible connection to “Swiftboat” type attacks, it will be harder for the press and Democrats to smear his campaign with the same brush. Attacks on 527 and other groups will be vicious.

    McCain will have deniability while reaping the benefits as he piously says what they do is wrong. If this is a strategy, his campaign had better not have any secret but traceable ties to 527 groups.

  31. #31
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:01 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    The ad is superb!

    Here’s what the “freedom fighters” say about their losses:

    Al Qaeda web sites are making a lot of noise about “why we lost in Iraq.” Western intelligence agencies are fascinated by the statistics being posted in several of these Arab language sites. Not the kind of stuff you read about in the Western media. According to al Qaeda, their collapse in Iraq was steep and catastrophic. According to their stats, in late 2006, al Qaeda was responsible for 60 percent of the terrorist attacks, and nearly all the ones that involved killing a lot of civilians. The rest of the violence was carried out by Iraqi Sunni Arab groups, who were trying in vain to scare the Americans out of the country.

    Today, al Qaeda has been shattered, with most of its leadership and foot soldiers dead, captured or moved from Iraq. As a result, al Qaeda attacks have declined more than 90 percent. Worse, most of their Iraqi Sunni Arab allies have turned on them, or simply quit. This “betrayal” is handled carefully on the terrorist web sites, for it is seen as both shameful, and perhaps recoverable.

    ________________________________________

    Jim M,
    Excellent analysis. McCain, and all that he represents is disagreeable to what conservatives truly hold dear. We’re screwed. There are no two ways about it.

  32. #32
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:01 am, garyt said:

    LGM has no facts on this issue just the same as he has no facts to back up his allegations that abortion clinics are bombed daily. The guy has no credence at all. Speaking of boycotting the government his ilk pretty much boycotts this government here in the USA.

  33. #33
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:06 am, iamsaved said:

    lgm - Mission Accomplished referred to the actual mission of the ship that the infamous banner was shown on. Of course, the liberal MSM changed the facts to suit their storyline.

    And if one goes a bit further, the actual war itself was “Mission Accomplished” — in just 3 weeks.

    What you are referring to is establishing an infrastructure and government within Iraq - even this country didn’t establish a good, stable government in 5 years. It’s especially hard when you have insurgents sniping and killing our troops as they try their best to accomplish this “second” mission. And it doesn’t help when the Democrats side with the insurgents by helping them by putting obstacles in the way of our troops with their rhetoric.

    Despite successes, the liberals just love to move the goal posts down the field.

    Liberals trully are mentally ill.

  34. #34
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:08 am, Texas Tiger said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:01 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Here’s what the “freedom fighters” say about their losses:

    30:

    I’m sorry. The eyewitness accounts of American soldiers and Al Qaeda’s statements will not be acceptable until they’ve been processed by lgm’s “reliable sources” on the University of Michigan faculty. :roll:

  35. #35
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:13 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:21 am, lgm said:
    Some mis-statements in the ad:

    “The Iraqi government has come together” — Major Sunni parties and some Shia are boycotting the government.

    “Al Qaeda has been decimated”: There never was much and there still isn’t

    “Come to Iraq and see”: visitors leave the Green zone only under heavy armed guard and don’t get to see much. Mostly they get powerpoint briefings inside the green zone that are equally available in the US.

    “The surge worked”: what worked was paying Sunni militia not to attack the US. The US would be even harder to attack if they weren’t there.

    Debunk of LGM

    Major factions have ended boycott

    Here is an article at the BBC claiming that Al Qaeda is the greatest threat to America.

    AS for people don’t get to see much of Iraq, all I can say is go to Michael Yon’s website for great coverage of Iraq.

    And lastly for the surge working here you go.

  36. #36
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:23 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:08 am, Texas Tiger said:
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:01 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Here’s what the “freedom fighters” say about their losses:
    30:

    I’m sorry. The eyewitness accounts of American soldiers and Al Qaeda’s statements will not be acceptable until they’ve been processed by lgm’s “reliable sources” on the University of Michigan faculty.

    Here is another link about LGM’s reliable source. Who would have thought that his reliable source would have been on Iraq panel of the Yearly KOS.

  37. #37
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:26 am, DesertLover said:

    iamsaved …

    You are correct …

    U.S. Revolutionary War1775-1783

    Declaration of Independence1776

    First Continental Congress drafted the

    Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union1777 - fully ratified 1781

    Second Continental Congress drafted the

    United States Constitution1787 - fully ratified 1788

    First President and first elected Congress took office … 1789

    So … it took us more than one attempt before we came up with our Constitution and system of government … but the libs expect the Iraqis, a people with absolutely no experience at self-rule, to become a fully functioning government overnight …

    Sorry folks … this is real life … not one of your instant gratification video games …

  38. #38
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:27 am, sonofdy said:

    The thing that really gets me about LGM and his type is they will never listen to anyone who has been to iraq unless they repeat exactly what LGM wants to hear. The IVAW backstabbers are a tiny tiny minority of people who have actualy been to iraq.

  39. #39
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:32 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Bushies want to keep troops in Iraq because they fear all heck would break loose if we left.

    Because that’s exactly what happened after we set forth a cease-fire, gave the region over to the Iraqis (before they were ready) and withdrew troops from Fallujah. The terrorists declared it a victory and more insurgents flocked to the region. We then had to go back in and finish what we started (i.e., Operation Phantom Fury). In summation - if we leave prematurely and based on history (what we know has happened in the past) why would anyone, who wants to see this war end (the right way!)pull our troops out only to have to return? You do recall the definition of insanity, correct?

    PS. Nevermind the fact that your beloved Obama wants to keep residual/reactionary forces in the region. Idiot.

  40. #40
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:34 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Texas Tiger

    30:
    I’m sorry. The eyewitness accounts of American soldiers and Al Qaeda’s statements will not be acceptable until they’ve been processed by lgm’s “reliable sources” on the University of Michigan faculty.

    Now that’s funny!

  41. #41
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:36 am, sonofdy said:

    Will LGM accept this source or is this source a “rabid bushie” as well?

  42. #42
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:37 am, sonofdy said:

    PS. Nevermind the fact that your beloved Obama wants to keep residual/reactionary forces in the region. Idiot.

    Just enough to be effectively cut off and defeated in detail.

  43. #43
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:40 am, TrinaLC said:

    Contribution just sent to this worthy organization - willing to carry the water that the senator himself won’t.

  44. #44
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:40 am, Misscheryl said:

    What McCain is missing is “balance” which is why he relates so well with the left.

  45. #45
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:42 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:27 am, sonofdy said:
    The thing that really gets me about LGM and his type is they will never listen to anyone who has been to iraq unless they repeat exactly what LGM wants to hear. The IVAW backstabbers are a tiny tiny minority of people who have actualy been to iraq.

    For that matter the left even listens to IVAW members who lied about being in IRaq.

  46. #46
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:42 am, jegjr said:

    Obama to Iraqis:

    “I’ll visit Iran. You, not so much.”

  47. #47
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:44 am, jegjr said:

    Maybe Obama’s afraid a visit to Iraq will produce a couple more key endorsements, from say, Syria or Iran.

  48. #48
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:46 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:44 am, jegjr said:
    Maybe Obama’s afraid a visit to Iraq will produce a couple more key endorsements, from say, Syria or Iran.

    Or perhaps he is afraid he will not get there endorsements that he expects to come soon.

  49. #49
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:48 am, Misscheryl said:

    Is lgm from Michigan? That explains a lot of things. I lived there and couldn’t take the liberalism any more. They would tax you to breath the air there if they could. Talk about the back side of the moon. I heard that the govenor was in the hospital - getting her head removed from her …. well, you get the picture. Funny thing is - the loyal citizens think as Michigan is, so is the nation. Very sad and they wonder why thier economy is going to hell in a handbasket but they keep voting in those democrats. Move west young man - it’s a brighter here.

  50. #50
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:49 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:37 am, sonofdy said:
    PS. Nevermind the fact that your beloved Obama wants to keep residual/reactionary forces in the region. Idiot.
    Just enough to be effectively cut off and defeated in detail.

    Good point sonofdy. I personally don’t agree with the junior Senator’s stance. In fact, I think it is one of the most stupid things I’ve heard Obie say in a long while… okay since his last gaffe but it doesn’t matter. Lgm only has the liberal agenda in mind.

  51. #51
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:52 am, mngirl said:

    Good, that RINO Graham has no business in an organization as classy as VFF.

    I’m reading Bellavia’s book right now, house2house. Wow. Its very good. Also, he’s running for the House seat from his district in New York. I’ll be sending him money.

  52. #52
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:55 am, sonofdy said:

    If McCain wants to win, he had better make some changes or obama is going to roll over him. McCain is going to need some sort of base.

  53. #53
    On May 29th, 2008 at 9:59 am, DBNinKY said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 8:21 am, lgm said:

    “The US would be even harder to attack if they weren’t there.”

    LGM, according to your web site, you live in NYC; so I don’t see how you could possibly post something naive as this after experiencing the attacks of 9/11 in such an up close and personal manner.

  54. #54
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:00 am, Just A Grunt said:

    I didn’t know Lieberman held an official position in the McCain campaign.

    anyone “with a McCain campaign title or position” from participating in a “527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate.”

  55. #55
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:01 am, Mister P said:

    Remember this: Maverics dispise other maverics.

  56. #56
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:04 am, Texas Tiger said:

    DBNinKY:

    It wouldn’t surprise me if lgm ‘fessed up to being a “Truther.”

  57. #57
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:05 am, Just A Grunt said:

    PS. Nevermind the fact that your beloved Obama wants to keep residual/reactionary forces in the region. Idiot.

    yeah I think we tried that once. It was called Beirut. Didn’t turn out real good for us, but I can understand the youngster not knowing about it since he was probably busy with all of that community service in Chicago or still in college.

  58. #58
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:10 am, misfit138 said:

    #49

    You know it’s (a little) different on the west side of the state (ie - not Ann Arbor or Detroit). If we can figure out how to trade/sell Detroit to Ohio or Canada, we’d be a red state. I would even agree to keep the Lions if it made the deal.

  59. #59
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:11 am, Yashmak said:

    Juan Cole? Juan Cole is your “reliable source” lgm?

    Thanks for the chuckle.

  60. #60
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:17 am, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    I’d expect something like this from Lindsey Graham, the VFF is too “Hot Button” for the likes of him…
    Hey! we’re sorry we voted that putz in…you can bet that’ll change next election.

  61. #61
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:18 am, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Why the hell is Graham still a senator from SC? This guys is the biggest squish in the GOP side of the senate. He apparently doesn’t have the guts to stand up to or for anything.

    You folks in SC need to VOTE HIM OUT! He has a good challenger in the primary. Run his *ass out on a rail. He DESERVES it for being the biggest wuss in Congress.

    And hey McCain, how’s that CFR McCain-Feingold working out for you, hmm? Idiot. He needs to repudiate it NOW.

  62. #62
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:24 am, spo-con said:

    Big Juan is making the same mistake G.W. did in 2001. Reaching out to the leaders of the Left. He’ll get hit in the face with the same olive branch. They don’t want friendship Juan, they want TOTAL CONTROL !

  63. #63
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:29 am, spo-con said:

    For all commenter’s above, just remember, LGM is not an American. Hes a Liberal. BIG difference.

  64. #64
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:29 am, lgm said:

    Truesoldier said (#35):

    Major factions have ended boycott

    That article from April was an announcement that the boycott would end. It didn’t. Much of the good news in Iraq is about things that are about to happen — but don’t — like the oil revenue law.

    Iraq is so dangerous that Obama would not get to see it if he went there, just as McCain didn’t see anything. It’s just a photo-op.

    They said they would in April (the date they will never listen to anyone who has been to iraq unless they repeat exactly what LGM wants to hear.

    Exactly what I want to hear is . . . political reconciliation that allows us to come home, safety that allows the 15% of Iraqis who are displaced (500,000 in Jordan) to return to their homes, stability that allows oil and electricity to be produced. Got any links?

  65. #65
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:30 am, libocrat said:

    Maybe Jesus Obama could take Bill Ayers along with him and they could discuss the good ol days when Billy Ayers (heirs) was making I.E.D.’s in Greenwich village.
    Oh those good old days when Bill and Bernandine were blowing up Pentagons, NYPD offices and robbing armored cars.
    Question to libs: Do you filthy freaks approve of Obama’s “friendly” relationship with DOMESTIC TERRORISTS?
    Just askin!

  66. #66
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:31 am, libocrat said:

    Lgm, are you saying Al Qaeda is dangerous?
    And we should leave?
    You’re a blithering moron.

  67. #67
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:33 am, sonofdy said:

    Yes lgm LINK HERE LGM

    Face it, you want defeat in Iraq and ignore anything that does not suit you, including people who have actualy been there.

  68. #68
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:37 am, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:17 am, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Hey! we’re sorry we voted that putz in…you can bet that’ll change next election.

    Do you promise, Bob? Cross your hear, hope to die and stick a needle in your eye that he will be gone next election cycle? :lol:

  69. #69
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:38 am, libocrat said:

    lgm= little girly man.
    Why would Obama be afraid to go to Iraq?
    Jesus Obama isn’t afraid of terrorists, some of his best friends are terrorists.
    I guess it was ok for Jesus Obama’s (fill in blank here) Uncle? Grandfather? or typical white relative to fight for America, but Jesus Obama doesn’t have time. What with all the Rezko deals and the “PRESENT” votes, and the Piano lessons he has to pay for.
    Lay off of Jesus Obama, he’s a busy man.

  70. #70
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:39 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:29 am, lgm said:
    Exactly what I want to hear is . . . political reconciliation that allows us to come home, safety that allows the 15% of Iraqis who are displaced (500,000 in Jordan) to return to their homes, stability that allows oil and electricity to be produced. Got any links?

    LGM, it has already been stated in an earlier posting that the things you are saying you want do not happen over night and did not happen overnight even for the fledgling democracy known as the United States. I know it is kind of hard for your “Reality TV” mind to comprehend that these things are not solved in a single season. As for the links, I am still waiting for your links to back up your statements (and using a guy who is in with the Daily KOS is not a reliable source).

  71. #71
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:42 am, libocrat said:

    Spo-con, McCain thinks he can stick his hand in the crocodile cage and come out with fingers intact. His ego allows him to believe that the MSM actually likes him. He’s deluded. Unfortunately he’s the less deluded of the 2 we have to choose from.

  72. #72
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:43 am, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Do you promise, Bob? Cross your hear, hope to die and stick a needle in your eye that he will be gone next election cycle?

    You can bet I’ll do my part…and I know I’m not the only SC Voter who feels the same way. If a election was held today, Graham would be back to chasing ambulances tomarrow.

  73. #73
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:47 am, FruNobulux said:

    LifeTrek (#7): Further to your remarks, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

    So, Obama says, in his speech (that you kindly link): “The world would be better off without [Saddam]“. He then says, in essence, “Oppose the war needed to remove Saddam, and do it for those who want a more secure world.”

    So those who want a more secure world are better off with Saddam in place.

    Yet the world is a better place (ie. people are better off) without Saddam.

    So a less secure world is a better world?

    This, sadly, is a typical Obama speech. The non-sequiturs flow like water. I guess that’s why he appeals to liberals.

  74. #74
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:48 am, The_Livewire said:

    #59 You’re assuming Ohio wants Detroit. We’ve enough problems with th dems trying to gut conceal carry.

    As to LGM, his mind’s made up, stop confusing him with facts

  75. #75
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:48 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Iraq’s revival boosted as oil production rises to 2.4m barrels a day.

    What’s an acceptable level lgm? Hear no progress. See no progress. Speak no progress.

  76. #76
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:49 am, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:43 am, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Do you promise, Bob? Cross your hear, hope to die and stick a needle in your eye that he will be gone next election cycle?

    You can bet I’ll do my part…and I know I’m not the only SC Voter who feels the same way. If a election was held today, Graham would be back to chasing ambulances tomarrow.

    When is he up for re-election?

    It would be good to see him out of office and back chasing an ambulance whose driver knows how to apply the brakes abruptly at the most opportune time. ;-)

  77. #77
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:52 am, GaMidnightRider said:

    Joseph I. Lieberman and Lindsey Graham now if we could just get these 2 to take a leave from government we would be alot better off. McShame better be careful it has already been noted in this thread how the left was buddy buddy with GW and then went after him tooth and nail. I wonder if he will need a timeout after they start slamming him as Nov. draws closer?
    As for lgm: He has shown time and time again that he knows not the truth nor will he except the fact of the truth. I am beginning to think he is Micheal Moore hiding in someones basement.LOL

  78. #78
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:56 am, GaMidnightRider said:

    I just contributed $100.00 to VFF. I challange any other vets here to do the same or atleast give what you can. I was told they will be running more ads and will push for victory not APPEASEMENT

  79. #79
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:57 am, Truesoldier said:

    Jim Geraghty has a great article about this subject here.

    Here is a great quote from it:

    And isn’t Obama vulnerable to the argument that a man who’s pledged to meet unconditionally, one-on-one, face-to-face with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad really ought to meet at least once one-on-one with Gen. David Petraeus?

  80. #80
    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:58 am, love2rumba said:

    This is incredible…McCain and friends is now abandoning his military brethren-again.

    And he wants my vote???

    Maybe he will have 1 or 2 votes this fall….

  81. #81
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:01 am, Chard402003 said:

    Well, if Lieberman and Graham have to leave the advisory board of the VFF, does that affect Obama’s advisor’s / supporters? Like Castro, Hamas, Chavez, A-jad, the Chinese military, the Russian military and the French?

  82. #82
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am, love2rumba said:

    It seems like evrytime a conservative voice gets heard (that wasn’t eliminated by McCain-Feingold), McCain justs runs and apologizes for them being there, like we’re an embarassment.

  83. #83
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:03 am, Alphonse said:

    Wow, mission accomplished once again.

  84. #84
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:04 am, Ron said:

    I’m trying to put a good spin on it, maybe, but perhaps Lieberman and Graham are stepping down to maintain the group’s tax-exempt, independent status, and I’m okay with that. It wouldn’t be necessary if it weren’t for the crappy rules McCain, et. al., put in place.

  85. #85
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:17 am, spo-con said:

    #70 Live…… hes right, don’t confuse LGM with FACTS. Thats a real buzz-kill.

  86. #86
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:24 am, spo-con said:

    #78, we ARE an embarassment to him ! We talk like real Americans and he runs to the nearest mic and says “their not with me ! I’m one of the GOOD GUYS” ! Very sad.

  87. #87
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:27 am, juliesa said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 10:58 am, love2rumba said:

    This is incredible…McCain and friends is now abandoning his military brethren-again.

    And he wants my vote???

    Take a deep breath. That’s not what he’s doing. VFF will be able to go after Obama with more vigor if they are more independent from the campaign. This is s a Good Thing.

  88. #88
    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:49 am, DirkBelig said:

    Anyone else notice that McCain seemed to have more enthusiasm defeating the other Republicans for the nomination than he does for defeating the Democrat to win the election?

  89. #89
    On May 29th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Barry F. said:

    On May 29th, 2008 at 11:49 am, DirkBelig said:

    Anyone else notice that McCain seemed to have more enthusiasm defeating the other Republicans for the nomination than he does for defeating the Democrat to win the election?

    He was looking to beat his adversaries in the primary. Now he is just up against someone who is cut from the same cloth, in many regards. :roll:

  90. #90
    On May 29th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, Joemantler said:

    Mr. McCain’s campaign… specifically prohibit anyone “with a McCain campaign title or position” from participating in a “527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate.”

    Lieberman and Graham should have stuck with the Vets and ditched the McCain campaign.

  91. #91
    On May 29th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, love2rumba said:

    The perception of “campaign independence” is really moot here as critics will make their charges false or not about them.

    The issue is that the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party has once again hamstrung himself from winning an election by his past stupidity….I’m increasingly convinced that John McCain exists in this race solelyto put in Barack Obama as president.

    No politician can be this nuts to do this to himself (hamstringing himself with his own stands and legislation).

    DirkBelig has it right:

    Anyone else notice that McCain seemed to have more enthusiasm defeating the other Republicans for the nomination than he does for defeating the Democrat to win the election?

  92. #92
    On May 29th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, sonofdy said:

    HMMM I would have thought that the head of the un citing progress in iraq would have been interesting to LGM but I guess not.

  93. #93
    On May 29th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Johnny Mc (R) and L. Graham -nesty (R)
    choose illegals over our fighting troops……HMMMMMMMMM

    LESSER OF TWO EVILS _ANY___ONE?!!!!!!!!!!!

  94. #94
    On May 29th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, terrig said:

    Christian Soldier, little girly man cannot wrap his head around any progress. He rejoices when things are going bad and is silent when they go good. He’s all for saying “some people say the troops are killers” because that is what he feels. I have a lot to say on that but it’s not worth getting banned over.

  95. #95
    On May 29th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Papa Louie said:

    The new policy was meant to head off embarrassing questions about connections of members of the McCain campaign to special interests that run counter to Mr. McCain’s reformist reputation.

    Not exactly. I bet their main concern is the fact that any criticism of Obama has a 80% chance of applying to McCain as well. The real embarrassment they are trying to prevent is the one that would occur if an independent conservative group were to criticise Obama on one of the many issues on which he and McCain are in agreement.

  96. #96
    On May 29th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Questions liberals refuse to answer

    — Major Sunni parties and some Shia are boycotting the government.

    “Al Qaeda has been decimated”:There never was much and there still isn’t

    Then why is the focus of military operations against the Madhi army growing? Why have attacks dropped?

    visitors leave the Green zone only under heavy armed guard and don’t get to see much. Mostly they get powerpoint briefings inside the green zone that are equally available in the US.

    http://news.sawf.org/Travel/4666.aspx

    That is false. If by escorts you mean ambassadors and political leaders, yes, but they receive such protection no matter where they go, even in your beloved Europe and Canada.

    Nice twist on information, though.

    “The surge worked”: what worked was paying Sunni militia not to attack the US.

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=4362610

    Yeah, because there is no strength in numbers, lgm. Actually, paying them really didn’t work, it just brought them more time to regroup and get weapons.

    The US would be even harder to attack if they weren’t there.

    Then why are there assessments that the USA is safer because of the Iraq War?

    Probably because it would give al quedia a base from which to launch attacks if we left.

    I know you think that terrorists are freedom fighters, lgm, because they are opponents of Bush, and not because you believe in freedom.

  97. #97
    On May 29th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, lgm said:

    Oil production is up to 2.4 (whatever units) and

    Production is expected to pass the prewar level of 2.6 million barrels by the end of the year,

    libocrat said:

    Lgm, are you saying Al Qaeda is dangerous?

    The 9/11 attacks proved that. The interesting thing is that after 6 years and half a Trillion (”a trillion is more than a billion, numbnuts.”) dollars, that ragtag group still is dangerous.

    And we should leave?

    Either (as you say) AQ has been decimated in Iraq, or (as I say) they never had a significant presence there. Either way, it’s time to hunt for them somewhere else, like where they actually are, maybe.

    You’re a blithering moron.

    You may feel that way, but saying so doesn’t advance the discussion.

  98. #98
    On May 29th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Iraq is so dangerous that Obama would not get to see it if he went there, just as McCain didn’t see anything. It’s just a photo-op.

    Source Professor?

  99. #99
    On May 29th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, terrig said:

    Aloha Guy, it’s Daily Kos, et. al all day, all the time. It’s his favorite places for sources.

  100. #100
    On May 29th, 2008 at 6:08 pm, spo-con said:

    Then why doesn’t he STAY there ?

Comment pages: [1] 2 »

You must be logged in to post a comment.

David Brooks’ Ivy League ejaculations

November 21, 2008 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Smarty pants. Panting smarty.

The ObaHillary morph: Recycling you can believe in

November 18, 2008 10:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

The more things change…

Hispanic lawyers to Obama: Pay up

November 18, 2008 01:32 PM by Michelle Malkin

147 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The wages of “diversity.”

How Obama got elected

November 18, 2008 09:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

Ayers on GMA: Putting the “unrepentant” in “unrepentant terrorist”

November 14, 2008 10:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

97 Comments | 24 Trackbacks

Free as a bird.

Unrepentant, anti-capitalist terrorist cashes in

November 12, 2008 10:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

141 Comments | 23 Trackbacks

God damn America. Cha-ching.


Categories: Barack Obama, Iraq


protein wisdom

» Anxiety of Influence?

Power Line

» Turkeys on parade