The inside dope on a successful counter-terror agency
A friend forwarded a link to a surprising analysis of how the DEA has adapted successfully to fight terrorism as well as drug traffickers. It’s surprising because a government agency adapted so successfully, not because of the drug dealer-terrorism link. That’s not surprising at all.
…in the decades prior to 9/11 the DEA had gained extensive experience targeting complex, adaptive international organizations that were skilled in using technology and had extensive resources (i.e. drug cartels and – what Braun describes as the wave of the future – terrorist/drug cartel hybrids such as the FARC.) The DEA turned some of its weaknesses – its relatively small size and low profile and the limitations of being a law enforcement agency – into strengths. Because it was small and low-profile it could practice patience in its investigations and develop appropriate (and creative) techniques.
As the terrorwonk link shows, these strategies have helped the DEA infiltrate the FARC and also arrest international gunrunner Viktor Bout.
______________
{Post by See-Dubya}
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Homeland Security

Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’
Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care Czar
Riehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go Unexploited
Legal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No Reid
The Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysis
The Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to Conclusions
Legal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names




If they are allowed to bust them, our law enforcement will.
The best thing that could ever happen in terms of the link between drugs and terrorism is to legalize drugs. This would solve lots of problems all over the world from Afghanistan to Colombia, and would allow us to direct our valuable and limited resources to combating our real enemies. I say change the DEA to the TEA (T for terrorism) and let them go at it.
Pot maybe. But some of those others… Do you really want herion availiable at your local Wal Mart?
Not a bad idea rpg. Lower the cost, tax the heck out of it, charge a tarrif on the import, and watch the leftards get so zoned out on drugs they can’t bother to show up to the polls.
And free up a group that knows how to do do the job without getting tied up in PC crap.
It’s a win all around.
I just cant really go with the “legalize and problems go away” approach. I personally believe in the end, it would create more problems than it solves.
I do believe, however, that the approach the DEA has taken in terms of dealing with groups has vastly improved, and i’m glad they are finding success in the field. here’s hoping the trend continues.
Now why did you have to go and harsh the board’s mellow?
I think the U.S. should say to growers in Columbia, Afghanistan and elsewhere: You will sell your crops to us and we will pay the same as the traffickers.
Then, load the stuff onto cargo plains and on the way back to the U.S., dump it into the ocean. Keeps the locals happy and employed, deprives the narcos of most of their product, and keeps that product off of the streets.
Why don’t I think this will ever happen? Because the narcos have their tentacles gripped tightly on political leaders and cultural elites around the world, including in this country.
Since when did FARC start using teenage prostitutes as weapons?
As much as I hate to say this, I am for at very least legalizing marijuana. We are pursuing and jailing people for a plant that grows wild in the US (and can be grown easily in your home). I do not use it and to think that today’s product is much stronger is scary.
The problem with making it legal is twofold:
First- what you legalize, you give license to. There is a very good chance if you legalize certain drugs, addiction may go up. Now if we legalize pot, will meth addiction (arguably a much worse addition and a bigger problem for society)go down? And how do we say, “Don’t do drugs” when it is legal.
Second- Do you really want the goverment in the business of buying and selling recreational drugs? Yes, I see it as a possible windfall for the Federal Government, with the profits go to the country, not the drug supply chain. It also would de-fund Organized crime. Why buy impure product from them, when you can buy unadulterated product (from probably less) from the Feds?
The legalization of drugs would free up law enforcement, such as the DEA, to pursue other crimes and criminals. I’m no expert, but if someone like the Late, Great William F. Buckley Jr. was for it, should we at least explore it.
too bad the war on drugs has been an EPIC failure since its inception
Notice that torture was not the trick. It was law enforcement.
Not unlike that other great war, The War On Poverty! When the heck is that dirge ever going to end?
Nice straw man. The U.S. doesn’t torture.
I’d take U.S. military interrogation techniques over Thai police interrogation techniques any day. Of course lgm might disagree.
lets keep all options on the table. torture is ok too
Wow Southpaw #7, that is a terrific idea. I like it !!
Never happen, but I like it.