He just makes himself look more the fool.

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

I don’t wanna play that game, and I see it coming. Nah, I’ll save us both the time. I’m done, so go back to ranting at strawpeople.

This Congress hasn’t been able to get their promises fulfilled, because Bush didn’t support them, and they couldn’t gather enough bipartisan support to override

Of course, you know that they need to work together to get Congress’ bill passed, and come to some common ground on their respective agendas.

As I said before–facts please, facts and no more of your “fallacies”. I’ve already demolished your vague statements regarding Bush being obstructionist with actual facts. It is quite funny to see how you seem to think that just because you make unsupported blanket statements that they must be true. Simply because you say something does not make it true. Hyperventilating will do you no good and your “position” is devoid of any factual information and therefore is quite easy to attack.
You might want to take your own advice mistress and grow-up child.

Actually it is because the dem party is infected with freezer filled illicit money–marxist celebrating–America hating, mean spirited racist (hate “whitey”) thugs. I forgot to mention that their promises were/are as empty as their suits (pant-suits for some). You would think the gay/lesbiens and other minorities would have learned from good ‘ol Slick. That is, the dems are complete fakes when it comes to inclusion–except when it comes to your vote. After the election it is and always has been–”C-ya suckers!”. Those that vote dem on the grounds of inclusion/multiculturalism are nothing more that useful fools of their hallowed party faction.

The November elections will show who the Americans blame for the state of things.

First off, you might want to invest in a pocket dictionary as your use of the word hyperbole is, well to use one of your other words–silly.

Hy*per”bo*le\, n. [L., fr. Gr?, prop., an overshooting, excess, fr. Gr. ? to throw over or beyond; "ype`r over + ? to throw. See Hyper-, Parable, and cf. Hyperbola.] (Rhet.) A figure of speech in which the expression is an evident exaggeration of the meaning intended to be conveyed, or by which things are represented as much greater or less, better or worse, than they really are; a statement exaggerated fancifully, through excitement, or for effect.

I forgot. Your “blame Bush” crap for everything that is wrong (perceived or otherwise) is so inane it shows that your entire education has been a complete waste of taxpayer dollars. Most assuredly you must also believe that the President (only Bush of course) could have stopped Hurricane Katrina in it’s tracks (ala Superman), can alter the price of gasoline, change individuals bad credit habits and “talk” terrorists into giving up the jihad.
Maybe you are really Jimmy Carter pretending to be a MM reader.

Description of Straw Man
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person’s actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of “reasoning” has the following pattern:

Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.

Grow-up slick.

On June 9th, 2008 at 11:04 pm, mistressjustice said:

Both the democratic controlled Congress and Bush are pathetic, and that’s why there poll #s are in the toilet. Of course, you know that they need to work together to get Congress’ bill passed, and come to some common ground on their respective agendas.

No, lgm, the crimes Clinton did that hurt so many people were not investigated and tried. Clinton sent the U.S. Armed Forces into Kosovo in order to stop the “brutal” Serb Army from hurting the Muslim Albanians. The Army kicked the Serb forces out of the villages and towns and formed barricades to prevent the Serbs from getting back in. This allowed the Albanians to go on a rampage against the Serbs. You know, all that peaceful stuff they are about, cutting off heads, burning down churches, raping women. The U.S. forces orders were to keep the Serb army out.

A young guy from my reserve unit, i did not go on deployment there, came back and told me that he thought the Albanians were the worst people in the world after seeing that they had burned down an elderly Serb woman’s home. She was sitting across the street screaming, but the mission was not to help, just keep the Serb Army from being able to protect the Serbs.

It turns out, even the U.N. had to admit that the so called atrocities committed by the Serbs were not factual. The Republican Congress should have crucified Clinton for dragging the U.S. into the middle of a conflict where the facts were not really true and apparently “cherry picked” intelligence was used to make us a puppet of the U.N.

Okay, so you’re one of those “loud” guys who likes to type in hyperbole.

First off, you might want to invest in a pocket dictionary as your use of the word hyperbole is, well to use one of your other words–silly. Secondly, you must be one of those “loud” women who like to scream their message:

This Congress hasn’t been able to get their promises fulfilled, because Bush didn’t support them, and they couldn’t gather enough bipartisan support to override

Emphasis (loud) yours not mine. Also, Bush used his first veto of dem pork barreling July 19, 2006, a full five and a half years into his presidency. He’s only had some 10 vetos in all and mostly were employed because the bills presented were loaded with pork having nothing to do with the underlying purpose of the bill. I don’t recall even one bill having been presented by Obama or any other dem in regards to energy so how exactly has Bush caused that problem? The so-called housing/mortgage crises? Where’s the veto? Hardly a record of presidential obstruction as you whine about. Show us the evidence blow-hard and quit using statements without the facts to back them. “Talk to strawmen much?” Ahaha, that was too easy.

Now, it only gets better:

Again, I’ll rationally state that this Congress has been unable to get bipartisen support for their bills, and Bush has used his veto to block important legislation

And then:

Save the ranting and blowhard tendencies for the local tavern

Yes you sound quite rational.

Amazing, the DO NOTHING CONGRESS wants to do LESS.

Actually, house leader Pelosi stated that she will not bring impeachment motions to the floor so that the business of the House is not interrupted.

Ordinary Coloradan said:

ARMITRAGE released the name.

Scott McLellan said in his new book that Bush told him he authorized releasing Plame’s name.

Have the Dems gone stark raving mad in their hatred?

Yes, some have. Again, this is all a waste of time without a “smoking gun” or new evidence. Gas is over 4 bucks a gallon and people are freaked out about the economy. The Democrats have an election to win in November, and this impeachment jazz appears to be a big waste as of right now.

2.Plame was NOT in a covered position, so “outing her” is NOT POSSIBLE. And aside form that, she had already done so herself by openly associating herself with the CIA to peopel with outh the requisite clearances and need to know.

Already ruled on by the courts.

Why are they flogging an obviously dead horse falsehood? (Other than their allies in the mainstream press are covering for them by NOT publicizing the truth).

Have the Dems gone stark raving mad in their hatred?

We are being governed by schizophrenics, mentally ill people who have utterly split with factual reality.

Actually it is because the dem party is infected with freezer filled illicit money–marxist celebrating–America hating, mean spirited racist (hate “whitey”) thugs. I forgot to mention that their promises were/are as empty as their suits (pant-suits for some). You would think the gay/lesbiens and other minorities would have learned from good ‘ol Slick. That is, the dems are complete fakes when it comes to inclusion–except when it comes to your vote. After the election it is and always has been–”C-ya suckers!”. Those that vote dem on the grounds of inclusion/multiculturalism are nothing more that useful fools of their hallowed party faction.

The November elections will show who the Americans blame for the state of things.

Okay, so you’re one of those “loud” guys who likes to type in hyperbole. Again, I’ll rationally state that this Congress has been unable to get bipartisen support for their bills, and Bush has used his veto to block important legislation. I’ve also said that Congress and Bush are both pathetic, so your “blame Bush” rant on #40, is childishly boring and off base.
Talk to strawmen much?

On June 9th, 2008 at 11:04 pm, mistressjustice said:

I took 6th grade social studies also. LOL. Both the democratic controlled Congress and Bush are pathetic, and that’s why there poll #s are in the toilet. Of course, you know that they need to work together to get Congress’ bill passed, and come to some common ground on their respective agendas. This Congress hasn’t been able to get their promises fulfilled, because Bush didn’t support them, and they couldn’t gather enough bipartisan support to override. The November elections will show who the Americans blame for the state of things.

See I passed social studies AND reading comprehension. Save the ranting and blowhard tendencies for the local tavern. Goodbye Silly, and get back to me in November.

On June 10th, 2008 at 9:19 am, lgm said:
The crimes Clinton was accused of didn’t hurt as many people. Bush lied, people died. That’s the truth.

Ahh, the Bush lied, people died slogan that some 5 year old can recite.

Look at your own statement:
The crimes Clinton was accused of didn’t hurt as many people

So….its ok for Clinton to do something, as long as its numerically less than something a Republican does? That’s rather nice of you!

If you want to talk about people being hurt, Clinton and his pro-Chinese stance(ya know, where he was giving them missile secrets and other scandles…the Tsu being on the other foot as it were LOL)…China has such a PERFECT human rights record and never harms anyone…well, we dont want to discuss that because it didnt hurt as many…or did it…

The argument about Bush’s decisions and the damage its caused arent so arguable based on the numbers, but you’re not going with that. There are tons of things that Clinton, and liberals in general, have done to harm others and you don’t complain.

How’s that Darfur thing going, btw? Just saying.