See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Moonbattery
2. Call Bush to Force Nancy “I’m Trying to Save the Planet” Pelosi into Special Session of Congress for Energy Crises « New Republican Party Blog

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:00 pm, nyk said:

     Hypocrisy much

     More like hypocrisy not at all. I respond in kind to other posters. Some can have civil discussions, and do; others start adolescent battles. You get back what you put out there.

102. #102
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:01 pm, nyk said:

     That’s the pot calling the kettle black.

     But then, what else would you expect? He’s the latter I mentioned above.

103. #103
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:03 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

     He’s the latter I mentioned above.

     More of that moral high ground Ad Hominem you are so good at. Hi pot.

104. #104
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:14 pm, nyk said:

     More of that moral high ground Ad Hominem you are so good at. Hi pot.

     1) It’s not ad hominem if I’m responding to the exact nature of your prior post. 2) It’s no moral victory to speak frankly about you. It is what it is.

105. #105
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:19 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

     1) It’s not ad hominem if I’m responding to the exact nature of your prior post. 2) It’s no moral victory to speak frankly about you. It is what it is.

     Um no, it’s your opinion. I merely pointed out the dakine was using a very long series of Ad Hominem to attack someone of whom they didn’t like their opinion of. You know nothing of my nature or who I am. I could claim your exact nature was vile and debased of moral substance but it would just be my opinion and my projection of your apparent beliefs based on what limited posting you do here. So thanks for projecting, but I didn’t expect much more from you.

106. #106
     On July 31st, 2008 at 12:32 pm, nyk said:

     Um no, it’s your opinion.

     It’s not my opinion that you offer useless attacks; it’s a fact. You’re doing it right now. The irony (should you recognize it) must just bowl you over.

107. #107
     On July 31st, 2008 at 7:58 pm, Dimsdale said:

     On July 31st, 2008 at 10:58 am, nyk said:

     (snip)

     If this Argus project is such a “joke,” what are these professors so worried about?

     They aren’t worried. It genuinely is being circulated as a joke, and that’s how it was sent me. All kidding (and snarkiness) aside, it honestly isn’t an email being circulated out of concern.

     Well I have taught in colleges and universities in both Massachusetts and Connecticut, and there are many profs (n>2) that seriously do need to be worried.

     You didn’t address either my commentary or the request that you look up the story of Dr. Miller. Care to?

108. #108
     On August 2nd, 2008 at 4:37 pm, ent said:

     When I looked at the reviews on Amazon a day or two ago, there were 160 1-star reviews. Now there are only 25. Anyone know what is going on?

109. #109
     On August 2nd, 2008 at 8:38 pm, ent said:

     A few hours later, there are only 21.

110. #110
     On August 3rd, 2008 at 6:11 pm, cao said:

     Wow it’s been a long time since I’ve visited comments. Either the moderator is not on duty today, or…things have completely changed.!

     I thought the comments on the book at Amazon were very amusing, although the link that Michelle originally used is now not working. They are experts at this historical revisionism stuff, LOL

Comment pages: « 1 [2]