McCain at The Race conference: Capitulation complete; Update: Juan Hernandez to broker meeting with Morones?

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 15, 2008 08:32 AM

As expected, John McCain’s appearance at the annual convention of La Raza/The Race yielded no Hermana Souljah moments. Ed Morrissey points to McCain’s mild, almost apologetic rejoinder to open-borders zealot Enrique Morones and compares it to Barack Obama’s embrace of the radical activist. That’s a relief. But it’s the very least we could expect of a Republican candidate. And when you watch the clip Ed posted, you’ll notice that in response to Morones blasting our Border Patrol agents as killers, there is not an explicit word of support from McCain for the thousands of men and women who try to enforce our immigration laws–men and women Barack Obama accuses of terrorism. Instead, McCain echoes Morones and La Raza’s talking points about the need for “humane” and “compassionate” enforcement and commits himself to “stop the inhumane raids.”

Translation: No enforcement.

For a stark illustration of McCain’s double talk at La Raza/The Race yesterday, here he is telling an audience member that he’ll support the DREAM Act–after telling conservative bloggers that he would have voted no on cloture for the bill “because he ‘got the message’ this summer that Americans want the border secured before we ‘go on to the rest.’” Uh-huh. McCain was AWOL for that cloture vote last October. He was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act.

I’d say my pre-event translation yesterday was dead on.

***

Allah begs to differ with me on McCain and the DREAM Act. Gabriel at Ace thinks I’ve been “taken in.”

Yes, I know what McCain said in the rest of his answer, not shown on the clip, about securing the border first. Anyone who believe that is the one who’s being taken in. He led conservatives to believe that he opposed it. He told his friends at La Raza that he supports it. All the rest is noise.

***

Reader Edgar M. e-mails:

On a Mexican radio program on 1420 AM in Tijuana hosted by Odilon Garcia, Morones called in and gave more information on what Morones and McCain talked about after their public conversation took place.

Morones told Garcia that while McCain was talking on the microphone about the fact that drug smugglers are using migrants to cross over illegal drugs, Morones told him that the United States should stop the demand for illegal drugs.

After McCain ended his Q and A session, Morones and McCain spoke face to face and McCain told him about the need for Border Security. Morones asked the Senator to meet with him privately without cameras so Enrique could make the point that Immigration raids are “separating families” and border walls are “killing immigrants”. He told the Senator to ask Enrique’s good friend Juan Hernandez, whom Enrique had dinner the night before, to set up the private meeting. McCain told him that he would. Enrique said that he would ask McCain to sign an executive order to stop Immigration raids.

Enrique then adds, that he called Juan Hernandez about the mistake the McCain campaign is doing by portraying the picture of John McCain with the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe in the background at the NCLR convention. Morones then told the story that on Saturday some students called him at the convention that they were upset with the McCain booth having a picture of Senator McCain with the Virgin of Guadalupe because the senator was using the image of the virgin for political purposes. One of the students took the picture and ran away. Some security officers ran off and caught the student but that the picture was not hung back. The next day the picture was not seen and Morones called that a victory.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Six Meat Buffet » Illegals… Stabbing The Unwed Mothers That Americans Won’t Stab
  2. Illegal Immigration « I Think ^(Link) Therefore I Err
  3. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morning Scramble - 7/15/2008
  4. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: McCain flip-flops on the DREAM Act — or does he?
  5. Ace of Spades HQ
  6. No Flip-Flop-Flip From McCain on DREAM Act « Gabriel Malor
  7. McCain Rips La Raza Activist That Obama Praised : BigMouthFrog
  8. The Dustin Inman Society Blog » Juan Hernadez the Mexican open borders McCain staffer…
  9. McCain’s Pandering to La Raza « The Foxhole
  10. Queer Conservative
  11. Could Cantor bring the Conservatives to the Polls? « No Compromise When it Comes to Being Right!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #376288
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 11:58 am, abstractmind said:
    Rob,

    I’m not sure if you’re just being off today, or if you’re just kind of xenophobic…

    I have absolutely no problem with legal immigration, regardless of where they hail from originally.

    Man I hate that “xenophobic” crap (I know you are not throwing that out htere like a liberal though). I understnad where Rob is coming from. I don’t like to call out any nationality as the sole problem. However, in his case, the nationality of the immigrants is clear. I am against the mass immigraiton policy of today. The sheer numbers are overwhelming the traditional culture and language of our country, as well as the environment. Mass immigration in the past was always followed by a moratorium to allow for assimilation. Usually 2 decades. This immigration wave has been going on for 40 years and is completley changing the landscape of our country. I call it common sense to question the mass immigration policies of today and evaluate if they are adding value to american citizens. Not “fear” as xenophobe implies. Please read some of the excellent material put out by NumbersUSA.com to see the myriad of problems caused by mass immigration and get facts you will never see from the PC MSM. Finally, in every non-muslim country that has had a massive wave of muslim immigrants, violence and civil unrest have followed as they sought to force their own will upon the natives. So, making a general sweeping statement that all and any amount of legal immigration is good, is frankly naive. I would argue that some cultures (agreed not a nationality) should not be allowed to come in any great number. We must not allow our compassion and romantic notions of immigration to cloud our judgement and lose sight of our ultimate goal. A better future and standard of living for our decendents. Which I fail to see materializing if we allow our population to hit 1B as predicted by the beginning of next century by The Census Bureau. Again, great stats that will open your eyes at NumbersUSA.com.

  2. #376292
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Rob said:

    abstractmind said: We don’t just call this the “Melting Pot” for nothing.

    I agree with you. We don’t just call this the melting pot for nothing.. because NOTHING is what is happening. March with Mexican flags demanding, DEMANDING rights. No assimilation…

    McAmnesty and the Obamasiah were pandering to a LOT of citizens at the Mexican “The RACE” rally yesterday. Those Mexicans want more and more illegls and more and more of my tax money and more and more of our neighborhoods and towns.

    I don’t care of your feelings are hurt. You can rant all you want. If your mommy waves Mexian flags and marches in the streets demanding her rights… if you are getting my tax money to take care of your baby. Then you ARE what I am talking about and I don’t want you here. If you are assimilating and fly the American flag.. then you can stay. Gracious of me, huh?

  3. #376293
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Mister P said:

    And he won. And this is now a two man race between McCain and Obama. We are in the end phase of the election that is now past the primaries.

    For you maybe, but I am voting a straight Libertarian ticket and encourage more citizen’s to do the same. I certainly am not giving McCain a mandate to open our borders even wider.

  4. #376294
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, love2rumba said:

    Please forgive some of my misspellings this morning on some of my posts -I have to go now.

  5. #376295
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, everett_mansfield said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, greenfairie said:

    You are missing my point. I DON’T CARE if they are illegal or not. I wish they were gone, they are changing this part of the country into another Mexico. It is a cancer that is going to spread across this nation.

    Thanks for that softball pitch to leftists who want to paint everyone opposed to illegal immigration as Latino-hatin’ racists!

    My mom is a legal immigrant from Latin America and a U.S. citizen for 23 years. She doesn’t like illegal immigration or any of these left-wing open borders nutballs any more than you do. I am perfectly fine with legal immigration, which is why I dropped Numbers USA like a hot potato because to me it seemed anti-immigration across the board. I am concerned multiculturalism, leftists who want to destabilize the country, and the welfare state are luring a different type of immigrant than decades ago, a guy who’s just looking for bennies and refuses to be part of our society. But I also know from personal experience there are plenty of people who are here–including Latinos-who know full well they have a better deal here than anywhere else and are grateful for it. Don’t throw the water out with the anchor baby. With your logic, unless you are named Little Black Feather, somebody can send you off somewhere else too.

    GREENFAIRIE:
    I don’t understand your rant at all- it makes no sense, other than to reveal that you are quite thin-skinned, but I believe I do understand the point being made by the person you quote. I can sum it up in two word: MEXICO SUCKS. (Please go back and read the quote you copied, the writer was referring to Mexico. Mexico sucks, got it?)

    Many, many Americans (no, actually only trhe well-informed) hate seeing the illegal, pushy takeover of any part of the United States by ILLEGAL ALIENS, most of whom are from Mexico.

    I lived in Southern Arizona and saw first-hand how these invaders have destroyed that state with their trash, and their incessant demands on every social and educational service available.

    And we’re sick and tired of hearing spanish speaking anything. Got it?

  6. #376298
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    Agreed. I dont like calling someone a racist, a bigot, or a xenophobe…but you’re right as far as i’m not throwing it around like liberals. ;)

    I agree that immigration needs to be very closely examined and make sure its appropriate by the numbers. But i’d take 100 legal immigrants over 1 illegal 12 days a week, in all 58 states :)

  7. #376299
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Rob said:

    Weary Citizen …thanks. I get a little too passionate I guess about something that won’t be fixed. I just know how it was, can see what it has become, and know what it will be… and I get tired of the ostriches that just shout racist and xenophobe when they don’t like what is said.

  8. #376301
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Irish Rose said:

    Instead, McCain echoes Morones and La Raza’s talking points about the need for “humane” and “compassionate” enforcement and commits himself to “stop the inhumane raids.”

    We do have a problem with illegal immigration in this country, and I don’t support the agenda of La Raza.

    But why do we have to be inhumane to get the job done?

    I honestly don’t see anything wrong with humane and compassionate enforcement of the law. These are people that we’re talking about after all, not cattle, and there are frequently innocent children involved.

    We can enforce our immigration laws just fine, without being “inhumane”. We do it by enacting legislation that will stop the flow of illegal immigrants now. We do it by automatically deporting any illegal with a criminal record and not allowing them to return.

    We can then find a way to hold illegals that are already living here in this country accountable for obtaining their US citizenship within a strict and specified timeframe, so that their children here in the US do not have to grow up in poverty without a mother or a father.

    Can we do this? I think that we can. And I think that we should.

    I realize that my opinion might be unpopular here, but I see no reason to ruin the lives of innocent children. However we as a nation decide to deal with immigrants who are already here in the US, we simply must not lose sight of the fact that there are innocents involved who do not deserve to have their lives destroyed.

    Deporting a an undocumented immigrant who has a family with young children is a cruel, short-term solution that has very serious long-term ramifications. It hurts both the parent, and the child(ren). If we can avoid doing this for the sake of the children invovled, then we should. If a parent hasn’t begun the process of earning their citizenship within a specificed timeframe, then the law will be clear… they’ll have to go. Then and only then, should the process of deportation take place.

    It’s a far better thing to enforce the laws of our land while still treating human beings like human beings. When we forget how to do that, when we dehumanize other human beings in the name of “law enforcement”, we lose a part of our own humanity.

    An overhaul of our immigration laws and better enforcement of those laws are necessary, no doubt about it. But conservatives and Republicans should not be in the business of advocating the dehumanization of other human beings.

    It has to be done, but it must be done humanely.

    My two cents.

  9. #376303
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, Dandapani said:
    Remind me again, how McCan’t is any different than Nobama????

    His wife owns a beer company. (o:
    At his age he probably won’t make two terms.
    His wife owns a beer company. (o:
    Nobama’s wife scares me
    Did I mention McCan’ts wife owns a beer company?

  10. #376305
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, wise_man said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, Blind_Mule said: If you want to convince people to vote for McCain you will have to produce more than ratings, c’mon I know you have to be smarter than this, you are going to have to give more than this to convince those who say they will not vote for him.

    It’s an insult that I have to even attempt to convince ‘conservatives’ to vote for McCain and help to keep Obama out of the whitehouse.

    These two links simply point the reader to two pages that illustrate that Obama is the most liberal, where McCain is no where near Obama, and is more conservative than most people here give him credit for.

  11. #376307
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, Rob said:

    This is what everett_mansfield is talking about… Here

  12. #376308
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    To all those that are going to vote Libertarian, write in a candidate, or stay home:

    I am a conservative and I’m a Republican. This is my party and I refuse to give it up any more than I am willing to abandon my country. I will vote for the most conservative candidate that has a legitimate chance of winning the presidency. I will let the RNC know through my donations (or lack thereof) and letter writing the direction I expect them to take. If you give up the party to the lefties, the damage may be irreparable. Remember, the ship can’t be righted if the crew jumps overboard.

  13. #376310
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Mister P said:

    “I am voting a straight Libertarian ticket and encourage more citizen’s to do the same.”

    A vote for Rosanne’s dad is certainly a wasted vote.

  14. #376313
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Barry F. said:

    I don’t think we can use the National Journal’s or the American Conservative Union’s results as a cut ‘n’ dry measure on conservative credentials for McCain. Yes. 80 looks much better than 65 the previous year for him. But, if we go back and look at the issues on which he missed the votes, where was he leaning with his public pronouncements on those issues, like the Dream Act cloture vote he missed. Yet he was a co-sponsor of that particular piece.

    Yes. Obama is worse. I know and don’t disagree on that. But, please, spare anyone the argument that McCain is a conservative. McCain uses an “R” after his name for mere political expediency and nothing more. Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal Democrat Socialist.

    If I do vote for McCain, it will be because the Republican candidate suck but the Democrat’s candidate sucks more, not because I have been convinced that McCain is a conservative maverick.

  15. #376315
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, wise_man said:

    And he won. And this is now a two man race between McCain and Obama. We are in the end phase of the election that is now past the primaries.

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Mister P said: For you maybe, but I am voting a straight Libertarian ticket and encourage more citizen’s to do the same. I certainly am not giving McCain a mandate to open our borders even wider.

    You have got to be kidding me. “for me?” He won the republican primary. If you want to vote libertarian, then welcome to the extreme edge of the voting bell curve. Wile millions of the rest of us will be voting for Obama or McCain, you and the few thousands of you who vote for a third party candidate will be relegated to an obscure wikipedia page on the 2008 presidential election. Go look up the 2004 election and tell me how many votes that the libertarian party got. And while you are at it, tell me how many electoral votes they got.

  16. #376317
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, Barry F. said:

    80 BO…

    Sorry. Typing too fast.

  17. #376319
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, sbw999 said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 9:41 am, Weary Citizen said:

    agreed and well said. I believe our Country’s course is irreversible. The equation is simple. Power hungry corrupt politicians… take the $$ from self reliant hard working citizens…give it away to those people, the majority of which have their hands out, and want to be supported by the gov’t….and whose voting #’s keep the corrupt politicians in power. This is the America nowm, and for the future.

  18. #376320
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Stubby said:

    The demands of Mexico and the illegals gets stronger and stronger and makes me ill. This situation is getting worse and something has to be done. Our candidates are worthless on this issue and I believe this issue is monumental in the hearts of American citizens. Do they think the populace is stupid? How can these politicians give away our money, services and sovereignty with such in-your-face arrogance? How can we accept that they prioritize the needs of foreigners, mostly illegal, over the American citizenry?

    We need a consistent program of phone calls and emails like when we beat down the Shamnesty last year. They don’t realize what anger is developing within the heartland. How arrogant can these people be?

  19. #376322
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, Rob said:

    Other than you’ve not only missed the point, but ranted about something you obviously didnt read too well, shows me you’re just waiting for people to reply so you can be all offended about something.

    lets try one more time, shall we?

    You never mentioned assimilation…well, before I busted your chops the last time. It’s a nice theme, but you didnt make that distinction beforehand. Attempting to use that to cover your rear end after the fact isn’t going to work here.

    McAmnesty and the Obamasiah were pandering to a LOT of citizens at the Mexican “The RACE” rally yesterday. Those Mexicans want more and more illegls and more and more of my tax money and more and more of our neighborhoods and towns.

    I completely agree. Both of those turds are a disgrace. And Nashville here has one of the largest illegal populations in the country, behind places in california and phoenix. Yes, i say ship every illegal back to where they are from. but i’m clearly making the “illegal” distinction, which you again are not.

    I don’t care of your feelings are hurt. You can rant all you want. If your mommy waves Mexian flags and marches in the streets demanding her rights… if you are getting my tax money to take care of your baby. Then you ARE what I am talking about and I don’t want you here. If you are assimilating and fly the American flag.. then you can stay. Gracious of me, huh?

    Someone with your limited intellect and absolutely asinine point of view doesn’t have the stones or the ability to hurt my feelings. But you do give me a good laugh. I wasn’t really ranting as much as slamming your ignorance in short order. You’re a racist. It’s blatant and on public record now.

    And just for your information, my mother is 100% white. I’m half native american. My child is half hispanic, however. why would i get upset about you not even making that very clear distinction? ;)
    And besides, I work hard and take care of my own. Your tax money doesnt factor into it. Some of us have a sense of responsibility, and i make a good living. My child doesnt NEED your tax money, so you’re welcome to keep it.
    :)

    Nice try. I’ve give you an A for effort.

  20. #376324
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, Little Ma said:

    In my opinion, illegal immigration is the most important issue in our country today. Thank you, Michelle, for keeping us up to date on it.

    As for Juan McCain, just thinking about him makes me sick at my stomach. Voting for him would put me in the hospital with the worst migraine of my life. I’ll vote for the candidate of the Constitution Party if he’s on the ballot; if he isn’t, then I’ll vote for Barr.

    beenthere said, “It is a horrible situation we face no matter how you slice it but I think it best to give the American people the government they deserve.” Amen!

    Rob, I’m with you. The USA is becoming a Third World Country fast enough as it is. We don’t need to be inundated with people who not only have no knowledge of the founding principles of our government, but who have no interest in gaining that knowledge (in English!) or respecting our laws.

    I feel like dragging out my great-granddaddy’s Confederate uniform and hollering, “Secession!”

  21. #376328
    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Rob said:
    Weary Citizen …thanks. I get a little too passionate I guess about something that won’t be fixed. I just know how it was, can see what it has become, and know what it will be… and I get tired of the ostriches that just shout racist and xenophobe when they don’t like what is said.

    also, nice attempt to equivicate to the crowd.

    You really just dont know what you’re talking about, and trying to win people to your side when i’ve already outted your position is weak.

    Come back when you’re intellectually honest enough to discuss this.

  22. #376333
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Irish Rose said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 11:47 am, wise_man said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 11:42 am, Rob said:You are missing my point. I DON’T CARE if they are illegal or not. I wish they were gone, they are changing this part of the country into another Mexico. It is a cancer that is going to spread across this nation.

    You want to deport hispanic US citizens to mexico?

    Whoa.

    I’ve been complaining about the in-your-face, anti-Mexican bigotry here for days, wise-man… where have you been?

  23. #376340
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Irish Rose said:

    On July 8th, 2008 at 9:28 am, Rob said:

    Irish Rose said: I see that you don’t differentiate here between illegals and legal immigrants from Mexico, Rob…

    you just lump them all together.
    There are a lot of issues that I think are destroying America. But my not liking to push 1 for English, gang tagging in my once clean neighborhood, free lunches given to most of the students, free tuition for illegals, etc, etc, etc, I guess the answer to your question is, Mexicans in general.

  24. #376341
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, franksalterego said:

    Good Grief

    Is there a cure for MM’s KneeJerk Reaction?

    fercrissaks

  25. #376342
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, abstractmind said:

    Thanks. I beleive we are in agreement on the issue. Namely, any illegal immigration is unacceptable. Legal immigration policy needs to sane and at reasonable levels. Unfortuantley, the policies today are based on PC and compassion, rather than what is best for the country in the short and long term.

  26. #376349
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, wise_man said:

    Michelle is justifiably upset at what mcCain is doing and saying, franksalterego.

    I do hope that some time before the election, that cooler heads prevail.

  27. #376351
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said:

    And lets’ not forget about ArizonaNeanderthal.

    On July 8th, 2008 at 9:11 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    Whose idea was it to send John McCain down to Mexico
    Worse yet, who let him back in? He is so enamored with Mexico perhaps he can run for office there.
    McCain to Mexico
    Obama and Mama to Ragheadistan

    The Ragheadistan comment was deleted, thankfully. Michelle said that she doesn’t agree with Robs’ position, but she’s not going to censor it either.

    If the hostess doesn’t care about bigotry here, then why should people like Rob stop making statements like this one?

    Just saying.

  28. #376352
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    Agreed.

    Hey, I’m all for being compassionate. We put them all back on a bus to their home territory…and the bus can be air conditioned ;) That’s compassionate isnt it? :)

  29. #376356
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said

    Irish, you’re making comments like

    If the hostess doesn’t care about bigotry here

    AFTER she deleted that comment from the thread.

    Just saying.

  30. #376359
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, orlandocajun said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Irish Rose said:

    We can enforce our immigration laws just fine, without being “inhumane”. We do it by enacting legislation that will stop the flow of illegal immigrants now. We do it by automatically deporting any illegal with a criminal record and not allowing them to return.”

    We already have laws that will stop the flow of illegal immigrants. We’re not enforcing them. Why not deport all illegal aliens and not allow them to return?

    We can then find a way to hold illegals that are already living here in this country accountable for obtaining their US citizenship within a strict and specified timeframe, so that their children here in the US do not have to grow up in poverty without a mother or a father.

    Their children don’t have to grow up without a mother or father. They can go back with their parents from where they came from.

    An overhaul of our immigration laws and better enforcement of those laws are necessary, no doubt about it.

    We don’t need any new immigration laws, no doubt about it.

    I realize that my opinion might be unpopular here, but I see no reason to ruin the lives of innocent children. However we as a nation decide to deal with immigrants who are already here in the US, we simply must not lose sight of the fact that there are innocents involved who do not deserve to have their lives destroyed.

    Illegal aliens are criminals who broke our laws. If anyone is responsible for destroying the lives of innocents, it’s the parents. Don’t blame America for its sovereignty. Maybe we should free all criminals with children!

    We don’t deserve to have our lives, or culture, destroyed either. Ask the folks (Americans) in Los Angeles how they’re enjoying the culture there. Your heart’s in the right place, but your vision of the future needs some work. We have a duty to leave our children the country better than we found it…not worse.

  31. #376362
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, NHMagenta said:

    I too call for a 20-year moratorium on mass immigration; during this period the only immigrants allowed should be those who have critically-needed skills.

    No more multilingualism; those who don’t understand English should be picking up the tab for an interpreter.

    Of course the real deal is a move towards an eventual political union between the USA, Canada and Mexico with a Charter which will supersede our Constitution, courtesy of a future President and 67 US Senators.

    I do see either McCain or Obama signing such a treaty UNLESS they see the prospect of an immediate civil war or military coup.

  32. #376365
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said:

    “If the hostess doesn’t care about bigotry here, then why should people like Rob stop making statements like this one?”

    I remember when reader comments on the old site were disabled because of the racism…It was like playing whack-a mole with rabid, leftist anti-Filipino idiots.

    So… draw your own conclusions.

  33. #376366
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, emjem24 said:

    McCain never had my support. If the Republican primaries were as closed as the Democrat primaries, we would have had a different nominee. However, let’s face it, most of the folks running in the Republican primaries were weak. This is why McCain won the nominaton in the first place.

    I don’t like the Republican nominee but I like the Democrat nominee even less. There are even a number of Dems who don’t like him. That speaks volumes.

    The point is, neither party is serving the American population. When we have both party nominees pandering to the Latino and illegal populations in this country we have a problem. Too many Americans (ummm, liberals) complain about the “unfair” trade policies but look what has brought the illegals to this country? Ummm, businesses who undercut our wages and a class of people who want a slave class in our country.

    Many common sense people of both parties feel like they’re being invaded. Illegals want to rape our economy and take advantage of our country’s resources while not having to reap the consequences. Mexico is handing off their poor to our country instead of taking responsibility for them and thereby repopulating areas of our country that they think are still theirs but are legally not. Neither candidate has addressed the fact that there are 12-20 million illegals living in this country and haven’t done a thing to prove they’re willing to be American citizens (like waiting in line like those who are legally applying for citizenship).

    Nope, I don’t like McCain. If it wasn’t for wanting to pay less taxes and responsibiliy manage the war in Iraq, McCain would have already lost my vote. He is pandering on illegals just like Obummer and that’s just wrong.

    If Americans were, indeed, as pissed off about illegals as they say they were, McCain wouldn’t have been nominated and neither would have Obummer.

    Oh, and Lgm, being the useless liberal sockpuppet you are, have got it wrong about main street. Main street has been steadily disappearing for years with the influx of these illegal invaders. They bring disease, drugs, and are sucking the life out of this country. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, why don’t pay a visit to the LA school district, okay? :sad:

  34. #376367
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, Irish Rose said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, abstractmind said:

    Irish, you’re making comments like

    If the hostess doesn’t care about bigotry here
    AFTER she deleted that comment from the thread.

    Just saying.

    You’re right, I could have stated this differently.

    What’s the difference between anti-Muslim bigotry and anti-hispanic bigotry, though? There is no difference.

    My point: clearly some forms of bigotry are verboten here, and other forms of bigotry are acceptable. In my opinion, none of it is acceptable.

    But this is Michelles’ blog, and I’m just a member here. Who am I to suggest that it’s wrong?

  35. #376371
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, wise_man said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Irish Rose said: I’ve been complaining about the in-your-face, anti-Mexican bigotry here for days, wise-man… where have you been?

    This is really the first time that I have ever seen a ‘i hate mexicans!’ comment here. I am under no illusions that there isn’t any anti-hispanic bigotry in the republican party, and this is unfortunate. Contrary to what the liberals paint us all to be, I would gather from my readings and personal experience that the overwhelming majority of republicans/conservatives against illegal immigrants are so because of national security and a desire to see or nation enforce our laws. Most polled (if I recall correctly) do not want to see illegal immigrants who are successful at breaking our laws to be rewarded with permanent residence or citizenship.

    People who are bigoted against hispanics do us all a great disservice when they identify themselves as conservatives. We need to be very careful that we don’t allow people who feel this way to co-exist with everyone else who is not a bigot, and are opposed to illegal immigrants and other political issues such as sanctuary cities.

    The comments on this site over the last few months are really beginning to trouble me. Just the other day, I saw a ‘I hope McCain dies; comment. And I really don’t want to see this place become the right’s version of the daily kos.

  36. #376376
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    Irish Rose said:
    And lets’ not forget about ArizonaNeanderthal.

    On July 8th, 2008 at 9:11 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    Whose idea was it to send John McCain down to Mexico
    Worse yet, who let him back in? He is so enamored with Mexico perhaps he can run for office there.
    McCain to Mexico
    Obama and Mama to Ragheadistan

    The Ragheadistan comment was deleted, thankfully. Michelle said that she doesn’t agree with Robs’ position, but she’s not going to censor it either.

    Irish rose will you get off the Ragheadastan crap from 2 weeks ago. When radical muslim jihadists capture Americans in the middle east and cut their heads off for the world to see, blood, screaming, severed sinew and the works; people get angry and call them ragheads or much worse. Being the MM PC cop is kinda stupid.

  37. #376378
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Mister P said:

    You have got to be kidding me. “for me?” He won the republican primary. If you want to vote libertarian, then welcome to the extreme edge of the voting bell curve. Wile millions of the rest of us will be voting for Obama or McCain, you and the few thousands of you who vote for a third party candidate will be relegated to an obscure wikipedia page on the 2008 presidential election. Go look up the 2004 election and tell me how many votes that the libertarian party got. And while you are at it, tell me how many electoral votes they got.

    Then don’t complain about McCain. Accept his pledge to Mexico and embrace his vision of the future for the US. Believe as he does in Global Warming. Start reducing your outgo of Carbon Dioxide. Embrace “No Child Left Behind” Embrace Nafta. Because that is what you get. I will keep my own integrity by voting for what I Believe in.

    You can limit your choices if you like. But I will do what I can to help create a viable alternative. The Republicans like the Democrats before them have lost their way, and it is time for us citizens to take our country back. The two parties have created a monopoly. One which you obviously support. It will be an uphill battle against that monopoly, but I think one worth fighting.

    It is just not good enough to be “Anti-Obama”.

  38. #376379
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Rob said:
    Weary Citizen …thanks. I get a little too passionate I guess about something that won’t be fixed. I just know how it was, can see what it has become, and know what it will be… and I get tired of the ostriches that just shout racist and xenophobe when they don’t like what is said.

    This issue is full of passion on both sides. Most of us at one time have gotten carried away. But, we will never succeed my being meek and quiet as we have for the past 40 years. However, deporting all hispanics would mean I would deport 2 lifelong friends and their mother who is like my 2nd Mom. I beleive your anger was more directed at the illegals and the latest immigrants (at least that is even how I interpreted your original post). All we can do is fight to stop illegal imigation and reomve those here illegaly. Then fight to get sane and sustainable immigraiton policies in place for legal immigration. If we don’t succeed, I fear very bad things will happen in the next 40 years, which my children will be forced to deal with.

  39. #376380
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, Irish Rose said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said:

    “If the hostess doesn’t care about bigotry here, then why should people like Rob stop making statements like this one?”

    I remember when reader comments on the old site were disabled because of the racism…It was like playing whack-a mole with rabid, leftist anti-Filipino idiots.

    So… draw your own conclusions.

    I have, I’m sorry to say.

  40. #376382
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, md1964 said:

    Anyone gonna broker a Meeting between McCain and the Conservatives???

    Not that he would listen.. hell he just doesn’t understand…for every open borders vote he gets…he loses 3 to 5 conservative votes who will stay home. He better hope that 75% who want immigration enforcement survey is off by a long shot..

  41. #376389
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, Irish Rose said:

    Point taken, and it will be the last time that I mention it.

    But it does confirm that my concern about various forms of bigotry here at MM – and their selective moderation – is valid.

  42. #376392
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, wise_man said:

    The comments on this site over the last few months are really beginning to trouble me

    It has gotten completely irrational. The idea that aiding an Obama victory is remotely “consirvative” is just crazy. The idea that immigration is the only issue when we are fighting a 2 front war is aggravating. The idea that the only thing that can be done to effect immigration is simply voting is disappointing.

    Conservatives who want stronger enforcement are going to have to take the issue in to their own hands, organize and push for it in the house and senate. It seem though, that many here just want a consirvative version of a “nanny state” where their vote is the only contribution they make to the process. Meanwhile the open boarders people take to the streets saying “Sí, Se Puede!”…”yes we can”…

  43. #376393
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:31 pm, wise_man said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Mister P said: It is just not good enough to be “Anti-Obama”.

    There are now two people to choose from. If you want Obama, then vote for him, or don’t vote for McCain, because it will net you the same result.

    And if Obama is the next president, I don’t want to hear a word of complaint from you for the next 4 to 8 years on this or any other site – when you and everyone else had an opportunity to stand up and be counted. Because millions of democrats are going to be voting for Obama.

  44. #376399
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, Irish Rose said:

    I’m off to work, have a good afternoon all.

  45. #376405
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, traveler49 said:

    Rob said: You are missing my point. I DON’T CARE if they are illegal or not. I wish they were gone, they are changing this part of the country into another Mexico. It is a cancer that is going to spread across this nation.

    Rob, I think you are a keen observer. You see first hand what the previous amnesties have wrought on us. When you say you don’t care if they are citizens or not, I imagine you are referring to those that came here illegally before and were then granted amnesty. This will only repeat itself but in larger numbers with more dire consequences. Thanks for the UN PC speak, it was refreshing.

  46. #376413
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, Salt said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said:

    The Ragheadistan comment was deleted, thankfully. Michelle said that she doesn’t agree with Robs’ position, but she’s not going to censor it either.

    Sincere question: Where did Michelle state this?

  47. #376414
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Surveyor said:

    NHmagenta said:

    I do see either McCain or Obama signing such a treaty UNLESS they see the prospect of an immediate civil war or military coup.

    Exactly. I have said this a couple of times before on this blog and others. THE ONLY WAY we will have change is if patriotic military Generals revolt and start arresting the traitors in our midst. Remember the FISA thread from a few days ago? Our civilian (key word here) elected officials have no idea that every…and I mean every underhanded deal they have discussed on the phone or faxed to a fellow traitor in congress or the house or the executive branch even…has been recorded and will come back to haunt them when the fecal matter hits the oscillating mechanism. I can’t wait for that! Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever but…you will have to just trust me on this.

    furtim vigilans 8)

  48. #376415
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Surveyor said:

    and see-dub calls me crazy in 3…2…1..

  49. #376420
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:55 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, Little Ma said:
    We don’t need to be inundated with people who not only have no knowledge of the founding principles of our government, but who have no interest in gaining that knowledge (in English!) or respecting our laws.

    Lumping all Hispanics in with the illegal/LaRaza crowd is just want they want you to do because it bolsters their numbers and makes all Hispanics feel persecuted. That way they can play identity politics and win. I know plenty of Cubans who lived under communism and are staunch conservatives. They know more about our method of government and its creation than most students graduating from our schools.

    If we allow them to make this an ethnic issue, we will lose.

  50. #376424
    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, nhpatriot said:

    The most frustrating thing about this issue is that we wouldn’t even need a border fence if we just enforced our own laws. I don’t see Canadians flooding over the open northern border.

  51. #376436
    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    agreed and well said. I believe our Country’s course is irreversible

    Maybe, I am not dead yet and I am not giving up just yet either. As much as I do NOT like or respect McCain I will still vote for him to twart Obama. But my biggest fear is that so many Conservatives stay home we not only get Obama but the Democrats sweep the House, Senate and local elections all across the country.

    But if our Country’s course is irreversible I am also making other plans. If I go down I plan to go down fighting. Better Ruby Ridge than the madrassa, be it mohammedan or Liberal/Fascist.

    If we could get a few million more Conservatives off their dead asses and into precinct meetings, primary fights and such we could knock off a few more RINOs each primary and elect Conservatives. If all we offer the public is More of the Same/Me Too they will take the original. Hard Conservative Ronald Reagan won by millions–moderate George Bush squeaked by two of the biggest jerks the Democrats ever put forth. More of the Same/Me Too.

    Nations die when the citizens give up. Don’t do that.

    I can’t say Ragheadistan?

  52. #376438
    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, Rob said:

    Lumping all Hispanics in with the illegal/LaRaza crowd is just want they want you to do because it bolsters their numbers and makes all Hispanics feel persecuted. That way they can play identity politics and win.

    The FACT that they do this, addressed by wimpy, politically correct eunuchs like Obamasiah and McAmnesty means to me that they may have already won.

    Maybe we need to follow nhypatriot’s advice, “if we just enforced our own laws.” Maybe this is why we have a constitutional right to an organized citizen militia.

  53. #376485
    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    This issue is tragic enough without all of the namecalling. The government has two major categories – productive and protective are what they are usually referred to as… this invasion falls under the “protective” category. And needless to say they are failing miserably at it. Not because there are too many people here to do anything about them but because our government has CHOSEN not to enforce the law. They’ve pretty much given them license to come here and run amok.

    The government’s first order of business is to protect its citizens.
    Legal citizens from an invasion. Again, the government has not done that. We’ve had to shoot down amnesty under a Republican President’s watch and most of us would agree that Dubya was more conservative than McCain. However, as we can see the fight will continue regardless of whether a R or D is in the white house.

    Lastly, all of this talk about humanely and inhumanely is absurd. No one here (Rob excluded) is advocating sending these people back home in shipment containers, trunks of cars or having them march through the desert back to Mexico which, and we can all agree, is likely the way they came here.

    Our anger, if channeled appropriately is with our government, not each other.

    And if our government continues to ignore the will of the people they will have to reap what they sow.

    30 out.

  54. #376487
    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    “If I go down I plan to go down fighting.”

    Amen.

    “Nations die when the citizens give up. Don’t do that.”

    Here here.

  55. #376488
    On July 15th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Oops.
    The government falls into two major categories…

  56. #376492
    On July 15th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, Irish Rose said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, Salt said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Irish Rose said:

    The Ragheadistan comment was deleted, thankfully. Michelle said that she doesn’t agree with Robs’ position, but she’s not going to censor it either.

    Sincere question: Where did Michelle state this?

    Here.

    When I brought these two comments to Michelles’ attention in #10, she replied, #19:

    On July 9th, 2008 at 9:33 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    The Ragheadistan comment has been deleted. As for the second comment, I do not agree with it, but I’m not going to censor it.

    Related discussion here.

  57. #376513
    On July 15th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, Rob said:

    Lastly, all of this talk about humanely and inhumanely is absurd. No one here (Rob excluded) is advocating sending these people back home in shipment containers, trunks of cars or having them march through the desert back to Mexico which, and we can all agree, is likely the way they came here.

    Once the border is shut tight, I am willing to use buses.

  58. #376526
    On July 15th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, franksalterego said:

    Michelle is justifiably upset at what mcCain is doing and saying, franksalterego.
    – wise_man, On July 15th, 2008 at 1:06 pm

    Yes,

    But, there’s a line between “being upset” and becoming an unwitting surrogate for the opposition.

    Multitudinous hordes of Menacing Mexicans, and her commenting Minions, notwithstanding.

  59. #376535
    On July 15th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, wise_man said:

    too bad there wasn’t a way of spelling ‘notwithstanding’ with an “m”.

  60. #376670
    On July 15th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, flenser said:

    In my opinion, the best time to criticize McCain would have been during the republican primaries when it could have made a difference. Now that the majority of republican voters have chose McCain, what good does all of this do?

    McCain did not receive the majority of Republican votes, or even the majority of votes cast in the Republican primaries. And I’m tired of seeing this particular lie repeated.

  61. #376672
    On July 15th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, flenser said:

    “It’s a shame one of them has to win.”

    Of course neither of them has to win, assuming the American people muster up a smigden of courage.

  62. #376709
    On July 15th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Little Ma said:

    #138, Concerned Citizen,
    I wasn’t talking about Cubans.

    ArizonaNeanderthal and Bill Grant,
    Yeah, I too plan to go down fighting.

  63. #376725
    On July 15th, 2008 at 6:57 pm, rightisright said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, flenser, I agree, having brought that to wise-man’s attention a few times. He much prefers to forget or ignore how exactly how McShame did get the delegate votes to be the presumptive Republican nominee.
    Careful he’s liable to start calling you names if you piss him off…seen him do that a few times. His reactions kind a remind me of McShames reactions to people that don’t agree with him.

  64. #376738
    On July 15th, 2008 at 7:18 pm, Genghis Khan-servative said:

    how instructive that the McCain lovers are bothered by a poster making xenophobic comments, BUT are NOT IN THE LEAST bothered by their hero pandering to a RACIST, XENOPHOBIC group that in it’s name declares itself a superior race.

    Obama is a disgrace, and so are a lot of his supporters. BUT, so is McCain and some of his sycophants.

  65. #376759
    On July 15th, 2008 at 7:57 pm, franksalterego said:

    Of course neither of them has to win, assuming the American people muster up a smigden of courage.
    flenser, On July 15th, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Are you implying, The American People are cowards?

    How Liberal of you

  66. #376774
    On July 15th, 2008 at 8:29 pm, Bill Grant said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, flenser said:

    “McCain did not receive the majority of Republican votes, or even the majority of votes cast in the Republican primaries.”

    Of course he did. If McCain didn’t receive the majority of the votes cast in the republican primaries who did?

    Of course neither of them has to win, assuming the American people muster up a smigden of courage.

    Nothing particularly courageous about wasting your vote on Rosanne’s dad or some other misfit velcro.

  67. #376780
    On July 15th, 2008 at 8:40 pm, America1st said:

    ” if Obama is the next president, I don’t want to hear a word of complaint from you for the next 4 to 8 years on this or any other site –

    I am so tired of comments like these.

    You don’t have to vote against Obama in order to be able to criticize him and and all the un-american actions he would take. By that rationale anyone who votes for Obama cannot criticize him or his actions either.

    People need to stop brow beating those of conscience who recognize McShame for what he is and cannot vote for him. Choosing not to vote is as valid as voting.

  68. #376781
    On July 15th, 2008 at 8:43 pm, wise_man said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 5:53 pm, flenser said: McCain did not receive the majority of Republican votes, or even the majority of votes cast in the Republican primaries. And I’m tired of seeing this particular lie repeated.

    He got the most.

    That’s why he will be the republican nominee.

    The others did not get ‘the majority,’ because they all got less. You don’t count all the people who lost in the same group. Therefore, the got the “majority” of the votes. The second place winner, or first loser, got less than McCain, not more than McCain.

    Or is that also a lie in your opinion?

  69. #376910
    On July 15th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, markedmanner said:

    In the Question and Answer after his speech he apparently said he would stop ICE raids and that he would support the dream act for the details read here:
    John Mccain Says He Will Stop ICE Raids And Will Support The Dream Act

  70. #376948
    On July 16th, 2008 at 12:25 am, Bill Grant said:

    “n the Question and Answer after his speech he apparently said he would stop ICE raids and that he would support the dream act for the details read here:”

    Not according to HotAir:

    Truncating quotes to fit their agenda is a DNC specialty so I e-mailed Patrick Hynes, McCain’s web liaison, to see if he had a transcript of the full answer McCain gave to the questioner. Quote:

    QUESTIONER: Hi. I’m a part of One Dream 2009 and I am one of the 6 million who either have an undocumented parent or is undocumented and I wanted to know if you would support humanity all around the world and support our Dream Act that we are trying to pass.

    SEN. JOHN MCCAIN: Yes. Yes. Thank you. But I will also enforce the existing laws of a country. And a nation’s first requirement is the nation’s security, and that’s why we have to have our borders secured. But, we can have a way and a process of people obtaining citizenship in this country. And, we cannot penalize people who come here legally and people who wait legally. And so, that’s a fundamental principle on which we have to operate. Thank you.

    That site has some connections to some pretty shady characters though.

  71. #377028
    On July 16th, 2008 at 7:03 am, sfcmac said:

    On July 15th, 2008 at 8:42 am, SlimyBill said:
    Gee, sorry, just always wanted to do that.

    I dunno. I guess this is a popular “blog” for some but La Raza is becoming to Malkin what Islam is to LGF – and obsession. And it’s becoming a rather boring one at that.

    Just one man’s opinion.

    Yeah, I’d say we’re ‘obssessed’ with ENFORCING the law and preventing anymore MS 13’s, rapists, murderers, thieves, and terrorists, from traipsing across our sieve-like borders.

    Just one fed-up American’s opinion.

  72. #377142
    On July 16th, 2008 at 9:45 am, Dimsdale said:

    Morones asked the Senator to meet with him privately without cameras so Enrique could make the point that Immigration raids are “separating families” and border walls are “killing immigrants”.

    I would think that secure, unbreachable walls would prevent both things from occurring; families would stay together in Mexico and South America, and the walls would prevent people from attempting to cross the desert.

    It would cut down on the trash they leave in their wake as well.

  73. #379362
    On July 17th, 2008 at 11:12 pm, Bill Grant said:

    “Yeah, I’d say we’re ‘obssessed’ with ENFORCING the law and preventing anymore MS 13’s, rapists, murderers, thieves, and terrorists, from traipsing across our sieve-like borders.”

    So aside from complaining on the internet what have you done to stop all of that?

    Here’s something.

    Electing Obama wont help.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Far Left’s ANSWER goons attack foes of illegal immigration

November 16, 2009 02:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Angry mob.

All aboard the Obama Amnesty Bandwagon

November 13, 2009 01:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Ugh: McCain & Company melting on cap-and-tax

October 8, 2009 10:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Oh, no: Here comes “Open Borders For Teddy”

August 27, 2009 12:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

135 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

John McCain goes to war again

April 30, 2009 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

141 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“AMC, you magnificent channel!”

Obama’s shamnesty distraction

April 9, 2009 12:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

158 Comments | 35 Trackbacks


Categories: Amnesty, Border Patrol, DREAM Act, Employer Sanctions, John McCain



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook