Introducing “Panties for Peace”

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 3, 2008 12:38 PM

Have you heard about Western feminists’ strategy to defeat the Burmese junta?

Send them your thongs!

They’re the perfect supplement to all the condoms the U.N. is showering on cyclone victims there.

Posted in: Moonbats

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Brief Encounters
  2. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Just ask me

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #339710
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:42 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Give dirty laundry a chance.

    ROFLMAO

    Image: Hippies in Berserkley sitting in a circle around a stack of logs (unlit to reduce their carbon foot prints) singing:

    “all we are saying is, give filth a chance”

  2. #339716
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:44 pm, zorro said:

    I had to read the byline twice, I thought Allahpundit was guest blogging!

  3. #339717
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    The Panties for Peace campaign plays on the regime leaders’ superstitious fear that contact with a woman’s underpants will rob them of their power. Women around the world are asked to post their panties to local Burmese embassies in a bid to strip the regime of its power and bring an end to its gross violations of human rights, especially those committed against Burma’s women.

    You can’t make this stuff up!… on either side!

  4. #339720
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, spookie said:

    Stupid, disgusting, and futile. In every way the perfect gesture for the colonized minds of the Canadian pacifascists.

    …and a perfect summation of modern libarlism/feminism.

  5. #339721
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Texas Tiger said:

    It’s just a front for Hillary to take another tax deduction for used, donated underwear.

  6. #339722
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:47 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    Fishing for some brief comments, today?

  7. #339723
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:48 pm, spookie said:

    Speaking of stupid…make that liberalism…gotta remember to preview before posting.

  8. #339729
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:51 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    This is just so bizarre on so many levels! Ugh–defines modern day feminazis! I am soooo disgusted with these looney tunes–but I am not surprised.

  9. #339734
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:52 pm, undrseige247 said:

    Distgusting.

  10. #339735
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:54 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Wow. My tongue is almost bitten in half, there are so many things I could say, but, in the interest of not being banned for life, I will forego the cheap jokes I so desperately want to invoke. Damn this hurts!

  11. #339737
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    I guess the best news is knowing the US does not have a monopoly on idiots. This bunch makes the Code Stink bunch look smart & that takes some effort.

  12. #339746
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:01 pm, John Ansell said:

    NO NO NO, They said “Send them your bongs” not thongs. What will Paris Hilton Send?

  13. #339749
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:02 pm, cpodug said:

    After y’all pick yourselves up off the floor from laughing – consider this: they really believe that this will make a difference! That’s enough to scare the crap out of anybody with even the smallest amount of sanity!

    And may of these – for want of a better term – moonbats – are the ones who indoctrinate your children in public schools and universities.

    It would be one thing if they were engaging in satire, but to honestly believe this is absolutely beyond insane.

  14. #339750
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:03 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Aren’t there international treaties against biological warfare?

  15. #339754
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:07 pm, libocrat said:

    Did burning bra’s contribute to global warming??

    And if panties work for Burma, why not Tibet too?

  16. #339755
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:07 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ew. I hope the skidmarks were bleached out first.

  17. #339756
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    ROFLMAO, I can hardly type :lol:

  18. #339768
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, Send_Me said:

    So, really, if you’re a Burmese woman, what are you to think of this? “Here we are, fighting a ruthless dictatorship, and the Americans, in all of their generousity and strength, send their dirty underwear. Gee, thanks. How about a box of shells or hand grenades, maybe a bite to eat?”

  19. #339770
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Finally, something Rosie O’Donnell can contribute something worthwhile to…… URP! I don’t feel so good….. excuse me!

  20. #339775
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:18 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Wait… so then Abu Graub (sp?) was totally OK then?

  21. #339787
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:21 pm, John Ansell said:

    Brooklyn Red, come to think of it, we did Zap their power so maybe this does work. LOL. Picture of Saddam in his undies in 5.4..3…2…

  22. #339796
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:24 pm, BobK said:

    Many years ago (1966-1967) when I was stationed in Thailand, I heard of something similiar.

    I had a house off base that I shared with a young lady. She asked me to install a clothes line to hang laundry. Not being sure how high it should be I asked her “How high?”.

    I was told that it couldn’t be above ones head because it wasn’t proper have underwear hanging above ones head.

    So, what is strange for us is perfectly normal for others.

  23. #339812
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:33 pm, abstractmind said:

    I believe we’re missing a greater truth here.

    We’re talking about girls…with no panties.

    All those girls, all those hairy, hippy legs and those non-bathing feminazi with their……….
    UGH, for the love of all that’s holy, please say someone is gonna send them back.

    /sarc off

    More idiotic liberal banter. I believe the link post had it right. on one hand, a military regime with LOTS of guns and ammo. on the other hand…hippies and other unwashed types and their underwear.

    Wow. Just wow. where to these kooks come from? And yes, i mean other than canada or other places :P

  24. #339834
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:44 pm, Ali-Bubba said:

    Will pro-war women now stop wearing panties to make a statement?

    “Go commando for the commandos?”

  25. #339836
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:45 pm, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Oh yeah…it’s just what the world needs now…socialistic skidmarks!

    It’s proof the world is turning to crap!

  26. #339849
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:50 pm, ct davis said:

    C’mon Guys, they are raising AWARENESS. Don’t you know that to the Commie liberals AWARENESS is the only thing that is important! You see, it allows them to say, “tisk tisk, well, I did my part” without actually having to do anything meaningful. They can them brag during the “Girls Lunch” about how they raised AWARENESS while sipping a Chardonnay.. ANYTHING a Lib can do to feel superior.

    Meanwhile, US Sa ilors sat in Steel cans in the IO sweating miserably waiting to distribute aid that real Commies wouldn’t allow. The irony..

  27. #339851
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Where’s lgm to tell us that Bush’s panties are dirtier than Hillary’s?

  28. #339882
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 2:02 pm, martin.musculus said:

    #18
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:
    Finally, something Rosie O’Donnell can contribute something worthwhile to…… URP! I don’t feel so good….. excuse me

    Wow, the mental picture…

    MNUSMCDavid, people often put “ROTFL”, but I really did fall out! Luckily I had locked the wheel prior to starting to read!

    … maybe a seatbelt is the answer…

    – martin.musculus

  29. #339883
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 2:03 pm, nyc123me said:

    The panties can be used to lash all the condoms flotation devices together.

  30. #339888
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 2:06 pm, Regulus said:

    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:02 pm, cpodug said:

    After y’all pick yourselves up off the floor from laughing – consider this: they really believe that this will make a difference!

    If someone had told me that this hare-brained stunt was from an old Monty Python skit, I would’ve believed it.

    I just saw the latest “Rambo” movie on DVD last weekend – I can only imagine what Stallone’s character would’ve said if the pacifist Christians in that film were replaced by an advance party of the 1st Women’s Underwear Brigade.

    Again, note the hallmarks of leftist thinking on display:

    1. Born of ignorance;
    2. Steeped in wishful thinking; and
    3. Focused on irrelevancy.

    Q.E.D.

  31. #339929
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, Misscheryl said:

    it’s all about the women’s undergarments with these feminist. First it’s burning bras, now it’s sending dirty underwear.

  32. #339938
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 2:44 pm, locomotivebreath1901 said:

    No comment. No comment. No comment.

  33. #339959
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:05 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    This is a tough issue for me. As a republican, I should find it morally reprehensible.

    When I was single, I highly encouraged this behavior.

    Now that I am in a serious relationship, I will ask my girlfriend what my opinion is on the subject.

    Is Andrea Tantaros participating in this?

    Respectfully,

    eric aka the Tygrrrr Express
    http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

  34. #339966
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:13 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Blind_Mule: Mizzou-RAH.
    And perhaps I should have used the term ’snail trail’ instead of skidmarks?

  35. #339976
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:29 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Only within the bounty of the capitalist free western world can people get old without ever having to grow up. The only real problem? They can vote for childhood fantasies ….

  36. #339982
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Lincoln said:

    THERE IS A GOD!!!!!!!!!

  37. #339988
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:48 pm, tre said:

    Can I just send them one of my baby daughters diapers? Used?

  38. #339993
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:52 pm, Donut44 said:

    This sounds more like an act of war. The last I heard, panties were a sign of torture. Or is that only if they are put on someone’s head?

  39. #339994
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:53 pm, tre said:

    On June 3rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:
    Finally, something Rosie O’Donnell can contribute something worthwhile to…… URP! I don’t feel so good….. excuse me!

    Dave, the ruling Junta would confiscate her underwear to use as parachutes for their soldiers.

  40. #339997
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 3:57 pm, wighttrasch said:

    I asked my husband what he would do if a small, petite beautiful blonde gave him her underwear. He shrugged & said ‘I dunno–throw them away’. I asked him what he would do with mine if I gave him a pair, and he said ‘probably wash the car.’

  41. #340006
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 4:07 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:

    Absolutely outstanding ploy by the Burmese regime! They are going to get all those panties and sell them on a Porno Site for fetishists and make ton of money!

    And if they send in Rosie O’Donnell’s, the Junta can use it as a car cover after they wash them first..

  42. #340008
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 4:10 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Actually, I’ve been wearing women’s panties for a couple of years now, ever since my wife found a pair of them in the glove compartment of my truck and I had to tell her they were mine.

    But that’s a whole ‘nother story.

  43. #340015
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 4:23 pm, abstractmind said:

    On June 3rd, 2008 at 4:07 pm, Ordinary Coloradan said:
    Absolutely outstanding ploy by the Burmese regime! They are going to get all those panties and sell them on a Porno Site for fetishists and make ton of money!

    And if they send in Rosie O’Donnell’s, the Junta can use it as a car cover after they wash them first..

    I was thinking more of parachutes or something along those lines.

  44. #340029
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 4:33 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL J S Ragman, do you have an ear ring too?

  45. #340064
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I asked my husband what he would do if a small, petite beautiful blonde gave him her underwear. He shrugged & said ‘I dunno–throw them away’. I asked him what he would do with mine if I gave him a pair, and he said ‘probably wash the car.’

    Here’s hoping you have a decent sofa for him to sleep on.

    :lol:

  46. #340087
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I asked my husband what he would do if a small, petite beautiful blonde gave him her underwear. He shrugged & said ‘I dunno–throw them away’. I asked him what he would do with mine if I gave him a pair, and he said ‘probably wash the car.’

    Here’s hoping you have a decent sofa for him to sleep on.

    Are you implying her but is so big he can’t even sleep with her? HMMMM?

  47. #340100
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:23 pm, dreid said:

    Michelle if you send yours to me I will ensure they get to the embassy…

  48. #340101
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:24 pm, graysonret said:

    Having them send their thongs there? Hmmm. I thought these idiots were against germ warfare. Sounds to me like an all-out attempt to destroy Burma by using biologicals. I would love to see the U.N. debate this one…on how an epidemic was started from used thongs/panties. The best part would be seeing Carter going over to appease the government there.

  49. #340104
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:25 pm, Joy said:

    Okay…. so condoms and dirty panties…

    And the leftys claim that conservatives don’t care enough about what the rest of the world thinks of us…

  50. #340119
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:42 pm, simcoe said:

    How ‘bout those used tightie-whities? Save me a trip to the dumpster.

  51. #340175
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 6:45 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On June 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    Are you implying her but[sic] is so big he can’t even sleep with her? HMMMM?

    Again…butt has two ‘t’s.

    I think the reference is to him being banished from the bedroom for his insensitive remark.

  52. #340183
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 7:00 pm, Wade said:

    Someone raid Barbra Streisand’s cloths line and send hers…

  53. #340205
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Kaos=killjoy

    Yup, I caught “but” as soon as I hit submit. I knew what the reference was. And Rosie’s thong would not make a parachute.

    Shesh :roll:

  54. #340218
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 7:34 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And Rosie’s thong would not make a parachute.

    The word hawser comes to mind…

  55. #340240
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 7:56 pm, Joy said:

    Wade – Now you’re just being mean to the junta..

  56. #340332
    On June 3rd, 2008 at 9:27 pm, DogBreath said:

    They could always use Rosie’s for a trebuchet or catapult.

  57. #340697
    On June 4th, 2008 at 11:07 am, wighttrasch said:

    Ah yes; my husband–I married him because we make each other laugh.
    He’s also a 6′6″ Irish/South African, so if there’s no room in the bed, it’s his own fault. Thanks, soap!

  58. #340703
    On June 4th, 2008 at 11:12 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Good luck to them. Of the ones who happen to wear panties, it’s often the only pair they own.

  59. #340883
    On June 4th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On June 4th, 2008 at 11:07 am, wighttrasch said:
    Ah yes; my husband–I married him because we make each other laugh.
    He’s also a 6′6″ Irish/South African, so if there’s no room in the bed, it’s his own fault. Thanks, soap!

    It’s all good and in good fun. You stick your butt out there, expect it to get spanked! 6′6″? Don’t tell him what I said! :shock:

  60. #340960
    On June 4th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Yes; he gets that all the time–a 6′6″ South African & everyone wonders if he was a rugby player. The Dutch background gave him his size, and the Irish gave him his astounding good looks & wild sense of humor. Lucky me (I say this all the time).
    Regardless, he is now a US citizen & cannot believe how far this country has fallen since his arrival in the USA (during the reign of his majesty Ronald Reagan). The ‘panties’ story is just one that flabbergasts him. I think everyone should have that immigrant’s point of view–the immigrants that want to truly be ‘American’!

  61. #342072
    On June 5th, 2008 at 2:15 pm, mymanpotsandpans said:

    Seeing that this is a Canadian initiative, can it be called Fruit of the Loon?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Charlie Sheen demands meeting with Obama on ‘9/11 cover-up’

September 9, 2009 03:37 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Wild thing

How to dress like an “authentic” grass-roots activist

August 6, 2009 04:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

112 Comments | 31 Trackbacks

Fashion statement.

More on the fake Marine anti-war poster boy

May 15, 2009 04:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The road to hell…

April 1, 2009 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

G20 thugs impersonate police, break into bank

April 1, 2009 09:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Berkeley libs fight over nuclear-free-zone law

December 5, 2008 05:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Moonbats



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook