About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Discuss: “We would have loved to knock his head off, too, but we had nothing to knock it off with.”

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 18, 2008 02:09 PM

I can’t get this story out of my head and heart.

How do you feel about the quote by the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department’s spokesman at the very end of the piece?

“It sounds like there was nothing anyone could have done.”

Nothing?!?!

***

I’m reminded of eleven-year-old Xochil Garcia, a brave little girl who rejected the idea that there was nothing she could have done to stop a 6′2″ attacker. If more of the adult witnesses who outnumbered the monstrous Sergio Casian Aguiar had adopted Xochil’s attitude, an innocent two-year-old boy might still be alive today.

First rule for instilling a culture of self-defense: Be prepared.

Posted in: Guns

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Yes, Lady, but You Watched Him Kill that Boy… | The Sundries Shack
  2. Red Alerts
  3. Opposite ends of the parental story, both equal more government | BitsBlog
  4. Sister Toldjah
  5. The DaleyGator » Blog Archive » Outrage of the year!
  6. Michelle Malkin » His name was Axel Casian
  7. Everybody Reacts Differently… « Competitive Intellect

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, rightisright said:

    A perfect example why I have a CCP…I’d have shot him without a 2nd thought. By any chance is the killer an illegal alien?

  2. #102
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:37 pm, John Ansell said:

    Rightisright #100, conflicting reports. I heard he’s illegal and heard he’s legal.

  3. #103
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:43 pm, vickisoup said:

    Oh no, please don’t turn this to a discussion of his immigration status. Please. I beg you. Not today, and not on this story.

  4. #104
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:43 pm, atheling said:

    One of the witnesses, Deborah McKain of nearby Crows Landing, said she was the first to pull up to the beating scene with her boyfriend, a volunteer fire chief who is 52, as well as her 20-year-old son, her son’s wife and her son’s male friend. They called 911 at 10:13 p.m., police said.

    So we see 2 grown women and 3 grown men pull up to the scene and they don’t even attempt to stop this guy? Hell, that’s five adults against one. What is wrong with the picture here?

    And not a tire iron in the vehicle she drove?

  5. #105
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, John Ansell said:

    Noted Vickisoup, I’m using the other thread for that.

  6. #106
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, vickisoup said:

    Bless you, John, thank you.

  7. #107
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, Lindsay said:

    I think JT has the answer with the tire iron…

    One thing to keep in mind, if a few people did try to help (how much has not been reported): if this creep was on drugs like PCP and/or was psychotic (getting the demons out of the poor baby) then it may have been impossible for one person to bring him down. I have seen four burly medics and security guards struggle to get psycotics in leather retraints in an emergency department. So it maybe was like that for the bystanders?

  8. #108
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, FruNobulux said:

    Faced with the prospect of hating myself for my cowardice for the rest of my life, I like to think I would have made an effort to intervene.

    That being said, it’s always easy to imagine all sorts of heroics, but when you’re in the situtation, it can be different. Not that I’m excusing anybody, but I wasn’t there, and don’t know exactly what happened.

    I was in a bank once when it got robbed. The robber was out the door before I even knew what was going on. So much for my Chuck Norris fantasies. Real life, as I found out, isn’t like TV.

    So, while in this tragic situation there is but a sliver of doubt, I believe we should extend the benefit of that sliver to those witnesses who will probably be haunted by their inaction for a long time.

  9. #109
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    Goes to show, most Americans these days are gutless PsOS. I think the schools, and this sissy PC culture are to blame. I have no doubt about what I would have done to this animal.I would have walked up, told him to freeze, and if he didn’t, Shot him in the face; And to hell with the Cal. courts. Sometimes you have to think about more than your own ass.

  10. #110
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, vickisoup said:

    There’s no dirt or tire irons in the ER.
    Besides, thanks to hacks like John Edwards, medics aren’t allowed to kick a crazy man in the crotch or bash him over the head or scratch his eyes out in order to subdue him, because they may get sued.
    Thank God I am allowed to do so, and I don’t care if I get sued.

  11. #111
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, rightisright said:

    John, tks for the info.
    vickisoup, wasn’t trying to turn the thread into anything more than it is, a horrendous happening. I can’t be curious and ask a legitimate question?

  12. #112
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, docflash said:

    Either him or me or both of us would have went down.No way I could have stopped myself.

  13. #113
    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:59 pm, jt3151 said:

    I agree. Nowadays, there’s more to this story than just “Kitty Genovese” syndrome, there’s the genuine reality that if a bystander had shot this animal, that bystander could very well be looking at prosecution for “vigilanteism”.

    What an absolute chickens*** excuse! Are you really suggesting that these cowards stood idly by for fear of prosecution?

    There were at least three grown men and no indication that the murderer had a weapon.

  14. #114
    On June 18th, 2008 at 5:22 pm, John Ansell said:

    jt3151 said:, I don’t think he had a weapon because he would have used it on the child and/or the police. Looking at the picture of the punk, it doesn’t look like it would take much effort to knock the snot out of him.

  15. #115
    On June 18th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, tuffy said:

    Oh. My. Unimaginable.

    My sympathies to the poor baby’s mother. I hope she has loving, supportive family members and friends to help her through this.

  16. #116
    On June 18th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, John Ansell said:

    JT3151, According to this account the animal was unarmed.

    Robinson said that Aguiar spoke calmly when he said he was beating the “demons” out of the boy. At one point Aguiar asked Robinson for a knife.

  17. #117
    On June 18th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, mom2jack said:

    After reading this horrible story on Monday, I was ready to condemn the witnesses. Actually, I still do, but I’ve never been in that kind of situation. Then I read about the first people on the scene:

    One of the witnesses, Deborah McKain of nearby Crows Landing, said she was the first to pull up to the beating scene with her boyfriend, a volunteer fire chief who is 52, as well as her 20-year-old son, her son’s wife and her son’s male friend. They called 911 at 10:13 p.m., police said.

    Isn’t this a person TRAINED to run TOWARD dangerous situations to help citizens? Plus the fact it’s 5 people against 1, I still can’t believe it. In some articles I’ve read people said, “It was obvious the child was already dead” so they continued to watch him kick the baby 100 TIMES!!! I’ve also read that the first guy there had the presence of mind to turn on the hazard lights on the truck? And the assailant actually helped him? So why, at that point, wouldn’t someone scoop up the baby and run? Even if he was already obviously gone, at least he should die in someone’s arms, not like roadkill. I look at my 3 year old who is so TINY and it just makes me sick.

  18. #118
    On June 18th, 2008 at 5:51 pm, ezupirate75 said:
  19. #119
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, Azygos said:

    Isn’t this a person TRAINED to run TOWARD dangerous situations to help citizens?

    Exactly.

    I’ve had to take down druggies, drunks, psychotic people more times than I can count and without being able to use any kind of weapon. Its not that hard and in a pinch I could teach five adults how to do it in about 10 seconds.

  20. #120
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, nyc123me said:

    I know exactly why bystanders didn’t act - because they would get sued for assault, without a doubt. This has happened many many many times in similar situations (albeit not as extreme). There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that would happen - under US law you can act in self defense, but you cannot act to defend someone else without risking ending up in jail for assault, and they way judges are lately, you can almost guarantee they’d happily send you away for it.

    The other option in my mind is that IF you decide to act, then be prepared to kill the offender so they won’t sue you.

  21. #121
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, nyc123me said:

    BTW, I believe the quote at the end ““It sounds like there was nothing anyone could have done.” was meaning that nobody would have foreseen this violent episode before it happened, not the there was nothing any of the bystanders could have done.

  22. #122
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:18 pm, Lindsay said:

    Did the story say how long the adults stood there doing nothing?

    I agree, it does not make sense to me that they did not overpower/distract this animal to the point that he had to drop the baby.

  23. #123
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:18 pm, Lindsay said:
    Did the story say how long the adults stood there doing nothing?

    McKain was one of the witnesses cowards.

    Over the next seven minutes, McKain said, Aguiar kicked his son at least 100 times

    If you read through many of the 450+ posts on the linked news story you can see the direct results of liberalism in action by which types of comments get the thumbs up and which get the thumbs down.

    If they want to live in a fantasy world where dialing 911 is their only duty they had better be prepared for a lot more of this to happen to them because even with the fastest police car responding immediately to a call they are not going to get there in time to save your life in a life and death situation. It is all in your hands, if those hands are empty and too scared to do anything because the society around you teaches you to submit rather than defend then you reap what you sow.

  24. #124
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, guerro said:

    The thing that sticks out in my mind is how willing these people were to be witnesses, standing there watching what had to be one of the most gruesome acts they have ever seen in their lives. If they weren’t going to try to intervene and somehow try to stop the guy, why they heck would they even stay around. Call 911 and continue on your way. Pathetic. But this is what Stanislaus County is, the armpit and butt-hole of California.

    The earlier poster’s comment about them being sheep is right on target. They are sheep that stand around waiting to be the next victim. From stolen cars to identity theft, from burglaries to drugs and gangs, that county is one ripe crap hole. Anyone in law enforcement working in that area, who deals with the cesspool that is Modesto/Ceres/Turlock and outlying smaller cities will confirm my statements.

    Its just a shame that such an innocent life had to be taken, yet again, by another piece of trash resident of that county.

  25. #125
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

    A real man would have done something. My father , God rest his soul, saw 3 guys trying to steal a car in front of our apartmet building in Los Angeles. He had no gun, just a bibi-gun (sp?) and he went out with it anyway. When the jerks saw it, they ran. I understand women not doing anything, but the fireman with his adult son and the son’s male friend? I don’t understand at all. That is why I carry a stunt gun, nowadays you cannot rely on anyone to help you. We don’t live in the era of John Wayne anymore. I will be studying soon for my concealed weapon’s permit. Too bad I cannot take with me when visting Cali.

  26. #126
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

    It’s been a while since law school, but I thought even in CA you could intervene to defend the LIFe of a third person. I am almost sure of that. Any criminal attorneys out there? OR ones who actually remember crim law?

  27. #127
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:45 pm, atheling said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, nyc123me said:

    I know exactly why bystanders didn’t act - because they would get sued for assault, without a doubt. This has happened many many many times in similar situations (albeit not as extreme). There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that would happen - under US law you can act in self defense, but you cannot act to defend someone else without risking ending up in jail for assault, and they way judges are lately, you can almost guarantee they’d happily send you away for it.

    The other option in my mind is that IF you decide to act, then be prepared to kill the offender so they won’t sue you.

    Now there you’re wrong. There is case law which allows for killing/shooting in the defense of someone else, as well as oneself. The danger would be using too much force, i.e., pumping the guy with 100 rounds, for instance.

    I doubt there is a jury in the country who would convict someone of murder or assault if they used reasonable force in order to stop the murder of that child.

    In fact, I would bet that if any prosecutor saw that reasonable force was used, the case would be dismissed.

    Let’s not stray into fantasy here. Do some research. No prosecutor in his right mind would pursue such a case when it involves reasonable force, and defending a child’s life. We do have laws and statutes which protect citizens from prosecution in cases like these.

  28. #128
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:47 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 4:30 pm, vickisoup said:

    And to Jet Jaguar, yes, you can know for sure what you would do. You can and should plan for such a hideous, albeit unlikely, event that requires you to care less about yourself than you absolutely must care for another, particularly a helpless child. You can learn some basic self-defense techniques.
    An attitude of self-doubt, however, will never prevail.

    vickisoup, self doubt and failing to plan ahead are not what I’m pointing out. I’m talking about in the shock of the moment, what would a person do? No time to think… just to react. Anyone who says they **know** what they would do is fooling themself, because every situation is different.

    By your response to me, you seem to assume that I’m admitting to indecision and inability to act. Note that I said — I’d like to believe that I’d do the “right” thing –. I didn’t say that I wouldn’t act. In fact, I’m a martial artist in-training and was worried that I may over-react and use too much force, in a given situation.

  29. #129
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I do carry my CC friend “Snuffy”, with me more these days… wearing Hawaiian shirts is a bonus … but in MN the season isn’t that long. I have had an opportunity to stop a beating in front of my VFW a few years ago and was able to get into the dust up with extreme prejudice to the attacker. The victim was an 82 year old gentleman.. I agree with an earlier poster who said, it doesn’t take “courage”… it takes “will”. Oh, and the fact that four or five people could have stopped him earlier but didn’t? That’s just disgusting. No man can take on 5 people…. not even a Marine, and if one says he/she can, they lie.

  30. #130
    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:50 pm, zorro said:

    People who are second-guessing her and her family can “never know until they’re in that situation,” McKain said. “We would have loved to knock his head off, too, but we had nothing to knock it off with.

    Own a gun. Shoot the bastard. At least try to save the child. This story has sickened me.

  31. #131
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, supersean said:

    I see many gung-ho comments talking about how they would have and if they were there but the fact of the matter is that bystanders did try to intervene but were fought off.

    It is a tragedy but not the fault of California, the public school system or Oprah…. it was a crazed lunatic who was hell bent on killing a kid.

    BTW in my personal experience one of the best self protection you can car in your car is the Club

  32. #132
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:15 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, supersean said:

    I see many gung-ho comments talking about how they would have and if they were there but the fact of the matter is that bystanders did try to intervene but were fought off.

    It is a tragedy but not the fault of California, the public school system or Oprah…. it was a crazed lunatic who was hell bent on killing a kid.

    Typical Liberal Response.

    We reading the same article, because the SFGate article I read linked above said this genius:

    But what was nearly as stunning for many people was that none of the motorists and their passengers who stopped and saw the attack tried to tackle the man.

    Or does “forcefully arguing” count as “intervening” to you liberals?

    She said her boyfriend, Dan Robinson, forcefully argued with Aguiar in an effort to get him to stop, but that he would not. At one point, another woman, 23-year-old Lisa Mota, pulled up in her car, but stayed inside.

    And only a fool would argue that the political nature of the anti-gun and anti-self-defense and “just call 911 and be submissive to your attacker” mentality hasn’t poisoned whole sections of society into sheeple.

    I’ve personally stood up an armed attacker who broke into my apartment while I was home. You know what scared him off without a fight? I think it might have had something to do with the .45 pointed at his face and my yelling “drop the weapon”.

  33. #133
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:33 pm, prendad said:

    I carry a large caliber high-powered handgun at all times. I have gone over and over hundreds of scenarios in my mind that would require its use. In situations like this, firearms make the attacker and I equal. I would not have hesitated to use my weapon to the best of my ability to protect this poor innocent defenseless child. What a shame.

  34. #134
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:43 pm, daleinamerica said:

    Any bets that this guy was an ILLEGAL ALIEN? Do we know?

  35. #135
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:15 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Typical Liberal Response.

    Or does “forcefully arguing” count as “intervening” to you liberals?

    Grizzly,

    Leave it to Malkin to post the the version that she can politicize. Here a couple of other stories from the local media, regarding the intervention:

    Here
    Robinson, a volunteer fire chief in Crows Landing, and at least one other man tried to pull Aguiar away from the boy, but the suspect kept attacking the toddler.

    Here
    “They tried to intervene and get involved, but their efforts really didn’t have an effect. The suspect was engaged in what he was doing. He just pushed them off and went back to it.”

  36. #136
    On June 18th, 2008 at 7:47 pm, Socratease said:

    I just don’t understand the bystander’s inaction. I was in an almost identical situation, except it was three teenagers kicking an old man on the ground. I intervened because, as scared as I was (and my knees were visibly shaking), the thought of living with myself if I’d walked away was even worse.

    But that’s my personal choice. As the police spokesman said, the witnesses did exactly what authorities in gun-restricted jurisdictions tell people to do: Call the cops, let the pros handle it, don’t be a hero. And the death of innocents is the inevitable result.

  37. #137
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:02 pm, Texhoma said:

    Why the shock that liberals believe in, and endorse, COWARDICE.

  38. #138
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    TOS
    and what is missing in the other reports that you quoted?

    I’ll tell you, no narrative on how the scumbag was debilitated from doing any more….

  39. #139
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:26 pm, John Ansell said:

    Theotherside: The attacker asked the coward for a knife. Check my post #115. He was not armed and this guy just talked with the animal?

    Give me a break. I’m glad they shot and killed that loser because people like you would be calling for him to go to the mental hospital rather than to the gas chamber.

  40. #140
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Cars are pretty intimidating>>>especially when they’re being used as a defensive weapon….
    Why couldn’t any of the bystanders give the _ _ _ a “nudge” with their vehicle?

    The police use horses to back mobs off.

  41. #141
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, atheling said:

    The guy was KICKING the child. If they used a car, they run the risk of driving over the child.

  42. #142
    On June 18th, 2008 at 8:58 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    atheling –I had thought that when this was first posted–then –after many hours–it came to me that a vehicle could have been postioned from behind the perp. —since the male and female by-standers were intimidated.

    I guess I’m just non-plussed that several men could just watched. As a female –I know I would not have–from experience.

  43. #143
    On June 18th, 2008 at 9:24 pm, vickisoup said:

    Hey, The Other Side:
    None of your examples change a thing; not a thing, about the problems we, the brave, think of they, the cowards.
    MM didn’t pick and choose. There is no spin that anyone can put on this hideous story to make it any more or any less an indictment on the inaction of the other adults.

  44. #144
    On June 18th, 2008 at 9:29 pm, mojoe said:

    The police would have had to have shot me to get me off that piece of crap.

    May his soul burn long and slowly.

  45. #145
    On June 18th, 2008 at 9:43 pm, almeehan said:

    One of the basic problems is the conditioning of our population. The justice system has become so perverted and lawyers & judges so obtuse regarding the stability of our society, people have an instilled fear of getting involved. There have been so many cases where decent people end up in jail, fined, sued, etc because they did the right thing. Lawyers and judges have become the bane of our society to the point where all the criminals, psychopaths, misfits, etc have all the benefits and rights while the core of society is imprisoned by fear. Look at the recent Supreme court decision. Evil at best, to undermine our nation.

  46. #146
    On June 18th, 2008 at 9:49 pm, guerro said:

    “They tried to intervene and get involved, but their efforts really didn’t have an effect. The suspect was engaged in what he was doing. He just pushed them off and went back to it.”

    Wow, here’s a novel idea. PICK UP THE CHILD AND DRIVE AWAY TO THE HOSPITAL WITH IT. But I guess they were just in too much shock and frozen by fear to think of that one? Pffft. Give me a break.

  47. #147
    On June 18th, 2008 at 9:52 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    I will admit that I only skimmed the comments here, but some are very disturbing. “Freezing up”? C’mon people, if you are a parent, there is no such thing as freezing up! I personally would have nothing nice to say about those who stood by and watched this happen. “He may have had something in his pocket….wah wah wah”. What if it were YOUR child? Would you let something this heinous happen to your child because you were afraid they “had something in their pocket”? There is NO excuse for this! NONE!!!

  48. #148
    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:04 pm, vickisoup said:

    UberInfidel67, my bet is that many commenters here will do a long, deep self-examination about their own readiness to handle a crisis. And in the meantime, I don’t want to be on an airplane with any of them if some bad person tries to take over the plane. I need me some action heroes!

  49. #149
    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, JT said:

    Subdue… Hell I’d have tried to take his head off with my softball bat.

  50. #150
    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, uhangtight said:

    i have often wondered what i would do if i saw a man beating on a woman or a child. i have imagined myself grabbing various instruments depending upon my situation, if in a car grabbing the tire jack and swinging. i have practiced such a scenario over in my mind as i cannot stand injustice towards the weaker. and as a young pre-teen witnessed a man beating his wife/girl friend in an alley as i was passing across the street. back then however various men came to her rescue. this incident so enraged me that i have carried this anger to be prepared now that i am an adult just in case. i would hope that i would have reacted as such with this man if i had happened across his path at the time of his murderous act. it does seem to me that a fire chief should have enough training and practice to handle an out of control person. so, either the child already was apprently dead when he arrived or this guy stopped to think of the consequences of his actions before acting, which caused inaction. how sad and may God Bless the Soul of that little child. God loves the little children. He wants us to care and love them as He does, too.

    I don’t care what triggered the man to go insane. it doesn’t matter what drove him to this selfish act, just glad he got immediate justice. hopefully, the police officer will not have any unnecessary repercussions from liberal morons.

  51. #151
    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    RE: #148 I hope so because this is just so sad.

  52. #152
    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, right_on said:

    Now apply that to this incident; all the California liberals stood by watching this dictator, Aguiar, stomp the helpless toddler.

    Odds are that since Stanislaus County votes Republican by about 60% to 40%, the bystanders weren’t all liberals.

  53. #153
    On June 18th, 2008 at 11:12 pm, NewOrleansLady said:

    Being a female, I realize that I may not have been strong enough to overpower this lunatic… but I can say with certainty that I would have grabbed that poor baby and shielded him with my own body… or hauled ass with him in my arms.

  54. #154
    On June 18th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, Coregis said:

    Amazingly, I’m with Rusty. I know how I have reacted in these situations, and I know that I have done some damage. However, I’m probably half brain dead and an Eagle Scout to boot, so what would you expect??? However, there are too many sheep out there that expect someone else to do the dirty work. What was the Orwell quote: Men sleep better because someone is willing to inflict harm on their behalf???

    BTW, I still have the scar, would do it again in a heartbeat. But I’m different - people with kids, etc., would have different conclusions. They just have to live with themselves…..

  55. #155
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:12 am, guerro said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 6:14 pm, nyc123me said:

    I know exactly why bystanders didn’t act - because they would get sued for assault, without a doubt. This has happened many many many times in similar situations (albeit not as extreme). There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that would happen - under US law you can act in self defense, but you cannot act to defend someone else without risking ending up in jail for assault, and they way judges are lately, you can almost guarantee they’d happily send you away for it.

    The other option in my mind is that IF you decide to act, then be prepared to kill the offender so they won’t sue you.

    It is this scared, misinformed mentality that causes situations like this. The media scares people into inaction with wild stories about people who are prosecuted after being a good samaritan. Well, guess what? We aren’t talking about “US law” here. this occurred in California and as such falls under California law. California has a good samaritan law just for cases like this. Anyone who is acting in good faith and in defense of another has civil protection via this law.

    Specifically:

    From Division 2.5 of the California Health and Safety Code:

    1799.102. No person who in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency care at the scene of an emergency shall be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission. The scene of an emergency shall not include emergency departments and other places where medical care is usually offered.

    This whole notion of “I didn’t do anything because I feared being sued or prosecuted” is just a cop out. Bottom line is, if you are using the common sense God hopefully gave you, and are acting with the intention of helping someone who is in need of help during and emergency, then who give a flying F whether or not you might get sued or prosecuted? I could live the rest of my life knowing in my mind and heart that I helped, that I did what was right. Nobody would or could take that from me.

  56. #156
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:20 am, guerro said:

    Odds are that since Stanislaus County votes Republican by about 60% to 40%, the bystanders weren’t all liberals.

    Stan county is predominantly Republican. Or at least it was when I left in 2003. People think that all of California is liberal when in actuality its the big cities like SD, LA, SF that make it seem that way. One must remember who moved into the central valley in the 30s,40s,and 50s. It was the religious people from the dust bowl regions who migrated there for work. They brought religion and conservatism with them. The central valley is often, or was at least, thought of as the bible belt of the west. Stan county didn’t even have a strip club or sex shops until a few years before I left. Why? Because the religious right worked their butts off to rid the area of adult book stores. The pressure was so high that a strip club was unheard of. Now, they have it all.

  57. #157
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:33 am, dakine said:

    Terrible, terrible tragedy. Good post Regulus…lot of internet heroes around here. Please atheling. You have no idea what you or anyone else would’ve done in this situation. Save the sanctimonious BS.

  58. #158
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:47 am, warden said:

    I have a problem with acting before thinking in a moment of shock. Sometimes regretting the force of my actions afterwards. I just hope that when I’m in need of help, there’s a little of that in anyone nearby and that these culturally castrated cowards are miles away sipping their soy lattes and listening to NPR.

  59. #159
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:52 am, Christian Soldier said:

    # 145 You’ve about said it all..Tnanks.

  60. #160
    On June 19th, 2008 at 1:27 am, Joemantler said:

    It’s back to the Pacifism society. “Just hand over your wallet! It’s not worth dying for” leads to “Just let the police handle it”. My solution to the 911 hijackers was, rather than take knives from everyone, give everyone a knife!

    We need to stand up!
    Stand up!
    STAND UP!

  61. #161
    On June 19th, 2008 at 2:07 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Caveat: I havent read all the posts up to this point

    There’s a rule with emergency personnel - you save yourself before you save someone else before you save any property. (e.g reach throw row go)

    The points of this story to note are: the ‘rescuers’ didnt have a weapon, didnt know the mental state of the attacker and didnt know if he was armed. And most of the onlookers didnt have emergency training. Plus from the article, if true, the toddler, had already sustained major bodily damage.

    Side story and I am simplifying it: Years ago, two acquaintances showed up on my doorstep at 5AM after a night of drinking. By 5:30, I had already threatened to call the police twice, but I had enough and physically escorted them from my apartment before the police could arrive. I tossed them out the door and each of them thought the other had tossed the other to the ground. One of them had a strange look in his eye and proceeded to give the other one a severe beating before I could pull him away.

    I felt bad that I had not been able to stop the attack soon enough and vowed to not wait to step in sooner again.

    Less than two weeks later, that same person attacked another acquaintance of mine. This time, it took multiple people to separate me from him and a trip to the hospital was incurred. However, for as long as I knew him after that, he never attacked another person again.

    The moral is: Perhaps, these onlookers have learned their lesson and will know what to do for the next emergency.

  62. #162
    On June 19th, 2008 at 3:27 am, Sanddog said:

    I don’t buy the whole “they were frozen in shock while he kicked the two year old child 100 times for seven minutes” line. One of the witnesses admitted she thought the child looked like he was “gone”. Those people stood there while he brutalized that child and watched him and they justified why they should stand back and allow him to continue. That makes them animals as well.

  63. #163
    On June 19th, 2008 at 4:01 am, jroberts said:

    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:47 am, warden said:

    I have a problem with acting before thinking in a moment of shock. Sometimes regretting the force of my actions afterwards. I just hope that when I’m in need of help, there’s a little of that in anyone nearby and that these culturally castrated cowards are miles away sipping their soy lattes and listening to NPR.

    How hard is it to look at a map of California? Those people were miles away. This was in the Central Valley, which is conservative and republican. This county votes Republican at a higher percentage than South Carolina. It’s easy to blame this on ‘latte-sipping liberals;’ unfortunately, it’s also lazy, stupid and unjustified. If this had happened in Berkeley you’d maybe have a point. Seriously, look at a map before making something a political issue when it clearly isn’t.

  64. #164
    On June 19th, 2008 at 4:19 am, Freddy said:

    People seem to forget that their cars/trucks are weapons! Covering a small person or a child, protecting them from that fellow, would not have been too hard to do as they would fit under the front of most cars easily.

    Thinking of doing it in the heat of the moment would be the challenge - till you read this comment anyway!

  65. #165
    On June 19th, 2008 at 5:39 am, graysonret said:

    I must be an oddball, I suppose. I would have reacted instantly. I know that, because once in the early 90s, a guy mugged an old lady in Arlington, Va. while I was driving by. I drove right up and blocked the guy from getting away, tossing him onto the hood of the car. Another good person assisted, driving up in his car. Seems this fool had a long record, and was going in for 15-20 years, this time. I have to admit I felt pretty good about it all. Guess it’s my military teaching…assess and react.

  66. #166
    On June 19th, 2008 at 5:44 am, warden said:

    On June 19th, 2008 at 4:01 am, jroberts said:
    It’s easy to blame this on ‘latte-sipping liberals;’ unfortunately, it’s also lazy, stupid and unjustified.

    Wow. I really struck a nerve with you. I would ask you to reread my post but since you quoted it in your post, maybe you should just reread that. I never mentioned liberal or conservative or any political party.

    I either nailed:
    A) Your sipping beverage of choice
    or
    B) Your most used radio preset

    Sorry for hitting so close to home on that one, but I was just trying to describe a person who is culturally castrated. I would never presume that the absence of moral absolutes in a person’s belief structure would cause them to react slowly when confronted with evil.

  67. #167
    On June 19th, 2008 at 7:53 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    After reading a lot of the posts I still can’t honestly say what I’d actually do. I’m fairly certain that, if I didn’t have a gun or at least another person willing to help me confront the monster, I’d likely not do more than what the firefighter did. I can’t compare this to a mugger or even a road rager because he was obviously a very twisted individual thus making the range of his possible responses to intervention much wider and less predictable.

  68. #168
    On June 19th, 2008 at 8:06 am, abstractmind said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, TheOtherSide said:
    On June 18th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, right_on said:

    Now apply that to this incident; all the California liberals stood by watching this dictator, Aguiar, stomp the helpless toddler.
    Odds are that since Stanislaus County votes Republican by about 60% to 40%, the bystanders weren’t all liberals.

    no, but you can bet the farm that all of them were cowards.

    “we tried to pull him off the kid, but he just pushed them away”…what a load of crap. Did they just gently tug on his shirt, and ask “please sir, stop…”

    You trolls can say “well, you people are awful brave online”…but some people are at least genuine when they say they’d have taken this guy down. Just because you dont have the spine to, or the training, don’t assume everyone else is just like you.

  69. #169
    On June 19th, 2008 at 9:17 am, cpodug said:

    ON SHEEP, WOLVES, AND SHEEPDOGS

    By LTC(RET) Dave Grossman, RANGER, Ph.D., author of “On Killing.”

    Honor never grows old, and honor rejoices the heart of age. It does so
    because honor is, finally, about defending those noble and worthy things
    that deserve defending, even if it comes at a high cost. In our time, that
    may mean social disapproval, public scorn, hardship, persecution, or as
    always, even death itself. The question remains: What is worth defending?
    What is worth dying for? What is worth living for? - William J. Bennett - in
    a lecture to the United States Naval Academy November 24, 1997

    One Vietnam veteran, an old retired colonel, once said this to me:

    “Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle,
    productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident.” This is
    true. Remember, the murder rate is six per 100,000 per year, and the
    aggravated assault rate is four per 1,000 per year. What this means is that
    the vast majority of Americans are not inclined to hurt one another.

    Some estimates say that two million Americans are victims of violent crimes
    every year, a tragic, staggering number, perhaps an all-time record rate of
    violent crime. But there are almost 300 million Americans, which means that
    the odds of being a victim of violent crime is considerably less than one in
    a hundred on any given year. Furthermore, since many violent crimes are
    committed by repeat offenders, the actual number of violent citizens is
    considerably less than two million.

    Thus there is a paradox, and we must grasp both ends of the situation: We
    may well be in the most violent times in history, but violence is still
    remarkably rare. This is because most citizens are kind, decent people who
    are not capable of hurting each other, except by accident or under extreme
    provocation. They are sheep.

    I mean nothing negative by calling them sheep. To me it is like the pretty,
    blue robin’s egg. Inside it is soft and gooey but someday it will grow into
    something wonderful. But the egg cannot survive without its hard blue shell.
    Police officers, soldiers, and other warriors are like that shell, and
    someday the civilization they protect will grow into something wonderful.?
    For now, though, they need warriors to protect them from the predators.

    “Then there are the wolves,” the old war veteran said, “and the wolves feed
    on the sheep without mercy.” Do you believe there are wolves out there who
    will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil
    men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget
    that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in
    denial.

    “Then there are sheepdogs,” he went on, “and I’m a sheepdog. I live to
    protect the flock and confront the wolf.”

    If you have no capacity for violence then you are a healthy productive
    citizen, a sheep. If you have a capacity for violence and no empathy for
    your fellow citizens, then you have defined an aggressive sociopath, a wolf.
    But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your
    fellow citizens? What do you have then? A sheepdog, a warrior, someone who
    is walking the hero’s path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness,
    into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

    Let me expand on this old soldier’s excellent model of the sheep, wolves,
    and sheepdogs. We know that the sheep live in denial, that is what makes
    them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world.
    They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire
    extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their
    kids’ schools.

    But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer
    in their kid’s school. Our children are thousands of times more likely to be
    killed or seriously injured by school violence than fire, but the sheep’s
    only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone
    coming to kill or harm their child is just too hard, and so they chose the
    path of denial.

    The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf.
    He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that
    the sheepdog must not, can not and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheep
    dog who intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and
    removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a
    representative democracy or a republic such as ours.

    Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there
    are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn’t tell them where to
    go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in
    camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the
    sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, “Baa.”

    Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide
    behind one lonely sheepdog.

    The students, the victims, at Columbine High School were big, tough high
    school students, and under ordinary circumstances they would not have had
    the time of day for a police officer. They were not bad kids; they just had
    nothing to say to a cop. When the school was under attack, however, and SWAT
    teams were clearing the rooms and hallways, the officers had to physically
    peel those clinging, sobbing kids off of them. This is how the little lambs
    feel about their sheepdog when the wolf is at the door.

    Look at what happened after September 11, 2001 when the wolf pounded hard on
    the door. Remember how America, more than ever before, felt differently
    about their law enforcement officers and military personnel? Remember how
    many times you heard the word hero?

    Understand that there is nothing morally superior about being a sheepdog; it
    is just what you choose to be. Also understand that a sheepdog is a funny
    critter: He is always sniffing around out on the perimeter, checking the
    breeze, barking at things that go bump in the night, and yearning for a
    righteous battle. That is, the young sheepdogs yearn for a righteous battle.
    The old sheepdogs are a little older and wiser, but they move to the sound
    of the guns when needed right along with the young ones.

    Here is how the sheep and the sheepdog think differently. The sheep pretend
    the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day. After the
    attacks on September 11, 2001, most of the sheep, that is, most citizens in
    America said, “Thank God I wasn’t on one of those planes.” The sheepdogs,
    the warriors, said, “Dear God, I wish I could have been on one of those
    planes. Maybe I could have made a difference.” When you are truly
    transformed into a warrior and have truly invested yourself into
    warriorhood, you want to be there. You want to be able to make a difference.

    There is nothing morally superior about the sheepdog, the warrior, but he
    does have one real advantage. Only one. And that is that he is able to
    survive and thrive in an environment that destroys 98 percent of the
    population. There was research conducted a few years ago with individuals
    convicted of violent crimes. These cons were in prison for serious,
    predatory crimes of violence: assaults, murders and killing law enforcement
    officers. The vast majority said that they specifically targeted victims by
    body language: slumped walk, passive behavior and lack of awareness. They
    chose their victims like big cats do in Africa, when they select one out of
    the herd that is least able to protect itself.

    Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically
    primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose
    which one they want to be, and I’m proud to say that more and more Americans
    are choosing to become sheepdogs.

    Seven months after the attack on September 11, 2001, Todd Beamer was honored
    in his hometown of Cranbury, New Jersey. Todd, as you recall, was the man on
    Flight 93 over Pennsylvania who called on his cell phone to alert an
    operator from United Airlines about the hijacking. When he learned of the
    other three passenger planes that had been used as weapons, Todd dropped his
    phone and uttered the words, “Let’s roll,” which authorities believe was a
    signal to the other passengers to confront the terrorist hijackers. In one
    hour, a transformation occurred among the passengers - athletes, business
    people and parents. — from sheep to sheepdogs and together they fought the
    wolves, ultimately saving an unknown number of lives on the ground.

    There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of
    evil men. - Edmund Burke

    Here is the point I like to emphasize, especially to the thousands of police
    officers and soldiers I speak to each year. In nature the sheep, real sheep,
    are born as sheep. Sheepdogs are born that way, and so are wolves. They
    didn’t have a choice. But you are not a critter. As a human being, you can
    be whatever you want to be. It is a conscious, moral decision.

    If you want to be a sheep, then you can be a sheep and that is okay, but you
    must understand the price you pay. When the wolf comes, you and your loved
    ones are going to die if there is not a sheepdog there to protect you. If
    you want to be a wolf, you can be one, but the sheepdogs are going to hunt
    you down and you will never have rest, safety, trust or love. But if you
    want to be a sheepdog and walk the warrior’s path, then you must make a
    conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip and prepare
    yourself to thrive in that toxic, corrosive moment when the wolf comes
    knocking at the door.

    For example, many officers carry their weapons in church.? They are well
    concealed in ankle holsters, shoulder holsters or inside-the-belt holsters
    tucked into the small of their backs.? Anytime you go to some form of
    religious service, there is a very good chance that a police officer in your
    congregation is carrying. You will never know if there is such an individual
    in your place of worship, until the wolf appears to massacre you and your
    loved ones.

    I was training a group of police officers in Texas, and during the break,
    one officer asked his friend if he carried his weapon in church. The other
    cop replied, “I will never be caught without my gun in church.” I asked why
    he felt so strongly about this, and he told me about a cop he knew who was
    at a church massacre in Ft. Worth, Texas in 1999. In that incident, a
    mentally deranged individual came into the church and opened fire, gunning
    down fourteen people. He said that officer believed he could have saved
    every life that day if he had been carrying his gun. His own son was shot,
    and all he could do was throw himself on the boy’s body and wait to die.
    That cop looked me in the eye and said, “Do you have any idea how hard it
    would be to live with yourself after that?”

    Some individuals would be horrified if they knew this police officer was
    carrying a weapon in church. They might call him paranoid and would probably
    scorn him. Yet these same individuals would be enraged and would call for
    “heads to roll” if they found out that the airbags in their cars were
    defective, or that the fire extinguisher and fire sprinklers in their kids’
    school did not work. They can accept the fact that fires and traffic
    accidents can happen and that there must be safeguards against them.

    Their only response to the wolf, though, is denial, and all too often their
    response to the sheepdog is scorn and disdain. But the sheepdog quietly asks
    himself, “Do you have and idea how hard it would be to live with yourself if
    your loved ones attacked and killed, and you had to stand there helplessly
    because you were unprepared for that day?”

    It is denial that turns people into sheep. Sheep are psychologically
    destroyed by combat because their only defense is denial, which is
    counterproductive and destructive, resulting in fear, helplessness and
    horror when the wolf shows up.

    Denial kills you twice. It kills you once, at your moment of truth when you
    are not physically prepared: you didn’t bring your gun, you didn’t train.
    Your only defense was wishful thinking. Hope is not a strategy. Denial kills
    you a second time because even if you do physically survive, you are
    psychologically shattered by your fear helplessness and horror at your
    moment of truth.

    Gavin de Becker puts it like this in Fear Less, his superb post-9/11 book,
    which should be required reading for anyone trying to come to terms with our
    current world situation: “…denial can be seductive, but it has an
    insidious side effect. For all the peace of mind deniers think they get by
    saying it isn’t so, the fall they take when faced with new violence is all
    the more unsettling.”

    Denial is a save-now-pay-later scheme, a contract written entirely in small
    print, for in the long run, the denying person knows the truth on some
    level.

    And so the warrior must strive to confront denial in all aspects of his
    life, and prepare himself for the day when evil comes.

    If you are warrior who is legally authorized to carry a weapon and you step
    outside without that weapon, then you become a sheep, pretending that the
    bad man will not come today. No one can be “on” 24/7, for a lifetime.
    Everyone needs down time. But if you are authorized to carry a weapon, and
    you walk outside without it, just take a deep breath, and say this to
    yourself…

    “Baa.”

    This business of being a sheep or a sheep dog is not a yes-no dichotomy. It
    is not an all-or-nothing, either-or choice. It is a matter of degrees, a
    continuum. On one end is an abject, head-in-the-sand-sheep and on the other
    end is the ultimate warrior. Few people exist completely on one end or the
    other. Most of us live somewhere in between. Since 9-11 almost everyone in
    America took a step up that continuum, away from denial. The sheep took a
    few steps toward accepting and appreciating their warriors, and the warriors
    started taking their job more seriously. The degree to which you move up
    that continuum, away from sheephood and denial, is the degree to which you
    and your loved ones will survive, physically and psychologically at your
    moment of truth.

    Sheep or Sheepdog? I am a sheepdog. You may be a sheep if you so choose.

  70. #170
    On June 19th, 2008 at 9:42 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    cpodug,
    Excellent post. I know for certain that I am no sheep or wolf. That leaves sheepdog. I’ll gladly accept that designation any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

  71. #171
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:10 am, StandardDeviation said:

    I know what I would have done.. I would have shot him. Then, I would be arrested, tried, acquitted and, for the rest of my life, harrassed.

    It would be worth it to save the child.

    It would have been worth it even if I were convicted and sent to prison for the rest of my life.

  72. #172
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:10 am, supersean said:

    #131

    “typical liberal response” implies that I am a liberal. I am not.

    The article cited by Michelle in this post is not the only coverage on this story and there seems to be a wide variance into the number of bystanders that assisted and their level of assistance.

    One article states that the firefighter managed to distract the attacker and the attacker returned to his truck how other bystanders did not rush to grab the child to me does seem irrational

    ” When Robinson went into the pickup to turn on the hazard lights, Aguiar stopped kicking the boy, helped him find the flashers, then went back to his attack, McKain said. She said there was blood in the truck’s cab”

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/17/MNO911A396.DTL

  73. #173
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:14 am, vickisoup said:

    supersean exactly echoes my sentiments. Already I’m reading that “experts” say that the bystanders were “in shock” and so excuse their inaction.
    That is what’s wrong with consulting so-called, “experts”. They will find a way to justify or excuse anything.
    :mad:

  74. #174
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:28 am, M0mm1e0f2G1rls said:

    I go on vacation for almost 2 weeks and this is what I come back to.! And then of course I have to read some of the comments (not all of them, some of them) that say that we are brave online and we don’t know what we would do if we came across this situation. WTH? I carry concealed, mostly for the protection of myself and my girls, but if there was a time I needed to protect someone else I would do it. That is what I practice and train for. I also carry a 6 D cell Maglight in my truck in the case I happen to not take my gun with me on any given day.
    ‘Over the next seven minutes, McKain said, Aguiar kicked his son at least 100 times as he calmly stated that he needed to “get the demons out” of the boy.’
    OVER THE NEXT SEVEN MINUTES!!! WTF! They stood there for 7 minutes watching this happen! And he was calmly stating crap out of his mouth. CALMLY? I’m disgusted. I’m afraid to read anything else from the last 2 weeks. Please excuse my language, but this makes me want to puke.

  75. #175
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    Aguiar stopped kicking the boy, helped him find the flashers, then went back to his attack, McKain said. She said there was blood in the truck’s cab”

    Uhhhhh, hello? This just piles on to the inaction of the bystander. When the boyfriend of McKain stopped with his headlights on the man and couldn’t find the emergency flasher button the “brutal attacker” calmly walked over to the bystanders cab and helped him find the emergency flasher button leaving the blood of his victim in the cab in the process and then resumed kicking the boy for another 7 minutes.

    This is some kind of defense in your eyes that he tried to do something? This just adds to the sadness and depravity of how weak and cowardly those bystanders in the McKain truck were.

    Scary, thank God I have a CCP and was trained properly by the Army Infantry and live in a state with sane gun and self defense laws. Because a lot of you all scare me with the responses defending these bystanders.

  76. #176
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:40 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    I also love how supersean is either reading with some kooky glasses the rest of us need a pair to view with because your two statements were not only misleading but flat out false and borderline deceitful.

    Original false statement by Supersean:

    but the fact of the matter is that bystanders did try to intervene but were fought off.

    Neither the first SFGate article nor the second (and later written one) you linked indicated at any time did any of the bystanders physically try and stop the man or was fought off physically by the murderer.

    Second false statement:

    One article states that the firefighter managed to distract the attacker and the attacker returned to his truck how other bystanders did not rush to grab the child to me does seem irrational

    You then go on to quote how the McKain boyfriend couldn’t find his emergency flashers and the ATTACKER calmly helped him find it while leaving the child’s blood in his cab.

    Wow, where do I get a pair of those glasses again?

  77. #177
    On June 19th, 2008 at 10:49 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    Correction:

    nor the second (and later earlier written one)

  78. #178
    On June 19th, 2008 at 11:30 am, SalsaNChips said:

    IMO, all the men present when this was taking place need to reach down and see if they’ve still got a pair.

    Pure apathy, complacency and outright cowardliness.

    If it was two guys fighting in the street, I would not intervene. This was a BABY being BEATEN to death in plain view of everybody.

    If I had come across that scene, the tire iron would have come out from under my seat in an instant and been bent over that guys head with great prejudice.

    And that’s no B.S.

  79. #179
    On June 19th, 2008 at 11:43 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    supersean,
    Either way the child is dead. And the argument here is that there is something that someone could have done to prevent it… and they didn’t. That’s the saddest part of this tale… second, of course to the beating and subsequent death of this two-year old baby boy.

  80. #180
    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, atheling said:

    On June 19th, 2008 at 12:33 am, dakine said:

    Terrible, terrible tragedy. Good post Regulus…lot of internet heroes around here. Please atheling. You have no idea what you or anyone else would’ve done in this situation. Save the sanctimonious BS.

    Is “sanctimonious” the only big word you know? You use it in almost every other comment you post.

    Piss off, gadfly.

  81. #181
    On June 19th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Wraith said:

    No one “freezes” for seven minutes. The three eunuchs who stood by and watched a two year old child die a horrible death are cowards without honor.

    There is no man made law that would have restrained me or kept me from defending that child. I would rather at the end of my life go before the Almighty and say “Yes Lord, I fought for that child”, than say “But Lord, I might have been sued”.

  82. #182
    On June 19th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, thebronze said:

    I would rather at the end of my life go before the Almighty and say “Yes Lord, I fought for that child”, than say “But Lord, I might have been sued”.

    Damn-well said!

  83. #183
    On June 19th, 2008 at 7:43 pm, Expendable said:

    One problem. This was in California.

    Let’s say one of the bystander’s whupped or capped the guy who was beating his son. This would be the result.

    “Hispanic-American male brutally (assaulted/murdered) in vicious hate crime!”

    And with some footage taken claiming that his son had fallen and that he was merely trying to help him up. In between the swarm of lawsuits and angry phone calls at all hours that would have ensued, it’s not really a surprise why theres inaction.

  84. #184
    On June 19th, 2008 at 9:00 pm, DougHagin said:

    I must wonder if this goes down the same way in Texas, or Florida, or Georgia, or some other Southern state?

  85. #185
    On June 20th, 2008 at 4:24 am, scottthong said:

    As an eldest brother, I have the ingrained instinct to protect others. Twice before, a dog scared my younger brother, and both times I reacted by roaring at the dog before I even thought.

    If I had been there, I would have attacked the killer with my bare hands. This is no mere aspiration. I might have leapt at that murdering father before I even realized what I was doing.

  86. #186
    On June 20th, 2008 at 11:18 am, Silvercharm said:

    I’m a grandmother. I drive a minivan. I’m not real physically fit.

    I could have stopped him and I would have stopped him.

    I have always have Misters Smith and Wesson with me. Yes, I would have been arrested and probably been sent to jail for doing so, but I would rather be in a California jail than have to stand before the Lord and explain why I stood there allowing a baby to be beaten to death when I was packing that much heat.
    In fact, like most people I do have a tire iron as well.

    This whole incident is an alarming example of the moral disintegration of our culture.

    ps. excuse the poor spelling, I’m a survivor of a quaker education..

  87. #187
    On June 20th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Please have some sympathy for these witnesses. No one says, “If I see a man beating a child to death I’m going to stand around and do nothing.” Everyone thinks they’re a hero when it’s nothing but talk.

    I can’t imagine how disorienting it would be to be confronted with something so horrible. If you’re dealing with a violent psychotic, who can blame someone for not wanting to get physically involved?

    That’s why you have to have the mental discipline to ascend to that level. Post-modern liberalism lacks that entirely.

    How would you like it if that was your kid and I walked by, did nothing, and told you later, “Sorry, Rusty, I was just too scared. Your child is now DEAD.”

  88. #188
    On June 20th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On June 18th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, WarTip said:
    Had someone (a concerned citizen) shot this criminal, they would currently be in jail awaiting trial. Think again about what you would have done. It is fine and dandy to sit here and suppose but when the rubber hits the pavement, views often change.

    Probably not. Defensive use of a fire arm occurs daily in the United States. Sometimes the good guy might be charged falsely. That is why good people such as you should be honored to do jury duty.
    I meet regularly with a group of people who have used guns in self defense/defense of others. We call our selves the
    Defensive Use of Firearms Bunch
    We all take pleasure in training/talking to others. One member is a retired Phoenix Police Lieutenant. That really helps in making sure we don’t give bad advise.

  89. #189
    On June 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 am, lonewolf said:

    I have no sympathy or understanding for anyone who witnessed this tragedy and did not instinctively tackle the animal beating the child.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Barack Better Not Be Banning Biden’s Beretta!

September 20, 2008 11:19 PM by see-dubya

47 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Shooting his mouth off.

Not-lifelong-Republican John Lott addresses Obama’s gun rights record

August 30, 2008 09:30 AM by see-dubya

91 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bullseye on Obama’s Bulls-, er…(UPDATE with speculation on Obama’s attempts to pander on the 2nd Amendment.)

Fake “lifelong Republican” alert

August 28, 2008 01:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

81 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Poser.

Self-defense story of the day

August 18, 2008 07:31 PM by Michelle Malkin

88 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

You go, grandma!

Heller gets his gun permit

August 18, 2008 03:16 PM by Michelle Malkin

79 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

“Victory!”

Texas teachers can pack heat

August 15, 2008 04:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

158 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

“Why would you put it out there that a group of people can’t defend themselves? That’s like saying ’sic ’em’ to a dog.”

The Dems’ drilling rhetoric just ain’t cutting it

August 14, 2008 12:12 AM by see-dubya

137 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Remind exactly why drilling would be bad? PLUS: Trust me, Montana: Obama ain’t gonna grab your gun!

D.C. rejects Heller’s gun application

July 17, 2008 02:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Jerking around.

More nosy doctors who don’t like guns

July 8, 2008 05:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bad medicine.


Categories: Guns


JustOneMinute

» The Debate!