Comments on: Homeland Security report: African human-smuggling rings could bring terrorists over the border

By: Michelle Malkin » FINO: Fence funding falls short

Michelle Malkin » FINO: Fence funding falls short — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:24:30 +0000

[...] if no one in Washington is paying attention anymore, you can bet the jihadists are. Posted in: Southern Border Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

By: Homeland Security report: African human-smuggling rings could bring terrorists over the border « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:26:41 +0000

[...] rings could bring terrorists over the border July 20, 2008 — budsimmons http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/10/homeland-security-report-african-human-smuggling-rings-could-br... Posted in Homeland Security, Illegal, Illegal Immigration, Illegal alien drunk drivers, [...]

By: jbirish

jbirish — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:01:34 +0000

So the African slave traders are at it again.
Does this mean we will have another 200 years of blacks blaming whites for their problems, when the whole thing started with their own counterparts providing their own people to the slavers?

By: Africa comes to the Mexican border « Take Your Cross

Africa comes to the Mexican border « Take Your Cross — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:36:44 +0000

[...] From MichelleMalkin.com on July 10, 2008: [...]

By: Leatherneck

Leatherneck — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:56:22 +0000

The Hindu extremist was not happy with the cow being killed, because it might be his Uncle. The Christian extremist said it was disrespect to have Homos taking a picture as the last supper, and warned the Homos to repent to a G-d that loves them,(hate speech). A person without compassion for the religion of peace drew a picture of Mohamed, and the whole moon god worshiping Ummah went bat sh^% murdering, and burning down stuff.

Of course, the secular humanist nut lumped everyone of any religion into extremest, or moderate.

By: Mostly Annoyed

Mostly Annoyed — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:24:36 +0000

I never understood the problem people have with porn on cable. If you don’t want it – LOCK IT OUT. The supreme court has looked at this and even though there is the “community standard” if people didn’t pay for it it wouldn’t exist. It’s not cheap to produce and distribute legally. They tried to ban it in Salt Lake City. Turns out there are a lot of pay per view movie sales for porn in Salt Lake City. The court told the prosecutor he didn’t know what his community wanted, because the sales said people wanted it and were willing to pay for it. We have seperation of church and state for a reason, actually several very good reasons. The religous extremists from any and all religons are dangerous. Moderation good, extremist bad. Works with just about anything.

By: LarryD

LarryD — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:17:04 +0000

It’s always interesting to watch liberals squirm when two of their ideologies converge and conflict. Which will win out? The right to sex or the right of Islam to never be offended by anything in Western culture ever?

Oh, there's a Sorting Algorithm of Victimhood, the largest groups of "victims" always wins. There's also the cowardice factor, the hirabi are more violent than all the other "victim" classes, so the liberals will appease them no matter who else they have to "throw under the bus".

By: nbarry

nbarry — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:16:22 +0000

George Bernard Shaw wrote with respect to this sort of controversy, “Never give your children any extensive religious or moral training unless you are sure they will never take it seriously. Better to be the father of Henri Quattre and Nell Gwynne than of Robespierre and Mary Tudor.”

By: englishqueen01

englishqueen01 — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:05:44 +0000

If I don’t care if porn bothers Christians, I’m certainly not going to lose any sleep if Muslims are offended.

Really below your usual standard, Rusty.

But it does capture the liberal mentality: I don’t care if Christians are offended.

By: On-my-soap-box

On-my-soap-box — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:25:46 +0000

“porn” brings out comments from Rusty every time.

By: Leatherneck

Leatherneck — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:08:31 +0000

Let’s see, Mohamed married a six year old girl, and had sex with her when she turned nine. That sounds like sick porn to me, but that is what the Muslims follow. Yet, these Muslims are upset with the porn from France. Ummmm.

Is it me, or does it sound like Satan’s house, I mean allah the false moon god’s house, is divided?

By: links for 2008-07-10 » The Foundry

links for 2008-07-10 » The Foundry — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:31:25 +0000

[...] Homeland Security Report: African Human-Smuggling Rings Could Bring Terrorists Over the border: Mich… Very interesting–both for the intercontinental flavor of these coyote rings, and because of the candid admission in… (tags: Security) [...]

By: Rorschach

Rorschach — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:09:39 +0000

Uh stupid question, but is this not pay per view? Does that not mean that the viewer affirmatively CHOSE to watch the pr0n? Isn’t that like paying the cover charge to enter a titty bar and then being offended that there were topless women and people drinking booze there?

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:07:13 +0000

threatening to blow up its headquarters if it continues to broadcast once-a-month pornographic films

I get it now – once a month isn’t enough!

By: chapoutier

chapoutier — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:51:44 +0000

Bet time! I bet see-dubya busts his knuckle again before he gets an answer.

I’ll give the Muslims my porn when they they take it from my cold, dead hands.