About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Homeland Security report: African human-smuggling rings could bring terrorists over the border

By see-dubya  •  July 10, 2008 01:00 PM

Very interesting–both for the intercontinental flavor of these coyote rings, and because of the candid admission in an internal government report that terrorists could take advantage of our unfenced, under-patrolled border:

Intelligence officials are focusing new attention on these networks that smuggle people from Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan — known havens for terrorists, including al-Qaida — according to an internal government assessment obtained by The Associated Press.

In the 12 months that ended last Sept. 30, U.S. officials caught 372 East Africans trying to get into the country, the assessment said.

Long, three page AP report there and I’m surprised it hasn’t gotten more attention yet.

Here’s an interesting detail that didn’t make it into the AP report: if you’re wondering where this smuggling ring they discuss got its fake documents, this newspaper report from Belize might offer a clue:

“Sampson Lovelace Boateng, 53, admitted that between approximately June 2006 and February 2007, he conspired with others to smuggle unauthorized aliens to the United States by providing them with fraudulently obtained Mexican visas,” said the release. “Boateng charged approximately $500 per visa. These documents, which Boateng obtained through a corrupt employee of the Mexican Embassy in Belize, enabled East African aliens to travel into Mexico and reach a point where they could be smuggled across the southern U.S. border.”

Boateng, who was formally arrested in the US on November 5, 2007, reportedly operated as a car dealer while in Belize. He was extradited from Belize after he and two other Ghanaians - Frank Boateng (his brother), 28, and Gwame Boakye, 26, as well as his the common-law wife, a Belizean woman named Irma Valencia, 49, were arrested in connection with what police had said was a major immigration scam.

Valencia was employed as a secretary at the Mexican Embassy while the scam was ongoing.

Good work by ICE (and DEA) in shutting this ring down, and I’m glad to see that someone inside government has the guts to admit there’s a terror risk at our southern border. I wish they’d shout it a little louder.
________________________________
Speaking of terrorists in Africa, here’s the ultimate culture clash: racy French TV programming is filtering through the (satellite) airwaves to North Africa, and threats come filtering back:

Canal-Plus, France’s first pay-TV channel, received letters from one or more people claiming to be Muslim and threatening to blow up its headquarters if it continues to broadcast once-a-month pornographic films, the official said. The official was not authorized to be named publicly about such matters.

Okay, liberals–who do you side with? The victims threatened by cultural imperialism or the…victims threatened by cultural imperialism?
_______________
{Post by See-Dubya}

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. links for 2008-07-10 » The Foundry
  2. Africa comes to the Mexican border « Take Your Cross
  3. Homeland Security report: African human-smuggling rings could bring terrorists over the border « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, John Ansell said:

    They are already here. And we have judges working on their behalf.

  2. #2
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Insomniac said:

    French pr0n? Trying to up your Google hits, eh, see-dub? :-P

  3. #3
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Canal-Plus, France’s first pay-TV channel, received letters from one or more people claiming to be Muslim and threatening to blow up its headquarters if it continues to broadcast once-a-month pornographic films

    Relax, if it’s a French broadcaster, it’s FauxPorn anyway…

  4. #4
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, see-dubya said:

    Apparently someone in Tunisia or Algeria or somewhere doesn’t appreciate that distinction.

  5. #5
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Okay, liberals–who do you side with? The victims threatened by cultural imperialism or the…victims threatened by cultural imperialism?

    It’s always interesting to watch liberals squirm when two of their ideologies converge and conflict.

    Which will win out? The right to sex or the right of Islam to never be offended by anything in Western culture ever?

  6. #6
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, John Ansell said:

    Which will win out? The right to sex or the right of Islam to never be offended by anything in Western culture ever?

    The Libs need votes so they will side with the Terrorist.

  7. #7
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Were the illegals all from Ghana?

    What’s with this ‘East African’ stuff?? Ghana is West Africa. What’s going on?

  8. #8
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:20 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Insomniac said:
    French pr0n? Trying to up your Google hits, eh, see-dub?

    Is this the french pron your talking about :lol:

  9. #9
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, see-dubya said:

    Good point, Wighttrasch–but the report says most of the illegals themselves were from Eritrea, Somalia, and Sudan.

    Apparently these guys had a lot of connections in African embassies as well.

  10. #10
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Good work by ICE (and DEA) in shutting this ring down, and I’m glad to see that someone inside government has the guts to admit there’s a terror risk at our southern border.I wish they’d shout it a little louder.

    I agree with you see-dubya

  11. #11
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, shooter said:

    Good work by ICE (and DEA) in shutting this ring down, and I’m glad to see that someone inside government has the guts to admit there’s a terror risk at our southern border.

    Yup, something we’ve known for about 5 or 6 years is all…maybe even 20 years.

    It’s nearly a DAILY occurrence down there, terrorists, future terrorists, all probably armed or seeking their ‘cell’ ready to go to war against us infidels.

  12. #12
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Okay, liberals–who do you side with? The victims threatened by cultural imperialism or the…victims threatened by cultural imperialism?

    Bet time! I bet see-dubya busts his knuckle again before he gets an answer.

  13. #13
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    blind mule, thank you for making me go blind today. geeze, and I have to drive. :(

  14. #14
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ah, yes, Somalia. Bill Clinton’s & the pink-tanked UN’s friends.

  15. #15
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, walterc said:

    Another indication of how evil the world thinks America is. . . .they just keep trying to sneak in and partake of our evil corrupt society. And they are allowing terrorists that want to turn America into the same kind of third world Sh$*hole that they are trying to get out of.

    Can someone explain to me why these East African muslims aren’t trying to sneak into Sowdi Arabia or Iran? Those countries already have kabillions of oil money and they already live under sharia. What could be better?

  16. #16
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    ajmontana said:
    blind mule, thank you for making me go blind today. geeze, and I have to drive.

    LMAOROf :lol: I could’nt help myself.

  17. #17
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:44 pm, Rusty said:

    Which will win out? The right to sex or the right of Islam to never be offended by anything in Western culture ever?

    The former wins over the latter every single time.

    If I don’t care if porn bothers Christians, I’m certainly not going to lose any sleep if Muslims are offended.

  18. #18
    On July 10th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, graysonret said:

    While we make people take off their shoes, confiscate their luggage, x-ray them, and harass them at the counters, terrorists ignore flying and gently walk across our open border to the south. In a few days, they’re with some cell in a major city, getting all set for their next attack. If it comes, and it turns out the terrorists crossed the border, you can bet politicians will be finger-pointing each other, blaming it on Bush, or “corruption” in the Border Patrol, while they hurriedly push through legislation to close the border to save their own politicial skins. Yeah…closing the barn door after the horses escaped.

  19. #19
    On July 10th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, Lifeofthemind said:

    Okay, liberals–who do you side with? The victims threatened by cultural imperialism or the…victims threatened by cultural imperialism?

    Just remember that Justice is Blind.

  20. #20
    On July 10th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, fighterDC said:

    Having spent a lot of time in Europe, I noticed Canal+ often overdubs American porn before broadcasting. So now, the liberals will need to also consider whether they want to denegrate the Porn Community in Left Wing Calipornia.

  21. #21
    On July 10th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, chapoutier said:

    Bet time! I bet see-dubya busts his knuckle again before he gets an answer.

    I’ll give the Muslims my porn when they they take it from my cold, dead hands.

  22. #22
    On July 10th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    threatening to blow up its headquarters if it continues to broadcast once-a-month pornographic films

    I get it now - once a month isn’t enough!

  23. #23
    On July 10th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, Rorschach said:

    Uh stupid question, but is this not pay per view? Does that not mean that the viewer affirmatively CHOSE to watch the pr0n? Isn’t that like paying the cover charge to enter a titty bar and then being offended that there were topless women and people drinking booze there?

  24. #24
    On July 10th, 2008 at 4:08 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Let’s see, Mohamed married a six year old girl, and had sex with her when she turned nine. That sounds like sick porn to me, but that is what the Muslims follow. Yet, these Muslims are upset with the porn from France. Ummmm.

    Is it me, or does it sound like Satan’s house, I mean allah the false moon god’s house, is divided?

  25. #25
    On July 10th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    “porn” brings out comments from Rusty every time.

  26. #26
    On July 10th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    If I don’t care if porn bothers Christians, I’m certainly not going to lose any sleep if Muslims are offended.

    Really below your usual standard, Rusty.

    But it does capture the liberal mentality: I don’t care if Christians are offended.

  27. #27
    On July 10th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, nbarry said:

    George Bernard Shaw wrote with respect to this sort of controversy, “Never give your children any extensive religious or moral training unless you are sure they will never take it seriously. Better to be the father of Henri Quattre and Nell Gwynne than of Robespierre and Mary Tudor.”

  28. #28
    On July 10th, 2008 at 5:17 pm, LarryD said:

    It’s always interesting to watch liberals squirm when two of their ideologies converge and conflict.

    Which will win out? The right to sex or the right of Islam to never be offended by anything in Western culture ever?

    Oh, there’s a Sorting Algorithm of Victimhood, the largest groups of “victims” always wins.

    There’s also the cowardice factor, the hirabi are more violent than all the other “victim” classes, so the liberals will appease them no matter who else they have to “throw under the bus”.

  29. #29
    On July 10th, 2008 at 6:24 pm, Mostly Annoyed said:

    I never understood the problem people have with porn on cable. If you don’t want it - LOCK IT OUT. The supreme court has looked at this and even though there is the “community standard” if people didn’t pay for it it wouldn’t exist. It’s not cheap to produce and distribute legally. They tried to ban it in Salt Lake City. Turns out there are a lot of pay per view movie sales for porn in Salt Lake City. The court told the prosecutor he didn’t know what his community wanted, because the sales said people wanted it and were willing to pay for it. We have seperation of church and state for a reason, actually several very good reasons. The religous extremists from any and all religons are dangerous. Moderation good, extremist bad. Works with just about anything.

  30. #30
    On July 10th, 2008 at 6:56 pm, Leatherneck said:

    The Hindu extremist was not happy with the cow being killed, because it might be his Uncle. The Christian extremist said it was disrespect to have Homos taking a picture as the last supper, and warned the Homos to repent to a G-d that loves them,(hate speech). A person without compassion for the religion of peace drew a picture of Mohamed, and the whole moon god worshiping Ummah went bat sh^% murdering, and burning down stuff.

    Of course, the secular humanist nut lumped everyone of any religion into extremest, or moderate.

  31. #31
    On July 11th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, jbirish said:

    So the African slave traders are at it again.
    Does this mean we will have another 200 years of blacks blaming whites for their problems, when the whole thing started with their own counterparts providing their own people to the slavers?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

49ers do the job San Francisco Democrats won’t do

September 6, 2008 12:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

66 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Sanctuary.

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

130 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Curb your enthusiasm.

Meanwhile, back on the War on Terror…

September 2, 2008 10:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 1 Trackback

Pay attention.

What the GOP platform says about immigration

September 2, 2008 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The rule of law.

The GOP platform: Putting face-saving above principle

August 27, 2008 03:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

The capitulation you deserve.

LPGA to golfers: Speak English

August 27, 2008 11:26 AM by Michelle Malkin

91 Comments | 1 Trackback

“[I]t is important for our players to effectively communicate…”

GOP platform fight over shamnesty euphemisms

August 26, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

105 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Crooked talk.

Daddy Yankee endorsement: Another pathetic McCain pander

August 25, 2008 04:11 PM by Michelle Malkin

128 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Juan Hernandez approves!


Categories: Homeland Security, Immigration, Jihadists, Southern Border