About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Maryland’s gang-fighting strategy: Satellite TV!

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 31, 2008 12:38 PM

The perks of criminality: Ah!

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:42 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Great! How soon before there will be whining about obese inmates who spend 24/7 watching OPRAH! and SPIKE TV ruining their health:=).

  2. #2
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:45 pm, tre said:

    Why am I going to work 40 hours a week? Why am I obeying the law?
    Why am I facing my responsibilities, raising my family, feeding my children, and paying my bills?

    And I don’t have satellite TV.

  3. #3
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Barry F. said:

    …available to all inmates who have televisions in their cells.

    It just seems like the punitive aspect of incarceration (i.e. prison) fades farther and farther from view with each passing day.

  4. #4
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Barry F. said:

    Heh. I say, block all channels coming in except Logo. :evil:

  5. #5
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:49 pm, ArmoredCAV said:

    Come on, guys. It’s in the Constitution. Right under “Congress shall establish the ACLU and a wall of separation between Church and State”, it says “Congress shall provide free Satellite TV to all miscreants, thugs, and ye olde General Population.”

  6. #6
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:52 pm, alt said:

    …available to all inmates who have televisions in their cells.

    Televisions in their cells?? When I sent my child to their room for punishment, the last thing I wanted them doing was watching TV and allowing them to enjoy their solitary time.

    It is no wonder that people are not frightened as much about the possibility of going to prison.

    Where is Sheriff Joe when you need him!!!

  7. #7
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:53 pm, ajmontana said:

    geeze why not just give em furloughs to the price is right, they may win a big screen…… :roll:

  8. #8
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:54 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    It will be available to all inmates who have televisions in their cells.

    Begs the question - what does an inmate have to do to not have a televisions in their cells?

  9. #9
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:54 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    televisions s/b television.

  10. #10
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    okay…there is yet another grammatical error in that post. I’m not bothering with it. ;-p

  11. #11
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well, scott peterson the murdering bastitch of his wife and unborn child has his own blog, why not a tv and a comphy recliner in every cell. and room service…. :shock:

  12. #12
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:56 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    This is the lib rehabilitation program, coming soon, to an enemy combatant camp near you.

    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Oh, and you have the right to satellite TV.

  13. #13
    On July 31st, 2008 at 12:59 pm, ackrite55 said:

    Great! Pacify criminals with The Wire, Oz, & The Sparanos.

  14. #14
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:03 pm, RobM1981 said:

    I’m on the fence for this one.

    Yeah, I get the whole “unfair” part of it - I do.

    But I also have to think about the guards. If this truly keeps the animals quiet, then it might not be a bad thing.

    Have any of you been sick, or in a situation where you were forced to watch TV for a whole day? I don’t find it pleasant, but that’s me.

    If we were allowed to treat prisoners like we treated them 50 years ago I’d be against this - but those day’s aren’t coming back…

  15. #15
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:05 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    But I also have to think about the guards. If this truly keeps the animals quiet, then it might not be a bad thing.

    I thought that’s what the cells were for… now we have to placate (translation: coddle) prisoners so they’ll behave and when this doesn’t work. What’s next? Spa Day?!?

  16. #16
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:07 pm, okbayou said:

    I work at a prison in Michigan. The inmates have 12″ B&W tv’s that they pay for themselves.They also have to pay for the satellite services(there are different ways this is done).The tv’s can be removed from their cells for rule violations. This can be a good tool for an officer.

  17. #17
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Craig said:

    He says the service will be paid for with money raised through commissary sales and telephone in the prison by duped taxpayers, other means to pay for it failed miserably.

    There. That’s better.

  18. #18
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    In another twenty years, this will be the scene outside the prison.

  19. #19
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:14 pm, prendad said:

    Can you imagine an American being imprisoned overseas, say in Mexico, Pakistan, Thailand etc. and asking the guards “Where is my satellite tv”? I cannot decide whether they would die laughing before or after they beat the crap out of you.

  20. #20
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:14 pm, Mostly Annoyed said:

    As they say it’s not Govoner O’Malley, it’s Govoner “OWE’Malley” Maryland residents owe him every penny for the insane decesion of electing the jerk.
    The really really sad thing is people voted for this nut after he did so many wonderfull things for Baltimore, that we have read about here…..

    Fortunately I won’t be a resident for much longer…

    What ever happened to making inmates work for thier food and housing. Can’t we bring in the guy that makes them all sleep outside in tents, wear all bright pink uniforms right down to their undies? Wait this is Maryland, we must treat the inmates better than the residents. Help them to improve their self esteem.

  21. #21
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:17 pm, GJCorby said:

    How about we lock them in their cells without the TV.
    That would cut down on gang activity and no cable bill.

  22. #22
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:18 pm, Barry F. said:

    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:07 pm, okbayou said:

    I worked in prisons, jails and juvenile detention facilities for years and never did like the idea of providing cable/satellite television for them. It was only on a common television in the common area of the housing unit then. Yes. It may babysit the inmates to some degree but it was also a distraction for officers working the unit, because they would end up watching what was happening on the television, instead of supervising what was going on with the population in their unit.

  23. #23
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:19 pm, tarpon said:

    What wrong with midnight basketball?

  24. #24
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    3 squares and a cot. the end.

  25. #25
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:38 pm, glockomatic said:

    Galley says inmates prefer to stay in their cells when there is a variety of television programming available. He says this reduces the likelihood of gang activity and violence.

    Just thinking outside the box here, but what about if we locked the cell doors? Wouldn’t that keep the inmates in their cells and reduce gang activity and violence more cheaply? I’m just saying…

  26. #26
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:42 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:25 pm, ajmontana said:
    3 squares and a cot. the end

    Aj, you gotta make rhyme. Yo.

    It’s three hots and a cot. ;-)

  27. #27
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    Oh, don’t show this to Sheriff Joe.

  28. #28
    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:59 pm, Barry F. said:

    On July 31st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    Oh, don’t show this to Sheriff Joe.

    I believe his version would be sitting an Etch-a-Sketch™ in the tent for them to entertain themselves. Even Sheriff Joe isn’t insensitive enough to set a television in a tent with them when they can’t even plug power into it. ;-)

  29. #29
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Up next, judge takes his cue from fuzzy math.

    Judge: How many years would make you feel good about your crime?

    Perp: I dunno. Does it come with satellite TV, conjugal visits, a paycheck, free food, a college education…?

    Judge: As you wish.

    Perp: What do I get if I want to be set free?

    Judge: I will commute your sustenance to time served.

    Perp: That’s a tough one robbed dude?

    Judge: Take your time, I do not want you to feel repressed.

  30. #30
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:02 pm, BrianNY said:

    …inmates prefer to stay in their cells when there is a variety of television programming available. He says this reduces the likelihood of gang activity and violence.

    So does 12 hours of chain gang work every day. And it’s cheaper than a gym filled with Bowflex equipment AND satellite television.

  31. #31
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:03 pm, Southpaw said:

    “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people.”
    Karl Marx

    “Television is the new opiate of the masses.”
    Southpaw

    Perhaps if the prison officials were able to put subliminal messages in the images, like in the movie “They Live”.
    -DO NOT commit crimes, DO NOT commit crimes, be a good citizen…

  32. #32
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:56 pm, purplepeep said:

    Hmmmm….if I start a rumble I get free Sat-TV?

    Let’s see - I rarely watch even broadcast TV, so it would just mean 500 more channels that stink. On the other hand, it’s a freebie and I do get to vent by punching a guy’s clock out before they allow me to settle in and watch x-rated movies.

    This is a tough call….

  33. #33
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:56 pm, mom2jack said:

    So, we have to accept illegals into our country because they are “doing the work that Americans won’t do.” How about sending chain gangs to the fields to pick produce, or dig trenches, or whatever else. Inmates can work for their “3 hots and a cot” (and then SLEEP because they’ve worked so hard all day - kinda like how I keep my puppy from chewing up the house), and the illegals go home because the jobs they take are now gone.

  34. #34
    On July 31st, 2008 at 2:59 pm, RobM1981 said:

    The days of “keep’em in their cells,” or “3 hots and a cot” are over for all but the most incorrigible. Now we have “process,” and all of that crap.

    What we *don’t* have to put up with, however, is short sentences. That’s the one thing that we get to vote on, by voting bum-judges (or the politicians that put them in there) out.

    As long as the animals are in prison, I don’t care if playing with dolls. Just keep them off the streets and keep the guards safe.

    Hearing that TV is a distraction to the guards was a bit alarming, but understandable.

    If I had my druthers we’d be back to penal colonies. Put them on an island, keep them on the island (with orders to shoot to kill anyone caught trying to leave the island) and let them do whatever they want to do on the island.

    Just get them off my streets, permanently.

  35. #35
    On July 31st, 2008 at 3:15 pm, sillygatboy said:

    John #27, you beat me to it.

    Do you think Sheriff Joe is laughing, or crying at this point?

  36. #36
    On July 31st, 2008 at 3:53 pm, nbarry said:

    As if these prisoners need any further dumbing down.

  37. #37
    On July 31st, 2008 at 6:59 pm, swmbo said:

    OYE DUDE !
    I also thought the bars and locks were to keep folks apart.
    WHO KNEW?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Where in the world

October 9, 2008 01:45 PM by Michelle Malkin

26 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Creed’s Scott Stapp supports the troops

September 29, 2008 08:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Tell all your friends: FactCheck.org is useless

September 23, 2008 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

September 20, 2008 02:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

247 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sunday open thread

September 14, 2008 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

366 Comments | 1 Trackback

Sunday open thread

September 7, 2008 11:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

406 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

My favorite new bumper sticker

August 31, 2008 10:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

86 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Andrew Sullivan jumps in on Palin’s grandma-gate rumor

August 31, 2008 10:16 PM by see-dubya

140 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

It’s this year’s “Dick Cheney’s Gay Daughter”. UPDATE: “Fair Game,” then and now.


Categories: Uncategorized


Weekly Standard

» Norm Coleman's New Strategy