Liberalism is a mental illness.

I really hate thinking that. For the Republic to be healthy we need to air different points of view to find the best solutions for the challenges we face.

But as much as I hate to think liberalism is synonomous with insanity, it’s getting neigh impossible to avoid that conclusion.

Damn shame.

Yeah, lgm, those nutroots are a classy bunch of people. The way the diarists reacted at the DailyKos regarding Tony Snow’s death was quite revealing of their contempt toward humanity and Tony Snow in particular. Yeah, the tolerance of the left…. if that’s not an oxymoron I don’t know what is.

Ask yourself, would I feel comfortable allowing this pundit to fly on a plane, given his/her presentation and state of mind. In the case of Michelle, no doubt, yes, always, 100% of the time. Chris Matthews, often, no. Many left-wing bloggers and pundits, often, no. Let’s not be disingenuous. Let’s be honest! We know unhingeness when we see it. Michelle isn’t even close. Anyone saying otherwise is either blind to basic social cues or is very dishonest. And I don’t think she’s rude or shrill.

On July 18th, 2008 at 8:02 pm, lgm said:

MM doesn’t use profanity explicitly (aside from calling on Obama to “grow a pair”), but the commenters do so constantly. And the things they say about liberals – oy!

Can you say that with a straight face after seeing the amazing level of hate on most of these liberal sites?

Michelle is hated by them because she pointedly and factually scrapes through the thin veneer of rationality and tolerance (you usually hit it when you ask them to do things like justify their adulation of Obama or what “change” means) revealing the psychotic hate filled beast that exists within.

That is why lgm rarely does more than deposit one of his droppings and then flees back to the nurturing womb of his mother’s basement. And when he does come back, well, it is like a double dose of bird droppings: just smellier and even less appealing.

More basically: the truth hurts, and Michelle hits them upside the head with it. It infuriates them, so, like the Swiftboat Vets, they have to tear down what Michelle does with lies and misstatements.

Their hatred is a badge of honor, Michelle. Revel in it!

Marcotte isn’t exactly super popular on the left either. Her book used racist images and, thankfully, many feminists called her on it.

On July 18th, 2008 at 8:02 pm, lgm said:

…the commenters do so constantly. And the things they say about liberals – oy!

*sniff* *sniff*

Obviously the mutt-roots’ goal is to fabricate the outrage du jour as they escalate their struggle for attention.

Consider the source.

She is obviously still sitting around underneath her rock, mumbling and raving to herself about how you single-handedly cost her that blogging post for Silky. Why, I can hear her now, repeating over and over, “…and i could have got away with it too if it wasn’t for that meddling Malkin!”

See, this is just one more example out of millions of how Liberals can never be wrong, can never admit when they are wrong and it is always someone else’s fault for why they fail. It couldn’t possibly be that profanity is called “profane” for a reason, and that outside of their little Liberal circles, the VAST majority of Americans truly find that sort of discourse offensive and thus, do not take the writer seriously, nor do they consider the author to be mature and educated when they resort to such things.

Why, just take a look at the comments on the usual Liberal sites…as well as those of the resident trolls here, and anyone will be able to say that their comments and “arguments” are brought down to the point of ridicule and treated as irrelevant for no other reason than the way they state them, laced heavily with sophomoric insults and profanity.

But hey…it doesn’t matter. They can be as offensive, insulting and profane as they want, because after all…you facts and non-profanity laced way of posting articles will ALWAYS be worse.