BO: Damn you conservatives for taking my wife seriously!

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 17, 2008 12:01 PM

Getting back on message after the New Yorker “lynching,” Barack Obama is refocusing on us right-wing rabble-rousers.

Or in his words: “Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk.”

Present and accounted for!

Yep, he’s whining to Glamour magazine–the print equivalent of, oh, Access Hollywood, about us meanies who listen to his bitter half on the campaign trail and hold her accountable for her public statements.

Curses on us!

GLAMOUR: An AP poll shows that while the positive ratings on Michelle are higher than those of Cindy McCain, her negative ratings are higher as well. I’m curious about how as a husband that makes you feel. Does it mystify you? And what do you want to say to those Americans who don’t know the woman that you know?

SENATOR OBAMA: It’s infuriating, but it’s not surprising, because let’s face it: What happened was that the conservative press—Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk—went fairly deliberately at her in a pretty systematic way…and treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans. And I’ve said this before: I would never have my campaign engage in a concerted effort to make Cindy McCain an issue, and I would not expect the Democratic National Committee or people who were allied with me to do it. Because essentially, spouses are civilians. They didn’t sign up for this. They’re supporting their spouse. So it took a toll.

On a separate front, Obama’s minions at MoveOn are gathering signatures to protest the “racist” “smears” against the holy couple. (Background: Anti-Fox hounds rally ’round Michelle O.”)

Just underscores my point about trying to appease the un-appease-able Left.

Why bother?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. We Live In Isolation, We Fear One Another, We Are Too Cynical… : BigMouthFrog
  2. To Question Obama Is “Crude” “Tasteless” “Offensive” “Insensitive” And “Racist” : BigMouthFrog
  3. BO whines about the missus | BitsBlog
  4. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » Am I An “Ilk” Of Sorts?????
  5. Can We Talk About Michelle Obama Yet? « Beltway Snark
  6. Michelle-O! Make Time to Stop and Smell the Shit [Dan Collins; UPDATE]

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #378606
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, Byantine said:

    He’s not making Cindy McCain an issue, but he keeps responding to criticisms of his wife, therefore keeping her an issue in the campaign. Silly.

  2. #378608
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Ignore my wife. She’s a distraction says Obama. . . but let her go on Access Hollywood and the view to soften her image while you ignore her.

  3. #378615
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, tre said:

    Lessee here, his wife opens her big mouth and people listen.
    And he doesn’t like that.

    Well, then, I suppose he needs to tell his wife to keep her big mouth shut.

  4. #378618
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    Obama, b!tching about others, the media, the right wing … say it ain’t so. This is so out of character for him. Who’s behind this smearjob.

    It never stops with this guy.

  5. #378619
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, ajmontana said:

    lets see, he’s blaming us for things his wife says? is that it? this proves the coke he snorted had long term effects and whatever other narcotics he used.

  6. #378624
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, wighttrasch said:

    The party of perpetual outrage, indeed.

    Get used to it, people. We are all the ‘untouchable’ caste now. Lie down in the dirt & just maybe a goddess will come by & grant you a tidbit.

  7. #378628
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:14 pm, John Ansell said:

    I Call “shotgun” for dibs when MO wears a red dress to post “Hey Kool Aid”

  8. #378633
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, sunandsteel said:

    …and treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans.

    Are you kidding me? I thought this was what the dems thrived on, personal attacks.

    Somebody give this whiny little baby a pacifier.

  9. #378638
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Somebody give this whiny little baby a pacifier.

    …and some no more tears shampoo. Thanks aj!

  10. #378639
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, rjbjrirish said:

    Let’s see, Michelle is a distraction and Iraq is a distratcion. I guess Jeremiah Wright was a distraction, too. Anything that might remove the luster from his aura is a distraction. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

  11. #378641
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, sausage said:

    I will be honest. Not so keen on Michelle.. she doesn’t have the Laura Bush boss-eyed look.

  12. #378645
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    He cannot see and therefore understand the criticisms made about his wife because he and she share the same beliefs.
    The puppeteers have to come from behind and whisper “Senator, those (core) beliefs of hers/yours won’t get you votes”.
    When all else fails blame the conservative media.

  13. #378647
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, behiker said:

    The reason Cindy McCain isn’t being made an issue in this campaign is because she’s keeping her mouth shut.

    If Michelle O would keep her trap shut and stop whining about how horrible things are for her, she wouldn’t be an issue.

    But, they will never understand.

  14. #378648
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, RaisedRight said:

    If people simply reprint something Michelle Obama says in a very public campaign speech… that’s mean? He acts like someone bugged their house and reported her private conversations. Any person making public speech chooses to publicize their thoughts and words. How is it wrong to reprint those?

  15. #378651
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, beenthere said:

    I would love to see Obama toss his wife, metaphorically speaking of course, under the bus. But it appears she got to his manhood long before Jesse did. But it’s not too late for him to recover some of his dignity. You can do it, Oh Mighty O!

  16. #378657
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Okay – new strategy.

    Let’s not take Mrs. Obama seriously at all. Every time she says something, let’s laugh at her or ignore her completely.

    That’ll work until…Obama criticizes us for not taking his wife seriously. Then we’ll all be misogynistic pigs who don’t take powerful women seriously.

    Snort.

  17. #378658
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, Goldwater Knight said:

    I guess in not accountable if I yell, “Fire!” in a crowded theatre either if I guage it by what Barry O’bonkers says.

  18. #378660
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    Wouldn’t you like to take the role of the parent to the difficult spoiled child and say to Obama “Stop whining or I’ll give you something to REALLY cry about!”.

  19. #378661
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, RaisedRight said:

    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, englishqueen01 said:
    Okay – new strategy.

    Let’s not take Mrs. Obama seriously at all. Every time she says something, let’s laugh at her or ignore her completely.

    Well, I don’t trust anything the Obamas say… does that count?

  20. #378673
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, sonofdy said:

    HOW DARE YOU REPEAT MY OWN WORDS!!! THATS RACISM!!!!

    oh wait…
    /sarcasm off

    But seriously, toughen up buttercup.

  21. #378674
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:38 pm, katieanne said:

    It’s not a smear when you are telling the truth. If Obama doesn’t want his wife criticized, then she shouldn’t be out giving speeches bashing our country. Seriously, who wants an angry First Lady with an agenda in the White House? Do people really want a First Lady representing our country who not only isn’t proud of the US but thinks we are a mean country?

    The problem for Obama is that we got an honest look at Michelle. Bummer.

  22. #378682
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    The reason Cindy McCain isn’t being made an issue in this campaign is because she’s keeping her mouth shut.

    What BO doesn’t seem to understand is that conservatives aren’t “attacking” MO because that’s just what conservatives do… au contraire. We are leveling these so-called attacks at her because of the un-American things she has said. In essence, it’s what she has said that has him trying his hand at damage control.

  23. #378683
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, orlandocajun said:

    Just because she represents herself as the psycho, bioch from hell is no reason for us evil conservatives to assume that she is one. If Obama wants us to perceive her differently, then he needs to buy some duck tape.

  24. #378693
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, abstractmind said:

    Ok, I want to pick his statement apart a bit. It’s telling.

    SENATOR OBAMA: It’s infuriating, but it’s not surprising, because let’s face it: What happened was that the conservative press—Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk—went fairly deliberately at her in a pretty systematic way…and treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans. And I’ve said this before: I would never have my campaign engage in a concerted effort to make Cindy McCain an issue, and I would not expect the Democratic National Committee or people who were allied with me to do it. Because essentially, spouses are civilians. They didn’t sign up for this. They’re supporting their spouse. So it took a toll.

    1. Our “ilk” just happened to be paying attention. It’s not like she’s said these things just once, or that she’s being quiet and simply standing around. She makes public statements about issues, and expects people to just not listen. She has the same mentality as “No Nuts” Jackson, whose recent comments were said under his breath, but were something he was really thinking. People like this dont want us to know what they think, and dont want us to pay attention when we hear it.

    2. Of course its systematic. Why would we just go off all willy nilly about it? I’m sorry if people are being systematic, which would indicate they’re being intelligent and methodical about actually listening to what is said.

    3. “rarely” must be a relative term. For instance, I “rarely” take a crap in relation to the number of times I blink during the course of a given day. But rarely, and regularly are very different things. Democrats regularly attack republican spouses. There’s a book, oh whats the title…ya know, the one thats been covered here…about, ummmmm, Laura Bush…..ya know, that book that slams her repeatedly and is as rude as it gets…..man, whats that called?!?!? Or all those people on that site…KOsomething?….who are always talking trash about cindy…or media outlet personalities on MSNBC….some old sportscaster guy….cant remember what he’s said lately…..but you get the idea.
    /sarc off

    4. As a point of clarification, its not McCain’s camp going after MO. He said specifically what “ilk” has been going after her, and i dont see alot of McCain endorsement or logos everywhere. If he chooses not to, that’s his call. But trying to tie into the discussion the fact its partisan on McCain’s part, while saying its coming from other people, doesn’t really make alot of sense in this case.

    And he’s right..they are civilians. But they *did* sign up for this. They agreed to come along, to participate, and I’m sure that D’obama didn’t decide this kind of path in his life without input from his wife. Saying they should be left out because they aren’t actually the candidate is off the mark I believe.

  25. #378694
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Misscheryl said:

    If Obama wants us to perceive her differently, then he needs to buy some duck tape.

    and – keep her home. Ohhh wait:

    MICHELLE TO STAY AT HOME
    Wed Jul 16 2008 19:02:05 ET

    Michelle Obama IS NOT going on Obama’s trips to Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, and Europe.

    Nor would she have a policy role in the Obama administration; she would be raising their daughters.

    But SHE WILL have a primetime speaking role at the Democratic National Convention.

    NEW YORK TIMES reporter Patrick ‘The Biographer’ Healy will be first out with the full details in the coming days, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.

    Developing…

  26. #378699
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, d1carter said:

    When a candidate has 80% of the MSM in the tank for him, it really does take some arrogance to whine about the media attacking his wife, Angela Davis, er Michelle Obama.

  27. #378705
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, Dandapani said:

    Arugula: it’s not just for breakfast anymore.

  28. #378706
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, MtsEdge said:

    BHO’s version of the “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy”

  29. #378713
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, rambler said:

    When is Michelle “strongwoman” Obama going to stop having her husband speak for her? She needs to get out there herself and clean up the mess she made. I guess being outspoken doesn’t include being responsible for what is said and making an apology, if necessary.

  30. #378714
    On July 17th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, J S Ragman said:

    and treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans.

    Dude, I thought you stopped smoking crack.

  31. #378719
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, Knife-n-Dork said:

    If, God help us, MO becomes First Lady, how long will it be before we’re told she’s the smartest woman in the world, and should maybe run for senate someday? Hey, it happened with a previous First Lady who had a law degree.

  32. #378720
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, MtsEdge said:

    rambler said:

    Totally agree with you. Where is the “strong” Michelle when called upon to defend her statements? Hiding behind the skirts of her hubby (yes I meant to say that).

  33. #378722
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, iamsaved said:

    Politics of “Personal Attack” – sharpened and honed by the Clintons and then when the tables are reversed, accuse the conservatives of using those nasty attacks methods – what hypocrites.

    I imagine if Cindy McCain opened her mouth and made the statements Michelle Obama made she’d be cannon fodder for the liberal press in a New York minute.

  34. #378724
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Barry F. said:

    GLAMOUR: An AP poll shows that while the positive ratings on Michelle are higher than those of Cindy McCain, her negative ratings are higher as well. I’m curious about how as a husband that makes you feel. Does it mystify you? And what do you want to say to those Americans who don’t know the woman that you know?

    Heh. I know I’m not the only one that jumped out at, right? :lol:

  35. #378725
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, old trooper said:

    When you allow your wife to campaign, we listen to her words, witness her demeanor and check out her attitude.

    She is part of Your Campaign, Bud!

    Like You, she has nothing in common with me, my beliefs and my values.

    So…suck it up and get off it!
    We reserve the right to comment
    and make our own judgement.

    You and your American Hating wife are not acceptable. Period!

  36. #378728
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, RaisedRight said:

    I’m just glad we finally have a candidate who is out there talking to Glamour and defending his wife’s rants.
    /sarc

  37. #378733
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    BH Obama is Don Quixote tilting at right-wing windmills. Yes, it’s like Hillary and the vast right-wing conspiracy. But w/ Obama it’s not a casual mention. It’s ongoing. I see it as a major distraction. Oh, poor me, I’m a victim. Imagine 4 years of that. One thing about GW Bush, he’s never played the victim. Once he said something about not questioning his integrity, but that’s about it with Bush. No whining.

  38. #378739
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, franksalterego said:

    “I don’t have a thick skin when it comes to criticism of my wife. And you know, the problem is that rarely do these folks have the guts to say it to your face.”

    Yeh,

    Tha’s ’cause, you’re such a awesome Hard-Ass

  39. #378740
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, A Typical Patriot said:

    I am so sick and tired of this ‘poor me I’m a victim’ mantra. The liberals are using race to squelch free speech. But, don’t present them with the truth and facts. They just get confused.

  40. #378742
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:20 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    ATP,
    How is that these people can still portray themselves as victims when they are potentially the next President and First Lady of the USA? Mind-boggling isn’t it… or is it? If being a victim is what brought you to the dance. Well….

  41. #378748
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, nbarry said:

    If MoveOn is protesting “racist smears” against the Obamas, are they including Jesse Jackson among the offenders?

  42. #378759
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Michelle Obama IS NOT going on Obama’s trips to Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, and Europe.

    Well Katie Couric is, so Michelle better buy him a pair of ill-fitting pants…Just sayin’

  43. #378763
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, alt said:

    You just have to laugh at this husband who won’t, or can’t, tell her to shut her trap; however, when she speaks we are suppose to ignore her.

    In reality, MO has been giving BHO a hard time because others are paying more attention to her than he is. BHO, please pay some attention to your wife so she does not have to look elsewhere for that need in her heart. One of the first commandments to men concerning their wives is to “PAY ATTENTION!!”. Take some time to really “LISTEN” to her.

  44. #378766
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, Gabe said:

    It’s infuriating, but it’s not surprising, because let’s face it: What happened was that the conservative press—Fox News and the National Review and columnists of every ilk—went fairly deliberately at her in a pretty systematic way…

    He is sounding more like a deranged Hugo Chavez every day–and he WILL become as radical as Hugo Chavez once elected. God help our nation where so many people are stupid enough to vote for him.

  45. #378771
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, starlightwoman said:

    I wonder if he would like some cheese with that whine?

  46. #378779
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, sambo said:

    Since someone brought this up!

    Democrat Sen. Barack Obama’s stunning assertion in a recent speech that the U.S. needs a “civilian national security force” that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force is not included in published transcripts of his prepared remarks.

    Thats funny.

  47. #378801
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Gabe said:

    Democrat Sen. Barack Obama’s stunning assertion in a recent speech that the U.S. needs a “civilian national security force” that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force is not included in published transcripts of his prepared remarks.

    Doesn’t that sound just like what all communist countries have? I’m thinking of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and the Maoists wrecking havok in China in the 1960s.

    I’m surprised more high profile conservatives aren’t questioning this Stalinist proposal for a “citizen security force.” Imagine La Raza and all these other groups with guns and funded as well as the military “patrolling” our streets. What will they do to anyone that “infuriates” Obama, such as criticizing his wife for her stupid remarks? Can you imagine what this armed “citizen security force” would do to Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity that dis their commi bro in the White House?

    Our country is becoming more like Venezuela every day. 49% voted last year there to make it into a full fledged communist country. No matter how Left Obama becomes, it looks like here in America, he could get a majority of stupid Americans voting for him.

  48. #378806
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:55 pm, sonofdy said:

    “civilian national security force”

    ————-
    In the USSR they called it the KGB.

  49. #378808
    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, shooter said:

    Does it mystify you? And what do you want to say to those Americans who don’t know the woman that you know?

    AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH

    B. Hussein, it is NOT because she is your wife.
    It IS what she SAYS. Maybe you don’t hear it as anti-American because this is what you have surrounded yourself with for at least the last 20 years. Or maybe you do ‘get it’ and this is just all of your master plan.

    Hint to the OBAMA’s. IT IS, and YOU BOTH ARE, OFFENSIVE TO AMERICA!
    You disgust me, michelle and barry!

  50. #378812
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, sambo said:

    Michelle: Americans are mean
    Barack & Michelle: Fist bump
    Michelle: Americans have broken souls
    Barack & Michelle: Fist bump
    Michelle: My husband can heel ur souls
    Barack & Michelle: Fist bump

  51. #378821
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, graysonret said:

    When you run for President, Obama, everything and everyone is fair game. I guessed you haven’t read any political history. The difference is that we conservatives don’t stoop to the low levels like many extremist groups do, promoted by the MSM.

  52. #378838
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Gabe said:

    On July 17th, 2008 at 1:55 pm, sonofdy said:
    “civilian national security force”

    ————-
    In the USSR they called it the KGB.

    Obama’s Stalinist proposal sounds just like the Red Guards in China. I’m sure he is modeling it after them.

    This is the most radical thing to be uttered by Obama and shows that he is every bit as communist as Stalin, Hugo Chavez, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong, and others.

    We will definitely get “change” with this guy! The first thing commis do when taking power is to set up numerous “volunteer” committees.

  53. #378849
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, gridlock said:

    All this talk is not helping Michelle Obama’s kids…

  54. #378866
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Barry F. said:

    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, gridlock said:

    All this talk is not helping Michelle Obama’s kids…

    Agreed. She should just shut up…but she won’t. ;-)

  55. #378877
    On July 17th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, right_on said:

    Distraction…
    sleight of hand…
    misdirection…

    My interpretation:
    Don’t focus on my lack of experience, lack of common sense, and my obfuscatory rhetoric. Lets talk instead, about my wife, and how she is being mercilessly attacked by the conservatives for no reason.

    I’m still waiting to hear the DETAILS of how he plans to accomplish all those lofty goals and visionary platitudes he seems tries to convey in all his speeches. Where’s the beef, Senator?

  56. #378904
    On July 17th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, cicerokid said:

    Civilian national security force? Like, civilians with guns? Some one please remove the brainsuckers from that mans head as they are starving…

  57. #378970
    On July 17th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, sunandsteel said:

    We will definitely get “change” with this guy! The first thing commis do when taking power is to set up numerous “volunteer” committees.

    This baloney makes my head hurt.

    Just a thought or two. Bambi keeps talking about getting more people to go into the armed forces. Which side of the aisle has been discouraging them in the first place?

    Also, maybe I am being a bit paranoid, but who thinks that any one of these voluntary programs will remain voluntary if Bambi gets elected?

  58. #378981
    On July 17th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, pabarge said:

    BHO, you should have anticipated this when your wife made all those speeches on your behalf on the campaign stump, saying for example that she had never been proud of her country.

    If you want her left alone then no problem … tell her to STFU.

    Otherwise, she places herself in the line of criticism and deserves everything she gets.

    What a poossah!

  59. #378997
    On July 17th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, Mimi1220 said:

    SHUT.YOUR.PIE.HOLE.

  60. #379053
    On July 17th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Micheleeroo said:

    ATTENTION BARACK: You sent Michelle out on the campaign trail to make public speeches for you. What she says in that capacity is fair game. Just because we tell the truth about WHAT she said in her anti-american statements does NOT constitute an attack.
    Get it?

  61. #379055
    On July 17th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, StanW said:

    This incident reminds me so much of the last election cycle.

    “I’m John Kerry and I’m reporting for duty just like I did in Vietnam. During my service in Vietnam, where I won three Purple Hearts, I learned what it’s like to lead. So my service in Vietnam makes be completely qualified to be President, unlike that draft-dodging National Guard coward Bush!
    BTW, how DARE you question my service in service in Vietnam!!!!”

    This is not about MO’s campaign speeches and hateful interviews. This is about the lord Obama being able let Michelle say whatever she wants to say, then be shielded from criticism.

  62. #379086
    On July 17th, 2008 at 5:20 pm, Tantor said:

    I’m hacking my watch to see how long it takes before Obama blames the Massive Right Wing Conspiracy.

  63. #379161
    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:21 pm, irving said:

    The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy made her say those bad things just so we could blame her for them!

    We are soooo sneaky!

  64. #379163
    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:23 pm, Regulus said:

    What makes Michelle Obama’s comments newsworthy isn’t just their intrinsic foolishness, but also a fact of life most every married man knows: for better or worse, the person with the most influence on his thinking, his values, attitudes and beliefs, is his wife.

    If what Michelle Obama blurts out in her speeches is indicative of what she’s often saying to and around her husband, some of that elitist negativity is bound to rub off — indeed, already has rubbed off. And wasn’t it was Michelle Obama who introduced her husband to Jeremiah Wright?

    You can judge them by the fruits of their labors, and by the company they keep.

  65. #379182
    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:51 pm, mngirl said:

    You know, if Obama is giving a speech in Germany on his upcoming European trip; is he delivering it in German?

    Because if not, he’d be highlighting just another dumb, embarrassing American who can’t speak anything but English.

  66. #379185
    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Boomer said:

    I shudder what to think will happen should this whinny light weight and his America hating shrew of a wife win this contest. The more he whines like a little girl and the more his hateful wife opens her mouth the fawning press can only go so far in covering their tracks. The truth is still getting out there thanks to the efforts of our lovely host, some of the folks at Fox News, and the member’s of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

  67. #379192
    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:55 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On July 17th, 2008 at 6:51 pm, mngirl said:
    You know, if Obama is giving a speech in Germany on his upcoming European trip; is he delivering it in German?

    Of course not. He doesn’t need to. He’s the Obamessiah and those listening to him will instantly be entranced by him and hear his words in their own language!

  68. #379214
    On July 17th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    You all are terrible just leave Michelle
    alone Hmmph, hmmph I mean it leave Michelle alone hmmph, hmmphBwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ,Rookiiieees! :lol:

  69. #379216
    On July 17th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, gayle said:

    OhDrama sounds like that kid in school that everyone dispised.

    Tattle-tale, run to mommy, cry over the smallest slight……and he wants to be president? Of what? Kindergarten??

    Whine, cling wife’s skirttales, hide in the closet, pout….what a pathetic sissy he is.

  70. #379217
    On July 17th, 2008 at 7:32 pm, gayle said:

    Errr…..despised.

  71. #379239
    On July 17th, 2008 at 8:14 pm, JohnnyD said:

    I admittedly have not read any of the comments, so forgive me if I am repeating someone. I couldn’t resist giving my 2 cents worth (minus any taxes of course) when I read this little gem:

    …and treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans.

    Then tell your little lady to STFU!!! If you allow her to open her pie hole to discuss policy issues on the campaign trail, then she is fair game! Tell her to buy a pair of $600 earings and stay home and raise your daughters and let you bamboozle the American public to the White House.

    As for the second half of that statement, have you listened to the majority leaders of Congress lately? Frankly, it is getting old listening to them bash the President and his party constantly. IF BO and them Dems weren’t so far to the Left, Congress might have an approval rating higher than 14%!!

  72. #379251
    On July 17th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, ChristmasGhost said:

    Note to Barry……..

    Michelle is not good for her kids………
    And we all must remember that according to the light worker *gag* that is all that matters..
    it’s for the “cheeldrun”……

  73. #379263
    On July 17th, 2008 at 9:07 pm, Dimsdale said:

    If Cindy McCain said the kind of things Mama Obama said, the MSM would be all over her.

    She is not as opinionated as MObama, and knows that she isn’t running for president.

  74. #379284
    On July 17th, 2008 at 9:29 pm, Rob said:

    Just get the Whitey tape out and let’s get this over with!

  75. #379307
    On July 17th, 2008 at 9:56 pm, Charly Martel said:

    Any wife of any president is in a unique position to whisper in his ear anytime, about anything, about anybody. Why does it surprise Obama to find that many Americans are concerned about what sort of things his pastor, his fellow “community activists” and above all his WIFE are whispering.

  76. #379308
    On July 17th, 2008 at 9:59 pm, DavidHughes said:

    Whatever happened to the dignity the presidency once demanded? If these whiny, narcissistic, arrogant fools take up residency in the White House (assuming it’s still racially OK to refer to it as that), whatever the Clintons did to degrade the prestige of office will pale in comparison (assuming it’s racially OK to use the word ‘pale’). Both of them disgust me.

  77. #379314
    On July 17th, 2008 at 10:09 pm, Charly Martel said:

    Regulus said:

    What makes Michelle Obama’s comments newsworthy isn’t just their intrinsic foolishness, but also a fact of life most every married man knows: for better or worse, the person with the most influence on his thinking, his values, attitudes and beliefs, is his wife.
    If what Michelle Obama blurts out in her speeches is indicative of what she’s often saying to and around her husband, some of that elitist negativity is bound to rub off — indeed, already has rubbed off. And wasn’t it was Michelle Obama who introduced her husband to Jeremiah Wright?
    You can judge them by the fruits of their labors, and by the company they keep.

    I had to jump in before I finished reading too. I guess that says how completely I agree with Regulus.

  78. #379321
    On July 17th, 2008 at 10:17 pm, GOPGin said:

    …treated her as the candidate in a way that you just rarely see the Democrats try to do against Republicans.

    This reminds me of that Seinfeld episode where a woman is breaking up with George & she says “It’s not you, it’s me.” And George then says that she can’t use that line on him because he invented the “It’s not you, it’s me” line.

    When Barack says that Republicans are personally attacking MichOb, he’s forgetting that Democrats invented the personal attack!

  79. #379338
    On July 17th, 2008 at 10:33 pm, Mookie said:

    Obama Is My Slave t-shirt sparks lawsuit.

    Has anyone else heard about this? It just seems…odd.

  80. #379352
    On July 17th, 2008 at 10:55 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    So John Edwards is designing t-shirts now?

    Hey Silky! If you’re taking requests, how about: Obama Is My Slave…and Where Do I Go to Get My Money Back?

  81. #379353
    On July 17th, 2008 at 10:57 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    Or: I Paid $50 For My Slave…and He Eats All the Arugula He Picks.

  82. #379448
    On July 18th, 2008 at 1:32 am, NewOrleansLady said:

    And I’ve said this before: I would never have my campaign engage in a concerted effort….

    Am I the only who notices how they ALWAYS say, “I’ve said this before….” or “As I’ve said from the very beginning…”– right before they tell a blatant LIE??

    Seriously, it is a consistent pattern (that is also, ironically enough, a trait most narcissists have in common) that I’ve picked up on for the past year or so.

    It could easily be pieced together to expose his use of this calculated phrase so that people won’t question what he says. He says this to manipulate others into believing that his word is truth because subconsciously they’ll think that there is some indisputable “record” of this… since, of course, he has been “saying this from the beginning…..”.

    *sigh*

  83. #379504
    On July 18th, 2008 at 6:05 am, graysonret said:

    Obama reminds me of Prof. Irwin Corey. He says an awful lot, but you go away shaking your head, wondering what the heck he said. So, in an attempt to understand it all, you look at him the following week, saying exactly opposite what he said before, and you still go away, shaking your head. It appears his supporters don’t care, they just like him. George Carlin once came on stage, and stood there, saying nothing for 3 minutes, then said, “thank you” and walked away. Obama should be like that, and not get into trouble.

  84. #379529
    On July 18th, 2008 at 7:10 am, GaMidnightRider said:

    Will someone please change B. Hussien’s diaper. He obviously has dropped a load and needs his little rubber pants changed.

    His wife came out speaking for him, they go on T.V. with entire family, but we are not suppose to question anything they say. Ok
    Makes me believe he is a moron eliteist liberal cause we are not to think just do. Sounds like he wants a dictatorship. DO AS I SAY, YOU HAVE NO FREEDOM TO QUESTION ON THINK.

  85. #379634
    On July 18th, 2008 at 10:09 am, jukin said:

    For thinking himself such a smart man, he just doesn’t get that if one has one’s wife CAMPAIGN for one, then her statements can and will be accurately quoted.

  86. #380151
    On July 18th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, Loadmaster said:

    What would Barry do if “on 9/11/2001 they loaded him up in Air Force 1 and flew him to parts unknown because the WH could be under attack. Would Barry “say WAIT” where’s Michelle?

    So, the real question to Barry is. “If this country is under attack (for real) and to protect our leader you had to be jetted out of DC w/o Michelle”. As President what would be your first priority – the USA or Michelle?

    With his “drawers” in a wod over Michelle…Now…what would it be in a real crisis. Me thinks he whins too much.

  87. #380462
    On July 18th, 2008 at 8:26 pm, Bruce said:

    Someone needs to tell John McCain, all the RINOs and most of the Republicans that trying to appease the unappeased is not only a waste of time, but a sure recipe for defeat.

  88. #383457
    On July 22nd, 2008 at 6:53 pm, sillygatboy said:

    Wow Grayson #83! You hit it right on the head. I’ve been trying for a year to figure out where I’ve heard all his crap before.

    It was Prof. Irwin Corey.

    I wish the prof was running now, he’d be a better choice.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

Stanford alumni blow the whistle on Valerie Jarrett

November 15, 2009 10:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

“An educated scoundrel is still a scoundrel.”

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback


Categories: Barack Obama, Michelle Obama



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook