Obamedia Watch: Left-wing minority journalists show their true colors

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 28, 2008 07:57 AM

“He touched me!”

So squealed a journalist attending Barack Obama’s speech yesterday to UNITY, the conglomerate of racial/ethnic identity-obsessed news associations for blacks, Asian-Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans in the media, according to the Chicago Tribune’s Swamp blog.

The UNITY event organizers were so concerned about public displays of Obamedia affection that they issued several warnings to their news professional members that the speech would be broadcast live on CNN. “Professional decorum” was encouraged. One wire story even fretted: “Can minority journalists resist applauding Obama?”

Um, well, some of us can. But we don’t count.

Despite the cautionary messages, it appears many of the minority journalists in attendance couldn’t contain their decidedly un-objective adoration of Obama. Fresh from his World Tour de Farce, Obama was welcomed by the “journalists of color” conventioneers with standing ovation, cheers, and whistles–along with repeated applause during his remarks.

No word on whether anyone fainted, wept, ogled, or performed a “happy dance.” Also no word on whether any female journalists were assigned to monitor Obama’s sweat glands.

The WSJ did, however, report that there was at least one audience member wearing an Obama t-shirt” and the Trib’s Swamp blog notes in addition to the worshiper who swooned at Obama’s touch, another journalist was overheard wishing the candidate good luck.

The UNITY convention chairman downplayed Obama’s slavering rock-star reception, blaming locals for making all the noise.

But left-wing partisan minority journalists have already shown their true colors. In 2004, more than half of the 2,000 UNITY media professionals who attended failed Dem presidential nominee John Kerry’s address gave him a standing ovation (none for Bush), cheered his partisan jibes, and booed during President Bush’s remarks:

There was applause nearly 50 times during [Kerry’s] address. There was laughter when he took a shot at the Bush administration by noting that “just saying there are weapons of mass destruction (in Iraq) doesn’t make it so.” He got a standing ovation at the end.

What was true then is true now: UNITY and its minority journalism members are inherently politicized entities. They push for a left-leaning agenda of advocacy journalism, color-coded diversity, and open-borders sympathizing disguised as reporting. They mau-mau editors to avoid ethnic descriptions when it reflects badly on their group (see AAJA: Don’t call shooter Asian!) and applaud themselves for promotion “diversity” in journalism.

I poked fun at the group-think that infects UNITY gatherings four years ago with my own Malkin Media Diversity Test. Still applies today.

In defending the pep-rally atmosphere, one Dateline NBC employee argued that journalists should allowed to be “human beings:”

Said Luz Villarreal, an associate producer for “Dateline NBC”: “I don’t think it’s such a bad thing if for 15 minutes you take off your reporter hat and respond to (Obama) as a human being at an event where you’re surrounded by people of color and you’re here for a united cause.”

Funny how that works. Expressing solidarity for the “united cause” of promoting pride in “people of color” is acceptable American media behavior. But wearing an American flag pin on the air to express solidarity with the united cause of pride in our country is not.

Racial/ethnic pride: Good.

National pride: Bad.

It’s “UNITY” you can’t believe in.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. BigMouthFrog
  2. Obama, has em reeling: « Riggword Weblog
  3. MSM groupies at UNITY conference « Crush Liberalism
  4. The Saloon dot net
  5. The Dog Ate My Homework - Obama’s Missing Thesis - MSNBC : BigMouthFrog
  6. Minority News Media Admits “We’re For Obama” : BigMouthFrog
  7. Minority Journalists Openly Cheer Obama At UNITY Event | THE HOT JOINTS
  8. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Politics
  9. Obamedia Watch: Left-wing minority journalists show their true colors « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian
  10. President Bush’s Humanity « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
  11. Obamedia Loves Obama… And I Mean Red Hot, Steaming Wet Lurve!!! « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  12. Anonymous
  13. Thinking Right » Blog Archive » WaPo Covers For Obama
  14. Sports journalists have higher ethical standards than news reporters « Converted Yankee
  15. Michelle Malkin » Notorious Obamedia moments of 2008
  16. California Conservative » What search engine does Obama use?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #388154
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:08 am, Craig said:

    Professional decorum” was encouraged…

    BAWAHHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  2. #388155
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:14 am, rplatt said:

    The media, essentially all of it, are nothing more than a left wing system of propaganda machines operating to support the Democrats and other leftist causes. They are not fair; they are not balanced; and, they certainly don’t produce factual unbiased “news”. The key is to inform the public of their warped perspective and separate them from any association with credible journalism or fair reporting.

  3. #388156
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:19 am, tre said:

    I think your Media Diversity Test needs one more question:

    I believe in the Lord Almighty God, attend Church, pray, and read the Bible regulary.

    Lets see how many members of the Lame Stream Media can say “yes” to that one.

  4. #388157
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:19 am, JDinTX said:

    True journalism is supposed to present unbiased facts, not invent the facts to support your personal views. But how is the MSM supposed to learn this in the liberal universities this country has. The only news we get from the MSM nowadays is what they support and they are not ashamed to show their support while covering the news.

  5. #388162
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:27 am, JHSII said:

    “UNITY” reminds me of the “Rainbow Coalition” – any color but white.

    Diversity of skin color does not equal diversity of thought or opinion. Liberals are afraid of real diversity because the liberal ideology cannot succeed in a world where Conservatism has an equal voice.

  6. #388163
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:27 am, Send_Me said:

    This would embarrass me if I were a journalist. One can never truly be “unbiased.” By nature of choosing one story over another, the feeling that one story will make more of a difference than another to people, shows that a bias must exist. For example, a book is biased because it’s impossible to completely exhaust all thoughts on a particular topic. Some discernment must take place to determine what to write or not. The biggest problem I see with journalists like this is that they have foresaken the previous notion of what is “newsworthy”. No longer is it the sake of the Constitution or our Country, but rather, like many things nowadays, whatever one chooses their ideal to be (i.e. political, social, racial causes, etc.) The problem with this lack of civics in our journalists is now when it comes time to make truly meaningful public policy and voting decisions, the public is woefully unprepared. If our “free press” were to fulfil its charter under the Constitution, rather than cheapening their own profession by choosing sides, then we would all be better off. It’s far harder to use the Constitution and Founding principles rather than one’s own views, but that’s what journalists are called to do. One quality of a profession is that it must police its own. Like I say, I’m embarrassed for their “profession” more than anything.

  7. #388164
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:29 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    People of color and a united cause. There is a slogan the Obaminites and sodomites can put on a bumper sticker. I’ll stick with a cross and the flag lapel pin.

    Allah be Praised
    Allie OOP OOP 2

  8. #388165
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:31 am, Parker said:

    Obama is the candidate equivalent of a boy band.

    Inexperienced, untalented, working from other peoples material – and made wildly popular through cynical, calculated manipulation of the press and the public.

    Who is pulling the strings?

    See also ‘post turtle’.

  9. #388175
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:54 am, beenthere said:

    If I were a RINO (and we might has well retire the term “republican” since there are so few of them left), this is what I would conclude: we’ve got to distance ourselves from and screw over our base even more! So a teeny-tiny percentage of the hate-whitey crowd will come on over — and RINOs will then be the majority party forever! McCain is a fool, but to be fair, he has plenty of company in his party.

    God help us if Obama wins. God double help us if he loses.

  10. #388176
    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:55 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Why do today’s journalists and their editors remind me of Mickey Rooney yelling “Hey kids! Let’s put on a show!”
    Current journalism objectivity: “Ooh, Obama touched me, and I didn’t even pee down my leg!”
    Somewhere Chris Matthews is getting a tingle.

  11. #388178
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:00 am, Dave Turson said:

    I’ve tussled in the past with columnist Rochelle Riley. I was not surprised to find her giving the winning bid on an Ebony magazine cover photo of Obama at the Unity convention. Obama is one of 25 black men picked by the editors of Ebony as representing something called “Black Cool.” The editors even bow to the “swagger” of the 25. Some Democratic Underground members are trying to place the picture—anyone here care to waste an hour to help them?

  12. #388180
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:01 am, prendad said:

    Scientists recently discovered an astounding breakthrough. The speed-of-light barrier was finally broken at a local cemetary when observers witnessed Edward R. Murrow’s body spinning in excess of the previously thought cosmic speed limit.

  13. #388183
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:08 am, DBNinKY said:

    Said Luz Villarreal, an associate producer for “Dateline NBC”: “I don’t think it’s such a bad thing if for 15 minutes you take off your reporter hat and respond to (Obama) as a human being at an event where you’re surrounded by people of color and you’re here for a united cause.”

    So the MSM wants us to be fine with this type of balantant bias from nbc/msnbc but when an underling at Fox News gives John McCain a heads-up, we’re supposed to turn off the channel? Get real!

  14. #388186
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:12 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    This form of racism is perfectly fine with the lame stream media.

  15. #388189
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:15 am, Regulus said:

    Watching a documentary on the “Mongols” motorcycle gang a few weeks ago, what struck me was how distorted their sense of “respect” was: they demand it from everybody and take offense if they don’t get it, but they don’t want to show anybody respect in return.

    It strikes me that liberal “journalists” are becoming similar to the Mongols, just substitute “professionalism” for “respect.” They demand that the public treat them as professionals, but don’t want to offer a professional service in return.

    It’s getting to the point where “Jounalism” needs to be retired as a political major in college, and Journalism schools be simply rolled up into the PoliSci department. Call it a mercy killing, and get it over with.

  16. #388193
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:25 am, maine yankee said:

    When a journalist joins UNITY does he or she receive a free pair of knee pads ? Or is it just assumed they come with their lib arts degree ?

  17. #388195
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:27 am, Blind_Mule said:

    And lo the lighworker world tour has come to pass and the masses that came to here the messionic message of the lightworker were sad that he must leave them, those in the lightworkers home said “lo our lightworker has been absent for 6 days where is our lightworker, what will we do?”, although the lightworkers followers did’nt understand why the lightworker would leave them they were filled with hope, “come back and annoint us with your presence once again lightworker.” on the 7th day he returned, “it’s a miracle!” they proclaimed, as the lightworker returned to annoint them with his presence once again and they bowed and swooned over him.

    Paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaathetic.

  18. #388198
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:30 am, DBNinKY said:

    Newsok.com

    “People don’t view (attending Obama’s speech) as work,” said Connie Llanos, a reporter for the Los Angeles Daily News and member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists. “We’re not going to write about it, so you’re allowed to voice your emotion or feeling.”

    Media bias! What media bias?! Why of course there’s no media bias, just like the networks are far tougher on B. Hussein Obama than they are on John McCain.
    Sarc/;-)

  19. #388201
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:36 am, ajmontana said:

    “He touched me!”

    I’d have to burn my clothes.

  20. #388204
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:44 am, mchristian said:

    Senator Obama’s supporters worshipers emote all over the place. They don’t think, they feel. They whip themselves into a frenzy of adulation. I wonder when some will start to spin in circles.

    I had to correct myself before I could even send it.

  21. #388205
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:44 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Big Media applies this rationalization to every argument used to point out bias. ‘It’s not a result of bias’, they say. ‘It’s a matter of news judgment.’ And, like the man who knows his wallet was pick-pocketed but can’t prove it, the public is left to futilely rage against the injustice of it all.

    The ‘newsworthy’ argument can be applied to every metric: one-sided imbalances in airtime, story placement, column inches, number of stories, etc. Every metric, save one.

    An analysis of federal election records shows that the amount of money journalists contributed so far this election cycle favors Democrats by a 15:1 margin over Republicans, with $225,563 going to Democrats, only $16,298 to Republicans .

    235 journalists donated to Democrats, just 20 gave to Republicans—a margin greater than 10:1. An even greater disparity, 20:1, exists between the number of journalists who donated to Barack Obama and John McCain.

    Searches for other newsroom categories (reporters, correspondents, news editors, anchors, newspaper editors and publishers) produces 311 donors to Democrats to 30 donors to Republicans, a ratio of just over 10:1. In terms of money, $279,266 went to Dems, $20,709 to Republicans, a 14:1 ratio.

    And while the money totals pale in comparison to the $9 million+ that just one union’s PACs have spent to get Barack Obama elected, they are more substantial than the amount that Obama has criticized John McCain for receiving from lobbyists: 96 lobbyists have contributed $95,850 to McCain, while Obama—who says he won’t take money from PACs or federal lobbyists—has received $16,223 from 29 lobbyists.

    A few journalists list their employer as an organization like MSNBC MSNBC.com, or ABC News, or report that they’re a freelancer for the New York Times, or are journalists for Al Jazeera, CNN Turkey, Deutsche Welle Radio, or La Republica of Rome (all contributions to Obama). Most report no employer. They’re mainly free-lancers. That’s because most major news organization have policies that forbid newsroom employees from making political donations.

    As if to warn their colleagues in the media, MSNBC last summer ran a story on journalists’ contributions to political candidates which drew a similar conclusion: “Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left”

    The timing of that article was rather curious. Dated June 25, 2007, it appeared during the middle of the summer news doldrums in a non-election year—timing that was sure to minimize its impact among the general public, while still warning newsrooms across the country that such political donations can be checked. In case that was too subtle, MSNBC ran a sidebar story detailing cautionary tales of reporters who lost their jobs or were otherwise negatively impacted because their donations became public.

    As if to warn their comrades-in-news against putting their money where their mouths are, the report also cautioned that, with the internet, “it became easier for the blogging public to look up the donors.”

    It went on to detail the ban that most major media organizations have against newsroom employees donating to political campaigns, a ban that raises some obvious First Amendment issues. Whether it’s intentional or not, the ban makes it difficult to verify the political leanings of Big Media reporters, editors and producers. There are two logical ways to extrapolate what those leanings are, though.

    One is the overwhelming nature of the above statistics. Given the pack mentality among journalists and, just like any pack, the tendency to follow the leader—in this case, Big Media—and since Big Media is centered in some of the bluest of blue parts of the country, it is highly likely that the media elite reflects the same, or an even greater, liberal bias.

    A second is to analyze contributions from folks in the same corporate cultures.

    That analysis provides some surprising results. Individuals who reported being employed by major media organizations made the following contributions:

    NBC, NBC Universal: $104,184 to Democrats / $3,150 to Republicans

    CBS: $45,508 to Dems / $966 to Republicans

    ABC: $17,320 / $4,717

    Turner Broadcasting, TBS: $30,161 / $3,950

    Fox: $40,573 / $0

    Fox News/Fox News Channel: $1,280 / $0

    MSNBC: $210 / $282

    CNN: $2,286 / $1,250

    Associated Press: $2,550 / $545

    Reuters: $10,745 / $3,450

    Washington Post, Newsweek: $4,268 / $0

    New York Times, NYT Co: $8,143 / $0

    Time, Inc: $40,988 / $4,850 ($2,300 to Republicans was from someone identified as a jeweler, so the total may actually be $2,550)

    Time Magazine: $1,250 / $0

    USA Today: $6,067 / $0

    Totals for the above:

    $315,533 to Democrats ; $22,656 to Republicans—most of that to Ron Paul, who was supported by many liberals as a stalking horse to John McCain, a la Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos with Hillary and Obama.

    What is truly remarkable about the above list is that, discounting contributions to Paul and Rudy Giuliani, who was a favorite son for many folks in the media, the totals look like this:

    $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans (4 individuals who donated to McCain.)

    Let me repeat that: $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans.

    A ratio of 100 : 1.

    No bias there.

    Link

  22. #388207
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:51 am, Marshall Russ said:

    I hope they keep it up. It sure helped Kerry get elected.

  23. #388208
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:51 am, twiggman said:

    #17 AJ don’t burn them..sell them on e-bay you would have gas for life…(for your car)…

  24. #388209
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:53 am, jsr said:

    Back in the good old days of the Cold War I would read press releases from Soviet news oulets Pravda and Izvestiya that were no more than communist propaganda. I remember thinking “How could journalists collaborate so slavishly to to such an obviously flawed, oppressive system? Have they no pride or ethics?” Back then, at least they had the excuse that there was no option and that the system was so oppresive one had no choice but to cooperate. The only other choice was a one-way ticket to a work camp.

    Now we have the phenomenon of the free press openly and shamelessly being used as a tool for the Democrats. What is their excuse for dropping their coveted and much heralded journalistic independence – they won’t be invited to some party or win a much coveted award? I think these people are undeserving of the freedom of the press that so many in this country and others have fought and struggled for. They would be better off being stooges for a communist dictatorship. No thought, research, or objectivity required. Just report the party line.

  25. #388210
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:53 am, sonofdy said:

    The Obamabots’ worship of him does have a religous feel to it doesn’t it? This fanatical religous zeal is dangerous for the country.

  26. #388211
    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:58 am, DaveC said:

    There is a song by Cake called:

    The Hem of Your Garment.

    I am intrinsically no good
    I have a heart that’s made of wood
    I am only biding time
    Only reciting memorized lines
    And I’m not fit to touch
    The hem of your garment

    No, no I’m not fit to touch the hem of your garment

    I have no love but only goals
    How very empty is my soul
    It is a soul that feels no thrill
    A soul that could easily kill
    And I’m not fit to touch
    The hem of your garment

    No, no I’m not fit to touch the hem of your garment

    I am intrinsically no good
    I have a heart that’s made of wood
    I am only biding time
    Only reciting memorized lines
    And I’m not fit to touch
    The hem of your garment

    I am intrinsically no good
    I have a heart that’s made of wood
    I am only biding time
    Only reciting memorized lines
    And I’m not fit to touch
    The hem of your garment

    No, no I’m not fit to touch the hem of your garment
    The hem of your garment

  27. #388212
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:03 am, Dimsdale said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:55 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Why do today’s journalists and their editors remind me of Mickey Rooney yelling “Hey kids! Let’s put on a show!”

    Too old. Think Spanky MacFarland and Our Gang…

    Current journalism objectivity: “Ooh, Obama touched me, and I didn’t even pee down my leg!”
    Somewhere Chris Matthews is getting a tingle.

    At least we know that when Chrissy Matthews is peeing on our leg and telling us it is raining, he is getting his jollies as well.

    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:14 am, rplatt said:

    The media, essentially all of it, are nothing more than a left wing system of propaganda machines operating to support the Democrats and other leftist causes. They are not fair; they are not balanced; and, they certainly don’t produce factual unbiased “news”. The key is to inform the public of their warped perspective and separate them from any association with credible journalism or fair reporting.

    When their objectivity is gone, so is their reason for being.

    On July 28th, 2008 at 8:27 am, Send_Me said:

    This would embarrass me if I were a journalist. One can never truly be “unbiased.”

    But one can at least try. Or at least make a show of trying.

    I bet the mainstreams still have morning meetings trying to figure out why their sales are sharply declining.

    Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of folks. It is wonderful to see the Sulzberger family fortune being flushed down the toilet with their reputations.

    Jayson Blair was just the tip of the iceberg…

  28. #388214
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:03 am, DBNinKY said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:53 am, sonofdy said:

    The Obamabots’ worship of him does have a religous feel to it doesn’t it?

    Are the Democrats still calling Colorado a convention, or a revival?

  29. #388216
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:06 am, sonofdy said:

    If the media were unbiased, I doubt Obama would have been nominated, let alone be ahead in the polls. If he is elected, the buyers remorse in this country is going to be huge. Because there is no way he can live up to this hype. No way.

  30. #388218
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am, ajmontana said:

    DBNinKY
    Are the Democrats still calling Colorado a convention, or a revival?

    from news I’ve been hearing it’s going to be more of a Riot. not ha ha funny riot either.

  31. #388219
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am, sonofdy said:

    Are the Democrats still calling Colorado a convention, or a revival?

    I think the “he touched me” quote answers that question.

  32. #388220
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am, Rob said:

    We have become a culture that worships celebrity. Brittany Spears, Paris Hilton, Barack Obama. Vacuous pretty people with no substance.

    Twitching legs is what now passes for journalism. TMZ is the bluprint for the evening news…

  33. #388221
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:08 am, Barry F. said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:36 am, ajmontana said:

    “He touched me!”

    I’d have to burn my clothes.

    On July 28th, 2008 at 9:51 am, twiggman said:

    #17 AJ don’t burn them..sell them on e-bay you would have gas for life…(for your car)…

    Yeah, AJ. Don’t burn them. Sell them on Ebay to some of those fruit cakes stupid enough to buy them. And, either use the money as twiggman recommends or use it to make donations to some campaigns you really like this year. ;-)

  34. #388222
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:09 am, ajmontana said:

    “He touched me!”

    Isn’t that sexual harassment? :roll:

  35. #388223
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:09 am, Just A Grunt said:

    I saw a segment on the Washington Journal on CSPAN this weekend which had an editorial writer from the Washington Times, I believe her name was Deborah Simmons, an African American woman, who stated she was leaning McCain. The tone of the calls that came in after that was about what could be expected when somebody leaves the plantation of the Democrats.
    The African American community is being held in check by good old fashioned peer pressure, the same pressure that causes so many teenagers to try something that is neither healthy or sensible.
    Hopefully the grown ups will show up at the polls in November.

  36. #388225
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:10 am, simcoe said:

    What a ridiculous display!!

  37. #388228
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:12 am, ajmontana said:

    “He touched me!”

    and my acne cleared up!

    ok, that’s the last one.

  38. #388229
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:12 am, dan708 said:

    Ugghh!! I haven’t been this ill since both candidates went to kiss The Race’s butt.
    8-P

  39. #388236
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:19 am, Barry F. said:

    “He touched me!”

    Well, obviously, he wasn’t healing the lame that day, huh?

  40. #388237
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:22 am, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    Ich bin ein leftist arschloch.

  41. #388240
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:24 am, sonofdy said:

    Saint Obama the great (PBUH) also healed the sick and fed the multitudes with 3 crackers and 1 small pot of caviar while lifting 70lb dumb bells too create the one bead of sweat to creat gallons of wine. All hail “top fit” Obama the great(PBUH)!!!!!

  42. #388241
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:27 am, sonofdy said:

    Methinks another might be about to go under the bus I know, off topic. But Interesting.

  43. #388245
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:36 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    As newpaper subscribtions fall, alphabet news viewership fall the Jounalist of Color just may be taking their last gasp and wondering why. But striving for Stupid is an attainable goal.
    They want respect? Do something well. Gee, what a concept.


    Allah be Praised
    Allie OOP OOP 2

  44. #388248
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:41 am, verogolfer said:

    Yes, it’s like these people are biased or something…Take off the reporter’s hat for 15 minutes. No one will belong it’s only for 15 minutes.

  45. #388250
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am, lgm said:

    their decidedly un-objective adoration of Obama

    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else. They watch McCain waffle and weasel day after day over his contradictory stances on lobbyists in his campaign, withdrawal from Iraq, illegal immigration, etc. If they like Obama better than McCain, who can blame them.

  46. #388252
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:47 am, sonofdy said:

    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else.

    Good little mind slave, obey obama, don’t question. OBEY!!!

    -
    Doesn’t it bother you just a little bit that not one news organization has done an extensive background investigation of the guy and reported on it?

  47. #388253
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:51 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am, lgm said:

    Get.In.Line.

    You aren’t the only one who thinks Obie is HOOOOOT stuff.

  48. #388254
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:52 am, HeatherRadish said:

    “He touched me!”

    Was her herpes cured by the touch of the Lightworker?

    Otherwise, I’m not impressed.

  49. #388256
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:52 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    I do not blame Liberal Reporters for supporting the Liberal Socialist.

    I understand they do, and weigh their drivel accordingly. And vote with the full understanding of their position.

    It just appears that the comic section in many of todays papers has expanded.

  50. #388257
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:52 am, ajmontana said:

    lgm
    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else.

    Step away from the crack pipe.

  51. #388260
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:54 am, abstractmind said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am, lgm said:

    but doesnt that detract from the “we just report the news” and unbiased reporting many of them claim to have? I mean, you’re making a case for them to be biased. And you’re right, they do like him better. But then they turn around and claim that they aren’t biased.

    So are you incorrect, or are they liars? It cant work both ways.

    And if you want flip flopping, i think these candidates compliment each other on that issue. Obama changes stances on things just as fast as McCain, so that argument doesn’t hold water either.

  52. #388261
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:54 am, CO2 Producer said:

    Kneepads! Gitcher kneepads here!

    To think that we still have more than three months of this crap left.

    The term “media circus” is synonymous with mainstream journalism and has been for too long. Diversity in, objectvity out. They don’t bother hiding it anymore. But they deserve to be treated like humans, unlike the Promised Chosen One, who transcends petty politics, I guess.

    The MSM’s credibility is gone in my eyes, and it’ll be hard for me to take them seriously again.

  53. #388263
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:57 am, CO2 Producer said:

    Oops, missed an “i” in objectivity. Ah, well.

  54. #388264
    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am, Barry F. said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:51 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am, lgm said:

    Get.In.Line.

    You aren’t the only one who thinks Obie is HOOOOOT stuff.

    Do you think lgm even realizes that he has competition out there with whom he is vying for BHO’s affection? ;-)

  55. #388271
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:12 am, Barry F. said:

    My wife and I went to see a performance of The Merchant of Venice at Shakespeare on the Square in Knoxville Saturday evening. While enjoying a nice dinner at one of the local eateries on Market Square, we noticed a table set up with Obama ‘08 material all over it and the occupants registering people to vote.

    By chance, my wife had a puppy with us that she is crate training. At one point, I had stepped into the Preservation Pub on the square to partake of a cold beer to combat the heat. When I came back out, she told me that the puppy had decided to relieve himself (#2). She said she cleaned up his mess and deposited it in the trash can next to the Obama table. I laughed and told her she needs to walk him in the mulch bed directly behind their table next time and conveniently forget to pick it up. That would have gotten ripe pretty quick in the hot and humid weather that night. It’s too bad he didn’t have to go again that night. ;-)

  56. #388273
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:16 am, Alphonse said:

    Minority racism has never been tabooized like white racism. Should be on the todo list before majority-minority America, which is coming up soon with the masses of chamberpot and illegal immigrants flooding in.

  57. #388277
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:21 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am, Barry F. said:

    With our help, Barry. With our help. ;-)

  58. #388288
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:27 am, atheling said:

    Lol, can you imagine lgm in the classroom? What a bore he must be!

    Buehler? Buehler? Buehler?

  59. #388291
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:28 am, JT said:

    Barry F.

    Come on Barack’s a 10, lgm has no shot.

  60. #388293
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:28 am, fulldroolcup said:

    An old Barbra Streisand (!!) song captures the moment perfectly:

    “He touched me, he put his hand near mine

    And then he touched me

    I felt a sudden tingle when he touched me

    A sparkle, a glow

    He knew it…it wasn’t accidental, no, he knew it

    He smiled and seem to tell me so all through it

    He knew it, I know…

    He’s real, and the world is alive and shining

    I feel such a wonderful drive twards valentining

    He touched me; I simply have to face the fact

    He touched me…

    Control myself and try to act

    As if I remember my name

    But he touched me…he touched me…

    And suddenly nothing is the same!

    cause he touched me…he touched me…
    And suddenly…nothing, nothing,

    nothing is the same

    A truly Pukeworthy Moment for those few rational beings left among us.

  61. #388300
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:32 am, lgm said:

    sonofdy said (#42):

    Doesn’t it bother you just a little bit that not one news organization has done an extensive background investigation of the guy and reported on it?

    All the MSM organizations have investigated Obama’s past. Is there something you think they’ve missed or covered up?

    abstractmind said (#47):

    but doesnt that detract from the “we just report the news” and unbiased reporting many of them claim to have?

    Reporters are supposed to report in an unbiased way. That doesn’t mean that they can’t have personal preferences. What thinking person would not? The reporters in the story MM posted were not reporting, but attending a reporters’ convention.

  62. #388301
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:32 am, swmbo said:

    I was amused when all the Obamessiah stuff started but I got to tell you, it scares me now. I’m beginning to wonder if he truely is the anti-christ the Bible tells us to watch out for. Obama’s world tour to garner global adulation gives me major cold chills of fear.

    The only Rapture I am looking for is the Second Coming of Christ when he calls all his children home.

    If you don’t know Jesus Christ as your savior, I strongly recommend you seek his Love. This world and it’s troubles are temporary, Hell is forever.

  63. #388303
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:32 am, TanyaB said:

    The Republican voter were gullible enough to let the media pick John McCain for us.
    NOW, they are picking our next president!! Something has got to be done , someway, somehow!!
    And I have no idea what it is!! But our country is in the balance.

  64. #388308
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:34 am, JT said:

    Hell is an Obama presidency

  65. #388310
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:34 am, TanyaB said:

    voters, (plural) not voter.

  66. #388312
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:37 am, Barry F. said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:27 am, atheling said:

    Lol, can you imagine lgm in the classroom? What a bore he must be!

    Buehler? Buehler? Buehler?

    That’s not fair to the Economics teacher Ben Stein portrayed in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off to equate him with lgm, even if Stein’s was a fictional character. ;-)

  67. #388319
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:41 am, DBNinKY said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am, lgm said:

    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else.

    The mind boggles at even attempting to formulate a response to such an obviously uninformed, broad-sweeping statement, that it is best just leave it alone.

    If they like Obama better than McCain, who can blame them.

    “Let me count the ways.”

  68. #388320
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Craig said:

    The reporters in the story MM posted were not reporting, but attending a reporters’ convention.

    Agree. And let’s stop the effin’ pretense the MSM makes about their faux-objective reporting.

  69. #388322
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:44 am, ajmontana said:

    99,99,99….. yes, only 99 more days until election day. :shock:

  70. #388325
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:45 am, sonofdy said:

    All the MSM organizations have investigated Obama’s past. Is there something you think they’ve missed or covered up?

    With this biased reporting how would we know?

  71. #388326
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:45 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    lgm said:
    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else.

    lgm, we know you are a jerk but EVEN you can’t be that stupid.

    lgm said:
    All the MSM organizations have investigated Obama’s past. Is there something you think they’ve missed or covered up?

    lgm, we know you are a jerk but EVEN you can’t be that stupid.

    lgm said:
    The reporters in the story MM posted were not reporting, but attending a reporters’ convention.

    I don’t know, maybe you can be that stupid.


    Allah be Praised
    Allie OOP OOP 2

  72. #388328
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:47 am, DBNinKY said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:32 am, lgm said:

    All the MSM organizations have investigated Obama’s past.

    “All?” Aren’t you carrying the subjective generalizations a little too far? And too, if the MSM truly have investigated B. Hussein Obama, it’s only so they can cover for him – not to report it!

  73. #388330
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:49 am, mchristian said:

    “He touched me!”

    I’m thinking if a simple touch is enough to give that “reporter” an orgasm, it’s no wonder Michelle Obama is addled.

  74. #388333
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:50 am, nyc123me said:

    UNITY is the antithesis of UNITY.

    who knew?

  75. #388338
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:54 am, fulldroolcup said:

    From his pretzel logic world, lgm asks:

    All the MSM organizations have investigated Obama’s past. Is there something you think they’ve missed ….?

    Dunno. Individuals don’t have the resources to investigate a guy like Obama. The press does.

    ISN’T THAT THE EFFING POINT, YOU MOH-RON??

    …or covered up?

    Well, sure. His relationship with Rezko, Ayres and Dohrn. The true extent of his relationship with the REVrunds Wright and Pfleger. His consorting with a great variety of radical leftist groups. Exactly what his….errr…lovely wife (bearing an unfortunate resemblance to the late James Brown) DOES for her $300K tit/noshow job…and why she got a $200k raise just before Barak HUSSEIN got a cool mill$ earmarked for her hospital…

    There. That’s enought to send lgm scurrying back under his wet rock, or respond ineffecually with his tiny little Fists of Fury waving heavenwards.

    And please: don’t disrespect Ben Stein. lgm teaches math to third graders. How else to explain that he posts during working hours? Because he’s a union teacher!!! They don’t DO no stinkin teachin’!!!!

  76. #388345
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:58 am, DBNinKY said:

    That doesn’t mean that they can’t have personal preferences.

    But the key to being a good reporter is to not one’s “preferences” color the view or scope of the story.

    The MSM have handily failed in that department, witness any PMSNBC/NBC/NYT report on BHO or President Bush to verify, and are only able to continue with such shenanigans because of their myopic appeal to the fringe elements of the left.

  77. #388346
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:58 am, sonofdy said:

    LGM they also may have picked up that his brothers job involves moving jobs to china. His BROTHERS job involves moving jobs to china. Think about that.

  78. #388348
    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:59 am, abstractmind said:

    Reporters are supposed to report in an unbiased way. That doesn’t mean that they can’t have personal preferences. What thinking person would not? The reporters in the story MM posted were not reporting, but attending a reporters’ convention.

    Right, and thats all fine and good…except that these people DONT report unbiased. You admitted as much yourself earlier.

    Them having opinions is fine..thats normal. Writing op-ed pieces is fine. But you and I both know (whether you want to admit it, or just ignore the fact) that these people dont report any more unbiased than our -opinions- are here. I find your example, while on target for -this- instance may be more applicable, in general its intellectually dishonest to the core.

  79. #388354
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, sonofdy said:

    link for the above Because I know LGM will ask.

  80. #388356
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, DBNinKY said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 11:58 am, DBNinKY said:
    LGM said:

    That doesn’t mean that they can’t have personal preferences.

    Nutz! That was lgm’s statement to which I responded. I had it highlighted in the type space, but it didn’t show up in the post. Sorry for the confusion.

  81. #388358
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, greenfairie said:

    The three biggest problems with what passes for journalism these days in one story:

    1. “Diversity” bean counting in terms of skin/ethnicity but not in social/economic/ideological terms. Since their melanin count and ethnicity got them those jobs, they primarily identify themselves on that basis, i.e. “I’m a Latina producer” or a “black editor” or an “Asian reporter.” They’re constantly expected to have a Latina/black/Asian/gay/whatever perspective according to what white liberals think that perspective is supposed to be.

    2. Too many advocates and activists in the newsroom out to “make a difference.”

    3. Everybody’s a liberal or a far leftist.

  82. #388376
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, bit_boy said:

    Good for the members of UNITY to have something they believe in, good for Obama and his audacity to pretend to be the President, and good for the Democratic Party. What does McSwish offer other than herrump and his experience qualify him as the best choice in all things but he never explains the piece parts of that experience as though it is a magic carpet. His piece parts would not make a starter tinker toy set and lets not forget his life experience proves global warming is caused by humans and even though Hispanics favor him by 23% he see them a God’s children (others might see illegal Mexicans as felon indent thief artists and social benefits explorers).

    What do we conservatives have other than
    shut up and vote for the less of what ever they are.

  83. #388382
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, lgm said:

    DBNinKY said (#67):

    Reporters know the candidates better than anyone else.

    The mind boggles at even attempting to formulate a response to such an obviously uninformed, broad-sweeping statement, that it is best just leave it alone.

    You, sir or madam, are a wimp.

    ArizonaNeanderthal said (#71):

    we know you are a jerk but EVEN you can’t be that stupid.

    we know you are a jerk but EVEN you can’t be that stupid.

    I don’t know, maybe you can be that stupid.

    This is ad hominem argument. You didn’t make any arguments against what I said, only posted insults. You get no debating points for that.

  84. #388387
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    I for one look forward to perusing the photos on the “I’m Sorry” web site once again after the Messiah is not swept in to office, followed by 4 years of congressional hearings, investigations and talk of retroactive impeachment along with the endless claims of voter intimidation, fraud and disenfranchisement. In other words 4 more years of just exactly what we have been sufferning through for the last 8.
    *sigh* Some things never change.

  85. #388398
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    Here is what happened to lgm

    Every time he posts he loses a brain cells, before long his post will read like this ;ajhfgweahtpaghajnvlvbm nb,u24t907u02(*&T^%

  86. #388401
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, abstractmind said:

    This is my favorite part…like the chewy center of a tootsie pop ;)

    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, lgm said:

    You, sir or madam, are a wimp.

    and then *immediately* turns around and says this about someone else.

    This is ad hominem argument. You didn’t make any arguments against what I said, only posted insults. You get no debating points for that.

    Kettle, i’ve got a friend for you to meet…

  87. #388404
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    oh thanks use my initials first.

  88. #388405
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    oops Barry did’nt see you posted the pick, oh well it’s worth reapeating.

  89. #388407
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, sonofdy said:

    lgm:

    You, sir or madam, are a wimp.

    Your claim that the press knows Obama best is clearly ignorant at least because Obama is not with the press 24/7 UNLESS it suits obama and then you only see what obama wants you to see. In fact alot of the press complained during obamas “tour of duty” in the war zones because they were left out. So your comment about Obama is either just ignorant or uninformed.

  90. #388416
    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, Barry F. said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, lgm said:

    You, sir or madam, are a wimp.

    :shock:

    It must be the drugs or something. :lol:

    You’re right, BM. It bears reapeating. I like the pic. ;-)

  91. #388419
    On July 28th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, Blind_Mule said:

    No it’s not just the drugs, because if it were just the drugs his brain would look much better. :lol:

  92. #388420
    On July 28th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, Barry F. said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, sonofdy said:

    So your comment about Obama is either just ignorant or uninformed.

    Nah. I think it is just Kool-Aid® induced. ;-)

  93. #388426
    On July 28th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On July 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, lgm said:
    This is ad hominem argument. You didn’t make any arguments against what I said, only posted insults. You get no debating points for that.

    BWWWAAAAAHHHAAHHAHAHHAAHHAHHAHAHAA

    This is ad hominem argument. You didn’t make any arguments

    This is ALL you ever do and YOU wish to point the finger at someone else? IDIOT

    You get no debating points for that

    You are passing out points for debating? You who have never debated a single thread?

    Whose Line is it moment: lgm’s points are like graduation from his class. You will not get a degree but you can get into third grade.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom