See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:11 am, sambo said:

   Jill Stanek read my mind: If Sen. Coburn were aborting babies for free instead of delivering them, he’d be getting awards instead of ethics complaints.

   The sad truth…enough said!

2. #2
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:13 am, letget said:

   Dr. Coburn, Keep up the good work and thorn in the side of the dems.
   L

3. #3
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:14 am, alaskangrizzly said:

   Jill Stanek read my mind: If Sen. Coburn were aborting babies for free instead of delivering them, he’d be getting awards instead of ethics complaints.

   Well, that sums up the Demoncrats quite well and I agree that under their rule what is up is down and what is down is up.

4. #4
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:14 am, katieanne said:

   Dems attack Sen. Coburn for delivering babies for free

   The smell of desperation is in the air and it stinks.

   Apparently, the Dems don’t want voters focused on Democratic fraud, obstruction of any kind of solution to our energy problems and the ongoing flops in the Obama campaign.

5. #5
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:15 am, Christian Soldier said:

   Calls to our individual state Senators are in order—-

   “You cut PP’s funds-and turn your thinking to pro-baby (pro-life)…then you can be “out-raged” toward Sen Coburn!
   Otherwise-SENATOR ________–shut up!”

   LFL

6. #6
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:17 am, Misscheryl said:

   I am proud of Sen. Coburn and Sen. Inhoff! Oklahoma is doing a lot of things right thanks to these two. They hear what Oklahomans are saying.

7. #7
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:17 am, Barry F. said:

   “If Sen. Coburn can only deliver babies for free at a public hospital, shouldn’t Sen. Leahy only be allowed to donate his notable thespian skills to a public entity like PBS?”

   “Notable thespian skills?” Leahy? He was a guest at the party in The Dark Knight, right? He got listed in the credits right after “Thug at Party.” Obviously, they missed type-casting him.

8. #8
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:19 am, Rogue said:

   Leaky was in The Dark Knight? I must have missed that.

9. #9
   On July 30th, 2008 at 11:19 am, Barry F. said:

   If Sen. Coburn were aborting babies for free instead of delivering them, he’d be getting awards instead of ethics complaints.

   Right. Were he sending them on to their death, instead of bringing them into this world, he could be hailed as a hero. Well, he may have to drop the “R” after his name too to get that status from them.

10. #10
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:20 am, Barry F. said:

    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:19 am, Rogue said:

    Leaky was in The Dark Knight? I must have missed that.

    He was just part of the cast of extras. It wouldn’t have been too hard to miss him, I don’t think. It’s not like he brought a lot to the film.

11. #11
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:20 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Truly, can the liberhoids stoop any lower.

12. #12
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:21 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    …or is it dangle?

13. #13
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:22 am, ajmontana said:

    isn’t he just getting a head start on “universal health care” ???????

14. #14
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:22 am, Rogue said:

    That would explain it…

15. #15
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am, bfly1133 said:

    This is beyond ridiculous! I can’t for the life of me figure out what is unethical about this practice. Then again, we’re talking about people who rarely make sense so I probably won’t ever be able to make sense out of it.

16. #16
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am, fighterDC said:

    Sen. Coburn should just tell the Ethics Committee that he is delivering illegal alien anchor babies who will vote Democrat and I’m sure they will leave him alone.

17. #17
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:28 am, Barry F. said:

    Nah. Coburn just needs to keep it simple and tell them, while pointing towards his posterior to “Pucker up, close your eyes and kiss this”, to borrow a line from Aaron Tippin.

    Like AJ says, he is helpin’ those masses the Dems keep pointing to that cannot afford healthcare, right?

18. #18
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:30 am, ACHefty said:

    Now just wait a minute! I thought the Senate was opposed to charging for this service, like with former Senator Frist, who delivered babies to stay “in practice.”

    Can’t have it both ways, folks.

    And for crying out loud, he’s volunteering! Just without the hideous AmeriCorps.

    Someone correct me if I am wrong.

19. #19
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:33 am, nyc123me said:

    Hello? It’s a private business. If they wish to contribute to society by providing free birthing, that is their prerogative.

20. #20
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:36 am, bloghooligan said:

    don’t attack the guy who’s hiding $90k in untaxed fund in his freezer. attack the guy who does that evil task of delivering babies for free.

    unreal.

21. #21
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:41 am, abstractmind said:

    I seriously need to hear a good reason as to why providing services to patients for free (and covering any incurred expenses on his own) is unethical. this sounds like complete garbage to me.

    Trolls, lets hear it.

22. #22
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:47 am, no2pcbs1 said:

    senate ethics committee, what a joke. the gutless wonders continue to prove how truly intellectually challenged they are. they are drowing in real issues that need to be addressed, but choose instead to attack someone who is actually doing something meaningful. senate ethics committee please extract your heads from your behinds, since it appears that you are drowning in your own BS.

23. #23
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am, rambler said:

    senate ethics – just another oxymoron. Yes he should be delivering anchor babies for free. That would fit right in with Rangle’s rent stabilized apartments and Wexler using his relative’s address for his Palm Beach address while he lives in MD. I guess there are 2 Americas – the one we live in and the one these politicians create for themselves at our expence!

24. #24
    On July 30th, 2008 at 11:55 am, Fat Jolly Penguin said:

    This is so completely absurd I can only think of one reaction.

    LOL WUT?

25. #25
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, kudafa said:

    As a practicing doctor myself, none of this makes any sense. Why would anyone object to delivering children, which I will assume are of parents with limited means? In over two decades of practice, autonomy of the doctor (the person who has been trained & busted his/her a** to learn & actually knows what to do) has been relaced by some remote authority of a legislator/lawyer/insurance company. Perhaps this is also what we will see if national health care comes to pass. Of course, the more salient & direct issue here is apparently the ethics committee wants to destroy Coburn.

26. #26
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, tre said:

    If Sen. Coburn were aborting babies for free instead of delivering them, he’d be getting awards instead of ethics complaints.

    According to Barack HUSSEIN Obama, babies are a punishment. Therefore, Senator Coburn is supposed to abort them so the mothers aren’t “punished”.

27. #27
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    See, the problem is that babies have never been delivered with rusty coat hangers in dark back alleys. If they had been, the Senator would be a hero.

    /MAX sarc off

28. #28
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:12 pm, Jim M. said:

    Those nasty Republicans. Now they have hit a new low, aiding and abbeting casting a curse upon the people by providing assistance in bringing children into this world. For shame.

    Why can’t he be like Howard Dean and support abortion, assisted suicide and euthanasia? Now there’s a example of a doctor that cares of his country. Keep costs down by the efficient disposal of those who cannot make a positive contribution to society at the ballot box. Lift the curses from parents. Get rid of society’s dead weight.

    Those Republicans. They just don’t get it, do they?

29. #29
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    I have read the article and still don’t quite get what the Committee thinks he is doing wrong.

    In any case, really, all I can do is kinda hang my head on this one. Not gonna try to justify this. Embarrassing.

30. #30
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, JT said:

    What country do I live in?

31. #31
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, Tom Blogical said:

    Jaw dropping. And the kicker is, they know how low their approval ratings are.

32. #32
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, Yashmak said:

    Wow, I hope Coburn DOES get a chance to fight this one in open hearings.

    Keep this up, and the Dems will acheive the impossible. Congressional approval ratings lower than zero.

33. #33
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, purplepeep said:

    Anytime you have a doctor donating his time and skills to help people in a positive way s/he should be applauded.

    If that’s the worst “dirt” the Democrats can dig up with on anybody, they’re truly desperate.

    (As a side note, I believe Ron Paul has also delivered quite a few babies pro bono; good for him on that, if nothing else.)

34. #34
    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, traveler49 said:

    I like how Sen. Coburn is challenging them to bring it on. Let’s shine a big light on your ugly ethics committee. In fact, let’s start shining big lights on just about everything the dems are doing these days. Oh yes, I forgot, there’s not too many Republicans with the b@lls of Coburn.

35. #35
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, ciceroskip said:

    Maybe they are upset because he does not have to pay income tax if he does not charge for the delivery?

36. #36
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, Reg.conservative said:

    I found this on zogby 2 hr ago!!!A July Rasmussen Reports poll found a nine percent approval rating for Congress, the first time in the poll’s history that Congressional approval had fallen to single digits.

37. #37
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, emjem24 said:

    I don’t understand this at all. What is Sen. Coburn doing that is wrong? I wish more politicians were the citizens they pretend to be. So he’s giving his services for free. So what? Now there are more babies in the world that can enjoy life instead of being sucked cruelly out of the womb by cold abortionists.

    I do not understtand why Dems are attacking Coburn. I really do understand why he wants to get out by 2016 though and keep his professional skills (not his poltical ones) current. He had the audacity to resist Congress’ overspending ways and this is how any person who crosses Washington (or Reid and the majority Dems) will be treated.

    This is not civil. You do not treat people like this. How does Reid look himself in the mirror? He belongs in jail just like Stevens!

38. #38
    On July 30th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, sambo said:

    I guess he could have ethics problems if one of the babies he delivered was John Edwards love child.

39. #39
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:11 pm, Jbgood said:

    Tom Coburn is good for Oklahoma and good for the United States. There aren’t many in congress like him. I’m glad to have him representing me and my family.

40. #40
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:16 pm, supersean said:

    Shouldn’t they be censuring those who default on their mortgages?

41. #41
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:21 pm, Salt said:

    On July 30th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    I have read the article and still don’t quite get what the Committee thinks he is doing wrong.

    In any case, really, all I can do is kinda hang my head on this one. Not gonna try to justify this. Embarrassing.

    If no one else says it, I appreciate your candor in expressing your dismay on this, chapoutier.

42. #42
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Coburn spokesman John Hart… called the Ethics panel’s logic “absurd” and its argument “inane.”

    Shocked. Congress? Inane?

43. #43
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:42 pm, abstractmind said:

    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:21 pm, Salt said:

    Agreed. Chap has the right idea. Good call

44. #44
    On July 30th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, walterc said:

    Frist, by contrast, had no plans to return to his practice when he retired from the Senate.

    Fixed it.

45. #45
    On July 30th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, swmbo said:

    Words fail me. Just when I think I’ve heard everything, something like this comes along.

    And we pay Reid how much a year to be stupid?

46. #46
    On July 30th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, frayed said:

    In Dr. Coburns book “Breach of Trust” he tells why the House (un)Ethics Committe ruled against him practicing medicine, reversing a previous ruling that had allowed him to do so for the past 3 years. It is under the heading, “The Incumbent Protection System”, (pgs.179-185). He was one of the 73 Republican freshmen Representatives in the Class of 94.

    If you really want to know how Congress works this book is a must read. There are a lot of revealing things about Newt Gingrich, Dick Armey, Tom Delay, and many other well known names.

    You get a good look at just how dysfunctional Congress really is.

47. #47
    On July 30th, 2008 at 3:42 pm, Papa Louie said:

    “Has Sen. Leahy provided an improper endorsement to Warner Brothers for appearing in Batman?” Hart asked.

    And what about Nancy Pelosi’s new book? It sells for $16.29, so she doesn’t even provide it for free. Does that mean she provided an improper endorsement to Doubleday, her publisher? Any chance the house Ethics Panel will investigate?
    Not a chance, she has a D by her name.

48. #48
    On July 30th, 2008 at 3:52 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Next, they plan to go after Sen. McCain for endorsing mom and apple pie.

    Any Senator who promotes drilling for oil could be in trouble for endorsing Exxon Mobil.

    (I’d better stop before I give them any ideas.)

49. #49
    On July 30th, 2008 at 3:55 pm, beenthere said:

    Don’t worry, Sen. Coburn. Your party and your president will stand behind you 100%.

    Okay, better start worrying.

50. #50
    On July 30th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, CleanGuy said:

    Maybe they would have less of an issue if Sen. Coburn were a Urologist…

51. #51
    On July 30th, 2008 at 6:15 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Back in the 60′s into the 70′s, my father, a dermatologist, used to provide free care at a walk-in free clinic every Wed morning for four hours and then sometimes have enough time left to get in 9 holes of golf. He also used to let poorer patients stretch their payments and never even considered using a bill collection agency. And then, for some long term patients who lost everything when the steel industry of Pittsburgh basically collapsed – he just told them not to worry about it..

    But then more and more people started carrying health insurance. The number of evening and weekend hours needed to submit the claims started adding up. And then some insurers demanded that he was required to disclose his overhead costs and history of charges for various procedures; some even limited what they would reimburse to be lower than new doctors just out of med school because his overhead was low and theirs was high! (After 40 years he had paid off the mortgage on his up/down two unit office/apartment building whereas new doctors were paying huge rents in comparison). And then malpractice insurance started going up… Eventually he gave up on the free clinic which wasn’t drawing as many people anyway as medicaid was coming on-line. Damn the health insurance companies, damn the politicians and damn the trial lawyers – none of them cure anybody yet they’re getting a huge chunk of each health care dollar. God bless Senator Coburn.

52. #52
    On July 30th, 2008 at 7:17 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    I read this blog daily, and post rarely but, today I feel compelled to post if only to say how shameless and depraved the democrats have become and to give a nod to chap for being honest.

53. #53
    On July 30th, 2008 at 10:42 pm, twofoot said:

    The most wonderful thing a doctor can do. Ushering babies into the world. And democrats have a problem with this?

    Pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the party of treason and death.

54. #54
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:15 am, Politicalguano said:

    The Dems hate it when doctors deliver babies alive unless they agree to immediately then suck the child’s brain out. They also hate the idea of a Senator working for free – this is their idea of real fascism!
    All in all, another shining example why liberals/democrats, particularly their senators,are the scum of the earth. I hope Harry Reid has elected cremation for his every closer to the day ceremony. I would love a movie clip of his body being consumed in hellfire. Even better if he woke up half way through the ceremony.

55. #55
    On July 31st, 2008 at 8:17 am, ahraley said:

    Wait a minute. I thought the DEMS wanted free health care?

56. #56
    On July 31st, 2008 at 9:43 am, MtsEdge said:

    If Sen. Coburn was RECEIVING freebies as a result of his position, THAT would be an ethical problem (at least it used to be, until the world turned upside down).

    I think the Dems are just upset that he’s helping babies to be born…THAT is the problem for them.

57. #57
    On August 3rd, 2008 at 8:04 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    A little late to the game on this, but let me make sure I understand.

    1) Liberals are all up in arms over the expensive cost of health care.

    2) Liberals want health care to be “free” under socialized medicine – which means taxing the hell out of the majority of Americans.

    3) Sen. Coburn delivers babies for free, thereby doing away with the expensive cost of having a child.

    And the Dems are upset about this? In a sane world, I’d say that defies logic – but when have the Dems been logical?

    Then they wonder why we think they hate children. As Ms. Stanek said – if Coburn was aborting children for free, he’d be a hero.

    Disgusting.