*Not for the first time in writing about Obama’s supporters, I am reminded of an utterly obscene but hilarious piece in The Onion from several years back. I won’t link it, but the gist of it was a man who was puzzled, angry, and indignant about why, since he was straight, all these homosexuals kept having sex with him?

An apt analogy for Obama’s long-term, knowing and willful associations with the likes of Jeremiah Wright and Tony Rezko and, to a lesser extent, Bill Ayers. Not an apt analogy at all for a racist moonbat poster who, for all you or I know, may not even support Obama’s candidacy, and who in any event posted his racist drivel without the campaign’s blessing, only to see said racist drivel deleted the instant the campaign learned of it.

A decent argument can be made that allowing such an open forum and not moderating it more proactively exhibited poor judgment on Obama’s part. That’s a fair point, but all it gets us is the molehill. To get from there to the mountain requires a huge leap far beyond guilt by association, and into the bizarro world of guilt by someone else’s desire to associate with you. Just because hundreds of gay men want to have sex with you, that doesn’t mean you are gay.

The G.O.P. has lost both houses of Congress, and since lost three special elections in what should have been safe Republican seats, and now faces polling numbers indicating that a rabid socialist committed to defeat in the Middle East may, by repeatedl…

Democrats are inherently Racist and Classicist. The simple fact is that without the generic “downtrodden”, Liberals have no one to point a finger at. Dems need the “black vote” or the “hispanic vote” whereas the RNC seems to feel it doesn’t need to campaign at all (sorry, I just can’t help my frustration over the lack of fighting will). The real problem with Democrats using the “I’m here to help the little man” propaganda is that there has to be a “little man” to begin with. Sure, there is poverty. But in the America I know, everyone has the opportunity to go out and get a job.

Wait, here is comes.. Here comes the liberal retort “How dare you, how can you say that anyone can work? Why, these people have been oppressed!” Well, I was born in the late ’60’s so the “oppression” that has become the standard reference really hasn’t been an issue in my lifetime. Yes, everyone can work. You may have to do work you don’t like but everyone can work.

If that isn’t true then explain how millions of illegal aliens CAN work but healthy Americans on welfare can’t? All unemployment statistics in this country are inaccurate because they don’t take in to account the millions of people working illegally. If those who don’t work simply found a job (note the fact that millions of people who have no work authorization and don’t speak English somehow managed to find work) we could devert the welfare money we give them back to the national debt and erase it without having to increase taxes. As well, the taking of jobs by Americans would reduce the need for illegal laborers to fill those jobs.

Call me whatever names you wish.. Once again, Conservative logic will be fought with Liberal slander..

cf said”
The other problem with anti-Semitic trash on Obama’s website is that it shows a certain nonchalance towards it, or maybe worse, a certain tacit willingness to tolerate anti-Semitism

Senator Barrack Hussein Obama’s ties to Chicago’s Nation of Islam, PLO organizations and his spit decision on Jeruselum all point to a rather ugly anti-Semitism. They all tie into his middle name nicely don’t they?

The Senator is anti-Semit, a Black Nationalist and a Progressive/Marxist. Please read the Senator’s book Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance

And you will KNOW just how off kilter this man is. He does not like America and he does not like non-blacks and he isn’t too thrilled with a lot of blacks.

Besides that he is ok.

“…That Liberalism may be a tendency towards something very different from itself, is a possibility in its nature. For it is something which tends to release energy rather than accumulate it, to relax, rather than to fortify. It is a movement not so much defined by its end, as by its starting point; away from, rather than towards, something definite. Our point of departure is more real to us than our destination; and the destination is likely to present a very different picture when arrived at, from the vaguer image formed in imagination…

Liberalism may be characterized as a progressive discarding of elements in historical Christianity which appear superfluous, obsolete, confounded with practices and abuses which are legitimate objects of attack. But as its movement is controlled rather by its origin than by any goal, it loses force after a series of rejections, and with nothing to destroy is left with nothing to uphold and with nowhere to go…

By destroying traditional social habits of the people, by dissolving their natural collective consciousness into individual constituents, by licensing the opinions of the most foolish, by substituting instruction for education, by encouraging cleverness rather than wisdom, the upstart rather than the qualified, by fostering a notion of “getting on” to which the alternative is a hopeless apathy, Liberalism can prepare the way for that which is its own negation: the artificial, mechanised or brutalised control which is a desperate remedy for its chaos” (Emphasis added).