<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Judiciary Cmte cites Rove for contempt: What will Nancy do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:11:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-393877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-393877</guid>
		<description>and mess with cow you get the........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and mess with cow you get the&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-393220</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-393220</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Would that be fair? It is my understanding that Pelosi can shoot concentrated Botox poison from her eyes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, you mess with the bull, you get the horns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Would that be fair? It is my understanding that Pelosi can shoot concentrated Botox poison from her eyes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, you mess with the bull, you get the horns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-393106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-393106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On July 31st, 2008 at 6:28 am, bilgerat said:

Where was the liberal outrage when Clinton fired 93 U.S. attorneys in 1993?????

Anyone?? Bueller? Bueller?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And, lest we forget, the firings and framing of Billy Dale in the White House travel office.  (Mr. Dale was cleared about as fast as you can snap your fingers, by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On July 31st, 2008 at 6:28 am, bilgerat said:</p>
<p>Where was the liberal outrage when Clinton fired 93 U.S. attorneys in 1993?????</p>
<p>Anyone?? Bueller? Bueller?</p></blockquote>
<p>And, lest we forget, the firings and framing of Billy Dale in the White House travel office.  (Mr. Dale was cleared about as fast as you can snap your fingers, by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-393103</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-393103</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On July 30th, 2008 at 7:33 pm, chapoutier said:

We could just settle this with a Thunderdome-style Rove V. Pelosi cage match.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Would that be fair?   It is my understanding that Pelosi can shoot concentrated Botox poison from her eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On July 30th, 2008 at 7:33 pm, chapoutier said:</p>
<p>We could just settle this with a Thunderdome-style Rove V. Pelosi cage match.</p></blockquote>
<p>Would that be fair?   It is my understanding that Pelosi can shoot concentrated Botox poison from her eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin.musculus(jr.)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391630</link>
		<dc:creator>martin.musculus(jr.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391630</guid>
		<description>I suspect a couple of factors present in Rove&#039;s response:
      1. Congress is exceeding its lawful power.  Worse than &lt;b&gt;no&lt;/b&gt; evidence, there is &lt;b&gt;contrary&lt;/b&gt; evidence concerning Rove&#039;s involvement.  Therefore, to capitulate would be to violate The Rule of Law.

2. By offering to provide &lt;i&gt;Con&lt;/i&gt;gress a written &amp; sworn state, he offers an olive branch, while avoiding a Libby: question a man until he commits an honest error of memory, then hang him with it.

Personally, I think this is GWB&#039;s &quot;new tone&quot; savaging his behind.  He thought his &quot;Compassionate Conservatism&quot; was close enough to the Liberal&#039;s agenda that they&#039;d make common cause.  He mistook National Liberals for Texan Liberals (c1998).  How foolish!

I was stationed at Randolf AFB while GWB was governor.  While there had always been a tendency for R&amp;D cooperation, and both parties tended to be reasonable, GWB &quot;crossed the isle&quot; more than was necessary and (in my opinion) good for Texas.  Still, since the parties were very close, it wasn&#039;t too significant a trait --  from a strictly practical POV.  Both parties were pretty conservative.  

Please remember, this was c.1998, prior to the cultural rot extending down to Texas.  Texas Liberals seem to be as black-moldy as the national Liberals now.  The vision of the National Liberals has pushed-out the Texas brand, leaving 1998-style Texas Liberals, (who most closely resemble the Classical variety) wondering how to effectively push-back.

(Boy, will I get flamed for this...) In my opinion, while GWB was the LOTE in 2000 &amp; 2004, &lt;b&gt;he isn&#039;t a conservative!&lt;/b&gt;  All our mistakes seem to stem from confusing &quot;Compassionate Conservatism&quot; with the REALLY compassionate original flavor.  We needed to be on his butt 24/7 to keep things like Kennedy NCLB &amp; McCain-Feingold from happening/being signed.  Although I will point out that he &lt;b&gt;promised to veto McCain-Feingold!&lt;/b&gt;  I have always considered that a violation of his Oath of Office.  Atleast we wised-up &amp; sunk Myers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect a couple of factors present in Rove&#8217;s response:<br />
      1. Congress is exceeding its lawful power.  Worse than <b>no</b> evidence, there is <b>contrary</b> evidence concerning Rove&#8217;s involvement.  Therefore, to capitulate would be to violate The Rule of Law.</p>
<p>2. By offering to provide <i>Con</i>gress a written &amp; sworn state, he offers an olive branch, while avoiding a Libby: question a man until he commits an honest error of memory, then hang him with it.</p>
<p>Personally, I think this is GWB&#8217;s &#8220;new tone&#8221; savaging his behind.  He thought his &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221; was close enough to the Liberal&#8217;s agenda that they&#8217;d make common cause.  He mistook National Liberals for Texan Liberals (c1998).  How foolish!</p>
<p>I was stationed at Randolf AFB while GWB was governor.  While there had always been a tendency for R&amp;D cooperation, and both parties tended to be reasonable, GWB &#8220;crossed the isle&#8221; more than was necessary and (in my opinion) good for Texas.  Still, since the parties were very close, it wasn&#8217;t too significant a trait &#8212;  from a strictly practical POV.  Both parties were pretty conservative.  </p>
<p>Please remember, this was c.1998, prior to the cultural rot extending down to Texas.  Texas Liberals seem to be as black-moldy as the national Liberals now.  The vision of the National Liberals has pushed-out the Texas brand, leaving 1998-style Texas Liberals, (who most closely resemble the Classical variety) wondering how to effectively push-back.</p>
<p>(Boy, will I get flamed for this&#8230;) In my opinion, while GWB was the LOTE in 2000 &amp; 2004, <b>he isn&#8217;t a conservative!</b>  All our mistakes seem to stem from confusing &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221; with the REALLY compassionate original flavor.  We needed to be on his butt 24/7 to keep things like Kennedy NCLB &amp; McCain-Feingold from happening/being signed.  Although I will point out that he <b>promised to veto McCain-Feingold!</b>  I have always considered that a violation of his Oath of Office.  Atleast we wised-up &amp; sunk Myers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilgerat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391599</link>
		<dc:creator>bilgerat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391599</guid>
		<description>Where was the liberal outrage when &lt;strong&gt;Clinton fired 93 &lt;/strong&gt;U.S. attorneys in 1993?????

Anyone?? Bueller? Bueller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was the liberal outrage when <strong>Clinton fired 93 </strong>U.S. attorneys in 1993?????</p>
<p>Anyone?? Bueller? Bueller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391550</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391550</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;See. We could take care of the deficit too.&lt;/blockquote&gt; - chapoutier

You overestimate my salary greatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>See. We could take care of the deficit too.</p></blockquote>
<p> &#8211; chapoutier</p>
<p>You overestimate my salary greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politicalguano</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391543</link>
		<dc:creator>Politicalguano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391543</guid>
		<description>Nancy Pelosi should go to prison for violating her oath to uphold the Constitution and serve our Nation. Selling out every citizen, attempting to wreck educaion for minority children and on and on. She is scum. She deserves execution by firing squad but we are merciful and because the woman is insane, prison will do, c&#039;mon, take a good look at her. She is as loupy as Charles Manson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi should go to prison for violating her oath to uphold the Constitution and serve our Nation. Selling out every citizen, attempting to wreck educaion for minority children and on and on. She is scum. She deserves execution by firing squad but we are merciful and because the woman is insane, prison will do, c&#8217;mon, take a good look at her. She is as loupy as Charles Manson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atheling</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391481</link>
		<dc:creator>atheling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391481</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What will Nancy do?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Leave Nancy alone.  She&#039;s trying to save the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What will Nancy do?</p></blockquote>
<p>Leave Nancy alone.  She&#8217;s trying to save the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391466</link>
		<dc:creator>mjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391466</guid>
		<description>Hmm, maybe Congress should be dealing with increased gas prices or something.  Instead of this pissant crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, maybe Congress should be dealing with increased gas prices or something.  Instead of this pissant crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391453</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Invoke the 5th&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You really want him to invoke &lt;em&gt;the 5th&lt;/em&gt;?  Are you sure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Invoke the 5th</p></blockquote>
<p>You really want him to invoke <em>the 5th</em>?  Are you sure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corona</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391438</link>
		<dc:creator>corona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391438</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmFhNTE3NzZiNGJlNmQwYmRlZGJkNTJiM2U2OTMxNDU=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The answer is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt;: become the next editor of &lt;em&gt;National Geographic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmFhNTE3NzZiNGJlNmQwYmRlZGJkNTJiM2U2OTMxNDU=" rel="nofollow">The answer is <em>not</em>: become the next editor of <em>National Geographic</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklyn red</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391420</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklyn red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391420</guid>
		<description>Invoke the 5th, flip a bird, walk out, have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invoke the 5th, flip a bird, walk out, have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391411</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391411</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You simply cannot pick and choose when you will honor the rule of law…

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry Chap, tell that to the illegal invaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You simply cannot pick and choose when you will honor the rule of law…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry Chap, tell that to the illegal invaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/30/house-judiciary-cmte-cites-rove-for-contempt-what-will-nancy-do/comment-page-1/#comment-391408</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13120#comment-391408</guid>
		<description>Just because his name is almost like a dog&#039;s name, doesn&#039;t mean that Rove(er) has to play little tricks for this congress.

All the Democraps are trying to do is to distract the loons on the left from the Democraps&#039; failures to impeach Bush and end the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because his name is almost like a dog&#8217;s name, doesn&#8217;t mean that Rove(er) has to play little tricks for this congress.</p>
<p>All the Democraps are trying to do is to distract the loons on the left from the Democraps&#8217; failures to impeach Bush and end the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
