Even Bigger Outrage–Mexican soldiers hitmen arrested for murdering man in his Phoenix, Arizona home

By see-dubya  •  June 26, 2008 03:02 PM

If you thought this was bad, wait till you see this.

The suspects may have been hired by drug cartels to perform home invasions and assassinations in the U.S.

Police reports show that three men arrested in a Phoenix home invasion and homicide Monday may have been active members of the Mexican Army.

Full tactical gear, AR-15s, 50-100 rounds burped off at the victim’s house (who was suspected to be a marijuana dealer) and alleged plans to “ambush” any Phoenix PD officers who tried to stop them.

When the Wall Street Journal says, “Let there be open borders”, is this what they had in mind?

Forget the fence for just a second and think about this:

The Mexican Army has made several incursions across our Southern border. Some were probably just units getting lost, some had a more sinister reason behind them…but given the recruitment of elite military assassination squads by the cartels, this should be seen as a serious problem.

It would be overstating the problem to say that “the Mexican military is invading us”. But there is a criminal, militarized element that is crossing the border with impunity and distressing regularity, and for nefarious purposes.

Why is President Bush pulling the National Guard off the border? Granted, there have been some problems, but why should we leave potential combat with a militarized incursion to the Border Patrol?

Okay, now think about the fence again. Real, please, not virtual.
_______________

UPDATE: That Fox item linked above (and the AZ Republic) is saying they weren’t active Mexican soldiers, but that one had received military training. So, okay, nothing to worry about then. Just business as usual. Six trained hitmen in a Tahoe full of AR 15s and tactical gear can drive across the “border” and kill a guy in his house in Phoenix and expect to get away with it.

No problem here. Everybody go back to sleep.

________________
{Post by See-Dubya}

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Phoenix man killed at home by three Mexican militiamen in military gear, or maybe not
  2. Nothing to see here sheeple « The Old Right Daily
  3. Mexican Army continues raids inside USA | The TIW Blog
  4. Michelle Malkin » Another home invasion in Phoenix by…Cartel hitmen? Mexican military?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #361273
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Great, now factions of the Mexican Army are killing people in the US. Answer: sweep it under the rug and protect the silk road.

  2. #361275
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, starlightwoman said:

    Is this really surprising to anyone? This has been happening for year and no one wants to do anything about it. I wonder what McAmnesty has to say about it happening in his backyard.

  3. #361278
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Well you knew this was coming. Mexico doesn’t recognize our border, and neither does Bush

  4. #361284
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, max said:

    Can we get the Iraqi army to fight them?

    /

  5. #361285
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Goldwater Knight said:
    Great, now factions of the Mexican Army are killing people in the US. Answer: sweep it under the rug and protect the silk roadResurect John “Black Jack” Pershing to lead the U.S. Army into Mexico again.

  6. #361291
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, JDinTX said:

    It is time to put the military back down on the border. Only this time, they need to be ordered to shoot any illegals coming across the border. We may never see the fence and we have to stop them somehow.

  7. #361294
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, khan said:

    Ok, this is somewhat related, given that it occurred in McCain’s state and given Juan’s open arms for open borders…

    McCain’s strategy: link

    The strategy: Paint Obama as conventional politician who always takes the safe and easy political road, then amplify the distinction by framing McCain as a patriot, somebody who has put sacrifice above self.

    It’s seemingly an effort by McCain to remind voters of his Vietnam-era heroism and compelling life story while touching on key issues to avoid running purely on biography.

    Sounds like John Kerry all over again. “Hey, did you know I was in Viet Nam?”

    And this, McCain again turning his back on party, as if partisanship is a bad thing:

    In a memo sent to reporters Thursday morning headlined, “Country First Vs. Self-Serving Partisanship,” McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt traces an unbroken line from the physical courage McCain demonstrated in the Hanoi Hilton to the political bravery his supporters say he demonstrated on Capitol Hill.

    I will never vote for Juan McCain.

  8. #361295
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, Barry F. said:

    Why is this not a surprise to me? :roll:

  9. #361297
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, RTater said:

    more on happenings in Phoenix which appears to be a hotbed of Islamic terror activities and Mexican drug cartels – PHOENIX — An Iranian-born engineer has pleaded guilty to transporting stolen property, including training software, from a U.S. nuclear plant where he had worked to Iran.

    Mohammad Reza Alavi, 50, pleaded guilty to the charge in a deal reached Tuesday with federal prosecutors, according to The Arizona Republic.

    A federal jury last month had convicted Alavi of illegally accessing a protected computer but deadlocked on two other counts, and he faced a retrial.

    He faces a maximum of 15 years in prison on both charges at a Sept. 29 sentencing.

    Alavi, a naturalized U.S. citizen, worked for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station west of Phoenix for 17 years.

    Authorities said that after Alavi quit the station in 2006, he took a laptop to Iran containing training software with design schematics and other details of the plant. His material did not contain enough information to pose a security threat, Palo Verde officials have said.

    But prosecutors said Alavi knew he was breaking federal law when he took the software to Iran and then downloaded codes to use it in Iran. /**/

    Last month, a jury convicted Alavi of illegally accessing a protected computer, but it deadlocked on one count of stealing protected software from the plant and one count of illegally exporting it in violation of the U.S. trade embargo with Iran.

    As part of the plea deal, prosecutors dropped the charge of violating a U.S. trade embargo. Alavi also agreed not to appeal his conviction of illegally accessing a computer.

    “We are pleased to have achieved a resolution with the government which fits the case and which enables Mr. Alavi and his family to move forward with their lives,” defense attorney David Laufman said Tuesday.

    After Alavi was arrested, Palo Verde operator Arizona Public Service promised to implement new security procedures.

  10. #361298
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, Pat Riotic said:

    How far from the border is Phoenix? 150+ miles?

  11. #361299
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    No problem here. Everybody go back to sleep.

    Thank goodness, I thought I was seeing a pattern here. Good thing they didn’t try it in California, they would be limited to 50 rounds of ammo each. Those CA legislators know how to solve problems…

  12. #361302
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:25 pm, capitano said:

    The Mexican Army has made several incursions across our Southern border. Some were probably just units getting lost, some had a more sinister reason behind them…

    Now the Rio Grande isn’t all that grande in some spots and some stretches may even be dry this time of year, but there’s still a river bed for a reference — South = Mehico, North = U.S.

    Lost? I don’t think so; more like “we don’t need no steenkin’ approval to cross!” And Phoenix is over a hundred miles north of the border as the crow flies.

  13. #361303
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, khan said:
    I will never vote for Juan McCain.

    Barack Obama thanks you.

  14. #361305
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    HMMMMMM follow the $$$$$$$$$$$$

  15. #361306
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    The practicalities of erecting nearly 2,000 miles of fence and guarding it aside, our government is too busy fighting for oil, er….energy independence… to concern themselves with a few interlopers coming over the border and regardless of whomever hired them.

  16. #361309
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, wise_man said:

    Wow. It took 6 posts this time. Getting slow, people. Getting slow.

  17. #361315
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, terrig said:

    Wow, this is scary-I kept looking at it to believe it. So we’re being invaded by the Mexican Army? Hmmh.

  18. #361317
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, khan said:

    #12:

    Why? I’m not voting for him, either.

  19. #361325
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, wise_man said:

    Yes we are, terrig. This place says so. Hundreds of thousands of Mexicans, all wearing terrorist scarfs that Rachael Ray personally gave to them at the Mexican dunkin donuts, and they are going to kill us all. And it’s all John McCain’s fault.

  20. #361327
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, khan said:

    #15:

    There have been numerous reports over the past few years of Mexican military accompanying drug runners, human traffickers, etc. Even reports of a skirmish between Mexican military and border patrol agents.

  21. #361330
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, tgusa said:

    So do you think this was an incursion or were they already here? Phoenix is about as far as LA from the border. Boy, if it was an incursion they better not try it here. We have a checkpoint about halfway between San Diego and LA, they would have to stop there so they’d never make it. Yeah, a checkpoint some 75 miles from the border, it works real good when its open.

  22. #361334
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, mchristian said:

    “Six trained hitmen in a Tahoe”

    A Tahoe? That can’t be very green. What do you suppose the carbon footprint of an operation like this is? At least they carpooled, I guess.

  23. #361335
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Use the National Guard. Build a fence sky-high, and tax every single democrat to do it.

    They like to pay taxes to make the world a better place, so let’s take them up on their offer.

  24. #361336
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, Django said:

    Don’t worry, I’m sure President Bush will get right on it.

  25. #361340
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, Barry F. said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, wise_man said:

    *sigh* :roll:

  26. #361341
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    Not to worry folks these soldiers, hitman, scumbags will be ok if they made it back over the border, a mexican judge will let them free to go on their merry way without any regard for the good ole USA. and they even considered getting my guns… ahahahahhahaahahh, good luck.

  27. #361349
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Is it time to do anything yet??????

  28. #361350
    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, ajmontana said:

    Chertoff is a flippin joke….

  29. #361359
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Who arrested them and why aren’t the arresting officers in jail yet?

  30. #361363
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, txvet2 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:25 pm, capitano said:

    Now the Rio Grande isn’t all that grande in some spots and some stretches may even be dry this time of year, but there’s still a river bed for a reference — South = Mehico, North = U.S.

    Lost? I don’t think so; more like “we don’t need no steenkin’ approval to cross!” And Phoenix is over a hundred miles north of the border as the crow flies.

    It may have moved since I looked last, but so far as I know the Rio Bravo del Norte doesn’t constitute any part of the Mexico/Arizona border. It flows south out of New Mexico, forms part of the Texas/NM border west of El Paso, then turns southeast, forming the Texas/Mexico border.

  31. #361364
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, WestCoastCoconut said:

    xler8bmw It is too late to do anything. They already started kidnapping in SoCal and that is just the tip of the iceberg.

    I wish I had the link to the news video on it. But it is happening to US citizens in California and murdering is not a surprise to be included.

    Stand by for reaction from the state legislatures and Gov. Arnold….

    Insert chirping crickets.

  32. #361365
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Barry F. said:

    So, okay, nothing to worry about then. Just business as usual. Six trained hitmen in a Tahoe full of AR 15s and tactical gear can drive across the “border” and kill a guy in his house in Phoenix and expect to get away with it.

    No problem here. Everybody go back to sleep.

    *whew* Okay. I was starting to worry there for a minute. Sut, since they aren’t active military from Mexico, I guess it is okay. /sarcasm off

  33. #361366
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:07 pm, Barry F. said:

    Sut But

    Ugh! Sorry. Long day today

  34. #361369
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:09 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, wise_man said:

    Now I know you are a LIBERAL troll. Only a liberal would make such a stupid remark about something as serious as any mexican (military or not) crossing the border and executing anyone (illegal or not) on American soil. I guess you don’t really see that as a big deal though. Afterall, mcamnesty would not see it as serious, so why would his die hard supporters. You never cease to amaze. McCain = Liberal = wise_man . Like others here, I will vote for mcamnesty the day he denounces “comprehensive immigration reform” and amnesty in writing. Till then, he can p*ss off.

  35. #361370
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, WestCoastCoconut said:

    Michelle! Here’s the link from Fox LA. The drug cartels are kidnapping US citizens!!

    Yes there are already doing it.

    MyFoxLA.

  36. #361371
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    So, okay, nothing to worry about then. Just business as usual. Six trained hitmen in a Tahoe full of AR 15s and tactical gear can drive across the “border” and kill a guy in his house in Phoenix and expect to get away with it.

    No problem here. Everybody go back to sleep.

    Liberals won’t even care when it’s a tahoe full of nuclear material (aka bomb) driven across the “border” and watches LA go up in smoke. We’ll they’ll kinda care since LA is so liberal but they’ll just blame Booosh (despite the fact that the FISA handcuffing, open borders mantra, and anti-military stance they took in direct conflict to keeping nuclear armed terrorists from coming across completely undetected. What is even more hilarious if it were not so insane even if a police car in LA did stop this nuclear laden SUV for suspicious activity the cop would not be able to ask for identifying information of the legal status of the terrorist since that would be “racial profiling”.)

    Yeah, they aren’t insane or anything.

  37. #361373
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, txvet2 said:

    I will vote for mcamnesty the day he denounces “comprehensive immigration reform” and amnesty in writing. Till then, he can p*ss off.

    Otherwise known as “legislation”.

  38. #361375
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, khan said:
    #12:

    Why? I’m not voting for him, either.

    If I have to explain it, you wouldn’t understand it.

    Let me guess. You’re an Independent that votes for the candidate that you feel is best.

  39. #361376
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:14 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    Someone asked on an earlier thread about tracking illegal alien crime. Check out this site – it’s pretty amazing! Sadly, it’s also very sobering. It’s less than a year old, and already has almost 2000 records. If you click on the drop-down list that says “Show Current Event Types,” it will show all of the categories they track.

    Maybe it should be required daily reading for all of the officials who are supposed to protect and defend this beautiful country.

  40. #361378
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    This completely undermines any and all legislation that is supposed to be for our “protection” from retrograde Arab terrorists that live in caves. The government has absolutely no credibility when it comes to security because of this invasion from the south. I posted a link to this story in the last blog entry here, I’m glad you picked it up see-dubya.

  41. #361379
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, wise_man said:

    #34, I’m not a liberal troll, But there are many of them here, so that shouldn’t be too hard to find. I’ll give you a hint: They come here every day and tell us all that they wont vote for the republican candidate, and the result of this is that the democrat will win.

  42. #361380
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, tre said:

    So armed soldiers from a foreign army are coming into the US and shooting American citizens.
    Doesn’t that constitute an act of war?

  43. #361383
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:18 pm, see-dubya said:

    tre–not unless they’re acting as soldiers or under orders.

    If a U.S. Marine vacationing in Tijuana gets in a bar fight and kills a guy, it’s not an act of war.

  44. #361387
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:20 pm, wise_man said:

    What about 19 citizens of the nation of Saudi Arabia? Many think that Saudi Arabia has waged war on us.

  45. #361389
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:23 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Hundreds of thousands of Mexicans, all wearing terrorist scarfs that Rachael Ray personally gave to them at the Mexican dunkin donuts, and they are going to kill us all. And it’s all John McCain’s fault.

    Have you always discounted the threat to this country from the south, or are you engaging in double-think so your vote for McCain will feel less…. slimy.

  46. #361390
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, sambo said:

    see-dubya said:
    tre–not unless they’re acting as soldiers or under orders.

    Oh, I’m sure we would go after them then! keep dreaming.

  47. #361391
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, wise_man said:

    Have you always discounted the threat to this country from the south,

    Nope. Nothing of the kind,

    or are you engaging in double-think so your vote for McCain will feel less…. slimy.

    Wrong again.

  48. #361393
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, khan said:

    #38:

    On the contrary, I think it is you who doesn’t and wouldn’t understand. You are correct; I vote for the candidate who best represents my values and beliefs. Given that our president is not elected by popular vote and that individual states select their electors, I don’t have much hope for your argument, whatever it is.

  49. #361395
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, GJCorby said:

    It sounds like an armed incursion by a foreign army, I say we send 1st Cavalry down to Mexico for a little armed incursion of our own.

  50. #361411
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, txvet2 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, GJCorby said:

    It sounds like an armed incursion by a foreign army, I say we send 1st Cavalry down to Mexico for a little armed incursion of our own.

    There’s a good idea. Let’s pick a fight with one of our biggest oil suppliers. That’ll show them. We’ll make them sell to China, instead. $10 gas, anyone?

  51. #361426
    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:59 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, tre said:
    So armed soldiers from a foreign army are coming into the US and shooting American citizens.
    Doesn’t that constitute an act of war?

    No. Mexico, and many right here, believe the southwest U.S. is rightfully theirs. They’ve been acting like it for decaded and our government abets them. Hence, these are not foreign soldiers. No problemo. No war.

    Now, if Canadian soldiers had done this in Milwaukee, now we’re talking WAR!!!

  52. #361432
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, Southpaw said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:14 pm, Lan Astaslem said:
    Someone asked on an earlier thread about tracking illegal alien crime. Check out this site – it’s pretty amazing! Sadly, it’s also very sobering. It’s less than a year old, and already has almost 2000 records. If you click on the drop-down list that says “Show Current Event Types,” it will show all of the categories they track.

    Maybe it should be required daily reading for all of the officials who are supposed to protect and defend this beautiful country.

    Hallelujah for whowever created that site (see #39), and thanks for the link Lan Astaslem. I’ll be e-mailing that to every one of my elected officials
    panderers.

  53. #361433
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    There’s a good idea. Let’s pick a fight with one of our biggest oil suppliers. That’ll show them. We’ll make them sell to China, instead. $10 gas, anyone?

    Near as I can tell, Obama would have no problem with $10 gas. We all may need horses. Good news if you live in DC, plenty of asses wandering around.

  54. #361434
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, bit_boy said:

    Is this a Bush guest worker program in action (or perhaps the result of L.A.’s Order 40 reaching across state lines).

  55. #361435
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:03 pm, khan said:

    #50:

    We’re not the ones picking the fight.

  56. #361439
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:04 pm, wise_man said:

    Why, yes. This is a Bush guest worker program in action. How did you know?

  57. #361441
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, rambler said:

    Let’s send congress to the border. We could use them as bait for the those mexican kidnappers, except we won’t pay the ransom to get them back.

  58. #361445
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, tc2011 said:

    I want to know if they were using AR-15s or M-16s…or something else altogether.

    The fact that the article says “AR-15 assault rifles” makes me think we don’t have some objective reporting here.

  59. #361448
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, see-dubya said:

    I noticed that I tend to think that’s accurate, because the media usually says M16 when they’re talking about an AR instead of the other way around.

  60. #361449
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, John Ansell said:

    WOW look at all the racist comments on here.

    sarc/ Well that’s what you get called when you demand our laws to be enforced.

  61. #361450
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    This reminds me of a comedy movie with Jonathan Winters back in the ’60’s where a Mexican officer decided to lead his small army unit into Texas where they occupied the Alamo and took a few tourists hostage.

    It was funny then. Not so now. I think there would actually be some people (Obviously no Texans!)who would be happy to surrender the Alamo to them if that happened today.

  62. #361452
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, gayle said:

    I say to place the SENATE BUILDING on the borders instead of Washington.

    Then let the warfare begin.

    Reality check perhaps?

  63. #361453
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, wise_man said:

    Yea that’s me, a liberal troll because I won’t vote for a liberal who happens to have an “R” by his name. I have explained my reasons over and over for not voting for the pr*ck. Hint, has obsolutely nothing to do with voting for obummer. I think they both suck. Therefore, I am voting Pastor Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party. I do have other choices, despite your insistence otherwise. In fact, the 2 party system is the equivalent of the elections in the old Soviet Union. “You will vote for communist A or communist B. There you have the choice we gave you”. It was not a true choice there, and it is not a choice now. Fortunately, we still have a real choice here and I intend to use it. Not be told by the gov’t what my choices are. Of course, with party hacks like you running around, that is probably coming to an end soon. With enough useful lemmings like you, the 2 parties can get together and ban 3rd parties altogether. Guess what, even then, I would not vote for mcamnesty.

  64. #361454
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:17 pm, greenfairie said:

    And this, you 4 SCOTUS justices who think I have no right to defend myself, is the reason why we have a 2nd Amendment.

    Don’t think the powers that be will care. They don’t care that American citizens have been kidnapped and murdered for years near Ciudad Juarez, a town that makes 1980s Cartagena look safe and tranquil by comparison. They won’t care until the bandidos start kidnapping and murdering pols, celebrities, wealthy businessmen, and their families. Don’t laugh, it’s what they’ve done in Mexico for years.

  65. #361458
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, gayle said:
    I say to place the SENATE BUILDING on the borders instead of Washington.

    Why not place it directly in Mexico City? Mexico already seems to own it anyway. Most of our senators seem to have more in common with the ruling Mexican elite than with their own fellow citizens.

  66. #361459
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    looks like AP slammed you pretty good over at HotAir see-dub.

    See-Dub is outrageously outraged

    ROFL

    AR-15’s at 30 paces?

  67. #361462
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:20 pm, John Ansell said:

    Time to send in the Illinois National Guard. They have a leg up on the Mexican Military. :lol:

  68. #361465
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:22 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    The fact that the article says “AR-15 assault rifles” makes me think we don’t have some objective reporting here.

    The only difference between the two is that the M16A2 military standard issue rifle (at least that model was the standard issued one I got in ‘98, the newer models rolling out have the vertical hand grip and I don’t follow newer names but I believe that model is the M16A4) has an additional 3 round burst selector whereas the AR-15 does not and only has the semi-automatic selector.

    So if the Phoenix PD says they were AR-15’s I have no reason to doubt them. You think the cartels are going to buy military grade M16’s that they would have to steal or bribe from the ones we sell to other countries or go to the local gun shop in Phoenix or Tucson and buy AR-15’s that look and work exactly the same minus the 3 round (rather useless and hardly ever used it myself while in the army) burst?

  69. #361471
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, see-dubya said:

    Soapbox–

    Anything but a glock. My poor thumbs!

  70. #361476
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, see-dubya said:

    grizzly–that’s a distinction i always look for in the media boilerplate about cartel weaponry. I’ve no doubt a huge amount of ordnance like AR15’s goes south out of gun shows and gun shops–but the media coverage then usually confuses it and complains about full auto weaponry, which is either stolen from the Mexican military or maybe percolating up from South American sources.

    Here’s an example.

  71. #361481
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:34 pm, wise_man said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    If I wasn’t talking about you, then I wasn’t talking about you.

    So you’re not a liberal troll, good for you. But you are one of the conservatives who would rather Obama win than to stoop down to the level of that traitor McCain and vote for him, be counted along with the millions of other Americans who are going to be participating in this country’s elections. The more of you there are, and the less there are of people voting for McCain and the higher likleyhood that Obama will win. Because a whole lot of democrats are going to be voting for him.

    I stand corrected. Sort of. Not really. Besides, my comment was in reply to your calling me a liberal troll. I am not. If you want to stand so close to the real liberal trolls that there is no daylight between you, then be my guest.

  72. #361485
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, John Ansell said:

    How many Mccain browning points do you have now Wise Man? Still shooting for that seat on stage at the La Raza meeting?

  73. #361489
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:38 pm, wise_man said:

    How many Obama points do you have John?

  74. #361497
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:45 pm, wighttrasch said:

    John “Black Jack” Pershing to lead the U.S. Army into Mexico again.

    Once again, let’s hear it for MIZZOU! John Pershing, born in Laclede, MO.

    And, just for fun, we’ll even bring up Gen. Omar Bradley (Clark, MO).

  75. #361507
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, gayle said:

    Hawkeye, GREAT idea!

    Just drop it in the nearest pig farm.

  76. #361512
    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:58 pm, flenser said:

    The practicalities of erecting nearly 2,000 miles of fence and guarding it aside …

    We have a 500 billion dollar “Department of Defense”. I don’t want to hear that we can’t secure our damm border, something which even poor third world countries manage to do.

  77. #361530
    On June 26th, 2008 at 6:13 pm, bald01 said:

    If enough of the conservative “base” stated that they were NOT going to vote for Mac–just maybe he would feel threatened enough to change his tune. Right now he really doesn’t care what the base thinks–he knows/thinks we will vote for him–we have no choice. Maybe we do.

  78. #361554
    On June 26th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, gayle said:
    Hawkeye, GREAT idea!

    Just drop it in the nearest pig farm.

    Well, the pols DO like their pork! Would have to make sure the swine (the pigs, that is) are innoculated against pork fever: )

  79. #361560
    On June 26th, 2008 at 6:35 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    pork swamp fever: )

    Thats what I meant. That fever seems to affect the minds of many pols who make DC their home. Wouldn’t want it spreading…even to Mexico : )

  80. #361593
    On June 26th, 2008 at 6:54 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, khan said:
    #38:

    On the contrary, I think it is you who doesn’t and wouldn’t understand. You are correct; I vote for the candidate who best represents my values and beliefs. Given that our president is not elected by popular vote and that individual states select their electors, I don’t have much hope for your argument, whatever it is.

    Wow, as a frequent commenter on this site, I didn’t think I’d need to explain my point, but here it goes.

    Any third party candidate that “reflects your values” has a very slim chance of actually getting elected. One only need look at Ross Perot and Ralph Nader as evidence. Given that these two are arguably more popular than any third party candidate running this time, it is safe to say that no third party candidate will be elected. Now that we have established that either McCain or Obama will be elected, by not casting your vote for McCain, you have decreased his odds of winning and increased Obama’s.

    Therefore, Obama will be glad to see that you won’t vote for McCain.

    Given how liberal our Congress has become and the possibility that they will retain a majority in both the House and Senate, I personally will do anything to keep a proven socialist out of office. A RINO is 100% more acceptable to me than seeing Obama signing bills into law that a liberal Congress dreams up and then having a Ginsburg filled Supreme Court declare constitutional and setting precedent. Maybe you have a place in some other country or are really just a troll, but I’m raising a family in this country and I’d like to see them enjoy the fruits of their labors, not what’s handed to them by the government.

    If that’s not simple enough for you, then I’m pretty sure you don’t have the ability to figure out a simple ballot either, so never mind.

  81. #361601
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:01 pm, txvet2 said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, see-dubya said:

    Soapbox–

    Anything but a glock. My poor thumbs!

    My son’t duty weapon is a Glock. I hated it when I fired it. Too much trigger slack, just a loose, uncomfortable weapon that I simply couldn’t fire accurately. I much prefer my little .38 Special.

  82. #361606
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, John Ansell said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 5:38 pm, wise_man said:
    How many Obama points do you have John?

    Zero. I’m a Gingrich fan. A real conservative Republican. Put McAmnesty up against Newt and compare who is the true conservative Republican. See, Newt wins that contest hands down. He’s against Amnesty, MCamnesty is pro amnesty.

    2, Newt’s for Drilling Now, Mcinsane is Anti drilling.

    3, Newt’s for keeping Gitmo, McInsane is pro terrorist on that issue.

    Need I go on?

    Newt is pro business, McInsane is against the oil companies making a profit.

    Nothing against you personally, but you’re riding a loser who is a liberal.

  83. #361619
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:25 pm, khan said:

    #74:

    M-I-Z !!!

  84. #361622
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:28 pm, khan said:

    #80:

    Any third party candidate that “reflects your values” has a very slim chance of actually getting elected. One only need look at Ross Perot and Ralph Nader as evidence. Given that these two are arguably more popular than any third party candidate running this time, it is safe to say that no third party candidate will be elected. Now that we have established that either McCain or Obama will be elected, by not casting your vote for McCain, you have decreased his odds of winning and increased Obama’s.

    You are aware, I hope, that a candidate can lose the popular vote yet still be elected? If I vote for Barr, then I’m voting for Barr. It is not a vote taken away from McCain and it is not a vote that goes toward Obama. Give me a break.

  85. #361632
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:40 pm, Boomer said:

    Sorry about the pain you suffer from the Glock see-duya this is one of the times it actually pays to have smaller hands.

    Yep! Nothing to see here move along just some folks looking to support their families in Mexico by busting a couple of hundred rounds in the butt of someone the DEA or the rest of the alphabet counter drug agencies should be taking off the streets anyway. :roll:

  86. #361635
    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:51 pm, gayle said:

    McCain should be on Obama’s ticket as VP.

    They are truly in the same party.

    We do not even have a conservative running.

    Doesn’t matter which one wins.
    WE ARE DOOMED.

  87. #361661
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:28 pm, khan said:
    #80:
    You are aware, I hope, that a candidate can lose the popular vote yet still be elected? If I vote for Barr, then I’m voting for Barr. It is not a vote taken away from McCain and it is not a vote that goes toward Obama. Give me a break.

    Funny. That’s what the Perot and Nader voters said.

    Oh well, I guess somebody has to be bad at math.

  88. #361670
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:26 pm, wise_man said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 6:54 pm, Concerned Citizen said: Any third party candidate that “reflects your values” has a very slim chance of actually getting elected.

    Very Slim?

    I think the word you are looking for is “none.”

    .

    On June 26th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, John Ansell said: Zero. I’m a Gingrich fan.

    And I have zero “McCain points.” I thought that Romney had the best chance of winning against Obama or Hillary, so I voted for him. And I lost. And now McCain is going to face Obama. Most of us who are intelligent enough to figure this out are forced to take sides that will allow one or the other to win, because that is how our system of electing the next president works … so your strawman accusation that I am getting ‘McCain points’ by speaking my mind and exposing a very dangerous mental condition that will allow Barack Obama to be elected is – incorrect and insulting.

    “McInsane is pro terrorist “

    You call McCain ‘insane?’ McCain is “pro=terrorist?” You are mentally deficient if you actually believe this. Again, Bush derangement syndrome has transfered quite completely into people like you against McCain. You are really an embarrassment.

    “Nothing against you personally, but you’re riding a loser who is a liberal.”

    Everything against you personally, you are a complete idiot, and it’s a shame that you are going to vote this november, because you are as dangerous to this country as ever single other Obama supporter.

  89. #361679
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, khan said:

    #87:

    Well…I voted for Perot, and Nader in ‘96.

  90. #361680
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:40 pm, khan said:

    Most of us who are intelligent enough to figure this out are forced to take sides that will allow one or the other to win, because that is how our system of electing the next president works

    Actually, that isn’t how our system of electing a president works.

  91. #361682
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, wise_man said:

    You’re a conservative. You should know better than this. You’re supposed to be smarter than the democrats, and know better. You shouldn’t lie about other republicans who are a ‘flawed candidate’ but not pro-terrorist for *k sakes.

    This is seriously derangement. Obama is a liberal. Very liberal. McCain is more liberal than would be acceptable but he is no where near the ideology of some one like Obama. This is so frustrating, you shouldn’t be acting like a democrat and lying about a republican you don’t like in an attempt to make him into a monster that you (any anyone else here) is attempting to make him out to be.

    And in this election, there will be two people to choose from. Not 3. Not 4. Not 5. If you had half a functioning brain cell you could figure this out on your own.

    Not participating in our democracy allows more democrats to decide who will be the next president. Choosing someone else will also be a wasted vote and will help the person who you like the least. AT LEAST the person you should like the least is the democrat.

  92. #361683
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:45 pm, wise_man said:

    #90 after the primary elections, then the decision is down to two people.

  93. #361684
    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:49 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, khan said:
    #87:

    Well…I voted for Perot, and Nader in ‘96.

    So you’re the one.

  94. #361691
    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:02 pm, khan said:

    #92:

    We were talking about the system and your misunderstanding of it.

  95. #361692
    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:04 pm, atheling said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, khan said:
    #87:

    Well…I voted for Perot, and Nader in ‘96.

    And that really made a difference.

    You are a moron.

  96. #361696
    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:07 pm, wise_man said:

    It did make a difference. Voting for Ross Perot gave America 8 years of bill and hillary clinton.

  97. #361699
    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, khan said:

    #95:

    I don’t vote to “make a difference”, especially since the president is not decided by popular vote. I think government school failed the three of you, but that’s government for you. If you people actually think you’re voting for president, then you need to turn in your citizenship merit badges.

  98. #361701
    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:18 pm, atheling said:

    On June 26th, 2008 at 9:16 pm, khan said:

    #95:

    LOL!!!! Why should we listen to you?

    Your record doesn’t exactly inspire confidence!

    (BTW, private school here)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 1 Trackback

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.

Saturday open thread

October 10, 2009 11:52 AM by Michelle Malkin

111 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Hardin, Montana update: Jail deal in limbo

October 6, 2009 05:41 PM by Michelle Malkin

17 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Border Patrol, Southern Border, Uncategorized




HotAir GreenRoom