Illegal alien Death Row rapist/killer’s last-ditch appeal

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 4, 2008 11:23 AM

The world court and President Bush tried and failed to stop the execution of illegal alien Death Row killer Jose Medellin.

Texas told ‘em to bug off–and the Supreme Court backed Texas.

Medellin faces execution tomorrow. The U.N. and the international meddlers are whining. Now, Medellin’s lawyers have filed one last-ditch appeal to subvert our national sovereignty and delay justice:

“Texas. It’s like a whole other country.”

Coined to promote tourism, that wry verbal wink at the state’s mythic image has assumed a literal meaning as Texas finds itself in defiance of the United Nations, the Organization of American States and national leaders in its planned Tuesday execution of Mexican citizen Jose Medellin.

Unless the U.S. Supreme Court or Gov. Rick Perry acts in his favor, Medellin, 33, will die for the 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña.

Jennifer’s father, Randy Ertman, dismissed international opposition to the execution.

“It’s just a last-ditch effort to keep the scumbag breathing,” Ertman said. “He never should have been breathing in the first place. I don’t care, I really don’t care what anyone thinks about this except Texas. I love Texas. Texas is in my blood.”

At issue is Texas’ refusal to hold a hearing to determine whether Medellin’s defense was harmed by his inability to confer with Mexican consular officials at the time of his arrest. A suspect’s right to talk with his consulate is guaranteed by the United Nations’ Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to which the United States is a party.

Medellin insists he told both Houston police and Harris County officers that he is a Mexican citizen. Prosecutors say the killer never informed authorities of his nationality.

In a sworn statement, Medellin said he learned that the Mexican Consulate could possibly help him in 1997, four years after his arrest. He unsuccessfully petitioned the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on the issue in 1998.

In 2004, the U.N.’s world court, responding to a Mexican lawsuit against the United States, ordered that hearings be held for Medellin and dozens of other inmates denied their consular rights. In 2005, President Bush called for the hearings to be held. Texas challenged the decision, and the Supreme Court determined that only Congress could mandate such action. In July, the world court ordered Medellin’s execution be stayed.

The proper response? Murder victim Jennifer Ertman’s father, Randy, says its all:

“The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Open Borders Lobby

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:27 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    “The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

    I second that emotion, all in favor say “aye”.

  2. #2
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:27 am, sonofdy said:

    Okay, lets stop messing arround, all it takes is a small amount of preasure on the trigger to solve this entire problem. Hell i’ll do it.

  3. #3
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:27 am, tre said:

    All I have to say is, may God show you the same mercy you denied your victims.

  4. #4
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:27 am, Barry F. said:

    “Go to hell.”

    And, use the express lane.

  5. #5
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am, sonofdy said:

    All I have to say is, may God show you the same mercy you denied your victims.

    Not being a christian, I get to say I hope he suffers like his victims did for eternity.

  6. #6
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:31 am, letget said:

    I do pray the families will finally see that justice will be done tomorrow by the state of Texas.
    L

  7. #7
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:37 am, John Ansell said:

    His Replacement.

    It’s not going to stop until we fix the politicians. We need Jamiel’s Law to pass.

  8. #8
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:38 am, John Ansell said:
  9. #9
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:38 am, sonofdy said:

    Justice would be letting the family have some “alone” time with this guy before the execution, I doubt that is going to happen. I am in a mean mood today aren’t I?

  10. #10
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:41 am, typicalwhiteboy said:

    AYE!!!!!!!!

  11. #11
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:42 am, rignerd said:

    You all may go to hell and I will go to Texas.

    D. Crockett, 1835

    Still a good idea, Texas being the opposite of hell.

  12. #12
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:42 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    The illegal alien thingie is gratuitous. Calling him a “Killer” would suffice.

  13. #13
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

  14. #14
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:45 am, MJ said:

    Aye.

  15. #15
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:47 am, brad_sk said:

    >the rest of them can go to hell.

    Not sure about the rest…but this killer definitely will go to hell within a second of his execution.

  16. #16
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:48 am, Subsunk said:

    Aye!

    Second the Davy Crockett quote also.

    Thank God I live here in a state where outlaws are still executed, women are protected and revered more than elsewhere, and we drink whiskey for ourselves and our horses drink beer when Justice is done. Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em.

    Subsunk

    Subsunk

  17. #17
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:50 am, walterc said:

    Correct me in my ignorance of International law (which I think is generally BS any way), but wouldn’t there be an assumption that this would only apply to someone in a foreign country LEGALLY? I would think that by violating a sovreign nations borders, you give up rights to international law.

    If you don’t like our laws, don’t come here illegally and then murder our citizens. Problem solved.

    Time (actually overdue) to withdraw from and evict the U.N.

  18. #18
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:52 am, ajmontana said:

    I’d throw in a hundred bucks for a lotto ticket “to pull the switch” with the proceeds going to the families.

  19. #19
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:52 am, gandolphxx said:

    Rusty said:
    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    If an American illegally goes into a foreign country, kills two girls, is tried and convicted, it works for me.

    There is a price to pay for murder.

  20. #20
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:53 am, ajmontana said:

    and…
    aye!

  21. #21
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am, DogBreath said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:
    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    If an American illegally entered a country to rape and murder I’d have no objections to the other country carrying out the sentence. Remember the boy who was caned in Indonesia? How about the Americans aiding and abetting the terrorists in South America?

    I have a cat named Rusty. Stop making him look ignorant.

  22. #22
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am, JohnHolliday said:

    There isn’t a corner of hell cold enough for this scumbag to hide in.

    Good riddance!

  23. #23
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:56 am, DanMan said:

    Godspeed to the Ertman and Pena families. Those of us in Houston that saw this unfold are forever tainted by the story and our prayers are with y’all.

  24. #24
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:57 am, John Ansell said:

    I have a cat named Rusty.

    Poor cat.

  25. #25
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:57 am, sonofdy said:

    RUSTY:

    Sorry but I don’t think the world court has any business in the US legal system. I will never support the ICC and would consider it an impeachable offense for any public servant who did. Because it would place the ICC above the constitution.

  26. #26
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:59 am, DBNinKY said:

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    How can we, when you’re constantly beating us over the head with it?

    I mean, would providing this convicted criminal with everything he asks further the cause of justice? Would it actually change the fact that he was found guilty? (And justly so.) Or is it that you’re upset because he doesn’t have the overt means to over turn his deserved conviction?

  27. #27
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:59 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:
    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    If an American snuck across Mexico’s border illegally and raped and murdered two teenage girls I would have the exact same response. Execution.

    Medellin, 33, will die for the 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña.

  28. #28
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:01 pm, Cameron said:

    Rusty,

    Jose Medellin was given a fair trial in a transparent court system and his legal team was kindly paid for by the taxpayers of Texas.

    If an American illegally entered another country and committed the crimes that Jose did, you really wouldn’t find much sympathy for him. Furthermore, any country that is inclined to imprison people with no regard for their rights is not suddenly going to reverse their stance because we don’t execute this man.

    And no, the World Court does not trump our laws in this country. They can voice an opinion but we don’t have any obligation to listen to them.

  29. #29
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    hey jose, cry me a river. another gutless coward who can’t even be man enough to accept responsibility for his actions. tomorrow when he checks out, think I’ll have a cold one.

  30. #30
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, DogBreath said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:57 am, John Ansell said: Poor cat.

    I’m thinking of changing his name. Wouldn’t want to subconciously saddle him with low expectations.

  31. #31
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, walterc said:

    If an American snuck across Mexico’s border illegally and raped and murdered two teenage girls I would have the exact same response. Execution.

    Ditto. If an American is in another country illegally, they have no rights. If a non-american is in the U.S. illegally, they have no rights. IMHO.

    And if you rape and murder people, you should be executed. This guy isn’t even alleging he’s innocent, he’s just doesn’t want to be executed. He’d rather live in a U.S. prison at taxpayer expense for the next 50 years.

    No thanks!

  32. #32
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, MtsEdge said:

    He’s already had 15 more years of life than his victims had.

  33. #33
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, DanVanSmak said:

    Dear Jose,

    Don’t fear the reaper.

    Signed,
    Blue Oyster Cult ERRRRR Ted Bundy

    P.S. see you in hell – in a few hours!

    *out*

  34. #34
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, grumpy_old_soldier said:

    How do you say “JUICE HIS CABOOSE!” in Spanish?

  35. #35
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, John Ansell said:

    Does this sound familiar? Hint, Jamiel Shaw. This victim when to the same high school and played football just like Jamiel. Both gunned down by a latino gang banger. For all the amnesty lovers, please pay special attention: THEY ARE AT WAR WITH US!

  36. #36
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, John Ansell said:

    This victim went*

  37. #37
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, Gabe said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    I agree with everyone else. If an American were illegally living in another country and killed two of their citizens, I would say hang him.

    I fully supported Singapore executing that Vietnamese-Australian gangster who tried to import drugs into that country. If an American were doing the same thing, I would support his execution.

    Liberals, like Rusty, are ALWAYS the ugly Americans. They support gangsters and murderers and are against the death penalty, then turn right around and support the murder of unborn children. The only reason Rusty supports this guy is because he murdered two Americans and was an illegal.

    No wonder no one in the world respects liberals.

  38. #38
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, Salt said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    That’s a presumption and a rather large one at that. Rusty, you should not build arguments projecting what we would say or think.

    If an American illegally entered another land and raped and killed two young girls, it is ridiculous to suggest that we would be “foaming at the mouth” to protect him.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    …and sometimes we should stick to the context of the situation at hand instead of trying to educate on being better “world citizens”.

  39. #39
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, tre said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am, DogBreath said
    Remember the boy who was caned in Indonesia?

    That was in Singapore. But, I agree, he deserved every one of those hits. Comedian Bill Engval said,”If I were that boys parents, I would have bought that cane and hung it over his bedroom door. Then when he misbehaved, I would threaten to call ‘Mr. Fuji’.”

    Also, if you want to change your cats name to “Tre”, I don’t mind.

  40. #40
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, James Felix said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Ah Rusty, it’s charming how you never tire of straw man arguments that rest on your certainty of what we think or what we’d do.

    The fact is we’re not talking about someone scooped up by a famously corrupt police force and denied due process. This animal was given the full benefit of the US Criminal Justice system which (flawed though it is) remains the most transparent, suspect-friendly venue in the world.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    Sounds to me like the Supreme Court did look at it.

    My hope, Rusty, is that you are one day made to live with the consequences of the policies you advocate.

  41. #41
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, swmbo said:

    AYE !

  42. #42
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, DagneyT said:

    What many people may not know about this animal monster (it was an unfair to animals comparison) was that he abducted two 15 year old girls who were on their way home. He and his gang raped and tortured them repeatedly for HOURS before killing them. It was all apart of a gang initiation. I pray they get the rest of them and put them out of our misery as well.

  43. #43
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, swmbo said:

    My cats name is MoJo because he has one. He votes AYE also. No mercy for legal or illegal criminals.

  44. #44
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, DogBreath said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, tre said: That was in Singapore.

    My bad. That’s what I get for trying to rely on my memory.

    I think I’ll keep calling him Rusty. Why should he have to suffer confusion for the action of a fool. Maybe the other Rusty can change his for for the sake of animal rights.

  45. #45
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, shooter said:

    “Go to hell.”

    I believe he will, and soon.

    MEET YOUR MAKER , DIRTBAG, and feel His wrath.

    And anyone outside the US with an opposition opinion, SHUT UP.

  46. #46
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, Rusty said:

    I’m not a big fan of the World Court either. My objections are that American entered into an international treaty and Texas broke it.

    I know retrials are expensive, but giving this monster consulate access won’t change the evidence.

    Allowing states to violate international treaties is a dangerous precedent and something that puts the lives of Americans abroad in jeopardy.

  47. #47
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, Surveyor said:

    Don’t Mess With Texas!

    8)

  48. #48
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:33 pm, dominigan said:

    I think I’m detecting the stunned silence of a liberal whose straw man was just burnt to the ground!

  49. #49
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, John Ansell said:

    something that puts the lives of Americans abroad in jeopardy.

    Don’t break laws when you go abroad. There, problem solved.

  50. #50
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #45 Rusty

    Constitution Trumps Treaties Period!

    Go back to Civics Class

  51. #51
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:35 pm, Rob said:

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    When the shepherds refuse to guard the sheep… wolves come, and the wolves are here.

  52. #52
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, justice said:

    If you go to the article, you’ll notice that the writer reminds us several times that it’s not the killer’s fault that he raped then choked and stomped Elizabeth and Jennifer to death. First, “…Medellin — 5 feet, 5 inches tall and weighing just 135 pounds — grabbed Elizabeth and flipped her to the ground….” Implication: this guy is small! If Elizabeth had REALLY wanted to get away, she could have. (Maybe she even wanted it!) Next, the writer pulls out the old classic “[Medellin] grew up in poverty amid drug abuse and an unstable home environment.” Implication: if we hadn’t fallen down on the job and involved Medellin in after-school activities such as ping pong, Jennifer and Elizabeth would still be alive.

  53. #53
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, Phiber0p said:

    Dang, I left my bullcrap deciphering glasses at home today. Now all I can see from Rusty is “Wahh wahh wahh… blah blah blah… it’s all America’s fault…. blah blah blah”.

  54. #54
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:38 pm, AnOldMan said:

    AYE!!!!

  55. #55
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, James Felix said:

    Allowing states to violate international treaties is a dangerous precedent and something that puts the lives of Americans abroad in jeopardy.

    Texas didn’t violate the treaty. They didn’t deny him consular access, the perp didn’t know he was entitled and didn’t ask for it. Since (as you just admitted) that access would not have affected the outcome there’s no reason to re-try him.

    And the reason they want to re-try him is because the evidence absolutely is affected. The crime was committed 15 years ago. Trying to prove certain guilt fifteen years after the fact would be extraordinarily difficult, and even if they did it they’d just be looking at another 15 years of appeals before they could finally kill this sorry excuse for pond scum.

    The hell with that. Strap him to the chair and be done with it.

    The USSC apparently agrees with me.

  56. #56
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, madchef said:

    Medellin, 33, will die for the 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña.

    Hell, this monster has LIVED in prison longer than these two innocent children were given the chance to live. Jennifer Ertman was 11 years old and Elizabeth Peña was 14. Their families have waited 15 years for justice to be done.

    Get a rope!!

  57. #57
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, everett_mansfield said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, Rusty said:

    I’m not a big fan of the World Court either. My objections are that blah, blah, blah…

    I know retrials are expensive, but blah, blah, blah…

    Allowing states to violate international treaties is a dangerous blah, blah, blah…

    It’s way past time to send a message to that cesspool country south of the border.

    GO TEXAS!…

    “AYE!”

  58. #58
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, sonofdy said:

    Allowing states to violate international treaties is a dangerous precedent and something that puts the lives of Americans abroad in jeopardy.

    Oh please. Like our enemies observe international law anyway. They never have except when it suits them.

  59. #59
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:41 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:33 pm, dominigan said:
    I think I’m detecting the stunned silence of a liberal whose straw man was just burnt to the ground!

    Terran Firebat: Need a light?

  60. #60
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, arclight said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country

    He wasn’t accused. He confessed and bragged about to his confessors. You sir, a goddammed, simple minded a$$. Enuff said about you and your hero Jose Medellin.

  61. #61
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, wighttrasch said:

    I left my bullcrap deciphering glasses at home today. Now all I can see from Rusty is “Wahh wahh wahh… blah blah blah… it’s all America’s fault…. blah blah blah”.

    I’ll help you Phiberop, and tell you what Die Hippie Die would tell you; Rusty said ‘queef queef queef’

    LOLOLOL

  62. #62
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, dominigan said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, Rusty said:

    I’m not a big fan of the World Court either. My objections are that American entered into an unconstitutional international treaty and Texas broke it.

    There, fixed it for you. The Supreme Court determined that President Bush entered into an unconstitutional treaty that infringed on the state rights of Texas. The President is allowed to engage in treaties (with the approval of Congress), as long as the treaties do not infringe on other Constitutional powers, such as those granted to the States.

  63. #63
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, alt said:

    I actually live in Texas. I wrote the Governor this AM and ecncouraged him to honor our laws, our decency, and have this murderer and rapist executed as planned. Jose Medellin has already lived 15 more years than he should have. As one of the commetors have already said, “JUICE HIS CABOOSE!!”

  64. #64
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, kerryb said:

    In my understanding, the Vienna Convention stipulates that an alien can request assistance from their consulate. The issue here that seems to be ignored is that Medellin did not request consular assistance until several years after his conviction. His lack of request does not equal negligence on the part of Texas. Anyone who thinks the U.S. has violated any agreement it entered into is wrong.

    I, for one, am content with the knowledge that one more murderous thug will be removed from the planet tomorrow.

  65. #65
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, mojack420 said:

    “The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

    there is a fast lane reserved just for Jose Medellin on the highway to hell tomorrow. And as far as Mexico and the UN go they can buckle up and car pool with this animal into the pit.

  66. #66
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, justice said:

    And I forgot to add that this is yet another time I am grateful to be living deep in the heart of Texas!

  67. #67
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, shooter said:

    12:39 pm, James Felix said:

    James, EXACTLY.

    from rusted;

    I know retrials are expensive, but giving this monster consulate access won’t change the evidence.

    Its not that he was not allowed consulate access, it was WHEN he was ‘allowed’.
    Illegals don’t have those rights, except in the minds of liberals and outsiders who blame America for everything.
    Go away Rusted, not Rusty the cat, just the Anarchist oxidized commenter.

  68. #68
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, Gabe said:

    Allowing states to violate international treaties is a dangerous precedent and something that puts the lives of Americans abroad in jeopardy.

    WRONG! Liberals have no understanding of human nature. All our barbaric enemies are not going to follow something that they signed. Other civilized countries will, with or without a piece of paper signed. This is why “agreements” and “treaties” with barbarians are useless.

    This is what liberals never understand. It is liberals that put American lives at stake when they insist on diplomacy with barbarians.

  69. #69
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, breg man said:

    Ah, Rusty…by some chance is your password AFLAC? Because everytime you log in you become a sitting duck…

  70. #70
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, IndyRich said:

    Just reviewed this.

    Why is it that Democrats are arguing over who’s legislation is toughest in dealing with “invasive species” that threaten plants or animals, but they do the exact opposite when it comes to an invasion of illegal aliens that rape, kill and injure human beings that happen to be law-abiding American citizens??

  71. #71
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    As a former corpsman I bet I could administer the dose of drugs for the state at no charge. I would even pay my own way from Dallas to Huntsville for the priviledge.

  72. #72
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, madchef said:

    Rusty #12 said “Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.”

    I see the bigger picture, when he killed these two children, he also killed their future children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, ect.

  73. #73
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, brushman said:

    Does anybody know when this piece of human debris will assume room temperature? I suggest we all ceremoniously crack open a cold one and hoist it in celebration at that time.

    Rusty – it is the height of hypocrisy to denounce the perfectly legal sentence of death, but to endorse a woman’s right to choose to slaughter an unborn child. Both have been validated by SCOTUS, yet you seem to think it’s OK to abort an unborn and completely innocent child, while lecturing us on why this dirtbag’s execution should be stayed. Sounds to me like you’re pro-life when it comes to scumbags and pro-death when it comes to children.

    I pity you.

  74. #74
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, Phiber0p said:
    Dang, I left my bullcrap deciphering glasses at home today. Now all I can see from Rusty is “Wahh wahh wahh… blah blah blah… it’s all America’s fault…. blah blah blah”.

    Phiber0P, you are in luck today. I just happen to have my BS deciphering glasses with me today. Let me decipher that for you: Wahh wahh wahh… blah blah blah… it’s all America’s fault…. blah blah blah
    It appears that you may not need those glasses after all.

  75. #75
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Armigerous said:

    I may be completely mistaken about this,but I was always under the impression that the only time the so-called ‘World Court’ had any jurisdiction in a case was when both sides agreed to submit their dispute for a binding verdict to the Court…such as in the case some years ago about disputed fishing rights off the Grand Banks between the U.S. and Canada…that was not the case here…the State of Texas had never had any such intent….just goes to show ya…you come to Texas and kill somebody like that,we’ll kill you right back…..stick in the needle,take out the trash

  76. #76
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, M1a-M14 4 ever said:

    We are missing the point here. Liberals do not care if our enemies follow treaties or not. The point is to hobble the U.S. by any means possible. Law of the Sea anyone? How’s Clinton’s treaty w/ north Korea working? When they broke that (10 seconds after it was signed),I heard no howls of protest over that from the left.

  77. #77
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:57 pm, JT said:

    Buh Bye. Scumbag.

  78. #78
    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, ajmontana said:

    grumpy_old_soldier said:
    How do you say “JUICE HIS CABOOSE!” in Spanish?

    El Zappo!

  79. #79
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Oh-nO said:

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    Rusty, let me tell you what the bigger picture is. This subhuman took the lives of two innocent young people and thus forfeitted his right to live. He has to be executed because we are incapable of providing the proper judgement and sentence. This subhuman has to stand in the court of the Almighty to receive his penalty. Whether we want to believe it or not, this is the bigger picture. Take a good look at that.

  80. #80
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, BrianNY said:

    #12 rusty said:

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    The Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena rape and murder:

    - The confessions of the gang members that were used at trial indicated that there was never less than 2 men on each of the girls at any one time and that the girls were repeatedly raped orally, anally and vaginally for the entire hour.

    - One of the gang members later said during the brag session that by the time he got to one of the girls, “she was loose and sloppy.”

    - One of the boys boasted of having “virgin blood” on him.

    - After the rapes, the gang members took Jenny and Elizabeth from the clearing into a wooded area. Jenny was strangled with the belt of Sean O’Brien, with two murderers pulling, one on each side, until the belt broke. Part of the belt was left at the murder scene, the rest was found in O’Brien’s home. After the belt broke, the killers used her own shoelaces to finish their job.

    - Medellin later complained that “the bitch wouldn’t die” and that it would have been “easier with a gun”.

    - Elizabeth was also strangled with her shoelaces, after crying and begging the gang members not to kill them; she began bargaining, offering to give them her phone number so they could get together again.

    - The medical examiner testified that Elizabeth’s two front teeth were knocked out of her brutalized mouth before she died and that two of Jennifer’s ribs were broken after she had died.

    - Testimony showed that the girls’ bodies were kicked and their necks were stomped on after the strangulations in order to “make sure that they were really dead.”

    Big enough picture for you, rusty?

  81. #81
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    How’s Clinton’s treaty w/ north Korea working? When they broke that (10 seconds after it was signed),I heard no howls of protest over that from the left.

    They only care if a treaty being broken violates their liberal agenda. Do as I say, not as I do. The treaty was Unconstitutional to begin with, as anything that places itself higher than our own Constitution is illegal and a farce. Which is why the Supreme Court shot Rusty’s argument clear out of the water a long time ago. He’s just still pissed the dirtbag is going to be executed tomorrow. For me, I’ll be drinking a cold one in celebration of removing one of the minions of destruction and death from this earth and sending him to be judged for his crimes in the only real court that matters.

    Bonus for you Rusty the fool:

    Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, disagreed. Roberts said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.

    The president may not “establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law,” Roberts said.

    Double bonus analysis of the Supreme Court decision from Andy McCarthy as a refresher:

    At bottom, the case is about the freedom of Texans to govern themselves, to put sadistic murderers to death if that is what they choose democratically to do, as long as they adhere to American constitutional procedures in carrying out that policy choice.

  82. #82
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, wytammic said:

    So, are talking around midnight tonight? His death will certainly be worth celebrating.

  83. #83
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, John Ansell said:

    I say put it on pay per view and give the victim’ family the money.

  84. #84
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, Phiber0p said:

    @ #59 On August 4th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Just so you know, I owe you one. I just spewed water all over my desk. =p

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, breg man said:
    Ah, Rusty…by some chance is your password AFLAC? Because everytime you log in you become a sitting duck…

    Breg Man I just spoke to the Aflac duck, and he’s pretty pissed at you right now. Hope you don’t get hurt and can’t work in the near future =D

  85. #85
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, starlightwoman said:

    This crap is ALL the more reason for us to withdraw from the United Nations

  86. #86
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, JohnHolliday said:

    I see the bigger picture, when he killed these two children, he also killed their future children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc.

    Exactly! And I also see the bigger picture about this as well. Now this monster won’t pro-create either.

  87. #87
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, rambler said:

    AYE!
    Go Texas!
    Middle digit to the UN! Why the UN or world court felt that this thug’s life was worth their time is beyond me.

  88. #88
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, StanW said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:31 pm, Rusty said:
    I’m not a big fan of the World Court either. My objections are that American entered into an international treaty and Texas broke it.

    I know retrials are expensive, but giving this monster consulate access won’t change the evidence.

    Yes Rusty, retrials are expensive, paid for by the legal citizens of the State of Texas, of which I am one. This animal has already had several trials and appeals at my expense. His guilt has been established beyond any and all reasonable doubt and all appeals have upheld this. There is no reason whatsoever for an additional trial.

    Giving this monster consulate access won’t change the outcome, but 15 years passed since the original trial might.

    Rusty, your motives here are all too transparent. You want a new trial for this murderer for the same reason all death penalty opponents constantly want a new trial for their favorite monsters… Double Jeopardy. No matter how many times these societial rejects are found guilty of their crimes, all you have to do is continue to judge-shop and find one worthless liberal POS that will ignore the evidence and let him walk.

    Medellin is guilty of rape and murder. He deserved to die long ago for his crimes. Were it up to me, he’d die like his victims, slow and screaming. But die he should, the sooner the better.

    The air in Texas will be sweeter tomorrow with this sub-human scum no longer breathing it.

  89. #89
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, James Felix said:

    This crap is ALL the more reason for us to withdraw from the United Nations

    Since childhood I’ve been baffled as to why we bankroll an organization that exists primarily to work against our interests. Surely the tiny handful of things the UN does well (WHO comes to mind) could be done independently of that cesspool.

    And don’t even get me started on oil-for-food.

  90. #90
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, MacUser said:

    International Law?

    Is that the law by which US/Allied POWs taken in Iraq were beheaded on video that was plastered all over the Internet?

    GIVE ME A BREAK!

  91. #91
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, bit_boy said:

    RE: All I have to say is, may God show you the same mercy you denied your victims.

    Tre, you obviously do not read English as your first language nor do you read with compehension. Why not ask the same mercy for Medellin that he showed for his victims. But to simplify, Ron White says: In Texas we have the death penalty. And we USE it. That’s right, if you come to Texas and kill somebody, we will kill you back. Get it tre, now go to your room.

  92. #92
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Another illegal alien costing American tax payers millions.

    It is to bad escalation of deadly force was not use on this perp during his crime. It would have saved us a lot of money.

  93. #93
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, swmbo said:

    Hey, since when did we become a nation of laws.

    Somebody forgot to notify me!

    AYE !

  94. #94
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:45 pm, abstractmind said:

    If access to the consular wouldnt change the verdict or the evidence, AND the fact he didnt ask for it until 4 years AFTER the fact…

    Oh well.

    This kind of scum makes me sometimes wish that we still had the guillotine.

    Or a headsman. A huge axe works just as well.

    Medellin, may what lies on the other side offer you no relief for the remainder of eternity. Burn.

  95. #95
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, RaisedRight said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:28 pm, DogBreath said:
    I think I’ll keep calling him Rusty. Why should he have to suffer confusion for the action of a fool. Maybe the other Rusty can change his for for the sake of animal rights.

    Reminds me of the character Michael Bolton in Office Space
    Samir: “Why don’t you just go by Mike instead of Michael?”
    Michael: “No way. Why should I change? He’s the one who sucks!”

  96. #96
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, James Felix said:

    This kind of scum makes me sometimes wish that we still had the guillotine.

    Or a headsman. A huge axe works just as well.

    Neither of which would enlarge our carbon footprint. Here’s an idea Liberals can get behind! :)

  97. #97
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, madchef said:

    There are currently 51 Mexican nationals on death row in the U.S. Let’s speed things up a little, huh!!!
    There are more coming every day.

  98. #98
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, John Ansell said:

    I say he should spend his last day in the general population and let the prisoners have some fun.

  99. #99
    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, John Ansell said:
    I say he should spend his last day in the general population and let the prisoners have some fun.

    :) tattoo CRIPS on him and put him in with the Bloods

  100. #100
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:03 pm, Rob said:

    RE: All I have to say is, may God show you the same mercy you denied your victims.

    I don’t think god is the one he is going to be seeing…

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Airline insecurity tale of the morning

May 18, 2009 09:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments

Latinos to Obama: You still owe us more

December 4, 2008 10:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments

Pay up.

Juan Hernandez is bummed

December 1, 2008 03:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments

It’s not just ACORN: La Raza partner caught red-handed

October 9, 2008 09:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments

Yes, they can.

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments

Curb your enthusiasm.

Update: Judge says English-only is not “hostile”

August 16, 2008 08:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Speak the language.

Your NEA cultural tax dollars at work

August 12, 2008 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments

National Endowment for (other countries’) Arts.


Categories: Open Borders Lobby

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook