<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 14 percent approval rating: Nan and Harry hit rock-bottom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:08:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Democrats pushing Stimulus-palooza, Part II</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-599151</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Democrats pushing Stimulus-palooza, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-599151</guid>
		<description>[...] not about stimulating the economy, of course. It&#8217;s about doing something about their plunging approval ratings. Time for the GOP to beat them back again: House Democrats want to inject at least $50 billion into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not about stimulating the economy, of course. It&#8217;s about doing something about their plunging approval ratings. Time for the GOP to beat them back again: House Democrats want to inject at least $50 billion into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thejim</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-562766</link>
		<dc:creator>thejim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-562766</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;14% approval rating means NOTHING!  The majority were returned by the voters, maybe 25 Republicans lost their reelections. Scary, isn&#039;t it!?  So, where are all of our fellow citizens that are disgusted, outraged,and disapproving of the clowns in DC ?  They must have missed the election somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>14% approval rating means NOTHING!  The majority were returned by the voters, maybe 25 Republicans lost their reelections. Scary, isn&#8217;t it!?  So, where are all of our fellow citizens that are disgusted, outraged,and disapproving of the clowns in DC ?  They must have missed the election somehow.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelosi: Bush &#8216;a total failure&#8217; - CNN.com &#124; The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-379389</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelosi: Bush &#8216;a total failure&#8217; - CNN.com &#124; The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-379389</guid>
		<description>[...] It takes one to know one, I suppose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It takes one to know one, I suppose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vatodio</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378175</link>
		<dc:creator>vatodio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378175</guid>
		<description>14% approval rating!

Maybe these rascals are still farting too much methane gas.
No wonder we have Global warming.

The approval number should be in a single digit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14% approval rating!</p>
<p>Maybe these rascals are still farting too much methane gas.<br />
No wonder we have Global warming.</p>
<p>The approval number should be in a single digit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2rumba</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378167</link>
		<dc:creator>love2rumba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chapotier&lt;/strong&gt;,

Are we talking about shotguns here?

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you are serious, Goldwater, here is what I propose.

Over/under on Senate Dem +4
Over/Under on House Dem +16 (I know I said 15 before, but that is too easy).

&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chapotier</strong>,</p>
<p>Are we talking about shotguns here?</p>
<blockquote><p>If you are serious, Goldwater, here is what I propose.</p>
<p>Over/under on Senate Dem +4<br />
Over/Under on House Dem +16 (I know I said 15 before, but that is too easy).</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love2rumba</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378165</link>
		<dc:creator>love2rumba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378165</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Enjoy sharia
Have a nice jihad
Harem line forms to the right

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And don&#039;t forget that &quot;Nordstrom Rack&quot; , &quot;Macy&#039;s&quot; and &quot;Ambercrombie and Fitch&quot; will soon feature designer Burkas for hip liberal women (who otherwise spit on fundamentalist Christians for &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; blowing themselves up)!  They&#039;ll even bring back Polygamy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Enjoy sharia<br />
Have a nice jihad<br />
Harem line forms to the right</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget that &#8220;Nordstrom Rack&#8221; , &#8220;Macy&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;Ambercrombie and Fitch&#8221; will soon feature designer Burkas for hip liberal women (who otherwise spit on fundamentalist Christians for <em>not</em> blowing themselves up)!  They&#8217;ll even bring back Polygamy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378081</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378081</guid>
		<description>If you are serious, Goldwater, here is what I propose.

Over/under on Senate Dem +4
Over/Under on House Dem +16 (I know I said 15 before, but that is too easy).

I bet the over on both.  You bet the under on both.  If one or the other of us wins both that person can pick the handle of the other for an entire month (using the nickname feature).  Obviously no name that would get either of us banned.  If one wins one and one wins the other, neither wins.  If one wins one and the other falls on the line, the winner of one wins and gets to choose the other&#039;s handle for a month.

We need a judge.  I would nominate Yashmak or AlohaGuy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are serious, Goldwater, here is what I propose.</p>
<p>Over/under on Senate Dem +4<br />
Over/Under on House Dem +16 (I know I said 15 before, but that is too easy).</p>
<p>I bet the over on both.  You bet the under on both.  If one or the other of us wins both that person can pick the handle of the other for an entire month (using the nickname feature).  Obviously no name that would get either of us banned.  If one wins one and one wins the other, neither wins.  If one wins one and the other falls on the line, the winner of one wins and gets to choose the other&#8217;s handle for a month.</p>
<p>We need a judge.  I would nominate Yashmak or AlohaGuy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldwater Knight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378074</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldwater Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378074</guid>
		<description>Alright I&#039;ll have to bet on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright I&#8217;ll have to bet on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-378006</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-378006</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think you may be going off of old data from spring perhaps. 3 in the Senate, 10 or 11 House.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would love to put money on that, but I suppose a gentleman&#039;s bet will suffice.

What shall the over/under be? 4 for the Senate?  15 for the House?  If I lose either of those I will change my handle for a month to one of your choosing.  You agree to the same?

I&#039;m thinking for you:
 &quot;Hopenchange.&quot;

or

&quot;Obamaluvchyld&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think you may be going off of old data from spring perhaps. 3 in the Senate, 10 or 11 House.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would love to put money on that, but I suppose a gentleman&#8217;s bet will suffice.</p>
<p>What shall the over/under be? 4 for the Senate?  15 for the House?  If I lose either of those I will change my handle for a month to one of your choosing.  You agree to the same?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking for you:<br />
 &#8220;Hopenchange.&#8221;</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>&#8220;Obamaluvchyld&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldwater Knight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377993</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldwater Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377993</guid>
		<description>Chap:

&lt;blockquote&gt;That or else you think 5-8 in the Senate and 20-30 in the House is “puny”. You aren’t forgetting the string of losses the repubs suffered this year already in special elections in supposedly “safe” red districts, are you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you may be going off of old data from spring perhaps. 3 in the Senate, 10 or 11 House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chap:</p>
<blockquote><p>That or else you think 5-8 in the Senate and 20-30 in the House is “puny”. You aren’t forgetting the string of losses the repubs suffered this year already in special elections in supposedly “safe” red districts, are you?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think you may be going off of old data from spring perhaps. 3 in the Senate, 10 or 11 House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlightwoman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377933</link>
		<dc:creator>starlightwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377933</guid>
		<description>The definitin of insanity is going the same thing over and over and expecting different results - sounds a lot like congress doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definitin of insanity is going the same thing over and over and expecting different results &#8211; sounds a lot like congress doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377918</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I expect the Senate and Congress to make a few puny gains this election cycle then it’s all down hill from there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you are pretty much alone in that regard, according to every current poll of voter preference and pretty much every ranking republican and democrat.  If you have some particular insight on this I would love to hear it.

That or else you think 5-8 in the Senate and 20-30 in the House is &quot;puny&quot;.  You aren&#039;t forgetting the string of losses the repubs suffered this year already in special elections in supposedly &quot;safe&quot; red districts, are you?

And just out of curiosity to MM, where was the post when Bush&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/video/106735/Record-Breaking-Disapproval-Rating-Bush.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;disapproval &lt;/a&gt;rating hit an all time low with Gallup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I expect the Senate and Congress to make a few puny gains this election cycle then it’s all down hill from there.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think you are pretty much alone in that regard, according to every current poll of voter preference and pretty much every ranking republican and democrat.  If you have some particular insight on this I would love to hear it.</p>
<p>That or else you think 5-8 in the Senate and 20-30 in the House is &#8220;puny&#8221;.  You aren&#8217;t forgetting the string of losses the repubs suffered this year already in special elections in supposedly &#8220;safe&#8221; red districts, are you?</p>
<p>And just out of curiosity to MM, where was the post when Bush&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gallup.com/video/106735/Record-Breaking-Disapproval-Rating-Bush.aspx" rel="nofollow">disapproval </a>rating hit an all time low with Gallup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377765</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377765</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How low can it go?...&lt;/strong&gt;

With the current Congress&#039;s approval rating at rock bottom 14% approval rating for Congress, one would think that the Republicans would be in a great position to take back a significant number of seats. 

That won&#039;t happen, for various reasons.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How low can it go?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>With the current Congress&#8217;s approval rating at rock bottom 14% approval rating for Congress, one would think that the Republicans would be in a great position to take back a significant number of seats. </p>
<p>That won&#8217;t happen, for various reasons.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gallup Poll: Congressional Approval Rating Plummets To 14% &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377744</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gallup Poll: Congressional Approval Rating Plummets To 14% &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377744</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: &#8220;&#8230; It’s all Bush’s fault!&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: &#8220;&#8230; It’s all Bush’s fault!&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg.conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/14-percent-approval-rating-nan-and-harry-hit-rock-bottom/comment-page-1/#comment-377714</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg.conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=12942#comment-377714</guid>
		<description>The percentage of voters who give Congress good or excellent ratings has fallen to single digits for the first time in Rasmussen Reports tracking history. This month, just 9% say Congress is doing a good or excellent job. Most voters (52%) say Congress is doing a poor job, which ties the record high in that dubious category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The percentage of voters who give Congress good or excellent ratings has fallen to single digits for the first time in Rasmussen Reports tracking history. This month, just 9% say Congress is doing a good or excellent job. Most voters (52%) say Congress is doing a poor job, which ties the record high in that dubious category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
