Progressive gasbags

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2008 02:32 PM

Eyeblast TV presents a brisk video tour of the progressive Left’s energy strategy (or lack thereof) over the last 30 years.

“Progressive”…er, rather, regressive:

Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #357600
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:37 pm, thegreatbeast said:

    I think Obama’s comments about changing our habits (reducing the use of air-conditioning, etc.) would have been a better pairing with Jimmah’s chides.

  2. #357603
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:40 pm, Harris said:

    “I love it when a plan comes together.”

    Col. John “Hannibal” Smith

  3. #357605
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Reducing the use of air-conditioning, etc.

    But, but, it’s hot due to global warming… only Obie knows how to stay cool and fresh in this ever-changing climate. I wanna be like Obie.

    /sarc

    The video is hilarious… there’s plenty more material for sure. Bring on part II.

  4. #357607
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    OT: Score one for the ACLU and jihadists everywhere

    A brief one-page order from the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington directed military officials to either “release or transfer Parhat, or to expeditiously hold a new [military] tribunal.”

    He isn’t sprung yet, but being a Chinese citizen attending an al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan and fighting for the Taleban does not an unlawful enemy combatant make, apparently.

  5. #357615
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:51 pm, RedDog said:

    I guess I’ll have to dig out my dad’s old cardigan sweater. These people have to called out and exposed at every opportunity. Thinking people need to use the cherished tactics of the left: mockery, derision, and ridicule. But this time applied to those who deserve it.

  6. #357619
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:52 pm, DesertLover said:

    30 pcs … in AZ’s hot summers my thermostat is set on 85 when gone and 78 when home … and that seems cool when it’s 115 outside … just what does he think we are going to do in the desert? … what an idiot …

  7. #357621
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Well of course drilling now won’t put gas in our tanks this summer moron, ever heard of planning for the future?

    I’m in favor of the Bovine Pipeline. Every cow in America will have a suction cup and a hose attached – not unlike a milking machine – and as they ruminate, their farts will head down the pipeline into the central collection tank for aggregation and thence on to the communal tank, where the methane will be burned for power. I like to think of it as Farts for Freedom. No Caribou will be harmed in the process. If you do not own a cow (they make lovely pets) Al Gore will sell you a virtual cow, so you will have Fart Credits to burn as you see fit.

  8. #357623
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 2:55 pm, tre said:

    Third world countries would love to achieve the American standard of living. Liberals would love to reduce America to third world standard of living.

    What’s wrong with this picture?

  9. #357632
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:01 pm, walterc said:

    Where would we be now if we had drilled in ANWR 10 years ago when the left (and associated RINOS) said it would be 10 years before we benefited from that production?

    Idiots.

    I find it interesting that a month ago the Sowdis pretty much told GW to take a hike when he asked for increased production, yet now that there is a lot of talk about increasing domestic production, they hold a meeting to figure out what to do about oil prices.

    Just an announcement that we are going to drill ANWR and the continental shelf would bring prices down, IMHO.

  10. #357637
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:05 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Reducing the use of air-conditioning

    With liberal logic being what it is, should we not all be using more air-conditioning and leaving the doors open to cool the planet? Just wondering.

  11. #357640
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:07 pm, twiggman said:

    #9 you are so right…

  12. #357643
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:12 pm, Yashmak said:

    Just an announcement that we are going to drill ANWR and the continental shelf would bring prices down, IMHO.

    Not to put a damper on this, because I agree that we should be drilling ANWR and wherever else we have oil available. . .

    Such a drop in price would be very short lived. After all, I see little reason to doubt the 10 year estimate for time taken from the decision, to substantial output. Yes, some speculators would dump, dropping the price for a short while. But after a few weeks, it’d be right back up to where it is now.

    None of that takes away from the long-term benefit of making our own reserves available for consumption though.

  13. #357661
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:28 pm, ajmontana said:

    my a/c is set at 78, touch it and you may lose an arm, i’m in the same boat as dl, today it will be around 110* right now it’s 103* last week, in the shade my thermometer on the patio hit 119*……
    is it winter yet? 8)
    were so screwed 08′,09′,10′,11′

  14. #357669
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:34 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Reducing the use of air-conditioning, etc.

    I do. Every winter I reduce the AC. Every summer I reduce the heater.

    Do I get a carbon credit?

    Such a drop in price would be very short lived. After all, I see little reason to doubt the 10 year estimate for time taken from the decision, to substantial output. Yes, some speculators would dump, dropping the price for a short while. But after a few weeks, it’d be right back up to where it is now.

    Everything has a short life-depending/relative. We have centuries of energy on this continent PLUS the alternative fuels and systems. Solar will come on line in LOCAL and LIMITED uses reducing the need for transmission lines.
    But the Holy Mantra of the Left and tree huggers of “We can’t drill ourselves out of this” is just another scam to raise taxes with cap and trade. And High Tax Johnny Mac is as guilt as any.
    Hydrogen fuel will not be feasible until we build generating plants to extract hydrogen from water or hydrates.
    Stripping the hydrogen molecule from natural gas is more expensive and more polluting than using natural gas directly. We have the reserves and technology to solve this problem. Now we need a bulldozer to run over the objections, leftist and tree huggers.

  15. #357674
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Alohaguy, re: “the Bovine Pipeline”…

    Not in my backyard.

  16. #357676
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm, ajmontana said:

    I do. Every winter I reduce the AC. Every summer I reduce the heater.

    Do I get a carbon credit?

    lol, az…. i’m not sure if my heater even works… next thing you know our fireplaces will be banned as well. :roll:

  17. #357683
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:44 pm, Barry F. said:

    I like that image on the front of the video with the allusion of liberals to bovine flatulence. :lol:

  18. #357684
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:44 pm, almeehan said:

    Obama/Carter, now that’s change we can all live with!! Jimmah Cotta and Obambambambambama are a threat to the free world and free people everywhere. Jimmah has sealed the fate of Zimbaweans. God have mercy on his sorry flatulent factory.

  19. #357686
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 3:46 pm, SPCOlympics said:

    I stopped using the AC and just leave the refrigerator door open 24/7.

    What do I win?

  20. #357699
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 4:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Alohaguy, re: “the Bovine Pipeline”…

    Not in my backyard.

    Brooklyn is sadly lacking in cows – you’ll have to buy the Fart Credits.

  21. #357716
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 4:18 pm, Socratease said:

    If you do not own a cow (they make lovely pets) Al Gore will sell you a virtual cow, so you will have Fart Credits to burn as you see fit.

    I thought it was magic beans he was selling.

  22. #357722
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 4:24 pm, americangrunthog said:

    Hey guys, am I the only one getting tired of a pack of losers, led by a rich Hawaiian lawyer, telling us what we CAN’T do all the time?

    If someone said 100,000 Al Quaida terrorists were coming up through Central America and would be at the border in a month, I suspect we could get the border defended in about 3 days with a nice wall and a bunch of tanks.

    Same applies to the pipelines. Who pulled this 10 year number out of their butt? I suspect if we had national will, we could get a hole drilled, pipe run, and refineries built in 36 months from conception to operation if the tree huggers and obstructionists would shutthefup and let us do our jobs.

    America has the ability to do anything. Teddy Roosevelt would have built the wall, drilled the oil, and probably taken over the entire middle east by himself if he had to. But he didn’t have to do all his real life accomplishments by himself because he was a leader, and people followed. Something we don’t have on the horizon. We get some rich elitist telling us about hope. Well hope in one hand, and poop in the other and see which one gets full first, Barrack. Same to you McCain. I just issued a fart credit with your name on it Juan- no drilling in Anwar – McCain.

    The AmeriCANS are being overwhelmed by the AmeriCAN’Ts

  23. #357769
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 5:17 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    Obamamust plan on waving his magic wand if he becomes POTUS & fixing all of our energy problems for the future. That was the most short-sighted statement I have heard in this election cycle & that is saying something.

  24. #357784
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 5:32 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    We currently use about 20 million barrels of oil a day, and pump about 5 million, or 25% of our needs. We really need to get that up to 35% or even 50%. All a part of a comprehensive energy policy. We HAVE to drill, we HAVE to build refineries, we HAVE to construct more nuclear power plants. McCain wants to start 50 new nuke plants. That’s the smartest thing he’s said. If we’d done this 30 years ago, we’d be so far ahead. So let’s start now! This is so frustrating.

  25. #357832
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 6:38 pm, terrig said:

    # 22, I’m tired of it too. I can’t afford to keep my ac or heat on 72 like the rich Obummer’s can. Must be nice to be so rich, but why oh why are they so bitter?

  26. #357835
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 6:42 pm, mchristian said:

    From my state: “FARMINGTON, NM — Seven environmental groups are breaking new ground with their protest of an entire Bureau of Land Management oil and gas lease sale. The protest blocks action on the sale until the Bureau assesses the effect the 43 leases might have on global warming.”

    There will be no drilling for oil or gas on land or on sea or from shale or from any other source in this country. Petroleum products are evil and people who want to explore for them or use them are bad people who hate the planet and want the world to end in a ball of flames. And while we’re at it, when are you people going to start caring more about others than you do about yourselves?

    Oops, channeling a lib. Hope that never happens again.

  27. #357844
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 6:54 pm, conservativesRus said:

    If the argument against drilling for oil is it won’t accomplish anything for several years – then why do the leftists yearn for public education starting at an ever earlier age? Those kindergarteners don’t vote, they don’t pay taxes. I think you’d have a difficult time calling them “productive members of society”.

  28. #357956
    On June 23rd, 2008 at 10:00 pm, americangrunthog said:

    Thanks for the back-up Terrig

    Whenever I have someone who comes in my office and tells me a project can’t be done for some reason, well, they don’t last long. Americans used to get things done by sheer force of will.

    Obama says I’m rich, (not Obama rich, just I need to pay more taxes rich) and I’ve also been dirt poor to where I had to make a can of refried beans and a pack of tortillas last for three days of meals, but I didn’t get from A to B by hoping, or whining, or saying things ‘can’t be done’ or’ it won’t pay off right away so why try’…..

    What kind of message is that for the kids????? We can’t get prices reduced this summer so why try? We can’t get technology to work right away, so let’s scratch our butts and whistle dixie until someone somewhere makes a windmill car. Let’s not build a fence because it might not work and someone could get their feelings hurt…… This lazy attitude of the two candidates is the most disgusting thing I have ever heard of.

    Pick a president -wuss number 1 or wuss number 2… they are interchangeable.

  29. #358035
    On June 24th, 2008 at 1:05 am, txvet2 said:

    McCain wants to start 50 new nuke plants.

    He may want to start them, but who is he going to get to build them? There aren’t anywhere near that many construction outfits with expertise in nuclear construction – especially in this country, since we never build any. And that’s after you get the permits and finish fighting the environmental lawsuits. Don’t get overwhelmed by the empty rhetoric.

  30. #358407
    On June 24th, 2008 at 11:51 am, spudmomof6 said:

    The government regulation that limits the incentive to build nuclear plants is similar to what our career school faces when attempting to alleviate the nursing shortage by offering nursing courses. Government officials have control of the decision making process (rather than the market) and even if we can meet all the guidelines, we can be refused permission because the publicly funded schools (our competition) have the ability to veto our application. How many companies can afford to defend themselves against continuous environmental lawsuits and/or protests while not being certain that they will be allowed to proceed with a well thought out plan?

  31. #358442
    On June 24th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, jwm said:

    Plenty of farts in Brooklyn, but for real gas bags, you have to go to the Upper West Side of Manhattan for that. Stuck on the West Coast now, but boy do I miss Bay Ridge!

  32. #358788
    On June 24th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    I heard the offshore stuff could be pumping in about 5 years. ANWR in about 10.

    If you had all of your electrical needs over your entire lifetime generated by nuclear power the amount of waste generated would be about the size of a can of soda.

    We should build a nuke plant on the Berkeley city line and then refuse to let it use any of the electricity generated.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The global warming scandal of the century

November 20, 2009 12:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

On fire.

Fighting “climate change”…with free condoms

November 18, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

256 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

EPA lawyers: Cap-and-trade bill is “fatally flawed”

November 10, 2009 11:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Inconvenient truth.

All by her lonesome: Sen. Boxer and the empty chairs

November 3, 2009 02:31 PM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Hey, there, lonely girl.

Barbara Boxer’s eco-power grab

November 3, 2009 09:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

Schooling global warming blowhard John Kerry

October 28, 2009 01:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

81 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Tinker Bell coopted by U.N. eco-zealots

October 27, 2009 10:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 1 Trackback

Lord Monckton’s warning to America

October 19, 2009 12:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“What is the truth?”


Categories: Enviro-nitwits



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook