About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Fight Their Smears: ABC News, Bob Beckel, Time, AP, Guardian, and NYT slime the Right

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 16, 2008 03:22 AM

1abeckel.jpg

Time lies. The NYTimes slimes. AP distorts. ABC News, the Guardian, and the blithering Bob Beckel have all now piled on, too. They are at it again. Smearing conservative bloggers and talk radio. Because they think they can get away with it.

Like Barack Obama, the MSM has adopted the “Yes, we can!” mantra.

Oh, no, they can’t.

As I reported on Friday, the ogling Obamedia is spreading the lie that conservative bloggers and talk show host Rush Limbaugh are responsible for perpetuating the Michelle Obama videotape rumor, whose dubious provenance is far left Hillary shill and disgraced disinformation operative Larry Johnson. Over the weekend, ABC News attributed Johnson’s rumor to “conservative bloggers” without even the most cursory mention of Johnson’s role in lighting the fire on May 16–and no acknowledgment at all that many leading conservative bloggers have been deflating and debunking Johnson’s hype from the get-go. (Allahpundit counts five major MSM outlets, including ABC News, which have now omitted Johnson from stories about the reckless tape rumor.) Here’s the ABC News smear:

Google “Michelle Obama” and the term “whitey” and you’ll find conservative bloggers claiming a video shows her using the racially tinged term at Trinity Church. No tape has ever surfaced. But the claim helped prompt the Obama campaign to launch its own Web site, FighttheSmears.com.

Are you ready to fight their smears?

At the bottom of the ABC News smear story is an invitation:

If you would like to tell us more facts about this story, please click here to send the editors of ABC News a separate email with the information you have.

I clicked and politely suggested to the editors of ABC News that they Google “Larry Johnson and whitey” and correct their smear story. You can also leave public comments on the smear story here.

In his Friday afternoon apology for smearing conservatives, Jay Carney is still blaming us for “picking up and spreading” the rumor–omitting the fact, and yes, I have to repeat it again, that many leading conservative bloggers have been debunking Johnson’s hype from the get-go.

Fight their smears.

You can leave comments for Carney about his botched apology here.

And just when you think they can’t go any lower, along comes Bob Beckel. First, let’s review what he said in a heavy-breathing interview on Fox and Friends on June 3. I’ve taken the time to transcribe the exact moment when he launches into his hyped-up Michelle Obama rumor-mongering–which was not solicited or prompted by the hosts. Pay close attention:

Transcript:

BECKEL: Now, there is one other thing that I’ve gotta tell ya about which worries me a little bit. And that is because I always hear rumors, I hear thousands of them in the course of a presidential campaign, but this one I’ve heard from enough sources that it worries me.

I won’t get into details on what it is except to say that there is some thought that there might be a very big shoe dropping on Michelle Obama tomorrow.

CAMEROTA: Wait a minute…

BECKEL: …And that, yeah, I can’t tell you what it is because I don’t want to perpetuate the rumor. But I will tell you this. Whoever is promoting this thing is doing it in enough ways, in a very smart way, that it gets to me in ways that make me get worried about it…

CAMEROTA: Ok, but are you suggesting in that case that Hillary Clinton is sticking around to see what that shoe drop’ll be?

BECKEL: N-n-no, because I think, it’s, from my understanding it’s coming from the Republicans and they wanted to wait until he wrapped up the nomination. ‘Course, the stupidity of that is, if there’s anything to it, if there’s anything big like that, they can always turn to her to take the nomination…

CAMEROTA: …back to Michelle Obama, is it your understanding that this is bigger than, say, a college thesis paper.

BECKEL: Significantly.

DOOCY: Alright. Let’s just call you Bombshell Bob Beckel.

Twelve days later, no bombshell dropped. But Beckel was back on Fox News yesterday, mounting his high horse to blame conservative bloggers and Rush Limbaugh for spreading the rumor he shamelessly hyped. (Hat tip - reader Away2Play.) Beckel has the gall to claim that he was trying to “cut it off” rather than breathlessly flog it. Then he turns and sanctimoniously wags his finger at FNC host Bret Baier, admonishing him not to ask questions about rumors because it legitimizes rumors.

The poison icing on Beckel’s demagogic devil’s food cake?

Calling conservative bloggers and commentators “crackers and right-wingers.”

I’ve clipped and transcribed this astounding performance. Without further comment, because none is necessary when a petard is being hoist so grandly, here are the clip and transcript:

Transcript:

BAIER: FightTheSmears.com. Set up by the Barack Obama campaign. What about that, Bob? Do they need to do this kind of thing?

BECKEL: Well, I suppose they need to do it. But frankly, it requires voters to be civic-minded and go and check these things out. And I don’t think that many of them will. But look: The Internet has changed two things in politics substantially this year. One is money. And the other is how you deliver smears. And what has happened here, particularly against Barack Obama, whether it’s his middle name, whether it’s the fact that he’s black, purely racist and bigoted stuff that I get through my Internet mail, what’s happened is, it comes from these right-wing bloggers and then, the question is—and it gets picked up by right-wing radio talk show hosts—and then, the question is, does the mainstream media then begin to ask questions about it, which then legitimizes it, and that’s really the problem.

It’s people in your business, Bret, that have got to—you gotta not ask these questions—because what it does, when you do ask the question, it then lets the radio talk show hosts come back and say something. I got into a problem with Rush—

BAIER: I’ll say that’s a fine thing to say, however, let’s say that in this bushel of things that you get one that really is true?

BECKEL: If you’ve got some evidence, that’s fine. But these guys don’t have any evidence. This story that they ran about Michelle Obama, which by the way, I got in some trouble on by trying to cut it off and, and Rush Limbaugh got on the radio and said, ‘Well, Bob Beckel mentioned it’—I did not mention it. I said that there were smears coming around, one of them had to do with Barack Obama, and that gave Limbaugh the chance to say it all over again. Look, that is a not true story. You wouldn’t go with that story without some evidence…

BAIER: No, of course not. But my point is, is that they’ll paint a big brush here, and perhaps in the mix, there may be something a reporter may be afraid to go after, uh, that there would be some truth—

BECKEL: Well, I’ll tell ya what. Let these crackers and right-wingers prove it before they put it, before they come out…

Before they come out and what, Bombshell Bob? Before they come out and, oh, start braying on tee-vee about “very big shoes” dropping on “tomorrows” that never came?

Project much?

1mirror.jpg

***

Good on the Chicago Sun-Times.

Update: Allah’s put the Beckel bloviations back-to-back in one handy video clip. Pass it on.

Update: Much more from LGF.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Ed Driscoll.com
  2. Sister Toldjah
  3. Fox News Bob Beckel Hints At Michelle Obama Bombshell Video : BigMouthFrog
  4. Bob Beckel: “Crackers And Right Wingers” Behind “Whitey” Smear! « Nice Deb
  5. NYTimes, AP, ABC News, The Guardian And Bob Beckel = Slime Artists : BigMouthFrog
  6. Wizbang
  7. Genesis Of A Smear
  8. Chickenhawk Express
  9. Political Party Poop
  10. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Disgrace: Beckel blames right-wing “crackers” for his own Michelle Obama smearmongering
  11. Obama Supporter, Beckel, Denounces “Crackers” for Spreading His “Whitey” Rumor « Gaffe Nation
  12. BOB BECKEL CALLS ME A CRACKER « Chicagoans Against Obama
  13. Horribly irresponsible journalism. « PaulSwansen’s Weblog
  14. Michelle Malkin » Tuesday morning open thread
  15. UNCoRRELATED

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: [1] 2 »

  1. #1
    On June 16th, 2008 at 3:42 am, BrianNY said:

    As usual - look what the Left says and then apply the projection back on to them and you have a pretty clear description of the truth.

  2. #2
    On June 16th, 2008 at 4:04 am, bit_boy said:

    During most of the Clinton White House years they were plagued by the Right Wing conspiracy. Perhaps the ghost, or derivative, of this conspiracy has claimed the Obie’s, baby mama and baby daddy, as its next subject matter. And just who is the mother of the Right Wing conspiracy. None other than jiHillary. Makes sense to me, she got three birds with one rumor. She nailed us red neck crackers, Right Wing bloggers, and the blow up doll. Even Beckel, professional sop that he is, see the victims of this conspiracy and has duly reported. jiHillary, LHAO!

  3. #3
    On June 16th, 2008 at 4:40 am, Truesoldier said:

    It’s people in your business, Bret, that have got to—you gotta not ask these questions—because what it does, when you do ask the question, it then lets the radio talk show hosts come back and say something. I got into a problem with Rush—

    Oh you mean like not asking questions about the phony Rathergate documents or perhaps the Fauxtography scnadals. Yea I bet Boobshell Bob would have loved it if none of that had come to light. What a hypocrite. Maybe if he had asked questions and done some checking he would not have made such a boob out of himself by hyping up a phony rumor.

  4. #4
    On June 16th, 2008 at 5:48 am, graysonret said:

    I don’t even bother watching the news anymore; prefering the internet. It’s usually 20 minutes of commericals, 20 minutes of commentary, 15 minutes of news I can’t use like “informercials” on actors and authors, and 5 minutes of something worthwhile. After an hour, I have everything I need, while a tv watcher is still trying to “wade through” the propaganda.

  5. #5
    On June 16th, 2008 at 6:08 am, docflash said:

    Unfair smears,racism.That’s going to be their whole campaign.I think they have realized the boob they pushed out there.He has nothing but total socialism and the American people are not going to go for it.If he doesn’t get elected this is the excuse.Kerry was swiftboated,the crackas and rightwing bloggers beat him down.We have heard about failed policies for 8 years.Looks like the chickens are coming home.

  6. #6
    On June 16th, 2008 at 6:22 am, WarTip said:

    “Victims” running the house, the senate and one in the White House?

    Have no fear though, smears and cries of victimhood really will dominate this campaign. At least they do have a common cause though.

    Fear not victims, the unwitting and unwilling American taxpayer will have his hard work and financial rewards stricken down and taken so that the victims can be justly and duly compensated for their lack of achievement and their position in society.

    And these people actually preach this as news and Americans actually listen? That is perhaps the scariest part of all.

  7. #7
    On June 16th, 2008 at 6:22 am, Armigerous said:

    Well what did you expect,Michelle?….surely you didn’t really expect them to put the blame on of their very own clowns-in-residence like Larry Johnson did you?….I mean after the Karl Rove ‘indictment’ by Patrick Fitzgerald,they knew everybody would laugh them out of town if they pointed the finger at him.

  8. #8
    On June 16th, 2008 at 6:46 am, CO2 Producer said:

    Wow. Just…wow. The gall Bob Beckel has. Jeremiah Wright’s happy-dancing again. Another cracker’s doing all the work for him.

    After watching that second clip, I have a few choice words for Bob, but out of respect for Ms. Malkin I will withhold myself.

    Dude, go back and watch that first clip above. That is you, right? To think that I had an ounce of respect for you. Not anymore. Consider my olive twig retracted.

    Conservatives have the art of the smear down pat, huh? Looks like you’re doing a good job of using your own words to fool yourself.

    Go ahead, though. Keep talking, Beckel, ABC, the assorted Times, etc. We’re listening. Well, some of us are. Some of us even pay attention.

  9. #9
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:01 am, zorro said:

    The evidence above adds to the reasons why I have called them democraps for years. Since the Ronald Reagan - Sam Donaldson encounters back in the 80’s, the media (democrap water carriers) have tried this stunt. It didn’t work then, it won’t work now. It illustrates their hate and their desperation. God help them.

  10. #10
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:05 am, longbow said:

    I saw Bob Beckel’s shameful performance where first he hyped the rumor. I could not help but wonder at the time, why was he giving it so much credence and almost promoting it?

    And then, how could he blame conservatives for this rumor after he himself had promoted it so forcefully?

    The answer of course is that for leftists, the end justifies the means. A lie is just another tool in the toolbox, to be used whenever they think it effective. There are no penalties for leftists for lying - in fact they praise and admire skillful liars for their ability to confuse and misdirect, witness BJ “I did not have sex with that woman” Clinton…

  11. #11
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:17 am, OldSailor88 said:

    And then, how could he blame conservatives for this rumor after he himself had promoted it so forcefully?

    Because Bob “SUPERDELEGATE” Beckel is in bed with the far lefties and the MSM, that’s how. Nobody but us conservatives will call him on it, which means it will stay here and never make the news.

  12. #12
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:17 am, old7 said:

    I watched and listened to this Fox show last night. Beckel must think that no one pays attention to what’s going on around them or listens to what he and the other left wing propogandist spew. I hope every voter sees Obama for the empty shell he is. If people would just listen to what he is “not” saying they would realize he has nothing of substance to say. Also, as an older southern conservative I find the term “cracker” to be as derogatory as some other terms that are no longer in use.

  13. #13
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:20 am, MrOlympia said:

    The only person that thinks Bob Beckel says anything that deals in reality is Bob Beckel. The guy lives in a fantasy world and you can tell he really thinks highly of himself. He’s just another lib mouthpiece that spews garbage. Its pathological how these folks operate on a daily basis.

  14. #14
    On June 16th, 2008 at 7:27 am, sam.i.am said:

    This is the new version of liberal self-hate. Whitey. Cracker. Redneck. Looking for absolution from the new Messiah. . . this is going to get really ugly, really fast.

  15. #15
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:01 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Expect the liberal MSM to correct thenselves?

    *Think I will go put my finger in the ruptured dike in Iowa

  16. #16
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:09 am, FruNobulux said:

    We must keep in mind that all good leftists lie and try to dress it up as truth. Both the Crocodile Woman and the Blow-up Man revere Saul Alinsky, who advocated that ends justify whatever means.

    In fact, the Crocodile Woman was so fond of him, she saw fit to state that she disagreed with him, then picked a tangential issue on which to disagree.

  17. #17
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:14 am, tarpon said:

    Comrade Obama has his slime machine working overtime. Obama’s slime site is a bunch of lies. Like communists everywhere, communists do what communist do, they lie.

    The good news is the drive-by parrot ain’t what she used to be, and can’t do what she used to do.

  18. #18
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:26 am, franksalterego said:

    Well, beings that Michelle Malkin is a frequent guest commentator on FOXNews, it seems to me, she must have a way to discredit that fat-ass toad, to his face.

    We’re all looking forward to it, aren’t we.

    Aren’t we?

  19. #19
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:27 am, Mixer14 said:

    I’m afraid we haven’t heard the last of the ‘Smear Conspiracy‘, which is my prediction as to what it will soon be called by the left.

    As soon as Obama’s candidacy is made official, be ready for:

    1. Racist claims by Jesse & Al
    2. Rascist claims by the NAACP
    3. Pictures of John McCain superimposed in front of Confederate flags and plantations.
    4. Calls on the right to stop the ‘abuse’ being thrown at Obama and his wife.
    5. Keith Olbermann ponedering if the GOP symbol should be changed from andelephant to a noose and a burning cross.
    6. So-called celebrities promising to leave the US if McCain is elected
    7. Calls by the left to sanction all condervative on-air personalities as their comments support Republicans only
    8. Screeds by all of the MSM that Voter-ID is a conservative plot to disenfranchise legitimate voters.
    9. Someone calling for the elimination of the Electoral College and it disenfranchises the will of the people.

    …and the list goes on.

    ….and the list goes on

  20. #20
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:29 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    A deluge of weirdos and jerks are coming out to bolster their candidate. The democratic primary definitely was the crux of their integrity. It’s all down hill from that. Recreate 68! Except this time mix in Viagra, Ecstasy and Gansta Rap.

  21. #21
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:45 am, A Typical Patriot said:

    You can always tell when you’ve hit a nerve with the libs. Their angst results in ‘you can’t talk about this’. I wonder if Beckel has ever read Daily Kos. I suppose he considers that racist, hate filled blog as serving a public interest, and just filled with truth and fact.

    BTW isn’t ‘crackers’ considered racist?

  22. #22
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:46 am, Boomer said:

    I really wish someone could find the time that also had the money to sue these jackasses in the MSM for libel and slander and hurt them in the pocket book, but I believe even this set of outrageous lies may be protected by the 1st Amendment. Just when I thought they could sink any lower they just keep digging.

    I can no longer rely on any of the MSM outlets to include Fox News (which has been drifting more and more to the left on a daily basis) to find out what is going on in the world. I thank God for the new media almost everyday now. They have really “jumped the shark” on this one and many of us bitter redneck, crackers, with our bibles in one hand and guns in the other are all racist because we won’t bow down before the Obamasiah and his empty promises of hope and change. Sorry MSM no sale here most clear thinking folks can see right through the all style no substance empty suit the Democrats are stuck with.

  23. #23
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:52 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I must give Bob Beckel credit for being able to lie with the unsaid. He is pretty good about lying with what he does say so I guess he is double talented. He spends a lot of time trying to appear credible and reasonable on these shows just so he CAN pull off-

    I must give Republicans Credit-they do it better than we do (Democrats)

    Yes, he is a slime machine. He sure put in the effort to spread the ‘whitey’ rumor.

  24. #24
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:03 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    I don’t really like Bob Beckel especially after he called that pastor a fruit cake on Fox.

  25. #25
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:09 am, Gator70 said:

    Wasn’t Beckel an advisor for two failed campaigns? It always cracks me up how he is an “expert”, but has never had any success in the political world.

  26. #26
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:10 am, DaveC said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:27 am, Mixer14 said:

    As soon as Obama’s candidacy is made official, be ready for:

    6. So-called celebrities promising to leave the US if McCain is elected

    Susan Sarandon has already threatened to do so.. but I think she does that every 4 years regardless.. if she would only walk the walk instead of talking the talk.

  27. #27
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:16 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    Did Bob “Fecal” Beckel just call people crackers on TV?

    I suggest we follow every other group that is offended at every word said and start a campaign to have him removed.

    You know if ANYONE had made such a slur against a minority they would already be fired.

    I demand Fox News fire Bob “Fecal” Beckel for his offensive and derogatory racial slur.

  28. #28
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:16 am, WarTip said:

    Strange. I thought he was talking about residents of Florida who have been known as “Crackers” since the early cattle days there when the residents obtained the state nickname due to the constant cracking of bullwhips (Actually used for cattle) in those days.

    There is no way I could imagine a lib instigating issues of racism, much less believe that is what he meant.

    / Sarc

  29. #29
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:17 am, Barry F. said:

    Someone had better get Bob Beckel an inhaler as much huffing and puffing as he is doing. :lol:

    I’m about to drop my two cents on the links, Michelle, for what good it will do.

    The MSM is in-the-tank for Obama. But, I can still tell them what idiots they are for perpetuating crap like that. And, they wonder why their ratings suck? :roll:

  30. #30
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:21 am, Donut44 said:

    Beckel is an idiot though and everyone should keep that in mind. He is the ultra liberal version of Geraldo. He is in for nothing but shock affect. I more dismayed at how many “new” show, including Fox, continue to allow this imbecile on their shows. He has nothing worth while to say, but he stirs things up and apparently, “we” like that? I don’t think so.

  31. #31
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:34 am, katieanne said:

    How utterly stupid of Beckel and MSM. It is on video who said what and when. The truth is there for anyone who looks for it. Their contempt for people’s intelligence is astounding. And, of course, the old standby of name calling. How marvelously tolerant of these liberals.

  32. #32
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:35 am, grumbles said:

    What happened to: “Until and unless anyone actually produces a video, I’m not going to mention it again.” ?????????????

  33. #33
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:36 am, southsideironworks said:

    Yahoo News this morning:

    “…Obama finds his sense of identity in basketball…”

    I didnt think he’d find it playing ice hockey.

  34. #34
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:36 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    They want to silence the right.

    It’s that simple.

    Did anyone else on here see that little sec-prog conference in MN?

    Nasty.

  35. #35
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:38 am, Laree said:

    I love the mirror and message- project much, that is a very good visual. Occasionally you should put a graphic in the mirror let us know who they are trying to channel- emmulate, most of the stuff they are repeating are talking points and they are parroting something they heard somewhere else.
    Bob Beckel wants to sound like he has been suffering fools. Yeah well Fooling Folks and Fools are pretty relative concepts. Democrats are Jesters? Republicans are Fools? Spin Spin Spin.

  36. #36
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:40 am, willie peter said:

    Beckels’ the scumbag who tried to manipulate members of the Electoral College to renege on their votes in the 2000 presidential election in order to ramrod Al Gores’ election.

    When this became known, the Public outrage at his tactics caused his wife to realize what a douchebag she was living with. She subsequently threw him out.

    Then, evidently unable to pick up women on his own, he got involved with numerous hookers.

    This made the news when one of his prostitures tried to extort him for $50,000 claiming she would go public about their relationship. Beckel was vulnerable as he had young children.

    So we’re crackers, huh Bob?

  37. #37
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:40 am, srhoades said:

    Bob Beckel is the Billy Martin of politics, only Billy was a chump who won championships and Bob is just a chump. Same stupid dirty tricks and lies though.

  38. #38
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:45 am, srhoades said:

    Donut 44 said:

    He is the ultra liberal version of Geraldo.

    I always thought Geraldo was the ultra liberal version of Geraldo.

  39. #39
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:46 am, Larraby said:

    The NY Times started the unsourced garbage about McCain having an affair with a lobbyist. The Times found a photo of her in a slinky evening gown and chose to run that. Bill Keller of the Times said it was “important” to have her photo and that was the only one they could find. The Times is far worse than the National Enquirer. Incredibly, The Times has assigned a team of four investigative reporters to a permanent investigation of McCain. No reporters have been assigned by the Times to investigate Obama. The NY Times staff, from editors to reporters, is so far to the left of the spectrum that McCain’s years as a POW in North VietNam is seen by the Times as disqualifying McCain.

  40. #40
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:50 am, flmom said:

    I think Docflash got it right, this is part of Obama’s campaign’s strategy to innoculate Obama from ‘unfair’ criticism, when the inevitable scrutiny of his associations come to the general publics attention. They’ve come out swinging, in the hopes that anything that comes out will be labeled as “smear” and “racism”.

  41. #41
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:50 am, radio relay said:

    Google “Michelle Obama” and the term “whitey” and you’ll find conservative bloggers claiming a video shows her using the racially tinged term at Trinity Church.

    I’m sure the lefties at Google are making sure that such searches have that result, also!!

  42. #42
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:53 am, rightwingrocker said:

    These people have no shame. Why should we be surprised?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  43. #43
    On June 16th, 2008 at 9:57 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    Bob, you’ve made me (a white guy) feel loved by calling me a “cracker”. You meant it as a term-of-endearment, right?

  44. #44
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:01 am, abstractmind said:

    i’d rather be called a cracker than a moron.

    Or a democrat.

    It’s a good thing that the same people who are first to denounce and decry everything as racist…resorts to racist rantings.

  45. #45
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:05 am, Bogtrotter said:

    While it is indeed B.S., I see it as a “Big Picture” and “Numbers Game” B.S. In case they win in Nov. they will have all the “evidence” they can drag up when the push for the Fairness Doctrine begins. They will have it all on the record, even though it is B.S.

  46. #46
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, franksalterego said:

    BREAKING NEWS: Beckel’s Cracker Problem

    New and dramatic developments. This is a heads up. I’ll post the news in just a few seconds. Now I know why people who have seen the videotape say it is stunning. Beckel’s headaches are only starting.

    [snip]

    “But the real reason for Beckel’s extraordinary freakout is that he fears the release of the videotape, reported here, of Beckel on FOXNews, railing against “crackers” And we don’t mean Nabiscos. Four Democrat sources have told me that the tape exists. I’ve also been informed that Michell Malkin and her allies have a copy of it and are using it to raise funds for independent expenditure groups. The tape, I’m told, will be disclosed as the DNC October Surprise. It’s a ticking time bomb.”

  47. #47
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:11 am, abstractmind said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am, franksalterego said:

    Michelle, are you holding out on us? ROFLMAO.

    Frank…stop playing into the rumor mill. it’s already absurd enough. if this tape was really out there, we’d have seen it by now.

  48. #48
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:12 am, DaveC said:

    fat man beckel brings up swift boating too at the very end..

    (as a man who is overweight himself, I can safely say that beckel is a fat man.)

    Bryan NY #1 said it best..

  49. #49
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:13 am, wighttrasch said:

    Rice meet Cracker. Cracker, Rice.

  50. #50
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:14 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Predictable. Our political discourse has been reduced to name calling for 30+ years. The children are running amok.

  51. #51
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:14 am, Barry F. said:

    Well, let’s see how long my comment on Jay Carney’s blog. ;-)

  52. #52
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:19 am, Mister P said:

    The poison icing on Beckel’s demagogic devil’s food cake?

    This guy has been a pompous ass for a long, long time.

  53. #53
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:19 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Headline 2009:
    President Obama soon to appoint member to newly created cabinet position, Minister of Information.

  54. #54
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:39 am, katablog said:

    Admittedly, I did report this rumor on my blog - but I reported it as just that, a rumor and I linked to NoQuarter.com where it came from.

    It’s unbelievable to me that Bob Beckel of all people would now try to blame conservative bloggers when he is the one who reported this on national television! It’s also sooo like Larry Johnson not to man up and admit that it was HE who started the rumor - even though he blamed it on Hillbuzz.

    When I was researching the story for my blog I found totally circular references between NoQuarter and Hillbuzz - each claiming the other as the source - both indicating they’d talked to people who had heard the tape.

  55. #55
    On June 16th, 2008 at 10:40 am, fulldroolcup said:

    What’s really hilarious, in an infuriating sort of way, is Beckel’s co-authorship with conservative Cal Thomas of a book titled: “Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War that is Destroying America”.

    After this I imagine the book will wind up being pulped and recycled into egg cartons or the like.

    Meanwhile over at AOL they have an article about some predictable leftist historians/Dem party activists saying McCain is going to get creamed in the election.

    AOL accompanies their piece with 500 political photos, more than 90% of which are of Obama, his family and supporters.

    But heh: in a a poll attracting more than 650,000 respondents, AOL subscribers are giving the election to McCain by a margin of 46 to 43%, while voting for him 50 to 41%.

    Yeah, it’s an unscientific sample, but so is one consisting of a handful of leftist perfessers (who famously predicted on AOL Kerry’s landslide back in 2004).

    See for yourself:

    http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/historians-see-little-chance-for-mccain/20080615124509990001

    Then take heart.

  56. #56
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:03 am, Trop said:

    Forgoodnesssakes, can we stop perpetuating all this ridiculous crap and focus on ISSUES?

    This country is in deep trouble (too much debt, too much entitlement, illegals, oil dependence that threatens to ruin our economy… and so on), and this pettiness is getting us no closer to solving the nation’s problems.

    Shame on you MM for being a big part of the problem.

  57. #57
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:07 am, xler8bmw said:

    BECKEL: Well, I’ll tell ya what. Let these crackers and right-wingers prove it before they put it, before they come out…

    I couldn’t believe I heard that last night. I almost fell off my sofa.

  58. #58
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:13 am, Christian Soldier said:

    An example of insults being turned upon the small minds that insult:

    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/06/to-burn-here-or-to-go.html#readfurther

    I watched it four times and LOL each time!

    Don’t we have anyone with the where-with - all to make vids to counter the left?!!!! MSM? B Hussein Obama? Rev.Wright. J. Jackson-Beckel-G.Rivera-Farrakhan(sp)? etc.etc.etc……..

  59. #59
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am, Angry Kneegrow said:

    Bob Beckel is nothing short of an asshat. Good for MM for not perpetuating this crap.

  60. #60
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:17 am, max said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:03 am, Trop said:
    Forgoodnesssakes, can we stop perpetuating all this ridiculous crap and focus on ISSUES?

    This country is in deep trouble (too much debt, too much entitlement, illegals, oil dependence that threatens to ruin our economy… and so on), and this pettiness is getting us no closer to solving the nation’s problems isn’t helping Michelle Obama’s kids.

    Is that what you really meant, Trop?

  61. #61
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:21 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Bob Beckel = Liberal Water-Carrying Hack

    Nothing New to see there, Move Along…

  62. #62
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:24 am, Thunder_Run said:

    The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 06/16/2008 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.

  63. #63
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:26 am, franksalterego said:

    abstractmind, June 16th, 2008 at 10:11 am

    Yes,

    And now, we can all sit here, waiting patiently, until Michelle gets on FOXNews, and beats Beckel over the head with the truth.

    Unless, there’s some unspoken quid pro quo between them.

  64. #64
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:28 am, TanyaB said:

    What I don’t understand is why the libs already had a “cover” for Michelle my belle Obama. They said what she was saying is “why did he”, not “whity”.It was the grammer “why’d he” that made it sound like “whity”.
    Sooo they must have known of a tape that they had to cover for. I’m just sayin”. I could be wrong. If I am, they were just busy trying to make a good cover story for her , in case there was a tape.

    Oh, I heard Rush say he didn’t know if the rumor was even true or not. The faithful listeners know that he didn’t start push the rumor.

  65. #65
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:32 am, Christian Soldier said:

    This about says it all –check out Micheal’s June 13-08 …

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/cartoon.asp

  66. #66
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:33 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    The only core principle for Marxists is advancing Marxism.

    Some may not be aware that they essentially accept pretty much everything Marx taught, but when the single biggest difference between Republicans and Dems is regular attendance of religious services (and even among ethnic minorities who lean heavily Democrat, like Jews and African-Americans, the religious are more likely to vote Republican than the non-religious), people who don’t believe in a higher authority will tend to not be contrained by morals in advancing an agenda.

  67. #67
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:34 am, coffee260 said:

    BREAKING NEWS: White community in uproar after being labeled “CRACKERS”

    All across America, the white community is trying to quell the pain and anger they are feeling after a prominent Fox News commentator called them “crackers.”

    It all started when democrat strategist, and Fox News contributer, Bob (Dick Morris look alike) Beckel referred to those who are pigment challenged as “crackers.”

    Beckel, a “cracker” himself has not responded to the grass roots outrage over what some say is being called the new “N” word.

    Someone close to the white community, actually myself, can speak to the epidemic like anger spreading virally all across America’s white neighborhoods.

    Most notable effected are the lower income white women and children who feel they have been stigmatized and worse.

    No word on whether Beckel will have to answer to the community as a whole. Anyone of his size can pretty much say anything. Even if that means offending a majority W.A.S.P. nation.

    UPDATE: Conservative bloggers have mounted a movement to have Beckel removed from position as a Fox News contributer.

    If Beckel doesn’t apologize to “whitey” one conservative blogger said, then he should be yanked off they air.

    Asked if he was afraid such a move would set a new precedent of censorship, the blogger responded, “How would you like to be called a “cracker?”

    Being I am a “cracker” I could only speculate as to what he meant.

    Needless to say, “whitey” this evening are a “bitter” bunch of “crackers.”

  68. #68
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:40 am, love2rumba said:

    Keep fighting for your principles and stand up for them…remember you are fighting for ideals, not for the next politician’s power trip. If any politician thinks like they can use you and then throw you under the bus- cut them off, shake the dust off your birkenstocks and move on

  69. #69
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:49 am, franksalterego said:

    TanyaB, June 16th, 2008 at 11:28 am

    Exactly,

    The reason the rumor had any legs was, that it fits Michelle Obama’s victimization/greivance mongering, plus all their racist associations.

    Although the story may not be documented, it prob’ly has some basis in fact…I wouldn’t be shocked at all.

    my opinion

  70. #70
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, Barry F. said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:34 am, coffee260 said:

    Are you seeking any reparations?

  71. #71
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:57 am, abstractmind said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, Barry F. said:

    I tried looking up the number for NAACP (the National Association for the Advancement of Cracker People), but i just couldnt find it.

    I looked up NOW (National Organization of Whites)…no dice there either.

    The only once left would be the ACLU (American Cracker Liberties Union)…but, as you can imagine, again…no number listed in 411.

  72. #72
    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:57 am, abstractmind said:

    *ones, not once…sorry, was on the phone!

  73. #73
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, Barry F. said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:57 am, abstractmind said:

    ROFLMAO :lol:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:57 am, abstractmind said:

    With whom? None of them had listings. ;-)

  74. #74
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    # 69
    Your come-backs are what I was talking about in #57!

    Great!

  75. #75
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:15 pm, abstractmind said:

    nice CS :)

    yeah, having trouble finding those groups. looks like we’ll have to make one then!

    BTW…if people enter our Cracker groups, and they’re jewish…do we have distinctions between leaven and unleaven crackers?

  76. #76
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, shooter said:

    3 AM post Michelle?
    ME TOO. Beckels lies and bullcrap kept me up last night too, I was sooo mad.
    What an outright loser lying pol hack.
    He set this whole thing up, and WE called it the day he did it.

    I just dont get it, why the Alan Colmes and Beckels of the world are given impunity when they lie outright AND GET CAUGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    If this is what the Obama candidacy means and the future of the Democratic party….whoa, we’re in deep doo doo.
    Cause the MSM is not just compliant, they are actively engaged in the deception of the American people…and the world.

    BECKLE, YOU SIR ARE THE CRACKER!

    FOX NEWS, this is your LAST WARNING….if you keep these guys, Below the Belt BECKEL & Spitter GERALDO, you will BE CNN’d or MSNBC’d real soon.

  77. #77
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    ab- (-: :-)

    I like both types of crackers.

  78. #78
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    Bob Beckel said:

    And what has happened here, particularly against Barack Obama, whether it’s his middle name, whether it’s the fact that he’s black, purely racist and bigoted stuff

    Fact check:
    His middle name is Hussein.
    He’s black.
    His father was a Muslim.
    For 20 years he went to a church based on the racist ideology of black liberation theology.
    He was rated by the National Journal as having the Senate’s most liberal voting record for 2007.

    The only racism and bigotry I see in the above facts is in Obama’s church … “FORMER church”, a phrase you’ll no doubt hear from Obama’s lips many time in the next 6 months. How disingenuous. It’s the equivalent of having a 20 year marriage with 4 kids, then having the Catholic church annul the marriage as if it never happened.

    Smears designed to appeal to emotion. Is that more likely a tactic of the left or the right? Can’t decide, can’t decide …

  79. #79
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    My satelite has been having trouble picking up some stations-FOX being one-I was upset - at first-now-I find I don’t miss the supposed “fair and balanced”.

  80. #80
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, coffee260 said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, Barry F. said:

    Are you seeking any reparations?

    Why, you offering?

  81. #81
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, abstractmind said:

    This was just on the news at ABC (Abstract Broadcasting Crackers) Network:

    Nabisco Expecting Higher Profits Due To Political Guffaw:

    Nabisco spokeswoman Gina Preston relayed during a press conference today that due to political commentary over the weekend, that stock for the company is expected to “shoot through da roofz”.

    The impromptu press conference was in response to comments made this weekend by Bob Beckle, notably seen on Fox News, but also an international spokesman for Nike, and their “Foot in Your Mouth” edible sneakers.

    “We completely feel that this revitalized interest in our products will certainly affect the bottom line”, Preston said. “We are working hard with other Democratic talking heads to get other such products as Ritz and Triscuits. If we can get someone from Mr. Obama’s camp to call someone a “Triscuit Head” instead of a “biscuit head”, then we can certainly get exposure that way.”

    Critics of the unusual publicity were quick to point out that only pinheads would use such racist language, and that we should just ignore the source, rather than use it to generate revenue or promote more crackers.

    ***sorry, lunch meeting, have to cut it short***

  82. #82
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    #76 said:It’s the equivalent of having a 20 year marriage with 4 kids, then having the Catholic church annul the marriage as if it never happened.

    A similar event actually happened here-in LA—R. Riordan (sp) mayor….

  83. #83
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Didn’t the term ‘cracker’ come from those who cracked a whip over the backs of others?? Good heavens, my forebears were so poor they probably had whips cracked over their backs. Therefore, if I’m a caucasian of Scots-Irish descent, and I’m not a ‘cracker’, what am I?

    (American)

  84. #84
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, Southpaw said:

    The ironic thing about the Michelle Obama rumor: It would’t have nearly the weight it currently has if it weren’t for the rantings of Wright and Pfleger. They created this monster.

  85. #85
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Can black people be crackers too?

  86. #86
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, terrig said:

    30, I once had a student named Marlo who was from WV. Her father was in the Navy and they were black. They loved country music and called themselves “rednecks” and “rye crackers” all the time.
    Bob Beckell is a clown. Why Fox keeps putting this idiot on tv instead of back on the shelf where he belongs amazes me.

  87. #87
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, max said:

    One thing I find interetsing about Whiteygate is that we now have a bunch of lefties basically pre-emptively trying to deflate it, i.e. “even if she did say Whitey it’s no big deal, bla bla bla…”

    What that clearly means is that it’s by no mean inconceivable to anyone that Babymamabama could have said it. Which to my thinking, makes her a racist and unfit for First Lady consideration. Period.

  88. #88
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Bob Beckel,and the MSM are turning into the Jerry Springer, and Geraldo show. Now what’s rumored to be in that vault?

  89. #89
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, its vintage duh said:

    FYI, if you post a comment in ABC’s comments section, don’t tell them to google “Larry Johnson and whitey” because it censors “whitey”.

  90. #90
    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, shooter said:

    Therefore, if I’m a caucasian of Scots-Irish descent, and I’m not a ‘cracker’, what am I?
    (American)

    A HUMBLE AMERICAN.

  91. #91
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, wighttrasch said:

    shooter; I’m glad we got that out of the way! whew. Can we all go back to helping Michelle O’s kids?!

  92. #92
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, Barry F. said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 12:24 pm, coffee260 said:

    On June 16th, 2008 at 11:51 am, Barry F. said:

    Are you seeking any reparations?

    Why, you offering?

    Nope. I’m wanting to jump on the bandwagon too. I wanna get my fair share of the reparations money.

    How disenfranchised and stigmatized do have to be or pretend? ;-)

  93. #93
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, Barry F. said:

    Even though Jay Carney can’t seem to muster the ability to more accurately report on the supposed Michelle Obama “whitey” video, Karen Tumulty on her section of the same Time blog.

    Tumulty, at least, notes “Jim Geraghty of National Review Online, a conservative who has been one of the leaders in debunking the rumor…” and cites his writing on the topic and how it “was picked up on the other side of the ideological divide* by Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld…”

    Should we consider that progress on the Swampland’s part?

  94. #94
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, Barry F. said:

    That should have been that “Karen Tumulty, on her section of the same Time blog does a little better job from what I see” in the first paragraph of #92.

    Typing too darned fast again. Sorry.

  95. #95
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Terrig,
    I just wanted to make sure I understood. Beckel’s the poster boy for liberal tolerance. There it is in black and white.

  96. #96
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    I’m thinking lawsuit against Beckel and Fox News if they don’t fire him.

    Much like the Rutgers women’s basketball team member that suffered emotional distress over a racial slur heard over the radio I feel Beckel’s comments have caused me great distress.

    NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!
    NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!
    NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!

    COMING SOON… THE FIRST EVER MILLION CRACKER MARCH!

  97. #97
    On June 16th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, novaculus said:

    Thought I would share my letter to ABC:

    “FTA:

    “Google “Michelle Obama” and the term “whitey” and you’ll find conservative bloggers claiming a video shows her using the racially tinged term at Trinity Church. No tape has ever surfaced.”

    Its really great to know that the folks at ABC can pry their lips off the Obamessiah’s wife’s ass long enough to publish smears of their own. Guess if you’re going to lie, might as well go for the Big Lie.

    That rumor was started by liberal blogger and Hillary fan David Johnson. Five minutes of research proves it. Many conservative bloggers refused to believe it, and said so from the beginning. ABC’s blanket condemnation of conservatives here proves that it can smear right along with the best.

    Every time I think my contempt for the MSM in general, and ABC in particular, cannot be expanded you do something to prove me wrong. This story exhibits a complete abdication of journalistic integrity and responsibility, and a willingness to prostitute the profession and the truth in the service of crass political agendas. Everyone involved or responsible should be ashamed.

  98. #98
    On June 16th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Chief RZ said:

    These are some of the same smear liars that double-spoke the Democratis campaigns Willie Horton smear.

  99. #99
    On June 16th, 2008 at 2:07 pm, right_on said:

    This issue is just more reason why rational people should avoid membership in the Democrat Party. For the life of me, I cannot think of one positive aspect of DP membership.

    This group of megalomanics (”a psychiatric disorder in which the patient experiences delusions of great power and importance,” will do anything, say anything, and imply anything in order to have power over the masses.

    This implication of a rumor, perpetuated by a recovering alcoholic talking head of the Democratic Party is yet another misdirection, all for “the cause of righteousness and democracy.”

    They talk about fighting corruption, while at the same time turning a blind eye to it within their own ranks. They talk about openness, but only if it exposes their “truths” about the opposing party. They talk about ethics, like they practice ethical behavior. They talk about freedom of speech, but want to deny that right to those with dissenting viewpoints. They talk about the saving and preserving the environment, while raping it, yet point fingers at others first. They talk about security, but are the party whose leaders talk with tyrants. They talk about the lack of adequate education, a system they have controlled for over forty years. They talk about equality, and are the first to point out that a person is black, female, a victim of the system (they controlled for how long?), rich, poor, you name it. They talk about race relations, but voted whole-heartedly against the Equal Rights Amendment, and they have the nerve to call conservatives “racists.”

    This is the Party of Oral Partisanship…P.O.O.P. All they can do is talk, and when nothing gets done, they create an opportunity to do what? Yes, that’s right! Talk about Republican villiany!

    How many years will we have to keep hearing the same old story, with new packaging? With all the “social programs” instituted by liberals the last four or five decades, we should have had all those “problems” fixed by now. Instead, we have ever more “victims” added to the “helpless” lists every year, with no end in sight. For them, personal responsibility is an unattainable aspiration.

  100. #100
    On June 16th, 2008 at 2:22 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Just checked out the AOL story/poll referenced in post #54. What a biased joke! (perfect for lgm!)

    To wit:

    Historians belonging to both parties offered a litany of historical comparisons that give little hope to the Republican. Several saw Barack Obama’s prospects as the most promising for a Democrat since Roosevelt trounced Hoover in 1932.

    “This should be an overwhelming Democratic victory,” said Allan Lichtman, an American University presidential historian who ran in a Maryland Democratic senatorial primary in 2006. Lichtman, whose forecasting model has correctly predicted the last six presidential popular vote winners, predicts that this year, “Republicans face what have always been insurmountable historical odds.” His system gives McCain a score on par with Jimmy Carter’s in 1980.

    Carter equals McCain?!?! While McCain has his faults, you cannot compare him to the inarguably worst president in modern times, who singlehandedly (well, with a Dem controlled Congress anyway) almost completely ruined the U.S. economy. Note Lichtman’s credentials too. No bias there.

    “McCain shouldn’t win it,” said presidential historian Joan Hoff, a professor at Montana State University and former president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency. She compared McCain’s prospects to those of Hubert Humphrey, whose 1968 loss to Richard Nixon resulted in large part from the unpopularity of sitting Democratic president Lyndon Johnson.

    “It is one of the worst political environments for the party in power since World War II,” added Alan Abramowitz, a professor of public opinion and the presidency at Emory University. His forecasting model — which factors in gross domestic product, whether a party has completed two terms in the White House and net presidential approval rating — gives McCain about the same odds as Adlai Stevenson in 1952 and Carter in 1980 — both of whom were handily defeated in elections that returned the presidency to the previously out-of-power party. “It would be a pretty stunning upset if McCain won,” Abramowitz said.

    Again the desperate attempt to compare McCain with Carter. Adlai Stevenson? Really!

    What’s more, Republicans have held the presidency for all but 12 years since the South became solidly Republican in the realignment of 1968 — which is among the longest runs with one party dominating in American history. “These things go in cycles,” said presidential historian Robert Dallek, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. “The public gets tired of one approach to politics. There is always a measure of optimism in this country, so they turn to the other party.”

    Yeah, I feel really inspired by the exuberant optimism of the lefties. Doom and gloom and no plan for success, either in Iraq or economically, unless you think raising taxes in a recession is good economic policy.

    But the biggest obstacle in McCain’s path may be running in the same party as the most unpopular president America has had since at least the advent of modern polling. Only Harry Truman and Nixon — both of whom were dogged by unpopular wars abroad and political scandals at home — have been nearly as unpopular in their last year in office, and both men’s parties lost the presidency in the following election.

    If you take out the misdirection and hype by the MSM, could Bush actually be more unpopular than Carter? Are the interest rates exceeding 20%? Are there long gas lines? How about that misery index? Unemployment anywhere near Carter levels of a max of 7.6% (he handed that off to Reagan, who reduced that more than any other president).

    Though the Democratic-controlled Congress is nearly as unpopular as the president, Lichtman says the Democrats’ 2006 midterm wins resemble the midterm congressional gains of the out-party in 1966 and 1974, which both preceded a retaking of the White House two years later.

    Nearly as unpopular? Last time I looked, the popularity of the Democrat Congress was lower than the president’s.

    One of the few bright spots historians noted is that the public generally does not view McCain as a traditional Republican. And, as Republicans frequently point out, McCain is not an incumbent.

    Masters of understatement. Some question all of McCain’s conservative credentials. But to these guys, not being a Republican is a “bright spot.” Nah, no bias here.

    “Open-seat elections are somewhat different, so the referendum aspect is somewhat muted,” said James Campbell, a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo who specializes in campaigns and elections.

    “McCain would be in much better shape if Bush’s approval rating were at 45 to 50 percent,” Campbell continued. “But the history is that in-party candidates are not penalized or rewarded to the same degree as incumbents.”

    That is the CYA statement.

    Campbell still casts McCain as the underdog. But he said McCain might have more appeal to moderates than Obama if the electorate decides McCain is “center right” while Obama is “far left.” Democrats have been repeatedly undone when their nominee was viewed as too liberal, and even as polls show a rise in the number of self-identified Democrats, there has been no corresponding increase in the number of self-identified liberals.

    Well, if we were allowed to mention Obama’s record, people would realize that he is far left of Ted Kennedy.

    Campbell also notes that McCain may benefit from the Democratic divisions that were on display in the primary, as Republicans did in 1968, when Democratic divisions over the war in Vietnam dogged Humphrey and helped hand Nixon victory.

    If Hillary has anything to say about it. She would be able to go after McCain in 2012 but not an incumbent Obama.

    Still, many historians remain extremely skeptical about McCain’s prospects. “I can’t think of an upset where the underdog faced quite the odds that McCain faces in this election,” said Sidney Milkis, a professor of presidential politics at the University of Virginia. Even “Truman didn’t face as difficult a political context as McCain.”

    Odds that would not be nearly so great if the press could tear their eyes away from Obama’s jean covered crotch.

Comment pages: [1] 2 »

You must be logged in to post a comment.

It’s beginning to look a lot like Hillmas

December 1, 2008 11:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Billary is comin’ to town.

Obama wants his Blackberry back

November 26, 2008 09:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Keeping in touch with the little people.

Obama keeps Bush’s Defense Secretary

November 25, 2008 08:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

121 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

David Brooks’ Ivy League ejaculations

November 21, 2008 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

112 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Smarty pants. Panting smarty.