Nancy Pelosi defends San Francisco values…silent on S.F.’s bloody sanctuary legacy

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 28, 2008 03:16 PM

Just how out of touch is Nancy Pelosi?

Go look at her defense of San Francisco values, if you must.

See what’s missing?

Not a word about the San Francisco values that led to illegal alien Honduran crack dealers getting subsidized escort shuttle service back home to escape deportation and proseuction.

Not a word about the San Francisco values that led to illegal alien drug lords getting sent down and dumped on San Bernardino group homes– only to walk out of them scot-free.

Not a word about the San Francisco values that gave bloody sanctuary to the illegal alien killer of the Bologna family.

Illegal alien sanctuary policies have been an inhumane curse on untold numbers of families in the Bay Area.

Let’s hear about those San Francisco values, Nan.

Nan?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS » Blog Archive » Until San Francisco gets bombed, they will not understand anything
  2. San Francisco to Undocumented Residents - You’re Safe Here : BigMouthFrog
  3. UNCoRRELATED
  4. Nancy Pelosi: Defends San Francisco Values: WTF « Dianej’s Weblog
  5. Michelle Malkin » San Francisco values: $650,000 for illegal alien teen felons
  6. UNCoRRELATED

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:56 pm, chapoutier said:

    You know though capoutier it occurs to me that you are saying our government under your President Obama is going to be “watching” posters on conservative websites and coming after them….

    No, I don’t believe that at all (or at least no more than any other government keeps an eye on those that make stupid comments about “revolution” on a web page.

    I am really just trying to mock the stupidity of atheling’s use of the word “treason.”

  2. #102
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:59 pm, keystone said:

    “So when they sort of use their winks and nods about San Francisco values, they are talking about the fact that we respect our gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community.”

    Yeah, Nan, we know. We’ve heard of the Folsom Street Fair.

  3. #103
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:01 pm, Jaded said:

    Do you realize how often during the last 7 years the netroots on DU and kos have over and over talked about revolution? way to many to count and no one takes them serious….hell if anyone were going to be tried for treason it would be those who have given state secrets to the NY Times….now that is treason!

  4. #104
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:05 pm, chapoutier said:

    Do you realize how often during the last 7 years the netroots on DU and kos have over and over talked about revolution?

    Yeah…but in the hippie 60’s free love sense of the word. Not the atheling-better-stock-up-the-larder-and-fortify-the-reloading-room sense.

    Or maybe atheling is talking about revolution in the hippie sense.

    Are you a hippie, atheling?

  5. #105
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm, mojack420 said:

    there is going to be a rally wednesday in SF to demand the resignation of Gavin Newsome over the sanctuary policies . Im going to be there so I will have some pictures to show you how well they treat people who don’t agree with there idiotic bs .

    How many American citizens have to Die for your sanctuary lies

  6. #106
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm, JT said:

    For the good of our country, hopefully someone blows her sorry ass away. Betcha Reid falls in line then.

  7. #107
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:35 pm, chapoutier said:

    For the good of our country, hopefully someone blows her sorry ass away. Betcha Reid falls in line then.

    Uhhhh…wow.

    Did you just openly advocate the assasination of an elected official on this site? Do you have any idea just how un-anonymous the internet is?

  8. #108
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:38 pm, dakine said:

    “Wow” was my reaction to JT’s post as well chap. Couple of shiny new FBI files opened up today for your buddy atheling and the right wing nutjob JT.

  9. #109
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:50 pm, JT said:

    chap,

    Hoping for someone elseto do it is not a crime. Have you been to the lib sites, plotting against Bush et al. Please.

    The main problem is that senators and congressmen used to try to do the right thing. It was business during the day and beers after work. Now they all hate each other. If Tip was still in charge he’d get business done, instead of sticking everything in a drawer like Pelosi.

    Let’s face it, high gas prices hurt the very people libs pretend to care about: travel, restaurant, blue collar, and middle class. What does Pelosi do… zip.

    Because an energy bill will pass, and she doesn’t want that. She is a moron and hurting our country. We will vote her out eventually. If a plane crash on the way back to SF, wouldn’t kill innocents, I’d hope for that. She’s poison.

  10. #110
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:52 pm, JT said:

    dakine,

    I’m not about to take up arms or anything. But if she’s gone, no loss.

  11. #111
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:54 pm, JT said:

    dakine,

    The FBI should spend more time on the lib sites for the real threats.

  12. #112
    On July 29th, 2008 at 12:14 am, Freddy said:

    This is really quite simple. Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco values are those of the aristocrat she believes herself to be. Nancy simply sees no diffenence in any working people from anywhere in the world. In Nancy’s mind, she is part of the ruling class and everyone else is a part of the ‘unwashed masses’.

    This is Obama’s thinking as well.

  13. #113
    On July 29th, 2008 at 12:23 am, tpierce2 said:

    Atheling,

    I don’t post to these boards much but read them daily. I see you are being attacked by a bunch of
    “liberals.”? Am I reading this board correctly?

    If so, remember, liberalism is a mental disorder. Extreme liberalism is mental disease. I think Savage. Extreme liberalism is not curable.

    San Fran Nan and all the liberal demorats are a bunch of traitorous b******s! Plain and simple.

  14. #114
    On July 29th, 2008 at 2:12 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, Die Hippie, Die said:

    Old Pelotas said:
    “San Francisco values to me means that every child in our city has health insurance until they are 25 years old…”

    Mmmmmmaybe that’s why so many Bay Area twentysomethings act like children. Ya think?

    OMG!! That so explains Dumpster Muffin! And why she wasnt afraid of falling out of that tree.

  15. #115
    On July 29th, 2008 at 9:13 am, ajmontana said:

    Chap, #25….lmao…
    I bet Rick Moran was a bit miffed if he saw that. :lol:
    pssst, his family just put out a hit on that MORON.

  16. #116
    On July 29th, 2008 at 10:16 am, Mister P said:

    She is a case of the dimwits trying to take over the country.

  17. #117
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am, pueblo1032 said:

    San Francisco values??? Now that is an OXY-MORON!!!!

  18. #118
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:25 am, atheling said:

    On July 29th, 2008 at 12:23 am, tpierce2 said:

    Atheling,

    I don’t post to these boards much but read them daily. I see you are being attacked by a bunch of
    “liberals.”? Am I reading this board correctly?

    If so, remember, liberalism is a mental disorder. Extreme liberalism is mental disease. I think Savage. Extreme liberalism is not curable.

    San Fran Nan and all the liberal demorats are a bunch of traitorous b******s! Plain and simple.

    Yup. Libtards united on this thread… all two of them. I got under the Pharisee’s skin so he’s gone off the deep end now. lol.

  19. #119
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:40 am, chapoutier said:

    I got under the Pharisee’s skin so he’s gone off the deep end now.

    Yeah. I really went off the deep end. I got so angry and unhinged that I called the Speaker of the House a Senator, manically labeled anyone supporting a major presidential candidate as a traitor, started spouting off about committing a capital offense against the government of the United States on a public forum (which, just to give you a better picture of my pathology, was the same offense I had just accused others of) and then rambled on about how Thomas Jefferson would come to my rescue.

    Oh, wait. No. That was you. My mistake.

  20. #120
    On July 29th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, atheling said:

    Right, PeeWee.

  21. #121
    On July 29th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, tpierce2 said:

    Atheling,
    I have a very liberal sister. PeeWee reminds me of her. Liberals grab onto a piece of minutia that contributes absolutely nothing to a discussion and then worries their “non-point” to death. Very similar to a yappy yorky. You know, a small dog that can’t see beyond an ankle.

    Very liberal trait because a liberal can’t stand up to logic in a factual discussion. So they try to deflect.

    PeeWee–very funny.

  22. #122
    On July 29th, 2008 at 3:33 pm, atheling said:

    tpierce2:

    Notice how Pee Wee makes a lot of assumptions about the nature of the revolution?

    Pee Wee should be careful for what he asks for. “Old School” revolution took traitors like him and made a public example of his treachery.

    I have libtard sisters as well, though they are starting to swing more to the right as they grow up. However, some libtards NEVER grow up.

  23. #123
    On July 29th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, dakine said:

    Atheling, you use a junior high term like “libtard” and you have the onions to insinuate that chap needs to “grow up”. Gotta be kidding me.

    Query for ya: are all members of the bar who support Obama “traitors”, and if so, under what legal theory? If your answer to the foregoing is yes, is any American who votes for Obama also a “traitor”? If yes, again, under what legal theory?

    You make some big grandiose statements around here, but never feel compelled to adequately back them up because 99% of the folks who post here won’t call you out on your BS.

  24. #124
    On July 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    Notice how Pee Wee makes a lot of assumptions about the nature of the revolution?

    I asked for clarification on what you meant by revolution, and you certainly had many opportunities to explain. But you certainly did seem to embrace the violent approach here:

    Old school would be my pleasure. I’d first come to your place and have you tarred and feathered, traitorous scum.

    And then this:

    However, some libtards NEVER grow up.

    I thoroughly enjoy how, in the course of six words, you manage to i) lament other people’s apparent lack of maturity and ii) do so by engaging in silly, truly unsophisticated name-calling that is about as mature as what one would find on a 3rd grade school yard. That is truly special.

    But whatever. You are certifiable and I am done. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you when you end up being spirited away in the middle of the night by some nice folks dressed in black who want to spend some “special time” with you and figure out just exactly what you mean by “revolution.”

  25. #125
    On July 29th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, atheling said:

    I am done.

    Okay, Pee Wee.

  26. #126
    On July 29th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, dakine said:

    Atheling, your pithy little retorts remind me of some of the stuff my 11 yo comes up with. Chap is liberal and owns it. He supports Obama and owns it. However, he is able to engage in interesting, entertaining and civil discourse with several regulars on this board with whom he disagrees on most issues. That’s kind of the idea. You come from some other weird and dark place. You must walk around in your daily life carrying a bunch of painful baggage. Two kinds of people in this world: decent ones and not so decent ones. All the other labels we attach to folks are pretty secondary. What kind of person are you atheling?

  27. #127
    On July 29th, 2008 at 4:43 pm, atheling said:

    I thought it was “sanctimonious”, Captain Dogcatcher.

  28. #128
    On July 29th, 2008 at 5:06 pm, dakine said:

    Yup. That’s what I thought.

  29. #129
    On July 29th, 2008 at 5:17 pm, Rob said:

    Atheling, your pithy little retorts remind me of some of the stuff my 11 yo comes up with. Chap is liberal and owns it. He supports Obama and owns it. However, he is able to engage in interesting, entertaining and civil discourse with several regulars on this board with whom he disagrees on most issues.

    Hey, if some of you don’t like the way others respond then DON’T WRITE BACK. I know I don’t feel I have to respond to you in any way other than the way I want to … sanctimonious ASS!

  30. #130
    On July 29th, 2008 at 5:43 pm, chep said:

    Sell California to Mexico and get rid of it. Build a 75 foot wall all around it.

  31. #131
    On July 29th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, secondsight said:

    Stop picking on Nanny

    She’s undergoing a difficult and experimental procedure where the doctors apply botox to the center of her head and try to guide the dose to those areas they wish to deaden — a tinkle down approach. This is usually accomplished by sticking her head in the sand. Everyone involves agrees that “It’s a wonderful fit between our theraputic needs and her habitual patterns of behavior.”

  32. #132
    On July 29th, 2008 at 7:27 pm, dakine said:

    Predictably Rob comes to atheling’s defense. Birds of a feather and all that. Better a sanctimonious ass than a bigoted ideologue who likely hasn’t had an original thought since birth.

  33. #133
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, tpierce2 said:

    dakine

    Liberal? Yea, I think so. So, who you voting for? Barack Hussein Obama?

    If so, based on what qualifications? Few to none?

  34. #134
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:19 pm, tpierce2 said:

    On July 29th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, dakine said:

    Atheling, your pithy little retorts remind me of some of the stuff my 11 yo comes up with. Chap is liberal and owns it. He supports Obama and owns it.

    This is one of the most stupid statements I’ve ever read! An 11 year old child, Chap, has an original thought? “He supports Barack Hussein Obama and owns it?”

    You are one dumb ass parent!

  35. #135
    On July 29th, 2008 at 11:33 pm, tpierce2 said:

    atheling said:

    I thought it was “sanctimonious”, Captain Dogcatcher.

    Go Atheling!

    Are these mental morons really attorneys? Geez, I thought they had to get an education. It appears they are really mental midgets.

    Short story about attorneys: I have a rental in Sacramento and while we were building it the house next door was rented by students attending a well known law school in Sacramento. A bunch of our building material disappeared. Locals that we knew suggested we question the rental with the law students. I confronted them, one took me down stairs and there was a bunch of our building material. My conversation was it had better be returned or my next call was to the law school. The building material appeared back in our yard overnight.

    I guess they were in training to be law students and uphold the Constitution? Ha, what a joke! They were learning how to legally steal! True story.

  36. #136
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:14 am, atheling said:

    tpierce2:

    Therein lies the problem. These people are Pharisees. The letter of the law supercedes the spirit of the law.

    No ethics. No morals.

    Hollow men. They deserve scorn and ridicule a la Pope.

  37. #137
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:30 am, dakine said:

    atheling, you are to conservatism as Code Pink is to liberalism.

    tpierce2, not sure what the hell you are talking about to be honest. Atheling spends most of her time calling folks with whom she disagrees silly, childish names. Chap is a liberal who supports Obama. So what? I’m a libertarian conservative and will be voting for McCain in November. We disagree on substance much of the time, but I find chap to be smart and funny, and he engages in CIVIL discussions with many of the better posters around here without resorting to hyperbole, ad hominem attacks or demagoguery. So other than not liking lawyers, what’s your problem again?

  38. #138
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:01 am, tpierce2 said:

    dakine ,

    I don’t have a problem.

    I don’t like most lawyers and mostly think your profession sucks!

    Chap, who supports Barrack, Barack Hussein Obama is anything short of being smart and funny but if you think he is—well ok.

    What the hell is a libertarian conservative? You really throw me on that one!

    Who are you voting for? Barack Hussein Obama? A liberal? Or McCain, an embarrassment for most Conservatives but far better than an extreme liberal? Your position please. I am Conservative. Voting for McCain while holding my nose.

    I thought Chap was his 11 year old kid? My opinion, Chap or whatever his name is, PeeWee seems good to me, is a liberal moron.

    I could be wrong. Who is he voting for? Barack Hussein Obama? Ok, mental moron.

  39. #139
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:02 am, tpierce2 said:

    By the way,

    Nancy Pelosi said she wants to save the world. Drudge.

    I thought she is Speaker of the House for the United States of America!

    Is she confused?

  40. #140
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:31 am, Politicalguano said:

    Looking forward to the next “big one” earthquake to devastate San Francisco. May it seek into the sea, never to be seen again
    May all that remain be a few conservative Christian churches.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Pelosi Republicans

June 29, 2009 02:27 PM by Michelle Malkin

47 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Pelo-cchio gets a Houston welcome

June 15, 2009 11:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“She is not an honest woman.”

The CYA Congress

May 21, 2009 05:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Dance, Nancy, dance

May 19, 2009 11:18 AM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Introducing Pelosiku!

May 15, 2009 05:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

What Nan knew

May 7, 2009 07:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

125 Comments | 32 Trackbacks


Categories: Nancy Pelosi, Sanctuary Cities



Pundit & Pundette

» States in dire straits