Grow a pair, Obama

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 14, 2008 05:26 AM


Barry,

So, you found this satirical New Yorker cover art “tasteless and offensive.”

Welcome to public life.

Guess what? In Washington, political cartoonists and caricaturists spare no one.

*Update* Chris at The Hot Joints reminds me of this truly disgusting cartoon run in the Obama-worshipping Rolling Stone magazine last month:

Here’s a reminder of the crap Condi Rice has had to deal with over the years:

1. The buck-naked bigotry of Ted Rall:

2. Jeff Danziger’s Condi-as-Prissy cartoon:

3. Pat Oliphant’s exaggerated-lipped parrot caricature:

Much more here.

But hey, that’s nothing compared to the assassination chic targeting President Bush:

bushgun.jpg

killbush.jpg

killbush003.jpg

bushbeheaded.jpg

dope.jpg

Oh, and if you’re going to echo your wife’s claims of special victimhood and decry the satirical “attack” on her, go buy a copy of the Laura Bush-bashing novel, “American Wife,” read what they said about her trip to Afghanistan, and check out the diatribe published by the San Francisco Chronicle smearing her as a “docile doormat” and much worse.

Then, when you’re done digesting all that, wipe your nose, grow a pair, do your little Jay-Z dance move, and take your own advice to your daughters:

No whining.

It clashes with your glow.

***

Much more from Doug Ross and Rick Moran, who says: “Man up.”

Posted in: Barack Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. New Yorker Mag, Obama and the Soft Bigotry of Satire « The Political Page
  2. Obama makes the cover of The New Yorker | BitsBlog
  3. New Yorker Cartoon v. Bush Administration
  4. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Netroots and Obama Loving MSM Up In Arms Over New Yorker Cover
  5. Pirate's Cove
  6. Now The Left Is Upset By A Cartoon? | McCain Blogs
  7. The Patriot Room
  8. Liberal Heads Exploding Over Magazine Cover | The Patriot Room
  9. Now The Left Is Upset By A Cartoon? : Stop The ACLU
  10. New Yorker Magazine Cover, Barack A Muslim, Michelle A Terrorist : BigMouthFrog
  11. Dave Lucas measures reaction across the Blogosphere
  12. Maggie's Farm
  13. Confederate Yankee
  14. Hopey needs to lighten up a bit… | cynics and skeptics
  15. New Yorker Clinton Covers Obama « Pronk Palisades
  16. Memo to Barrack Hussien Obama: Grow up and shut-up | BitsBlog
  17. Satire or Tasteless or Tasteless Satire? « think on these things
  18. Barry Doesn’t Like This « The Reluctant Optimist
  19. Grow a pair, Obama « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
  20. Oh Jeez… The New Yorker Strikes Again. | Jeffrey A. Setaro
  21. Obama is Grazed by Friendly Media Fire, Shrieks Like a Little Girl. | The Sundries Shack
  22. Bookworm Room » That New Yorker cover
  23. Obama & McCain Cartoons… « ~ NonBlondQT ~
  24. Grow a Pair, Obama « THE OATH
  25. The Other McCain: Liberals attempt satire, fail
  26. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Politics
  27. Steynian 198 « Free Mark Steyn!
  28. Ed Driscoll.com
  29. Firewatch » Blog Archive » New Yorker Cover: When a joke goes over your crowd’s head
  30. Obama As A Monkey Is Racism, So Shut the F*ck Up Bush Chimp and Condi House N*gga « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  31. Werner Patels - A Dose of Common Sense
  32. Outrage, outrage, outrage
  33. The Commissioner’s Corner » Blog Archive » Double Standard
  34. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Dr. Hook parody
  35. Has The New Yorker gone too far? « The Currin Chronicles
  36. Obama slams Muslim portrayal - Trackpads Community
  37. Otra vez las Caricaturas! Esta vez el “ofendido “es Obama « NUEVA EUROPA- Nueva Eurabia
  38. Webloggin - Blog Archive » The Ridiculous Media Outrage Over The New Yorker Cover
  39. Jon Swift
  40. Tweezle.Net » Blog Archive » Your Reactions Are Showing
  41. New Media Commandment | D.C. Thornton
  42. EckerNet.Com » Blog Archive » The New Politics Of Blame
  43. Turban-clad, Fist-Bumping Muslim in the Oval Office! - Page 4 - Political Forum - US & World Political Discussion Forums
  44. Satire Isn’t Satire If Someone Has To Explain It To You « Obi’s Sister
  45. Scanning the Sphere: quick hits | The Anchoress
  46. It has the added benefit of being true… « Chockblock’s blog
  47. Michelle Malkin » Educating the ignorant Kumbaya candidate
  48. Michelle Malkin » Clueless Washington journalist of the day: John Harwood
  49. Is this man for real? | BitsBlog
  50. Michelle Malkin » NAACP race-monger: Obama was “lynched” by a cartoon!
  51. Obama; Does He Have a Clue About the Middle East? « Riggword Weblog
  52. Are You Freaking Kidding Me? « Desert Martini
  53. “satire go to hell” « O Insurgente
  54. Blatant Reality » Blog Archive » Preschoolers for Obama (aka Obamatots)
  55. The Column » Blog Archive » When Art Gives Offense

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #374831
    On July 14th, 2008 at 5:37 am, graysonret said:

    The Left certainly knows about “tasteless and offensive”. They’re experts at it.

  2. #374832
    On July 14th, 2008 at 5:41 am, maine yankee said:

    All this talk of growing a pair is like asking john kerry for an origial thought- is just ain’t in the jeans.

  3. #374835
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:01 am, Lincoln said:

    You simply don’t understand. Obama is the Chosen One. He simply cannot be besmirched the way us mere mortals are, lest we face eternal damnation in the flames of California.

  4. #374839
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:18 am, localmalcontent said:

    Both Obama and the Left in this country intend to catagorize any criticism, any caricature of him as ‘racist’. To force across their wild, socialist agenda on the people by putting everyone on a guilt trip.
    Such a lame attempt, hiding that neither has real solutions to America’s threats or problems.

    Oh, Barry- at least they hid your big ears.

  5. #374845
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:33 am, fluffy said:

    President Bush has endured slander of the worst kind without a sound. Senator McCain got the living snot beat out of him for 6 years at the Hanoi Hilton. I’m sure either of them could call the wah-mbulence for you, Senator.

  6. #374846
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:34 am, thutmose18 said:

    Obama is whining if he calls ugly rumors and stereotypes of himself and his wife tasteless and offensive? just because idiots outside with stupid signs and tshirt makers in their basement create the same garbage doesnt balance it out and make it right.

  7. #374847
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:36 am, zorro said:

    Excellent post Michelle.

    It never ceases to amaze me how vicious the left can be. If Obama wants to step into the arena, he really does need to grow a pair.

  8. #374850
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:43 am, ajmontana said:

    Wait a second, Obama has the biggest pair I have ever seen. ears that is.
    as for the other kind, they just don’t grow on trees you either have em or you don’t. Just on his non voting to not show his hand on anything it’s obvious he does not have a pair.

  9. #374851
    On July 14th, 2008 at 6:43 am, Lifeofthemind said:

    Bush keeps moving on because he is focused on results. He doesn’t sweat the small stuff. Obama and the Moonbats focus on grievance and display because that is all they have. The cornering of the term Move On by the left was brilliant because that was the one thing they can not do. Results are meaningless to them. All they can do is attack those who create and build and solve problems. If Obama didn’t have non-issues to agonize over, like someone insulting him, then he would have to talk about the substance of an issue. Now Obama gets to talk about the appearance of substance. The hate filled thugs that attack Condi Rice are not an aberration, they are Obama’s core constituency.

  10. #374853
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:03 am, ajmontana said:

    Note to Obama: don’t go near Jesse (the race baiter) when he’s holding a pair of scissors. :shock:

  11. #374854
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:06 am, Jarhead said:

    If Barry grows a pair & that is a BIG IF, didn’t Jesse call dibs on them with scalpel in hand.

  12. #374856
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:15 am, Jon Brodin said:

    To the liberal mind, an individual’s personal character is solely defined by his/her racial or gender identity. This is the reason that they don’t cry foul when similar attacks are launched against conservates who happen to belong to a racial minority. Afterall, if conservatives remained “true to their identity” then they would not be conservatives. Therefore, it’s only racist if you attack a liberal in this manner because such an attack is a personal attack upon character.

    This is truly the most backward thinking movement that I have ever witnessed – and they call themselves “progressive”. Quite mindless if you ask me!

  13. #374860
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:32 am, GaMidnightRider said:

    I like it. I think it shows excatly who these people are.

  14. #374864
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:36 am, Lockstein13 said:

    This cover’s biting criticism of The Obamboozler reminded me of the fabulous film by Billy Wilder, “One, Two, Three.” I highly recommend it as good inspiration in describing Obama and his “people’s vision” (see Buchholz in film).

  15. #374865
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:37 am, Barry F. said:

    …wipe your nose, grow a pair, do your little Jay-Z dance move, and take your own advice to your daughters:

    No whining.

    But…but…but…it’s just all a distration from change. ;-)

  16. #374867
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:39 am, Rob said:

    My young college Obamamaniac has a big sticker on her laptop that says, “God hates George Bush’. She works at a public school and the laptop and sticker are visable in the classroom everyday and no one has ever told her to remove it. But I will bet this cover would sure be yanked pretty damn fast.

  17. #374869
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:40 am, Barry F. said:

    Ooops..distration distraction.

    I guess its too early yet for me. :oops:

  18. #374871
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:47 am, Rob said:

    When I said “My young college Obamamaniac” I should have added co-worker.. she is NOT my child.

  19. #374876
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:58 am, Mixer14 said:

    Don Imus had no comment.

  20. #374877
    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:59 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    “tasteless and offensive.”

    But it sho is funny. :-)

  21. #374878
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:00 am, Rob said:

    “We completely agree with the Obama campaign, it’s tasteless and offensive,” McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said in a statement.

    Jesse wants to cut off Obama’s… but I think McCain left his in Vietnam. He just doesn’t want to win this, does he?

  22. #374879
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:01 am, tre said:

    So Barack HUSSEIN Obama can’t take the heat? Yet another reason he’s not ready for the Presidency.

    For some reason, it’s racist to use his middle name, but saying George DUBYA Bush is okay. Pointing out where his wife put her foot in her mouth is racist, but attacking Laura Bush or Condi Rice is okay.

    Ya can’t have it both ways, Barack HUSSEIN Obama!

  23. #374883
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:07 am, twiggman said:

    This would not help Michelle’s kids…

  24. #374885
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:14 am, irving said:

    The irony is that long before the campaign is over, the left will be pointing to this particular attack and others like it as evidence of right wing hate mongering.

  25. #374886
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:17 am, JDinTX said:

    Now if Obama would just show us he can walk on water, then we would know he is the chosen one. Racism and being insensitive comes in all colors and it doesn’t matter if you are a Dem or Rep. But only a Dem can get away with it.

  26. #374890
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:27 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Barry Obama the media phenomena have thee no stones? Smooth talking when reading from cards, but without look-out, he’s a one-hit wonder with nothing to show for it…but a media fixation that is what he is and nothing else.

  27. #374893
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:32 am, beenthere said:

    The cover was intended as a satire on how the Right views the Messiah. For heaven’s sake, it is impossible to conceive of the New Yorker doing anything else. The Obamas being the urban sophisticates that they claim to be certainly should know that, or does irony completely escape them?

    As for McCain, he thinks irony is something the laundry does to his shirts. If he does win, I can well am imagine him spending election night repeatedly apologizing. Like Bush he appears to have two modes: placating the left and attacking the right. Why didn’t these men switch parties decades ago? They could have spared us so much.

  28. #374899
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:39 am, A Typical Patriot said:

    George Bush’s answer to the satire and caracatures of him was that they were exibiting the right to free speech. Senator Hussein has a list of things we aren’t supposed to talk about, meaning anything derogatory or concieved as negative by him. Unbelievable.

  29. #374900
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:41 am, TypicalWhite said:

    MM said: “No whining. It clashes with your glow.”

    Great image, Michelle! BHO is definitely having problems keeping his shine. Maybe, just maybe, enough voters will see the tarnish by November!

  30. #374905
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:49 am, ajmontana said:

    Dang, I think the artist forgot to put the Parrot on his shoulder.

  31. #374907
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:52 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    Typical socialist liberal democrat. They have no problem with the crude and inappropriate handling of Republicans and conservatives but they cry foul when the exact same things happen to them. Cry baby, B. Hussein!

    I think B.H.O. is worried. Despite his camp’s self proclaimed savior status he is tied in the polls with a guy the MSM’s tries to tell us nobody wants and nobody agrees with.

    Maybe that explains Hussein’s daily flip flop on issues from his extremist left wing anti-American views to more conservative stance.

  32. #374911
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:56 am, MikeOK said:

    There’s also this classic Bush montage.

  33. #374912
    On July 14th, 2008 at 8:58 am, Chesapeaekegal said:

    Yep…me think that there is a Freudian slip here at The New Yorker..what they meant for satire…well….maybe it’s true.

  34. #374920
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:06 am, MtsEdge said:

    James 1:8: “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” (KJV)

  35. #374924
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:09 am, henryinga said:

    It boggles my mind that so many lame people want this whining, sniviling, cry baby as the leader of the greatest Country on God’s Green Earth. Absolutly mind-boggling.

  36. #374925
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:11 am, ajmontana said:

    ditto that henry. :(

  37. #374927
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:13 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Most excellent all! Bro Obama can quit his whining yesterday if Sista Michelle (the other Michelle) would release his Pair from the Lock Box. She learned that Lock Box thing from Mama Hillary, the other Liberal Whiner in the race.

    Now I need to dig out my 2000 Left/Right flip flop beach shoes.

  38. #374929
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:17 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    With due respect, this is one of the most oblivious blog posts I have ever seen. First, the issue isn’t Barack Obama. The issue is Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and all the other demagogues who have taken the opportunity at every chance they get to play on Americans’ bigotry by calling him Barack Hussein Obama (what’s John McCain’s middle name? I don’t know either because it’s not important unless you have roots in an unpopular ethnic group).

    And the issue is Michelle Malkin for taking on Mrs. Obama for being a strong black woman — dare I say a typical strong black woman — who has the nerve to say what she feels is wrong with this country.

    For once, it’s the Republican who has left his cripple wife for a young, beautiful, rich heiress — and then lying about the adultery. This time, it’s the Democrat who is the pillar of family values, but it doesn’t matter. It’s always something, and it’s always personal.

    Moreover, either condemn all bigotry or excuse all bigotry. You can’t spend your whole life whining about the Ted Ralls of the world, and then say “get over it” when liberals are exposed to equally offensive hatred. Condemn the Curious George shirts. Condemn the Obamaassassination chic.” Don’t play the conservative grievance card and then tell Obama to “grow a pair” when his camp (not really Obama, who just shrugged and had no comment when told of the story) takes offense.

  39. #374931
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:19 am, bit_boy said:

    Obama is a mix of rube and urban, that’s a Ruban. When a candidate for POTUS lacks the ability to understand why much of the world speaks English rather than Ghetto he’s a relic of the far, far left. A carbon unit that will amount to very little unless initiated and fostered by the courts. He clearly is in a race with McSwish for stupid.

  40. #374935
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:27 am, Christian Soldier said:

    Johnny Mc and his retinue have come out against the New Yorker cover.

    I don’t know–I LIKED it!!!

    Stop playing NICE Mr Republican!!!!!

    http://neveryetmelted.com/?p=4067#respond

  41. #374939
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:31 am, Speakup said:

    Militant Michelle O, accurate and scary.

    Would she become the future reparations queen?

  42. #374940
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:31 am, tarpon said:

    Looks like Barrack Hussein Obama doesn’t like his life’s choices … well Barrack Hussein Obama, you should have done some things differently.

  43. #374943
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:36 am, gator said:

    On July 14th, 2008 at 7:03 am, ajmontana said:

    Note to Obama: don’t go near Jesse (the race baiter) when he’s holding a pair of scissors. :shock:
    I think Jesse already got them. He really does have to grow a pair!

  44. #374944
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:37 am, RobM1981 said:

    Obama is often compared to JFK, and for many good reasons. They are (were) both young and charismatic senators. It has been pointed out several times that Kennedy was a terrible president for many reasons, not the least of which is that he was nowhere near bright or experienced enough to handle the job.

    But, although he was a cretin, there’s no denying that JFK had a pair. Aside from his psychotic womanizing, he was a man’s man. That was actually his aura – much of it faked, given the reality of his frail health, but his “pitch” was “here’s a man’s man.”

    Obama has JFK’s look, but beyond that he’s 100% Phil Donahue.

    The press will make a meal of Oboohoo for 4 years. It will make the Carter years look like a love-fest.

    This will be the one high-point in what will otherwise be a miserable 4 years…

  45. #374949
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:42 am, wighttrasch said:

    I heard James Carville laughing about the cover on TV this a.m.

    That’s a scary sound.

  46. #374951
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:44 am, swmbo said:

    Guilt Trip, can’t afford the gas so I’m not going.

    Obama’s Big Black Suburban needs a sign in the window “Baby on Board”

  47. #374953
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:47 am, ajmontana said:

    it might be fun to tune into “the spew” today just to see the fake outrage. Bash a General good, Bash Obama bad, and oh the pukey sweet Michelle when she made her appearance was enough to make a a garbage disposal barf.

  48. #374954
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:48 am, dan708 said:

    Those “Kill Bush” signs are a stark reminder that American society is falling steadily down to the level of a third-world country. Frightening!

  49. #374957
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:51 am, josetheguerilla said:

    Good post MM!!!!!!!!

    Then, when you’re done digesting all that, wipe your nose, grow a pair, do your little Jay-Z dance move, and take your own advice to your daughters:

    lol

  50. #374960
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:54 am, nhpatriot said:

    Well, you can’t blame the poor man for being upset about this… only conservatives/Republicans are supposed to be critized and made fun of, not liberals! Oh, the audacity of The New Yorker for playing fair.

  51. #374962
    On July 14th, 2008 at 9:59 am, Gabe said:

    So, you found this satirical New Yorker cover art “tasteless and offensive.”

    Welcome to public life.

    The cover is accurate in its representation of Barack Hussein Obama and his wife. If he disagrees, it’s called freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

    No doubt if this were his country, the first “change” would be to get rid of anything criticizing him or the revolution and to place his picture everywhere like in 1984.

    The revolutionary aspect of the cover is dead on:

    The Muslim and Stalinist Obama actually wants a civilian corps of Obama “youth,” just like in 1984, that is LARGER and more POWERFUL than the military. This is straight from the horse’s mouth on July 2. He actually wants a gang of La Raza style youth going around in guns to “secure” the country:

    http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/007818.html

    The above was a headline on Hot Air. Is there any wonder that the MSM does not want to advertise it?

    Barack Hussein Obama IS a Muslim and he and his wife ARE communist revolutionaries. What Obama is upset about is the fact that the cover of the mag is going to draw attention to the evidence supporting it:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2042459/posts

    http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12745.htm

  52. #374965
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:01 am, tropicalwave12 said:

    Ahh! But Hope and Change. I hope he can change his pants after (if) he is elected because I’m sure he will get the crap kicked out of him in the cartoon arena.

    BUT! He isn’t the same ol’ politician is he?

  53. #374966
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:06 am, Chesapeaekegal said:

    To Red State Skeptic…how refreshing…a troll. It seems that you are no longer just a skeptic but kool-aid drinking left winger Obamaniac.

  54. #374968
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:07 am, sonofdy said:

    Over on huffpo they had a picture of bush with a bone through his nose for days. They laughed it up, but just ry doing the same for Obama. I sugest we do exactly the same thing to Obama that was done to bush.

  55. #374971
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:10 am, bayou22 said:

    Wasn’t the original Messiah also blasphemed and treated quite poorly by cultural elites? Oh, that’s right. He’d know that if his church for 20 years actually preached biblical material.

    BTW, if he won’t grow a pair, perhaps he can borrow Hillary’s.

  56. #374972
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:10 am, bayou22 said:

    …or better yet… “Just words.”

  57. #374973
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:11 am, sonofdy said:

    Red State Skeptic,
    After 8 years of such attacks from the left on the right, do you really expect us to just play nice? You seem to think making bush look like a chimp is ok but somehow obama can’t have the same treatment? Go to hell.

  58. #374974
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:12 am, sonofdy said:

    If he grows a pair, don’t let jessie jackson anywhere near him!!!

  59. #374975
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:12 am, Henry said:

    LOL! That’s a great New Yorker cover.

    Screw him if he can’t take a little ribbing. What a wuss!

  60. #374976
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:13 am, rambler said:

    BO & MO really wanted a cartoon depicting them as the new camelot white house. The the cartoon hit a nerve because it is the truth. The left has to make-up stuff about the right and the right just has to expose the truth about the left.Add JJ to the mix and it produces one comedy act. BO needs to realize that if he gets the WH he can expect more nasty cartoons when he screws up!BO is too thinskinned to be POTUS and MO is not a strong woman!

  61. #374977
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:13 am, ajmontana said:

    The only bummer about the cartoon is the American Flag burning.
    is that a Obama bong on the mantel next to the pot plant? :lol:

  62. #374981
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:15 am, foxforce91 said:

    BTW, if he won’t grow a pair, perhaps he can borrow Hillary’s.

    LOL!! Best post of the day! I’ve thought many times that Obama will not be the “uniter” his people think he will be merely because I am angry about the 8 years of tantrum throwing the left has had over Bush and I intend to give it back 10-fold. They think we’re mean? Let’s show them just how mean we can be. We are better at it and we’re smarter than they ever thought of being.

  63. #374982
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:15 am, nyk said:

    I like it. I think it shows excatly who these people are.

    The irony of this statement, of course, is that the cartoon is meant to make fun of how absurd these right wing slurs are (as well as the people who make and believe them. In other words, The New Yorker isn’t laughing with you, it’s laughing at you). The artist is quoted as saying the cover was created to “show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is.”

    With due respect, this is one of the most oblivious blog posts I have ever seen.

    Really? I kinda think it’s par for the course around here.

  64. #374984
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:16 am, TheSageOfSedgwick said:

    It has had some competition over the years, but this blog has got to be one of MM’s all-time best – served up cold with a perfect garnish of vitriolicly dismissive disdain.

    Eat ‘em up, Michelle!

  65. #374987
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:18 am, sonofdy said:

    The irony of this statement, of course, is that the cartoon is meant to make fun of how absurd these right wing slurs are (as well as the people who make and believe them. In other words, The New Yorker isn’t laughing with you, it’s laughing at you). The artist is quoted as saying the cover was created to “show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is

    Yes I know what they intended, but they actualy managed to paint a somewhat accurate picture. Except Obama is not muslim (sorry guys, he isn’t)

  66. #374992
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:21 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    I don’t know if Newt has weighed in yet, but if he does be sure he’ll mention the 1994 Time (with Newt as Scrooge taking away Tiny Tim’s crutch) and Newsweek (with Newt as Dr. Seuss’s Grinch) covers in 1994 after the Repubs took over the House. And the sick thing is, they were SERIOUS. The most popular weeklies out there, not some crappy little New Yorker mag. Gingrich is still steaming about those covers, 14 years later.

    Obama, stop whining? Who would he be without his whining? He’s like the Jackie Chiles character in Seinfeld — saying “I am outraged!” at the slightest provocation. You upset about my racial reference? Stuff it.

  67. #374993
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:21 am, wighttrasch said:

    Really? I kinda think it’s par for the course around here.

    But yet you keep coming back…Solomon said ‘like a dog returns to his vomit’.

  68. #374994
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:21 am, pueblo1032 said:

    If he grows a pair??? I don’t think MO has room in her purse for another pair. She already has his in check, in case she needs them…

  69. #374997
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:24 am, MtsEdge said:

    In other words, The New Yorker isn’t laughing with you, it’s laughing at you).

    We got that already. The point is, many a truth is said in jest.

  70. #374998
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:24 am, DBNinKY said:

    “…these right wing slurs are (as well as the people who make and believe them.”

    NYK, I live eastern KY, a.k.a., Democrat Central, and believe me, it is not right wingers who are saying those thing, the “slurs,” about BHO but the base of the Democrat Party.

  71. #375002
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:26 am, chep said:

    I think it’s a great cover for the magazine. The american white voter should not be forced to vote for Obama because he or she is guilty of being born white. They should not vote for that clown and his angry wife because they are bad for our country.

    The Obamas spent 25 years or however many going to all black anti white church ceremenonies. I’d say that is out of touch with most Americans. If McCain went to an all white church which spewed out anti black sermons every week he’d be on a grill for it. But he’s white so the rules are different…

    The news media wants us all to think that Obama is the only one running for president. They never give McCain any air time up here in Seattle.

  72. #375004
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:28 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    nyk said:

    The irony of this statement, of course, is that the cartoon is meant to make fun of how absurd these right wing slurs are (as well as the people who make and believe them. In other words, The New Yorker isn’t laughing with you, it’s laughing at you). The artist is quoted as saying the cover was created to “show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is.”

    Another demonstration of Nyk’s integrity and supreme lockstep intelligence.

  73. #375007
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:29 am, dadmin said:

    I agree with McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds that the cover graphic was “tasteless and offensive”, but the SCOTUS has not reached the point of regulating “tasteless and offensive” speech from the first amendment. Elect BHO, though, and a future generation of justices will surely discover that Congress’ making no law “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press” does not apply to “tasteless and offensive” speech for certain classes of people.

  74. #375010
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:31 am, englishqueen01 said:

    The irony of this statement, of course, is that the cartoon is meant to make fun of how absurd these right wing slurs are (as well as the people who make and believe them. In other words, The New Yorker isn’t laughing with you, it’s laughing at you). The artist is quoted as saying the cover was created to “show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is.”

    Then the oh-so-brilliant Obamas missed the memo. If they felt it was a portrayal of the “fear-mongering rediculousness that it is”, they’d embrace it – you know, great for the campaign and all.

    However, methinks they doth protest too much, which means the “right wing fear-mongering” is probably closer to the mark than the Obamas wish to acknowledge.

  75. #375014
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:33 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:11 am, sonofdy said:
    Red State Skeptic,
    After 8 years of such attacks from the left on the right, do you really expect us to just play nice? You seem to think making bush look like a chimp is ok but somehow obama can’t have the same treatment? Go to hell.

    I’m a Democrat, so hell is a given. It’s not OK to make Bush look like a chimp, and it’s not OK to make Obama look like a chimp.

    I would love conservatives to at least be self-aware enough to see the irony of telling liberals to stop complaining, when they spend every waking moment whining about the “liberal” media, institutions of higher learning, Hollywood, and pretty much anything else that they’re convinced isn’t being fair to them.

    Conservatives, the “grievance mongers” are you.

  76. #375020
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:36 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    The cartoon shows the prejudiced, twisted mind of a left-wing cartoonist and what he thinks of the mind of the right-winger. Even those on the left should be able to see the joke is on the cartoonist, not on conservatives. The truth is, the mind of a conservative is generally more flexible and lacking in prejudice than those on the left. There are so many things a left-winger won’t consider rationally because his emotions get in the way.

  77. #375024
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:37 am, derel3433 said:

    Has Obama commented on this?

  78. #375025
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:38 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    I would love conservatives to at least be self-aware enough to see the irony of telling liberals to stop complaining, when they spend every waking moment whining about the “liberal” media, institutions of higher learning, Hollywood …

    It’s a factual matter those institutions are liberal. Whining doesn’t have anything to do with it.

  79. #375027
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:41 am, Gabe said:

    Except Obama is not muslim (sorry guys, he isn’t)

    He isn’t? So everyone that knew him, including the president of Garuda airlines of Indonesia, is wrong? He didn’t actually state that “There is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet” to the New York Times” in a perfect Arabic accent? He wasn’t registered as a Muslim in an Indonesian Catholic school? He didn’t go to a Marxist and anti-American church for 20 years? None of his family was Muslim?

    He IS Muslim, and this article proves it. But he STATES he is Christian! Just because someone states something–especially when they are desperate to gain something from a lie, in this case the presidency–doesn’t make it true.

    Here is the proof that Barack Hussein Obama IS and WAS a Muslim:

    http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12745.htm

    Of course, we have all known he is a Marxist, and his Stalinist statements on July 2 prove this fact as well:

    http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/007818.html

    Thus, the cover is entirely accurate. If it weren’t, the Obama campaign would just be shrugging it off as Condi Rice has always done with the negative caricatures.

    News flash: Barack Hussein Obama is already scheduling talks with his Muslim and terrorist allies:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080714/ap_on_el_pr/palestinians_obama_3

  80. #375033
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:42 am, fluffy said:

    Red State Skeptic trolled:

    Remind us again, who wants to restore the Fairness Doctrine?

  81. #375037
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:44 am, nyk said:

    But yet you keep coming back…

    Primarily to marvel at posts and responses like this.

    Then the oh-so-brilliant Obamas missed the memo. If they felt it was a portrayal of the “fear-mongering rediculousness that it is”, they’d embrace it – you know, great for the campaign and all.

    However, methinks they doth protest too much, which means the “right wing fear-mongering” is probably closer to the mark than the Obamas wish to acknowledge.

    In one fell swoop you both ask and (unwittingly) answer your own question about why the Obama camp might not “welcome” the image. Oh, the irony!

    I would love conservatives to at least be self-aware enough to see the irony of telling liberals to stop complaining, when they spend every waking moment whining about the “liberal” media, institutions of higher learning, Hollywood, and pretty much anything else that they’re convinced isn’t being fair to them.

    Exactly.

  82. #375038
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:45 am, wighttrasch said:

    whining about the “liberal” media, institutions of higher learning, Hollywood, and pretty much anything else that they’re convinced isn’t being fair to them.

    We don’t whine–we point out discrepancies, fallacies & foam-flecked maniacal rantings.

  83. #375039
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:45 am, sonofdy said:

    Conservatives, the “grievance mongers” are you.

    Now that is the biggest pant load I have seen in a long time. Conservatives look at solutions, democrats look at past “crimes” (jessie jackson ring a bell??)

  84. #375044
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:48 am, sonofdy said:

    nyk, If the liberal press were even handed in thier reporting, you would probably know alot more about Obama and he probably would never have been nominated.

  85. #375050
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:52 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Conservatives, the “grievance mongers” are you.

    Ha! Thanks for the morning laugh.

    nyk: I stand by my assessment. The truth hurts, and clearly the Obamas are feeling the pain.

    Their behavior over the past 20 years, plus some of their campaign commentary, would say the picture painted by the New Yorker isn’t too far off the mark – regardless of where it comes from.

    But, then agin, who am I to blaspheme the son of god, right?

  86. #375051
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:53 am, Misscheryl said:

    nyk – you are certainly no better than the right wingers you hate. You are guilty of behaving the same way.

  87. #375054
    On July 14th, 2008 at 10:55 am, wighttrasch said:

    But, see, the media does report some of this stuff, but it’s never a big deal. It’s not important to the media, nor deal-breaking news to those who believe in liberal candidates. The only things that matter to liberals is if we go to church, how we teach our children to salute a flag, if I want to smoke a cigarette in a bar, if I don’t want to put on my seatbelt, or if we want to search suspicious-looking people at the airport.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Damn it feels good to be a victim”

October 27, 2009 01:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

47 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

About the “new” federal medical marijuana policy

October 19, 2009 11:16 AM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Blowing smoke.

Best Nobel Peace Prize Rap Ever

October 16, 2009 09:40 AM by Michelle Malkin

65 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Doing my laundry. That’s a Peace Prize.”

Magazine industry rewards Obama cult worship

October 15, 2009 09:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

79 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom