Illegal alien Death Row rapist/killer’s last-ditch appeal

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 4, 2008 11:23 AM

The world court and President Bush tried and failed to stop the execution of illegal alien Death Row killer Jose Medellin.

Texas told ‘em to bug off–and the Supreme Court backed Texas.

Medellin faces execution tomorrow. The U.N. and the international meddlers are whining. Now, Medellin’s lawyers have filed one last-ditch appeal to subvert our national sovereignty and delay justice:

“Texas. It’s like a whole other country.”

Coined to promote tourism, that wry verbal wink at the state’s mythic image has assumed a literal meaning as Texas finds itself in defiance of the United Nations, the Organization of American States and national leaders in its planned Tuesday execution of Mexican citizen Jose Medellin.

Unless the U.S. Supreme Court or Gov. Rick Perry acts in his favor, Medellin, 33, will die for the 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña.

Jennifer’s father, Randy Ertman, dismissed international opposition to the execution.

“It’s just a last-ditch effort to keep the scumbag breathing,” Ertman said. “He never should have been breathing in the first place. I don’t care, I really don’t care what anyone thinks about this except Texas. I love Texas. Texas is in my blood.”

At issue is Texas’ refusal to hold a hearing to determine whether Medellin’s defense was harmed by his inability to confer with Mexican consular officials at the time of his arrest. A suspect’s right to talk with his consulate is guaranteed by the United Nations’ Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to which the United States is a party.

Medellin insists he told both Houston police and Harris County officers that he is a Mexican citizen. Prosecutors say the killer never informed authorities of his nationality.

In a sworn statement, Medellin said he learned that the Mexican Consulate could possibly help him in 1997, four years after his arrest. He unsuccessfully petitioned the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on the issue in 1998.

In 2004, the U.N.’s world court, responding to a Mexican lawsuit against the United States, ordered that hearings be held for Medellin and dozens of other inmates denied their consular rights. In 2005, President Bush called for the hearings to be held. Texas challenged the decision, and the Supreme Court determined that only Congress could mandate such action. In July, the world court ordered Medellin’s execution be stayed.

The proper response? Murder victim Jennifer Ertman’s father, Randy, says its all:

“The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

Posted in: Open Borders Lobby

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #394880
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, Nikita said:

    Nothing I need add to #1. AYE.

  2. #394888
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I agree. The “World Court” and the UN can join this murdering scumbag in Hell. Adios Amigo!

    I recommend lethal injection as “Ol’ Sparky” has a big carbon footprint.

  3. #394892
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:19 pm, atheling said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    There goes Rusty the Misogynist again, defending a murderous rapist of women.

  4. #394893
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, purplepeep said:

    The proper response? Murder victim Jennifer Ertman’s father, Randy, says its all:

    “The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

    Can’t add anyhing to that – it just bears repeating.

  5. #394903
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Mr. Ertman-great words…”…the rest of them can go to hell.”

    Why are we still “bowing” to the ‘world court’ and the corrupt U.N.?

  6. #394904
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:34 pm, Doctor Hook said:

    Pay attention to Jennifer’s’ “Pa,”
    Instead of international law,
    Give him the needles,
    No matter who whines and who wheedles,
    Send Medellin straight to Hell’s gaping maw.

  7. #394906
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Rusty said:

    If an American were accused of murder in a foreign country, sentenced to die, and not allowed to visit with a consulate or embassy, you’d be foaming at the mouth and probably support a full fledged invasion of that country.

    Sometimes there’s a bigger picture and it would do you all some to good to take a look at it.

    All too often an American languishes in foreign jails and the US State Department refuses to get involved. The US State Department is more concerned with the foreign country than US Citizens.

  8. #394914
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, John Ansell said:

    tattoo CRIPS on him and put him in with the Bloods

    I think that would get the job done. :lol:

  9. #394916
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, BrianNY said:

    Jose Medellin later complained that “the bitch wouldn’t die” and that it would have been “easier with a gun”.

    Pretty ironic for this guy Medellin (and his bleeding-heart supporters) to now be complaining that the State of Texas is somehow rushing to punishment.

    My advice to Jose Medellin – “be a true playa’, esé. If you wanna be offing 13 and 14 year old girls after you be ripping them apart orally, vaginally and anally with your homies…then stand up and be a real hombre, esé. Your hiding behind the skirts of the World Court, ACLU, Open-Borders pussy(cats) makes you look like one too, esé. Stand up and keep it real, esé. Ride and die, esé. Do the crime, do the time, esé. Don’t be crying to you momma now, esé.”

    Testimony showed that the girls’ bodies were kicked and their necks were stomped on after the strangulations in order to “make sure that they were really dead.”

    And now this “gangbanger” is whining about not getting to talk to some embassy bureaucrat?

    Wow, what a Mexican crybaby.

  10. #394922
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, Rob said:

    WE NEED TO KILL ALL THESE INVADERS

    I just read this article that shows how much the illegals are now running the show in many places, and it is coming to a city near you soon.

    If we see someone calling the police, then we target them,” said Mario Garcia, 20, … “You are trying to stop me from what I live, what I believe in and what I breathe? We are not going to let no one get in the way.”

    In an attack last month, two youths spray-painted the face and body of the 6-year-old boy who spotted them scribbling gang signs on a wall near Compton. The boy recovered from chemical burns to his eyes.

    On the same day, a 51-year-old auto mechanic was shot in the chest in Los Angeles when he confronted two suspected gang members painting the wall of his shop.

    Another man, Michael Lartundo, 26, was stabbed in the hand and arm after yelling at a group of graffiti vandals scrawling on a wall in March behind his brother’s house in suburban Whittier.

    The most recent attack occurred July 15, when a 16-year-old boy was shot and killed after rival graffiti crews converged on a Los Angeles park for a fight. The victim was in a crowd of onlookers.

    Last August, Maria Hicks, 58, was shot in the head and died after flashing her headlights and honking at a teenager spray-painting a wall near her home in Pico Rivera, a blue-collar suburb east of Los Angeles. Four people have been charged with murder.

    Ten days after Hicks died, Seutatia Tausili, 65, was fatally shot and her grandson wounded when he told taggers to stop vandalizing a trash can outside their home in Hesperia in San Bernardino County. Three men were charged with murder.

    Robert Whitehead was shot to death in 2006 in the Los Angeles County area of Valinda when he tried to keep taggers from marking a neighbor’s garage. Investigators arrested one man with alleged ties to the Mexican Mafia, a prison gang.

  11. #394923
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Texas – The United State of America

  12. #394926
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, TMoney said:

    “Texas. It’s like a whole [n]other country.”
    Fixed it.

    Fry him, and the world court be damned.

  13. #394927
    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, atheling said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, Rob said:

    WE NEED TO KILL ALL THESE INVADERS

    Rob, do you know how demented you sound?

  14. #394939
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, figetyfiggs said:

    Now I think I understand a bumper sticker I saw: I’m not from Texas but I got here as quick as I could.

    People who need a rope around their necks themselves probably don’t understand Texas justice anyway.

  15. #394947
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, Rob said:

    Rob, do you know how demented you sound?

    I suppose demented is in the mind of the beholder. I simply want all the murderous invading thugs killed.

  16. #394954
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:18 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, Rob said:

    Well, not to pick, but…yeah, putting everything in bold capital letters (screaming in text as it were) about killing “all the invaders” tends to make you look a little demented.

  17. #394973
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Rob,

    The way things are going you might get your wish. Frankly I see something like this actually happening. Inaction is breeding a level of hatred. We keep getting pushed around..Someones going to break bad. I want to be around when the camel’s back breaks.

  18. #394978
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, Azygos said:

    atheling,

    In which state do you live? Here in Arizona its at times almost all out war. Nearly 30% of those in prison are here illegally. Maybe instead of killing them all maybe killing only 30% of them would work? I will hoist a cold one tomorrow if this trash is taken out.

  19. #394981
    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Rob said:

    Did any of you read the posts I put above with the lists of mexican murders on the most wanted lists, the taggers that are KILLING people??? THESE ARE THE ONES THAT NEED TO BE KILLED. Or do you only read words in capitals?

    Why we are putting up with people like this when we outnumber them. Let the police or government handle it? WHEN?

    I don’t want to kill all the invaders… but the trash must be thrown out.

  20. #395002
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, atheling said:

    Rob:

    Well, you should have specified that at first, instead of typing in all caps, screaming to kill all the invaders. Sheesh.

    Azygos:

    I WANT THE ILLEGALS OUT. GONE. BACK TO MEXICO.

    BUT IT UNDERMINES OUR CAUSE TO WRITE IN ALL CAPS AND SCREAM TO “KILL THEM ALL”. THAT’S CRAZY.

    BTW, HOW DO YOU LIKE BEING SCREAMED AT IN ALL CAPS, AMIGO?

  21. #395003
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, Rob said:

    Well, we did. but there’s are ways and means to communicating your point.

    And by nature, people are going to pay more attention to the large, bold print than the rest.

    I sympathize with what you’re trying to say, and i agree…we need to deal with people who come here illegally and murder innocent people. But there’s a way to get your point across without putting others off, and still having them rally to your cause.

  22. #395011
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    Don’t let them get to you Rob. I believe everyone knows what you were trying to say. It reminds me of an old Arlo Guthrie song.

    If one person says kill them all, they say that he is demented.

    If two people says kill them all, they are faggots.

    But if three people says kill them all, it’s a movement.

    The Rob Movement of selective immigration.

  23. #395044
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, Rob said:

    atheling, I don’t care of you use CAPs when you type cuz most of the time you use CRAP when you type.

    I think if we had guards on a border wall, we would only have to shoot a few. Lives saved on both sides that way.

    there’s a way to get your point across without putting others off

    Putting others off means pretending to be politically correct to appease the liberals. The only thing that will change a liberal’s mind is having their children killed or raped by an illegal. And as the numbers increase and increae, sooner or later it will affect enough sheeple that things will change…

  24. #395056
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, atheling said:

    Rob:

    You are demented. And impolitic. We agree with you that we don’t want illegals here, but we disagree with your method. And then you call us PC? Dude, you’re pathetic. You argue like a libtard.

    You’re the one who previously said that you have been perusing white supremacist groups’ websites. You typed in all caps that you wanted all the invaders killed.

    And then you get upset when we question your sanity?

    BTW, as far as “using crap” when I type goes, no, dummy, I use a keyboard.

  25. #395072
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, Seabee40 said:

    If Jose doesn’t want to die, he should have stayed in Mexico.
    since he came here and committed murdered, Fry his A$$.

  26. #395076
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:51 pm, John Ansell said:

    Atheling, I am sure Rob is just tired of this. Read the comment section on that bit of news. It’s not just Rob. When you take the other links I provided from just today’s headlines (1 deputy shot to death because of his job watching the Mexican Maffia Gang in the county jail, then another story about a 16 year old football player gunned down by a latino gang memeber similar to Jamiel Shaw’s case) it gets frustrating that our leaders do nothing to fix the problem. On the other hand, they go out of their way to protect the gang members.

    They are at war with us. Serious, read the comments on that posting board and you will see anger on both sides. From the Illegals posting to the American fighting to keep his land.

  27. #395079
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, Rob said:

    atheling, I live in the toliet that the illegals are turning Southern California into.. I just see things throgh a browner pair of glasses than you have at this time… but give it time, give it time.

    I am a problem solver, not a politician. Give me a few squads of American marines and I could make my part of the world safe for Americans again.

    And anybody that is so into the “reality” of the internet that he gets upset by “shouting” with capital letters is pathetic. THEY ARE JUST CAPITAL LETTERS. I have looked at some white websites and they are as stupid as the Daily Kos. Any moron can have a computer, and most do… enjoy your keyboard.

  28. #395085
    On August 4th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, Chief RZ said:

    He should have been executed ten years ago for his 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peña.

  29. #395089
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:06 pm, atheling said:

    John Ansell:

    Yes, I see that Rob is tired of this. So am I. But we have a 5th column obstructing any efforts to solve our illegal problem. And Rob FEEDS that 5th column with his shrill, irrational and hateful spewings.

    Yes, he claims that he is no politician. But neither am I. However, I know well enough that making stupid comments like his HURTS our cause, because that 5th column will dismiss his rantings and assume that we ALL share the same sentiment.

    We live by a rule of law, not by emotions. And being “tired”, or “upset”, is no excuse for rantings about killing people. No sane person would regard our cause as a just one, so long as we make stupid errors like Rob has.

    Sorry, but there is no excuse for it, unless he is 6 years old.

  30. #395101
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, John Ansell said:

    We live by a rule of law, not by emotions. And being “tired”, or “upset”, is no excuse for rantings about killing people.

    Your point is well taken but I just heard another report on the news of another dead American at the hand of an illegal. When it’s linked to a news paper, I’ll post it. It should be later today but latest tomorrow. That’s at least 3 dead in as many days. So when Rob types about killing people, the illegal invaders are actually doing it. That’s all I’m saying.

  31. #395111
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, atheling said:

    John Ansell:

    And I hope that scum is tried, found guilty, and executed – through a court of law.

  32. #395118
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:39 pm, John Ansell said:

    Me too, Atheling. I know we are fighting on the same side of this issue. It just amazes me that the Los Angeles city council will wory about fast food joints going up in poor neighborhoods, and getting a plastic bag tax, yet they will not take up Jamiel’s law. It’s sick.

  33. #395120
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, reine.de.tout said:

    “Texas. It’s like a whole other country.”

    Coined to promote tourism, that wry verbal wink at the state’s mythic image has assumed a literal meaning as Texas finds itself in defiance ofrejecting the meddling of the United Nations, the Organization of American States and national leaders in its planned Tuesday execution of Mexican citizen Jose Medellin

    Fixed it.

  34. #395121
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    How would meeting with members of the consulate have any effect on the outcome of this case? About the only action the Mexican consulate could have done was plead for his life.
    Yes, it is unfortunate that this man made such bad decisions in his life. But he brutally killed these young girls and execution is the result. I do not celebrate when an execution is per formed (ok, I did when Gacy died, I’m from where he killed at) but for some, deathe is the correct sentence.

  35. #395128
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:42 pm, Les in NC said:

    What time is this going to be carried out?

  36. #395139
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, JDinTX said:

    I must say that I am very proud of my home state. Go Texas. We need to tell the World Court to stay out of our business. If we have some sort of treaty recognizing this, then it is time to do away with it.
    Es tiempo mátarlo a José.

  37. #395140
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, Jim M. said:

    It would be nice if the government of Mexico or the international community for that matter showed one tenth the concern for the victim’s families as it has for its murderous citizen. And perhaps if they were truly concerned over this matter, they would do a little more to insure that its citizens don’t murder and rape our children.

    Texas did not violate any lawful treaty. Fortunately we have something called the Constitution, which reserves all powers not specifically granted to the federal government in that document to the individual states. And any treaty made by the federal government cannot be in violation of the provisions of the Constitution. The Constitution trumps any conflicts.

    In addition, the defendant in question had moved to the US as a young child. He was not denied access to the Mexican consulate and undoubtedly never had a clue that his status as an illegal possibly vested him with greater protection than a US citizen. And the fact that he did not have a pow wow with the Mexican Counsul was, at best, a procedural issue that would not have changed the outcome of the trial or the sentence one bit.

    The UN and the world court are the ones that should be chastised here. They attempted to recklessly exceed any authority they had to violate the sovereignity of not only the State of Texas but the United States. Let them take their third world union and screw up some other country tht doesn’t have the backbone to tell them to go to hell.

    “The world court don’t mean diddly. This business belongs in the state of Texas … the rest of them can go to hell.”

    The people of the State of Texas have spoken.

  38. #395142
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, John Ansell said:

    Wasn’t Gacy down state Rob? Eitherway, I’m glad Gacy got what was his due.

  39. #395143
    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:57 pm, Ed Lilly said:

    Randy Ertman as a VP pick anyone?

  40. #395147
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, John Ansell said:

    “An 8-year-old little girl is dead, and all of a sudden all of the stats don’t seem that important. And I mean they are, but it was an 8-year-old girl who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time,” Carr said.

    No, It’s the illegal ivader gang banger that’s in the wrong place at the wrong time.

  41. #395150
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, John Ansell said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:42 pm, Les in NC said:
    What time is this going to be carried out?

    About 15 years too late.

  42. #395159
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, Rusty said:

    The amount of ignorance on this thread is shocking. Constitution > treaties? What!? President Bush’s treaty? Huh!? The detained foreign national must request to speak to a consulate?

    All of those things are wrong.

    The Vienna Convention compels states to inform the foreign consulate when a foreign national is arrested. Medellin didn’t need to ask for diddly-squat. Texas denied him this right.

    This treaty was completely Constitutional. No one has ever argued that except for some harebrained commenters.

    The Supreme Court argued that the treaty was not “self-executing” and therefore not enforceable. This is madness. The 10th Amendment didn’t apply since treaties were already explicitly mentioned in Article II of the Constitution. Furthermore, most treaties aren’t “self-executing.” The Supreme Court managed to nullify a slew of international treaties based on a new reading of Constitutional law. And yet it’s always the liberals who are referred to as the activists?

    This lack of support for international treaties is a slap in the face to countries that have honored their obligations. It puts American civilians at risk. Why should a country that hates America bother informing a consulate if an American citizen is accused of a crime on their soil?

    167 countries signed the VCCR. I bet there are quite a few enemies in there.

  43. #395185
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:55 pm, John Ansell said:

    Wasn’t Gacy down state Rob? Eitherway, I’m glad Gacy got what was his due.

    Gacy lived on the Far NW side of Chicago. I went to school with the brother of one of his victims. Sad to see first hand how evil can affect people. Oh and by the way.he was a Democratic Precinct Captain

  44. #395188
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, John Ansell said:

    Rust, tell that to Daniel Pearl….Oh wait, you can’t. Move along.

  45. #395192
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, Rob said:

    The Vienna Convention

    LOL… antiquated rules. Time to kick ass. Cut off the heads of the terrorists if we can find them after the nuke radiation settles. Illegals, are illegal, they aren’t obeying any laws, nor should we…

    This lack of support for international treaties is a slap in the face to countries that have honored their obligations.

    Countries that do what we want them to do have nothing to worry about…

    Mexico is a terrorist nation sending its evil people into our country. They are doing so on purpose, with guidebooks and I don’t care about them one little bit.

    We are going to spend so much time being civilized that we will lose our civilization.

  46. #395193
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:42 pm, John Ansell said:

    Thanks Chicago Robb, for some reason I was thinking he was in the Springfield area as I remember a lot stories about him. Even that he got praise from Gov. Thompson. I’m glad to see Gracy gone.

  47. #395196
    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:43 pm, Boomer said:

    I know I’m getting on this thread real late, but for what it’s worth this mad dog is finally going to be put down so he can never get the opportunity to harm anyone else’s little girl. If it where up to me he would have been presenting his last appeal to Saint Peter a few months after being sentence by the good people of Texas before being cast into the pit for his just reward.

  48. #395212
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:04 pm, lgm said:

    Red blooded Americans can be just as brutal as any Mexican immigrant. Here’s an account of a brutal murder of a Mexican by some Pennsylvania white boys.

  49. #395215
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:08 pm, John Ansell said:

    LGm, I saw that the other day and it looked like a street fight gone bad. If he was not here illegally would the fight have taken place? See, he should have obeyed the laws. Actions have Consequences.

  50. #395218
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, Jim M. said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, Rusty said:
    The amount of ignorance on this thread is shocking.

    I take it you don’t have a law degree.

    It shows.

  51. #395232
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, srhoades said:

    I hope they use an infected needle.

  52. #395233
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:22 pm, Les in NC said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, John Ansell said:

    I agree, I was just wondering what time to raise my glass. I know that won’t sit well with some here but I have a 12 year old daughter. If this had happened to her, I would be on the row with this POS.

  53. #395237
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, srhoades said:

    <blockquote lgm 7:04 pm:

    So bad behavior on the part of one justifies it on the part of another? I don’t get your point.

  54. #395239
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:26 pm, xplodeit said:

    They should bring back burning at the stake for scum like this!

  55. #395245
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, Richard Romano said:

    This slime deserves everything he gets — you take a life senselessly, we’ll take yours in good sense.

  56. #395275
    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:59 pm, John Ansell said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:26 pm, xplodeit said:
    They should bring back burning at the stake for scum like this!

    Oh now I can post a good one on that, but I’ll pass. It was along a lines of not being a good idea because a certain type of fires is hard to put out. :lol:

  57. #395277
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:01 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 7:04 pm, lgm said:

    Red blooded Americans can be just as brutal as any Mexican immigrant. Here’s an account of a brutal murder of a Mexican by some Pennsylvania white boys.

    What has race got to do with this thread? The point here is that Texas has a right to make and enforce its own laws and to pass and execute sentence on lawbreakers.

    Stop trying to misdirect with your lame and pitifully obvious attempts to demogog the issue.

    Ok, now hurry up and get back to Kos to cut and paste your next load of non sequiturs.

  58. #395281
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:09 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I must say that I am very proud of my home state. Go Texas. We need to tell the World Court to stay out of our business.

    That’s right. International sign language anyone?

  59. #395291
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:31 pm, cabrerski said:

    One very important point here:

    Texas has seen fit through proper legal channels to execute a convicted murderer following a fair trial and many appeals.

    It is Texas’ right to do so and our Constitution is written to support state’s rights. That is how we formed our Union, by allowing the states to handle justice for any laws not covered by the federal system. That also translates as no other government shall be placed above Texas in this matter.

    Our Union is the United States of America and we are watching a valuable civics lesson. No member of the World Court has any say in Texas. They do not pay taxes nor do they reside there. They can issue proclamations and opinions, but those are similar to *ssholes (everyone has them and they all stink).

    Until the day that Texas and the rest of the United States are forced into submission, then the rest of the world can stick it. At least Texas holds firm to the laws they legally enacted.

    Hey U.N. and other international legal bodies: how is that oil-for-food investigation going?

    One more thing: if some court orders a re-trial on the basis of attorney incompetence, shouldn’t the attorney be barred for life? If they cannot realize the importance of a capital crime trial, then they have no business plying their trade in any court.

  60. #395292
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    No human being is illegal…unless they’re on death row. Only then do they want to be found as an illegal alien.

  61. #395293
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:38 pm, cabrerski said:

    Of course, I meant disbarred…

  62. #395294
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:39 pm, Dandapani said:

    The ever turning Wheels of Karma cannot be stopped. The State of Texas will assist this dirt bag in keeping his Karmatic Appointment. I pray his pain at the hands of the Asuras is great as his Atman is purged and cleansed prior to his rebirth as the lowest of lifeforms so that he may slowly earn his way back to human form. Aum. Dharma will be fulfilled!

  63. #395296
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:54 pm, chep said:

    Hang the son of a b*tch anyways.

  64. #395297
    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:57 pm, Morganfrost said:

    Mexico has sent us several million of its citizens; if they get so worked up about our killing one or two every now and then, perhaps they should send them somewhere else in the future.

  65. #395300
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:01 pm, atheling said:

    cabrerski:

    Well said.

    The world court can kiss our a**.

  66. #395303
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:10 pm, Kevin K. said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, xler8bmw said: #45 Rusty
    Constitution Trumps Treaties Period!
    Go back to Civics Class

    This is not quite true. They are equal in some cases, according to some Supreme Court cases a couple of decades ago. (Darn it.) (and double darn it!)

  67. #395306
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:14 pm, cabrerski said:

    Yes Kevin K.

    This is true. But this is the last act of a desparate man (and trial team). Just because he said he was denied consular intervention, doesn’t mean it happened. For some reason, people accused of capital crimes (and their lawyers) make outrageous claims (and some may be true). But this is pure bunk to go by the word of a dispicable person such as Medillen and hold it as gospel.

  68. #395311
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:19 pm, sbw999 said:

    I love the smell of justice in the morning…one less scumbag living on the taxpayer’s dime.

  69. #395315
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:33 pm, Rusty said:

    It is Texas’ right to do so and our Constitution is written to support state’s rights. That is how we formed our Union, by allowing the states to handle justice for any laws not covered by the federal system.

    Treaties are covered by the federal system. If the Vienna Convention were “self-executing,” this killer would have a right to a retrial.

    Good luck finding the term “self-executing” in Article II.

    It just bugs me so much since SCOTUS ruled that an international treaty has to very carefully fit under state law. It’s arrogant to think that every treaty needs to be specifically tailored to American needs.

  70. #395319
    On August 4th, 2008 at 9:40 pm, cabrerski said:

    Rusty,

    Isn’t this why treaties have to be approved by the U.S. Senate? Besides, let’s say for the moment that Medellin was denied access to consular advisement…shouldn’t his lawyer pay the piper. Seems to me that if you do not identify yourself as an illegal and you do not do so for your counsel, then that’s your hard luck.

    I am curious what the Mexican consulate would say anyways… (in Spanish)”Senor Medellin, if you did these crimes and are found guilty, you will more than likely be put to death. Hasta la bye-bye.”

  71. #395326
    On August 4th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, Craig said:

    Why should a country that hates America bother informing a consulate if an American citizen from the United States- who has entered their country ILLEGALLY- is accused of a crime on their soil?

    There. Much better. Next time you want to finish with a soaring coda- be sure to compare apples with apples.

  72. #395339
    On August 4th, 2008 at 11:06 pm, Rusty said:

    Caberski, the VCCR, which was approved by the Senate, states that Texas authorities were compelled to inform the Mexican consulate.

    And you’re right, him meeting with the consulate would have probably done very little other than him maybe getting hooked up with better attorneys. Which I guess is my point. This missed step by Texas is jeopardizing a treaty designed to protect American citizens!

    Craig, whether the person is in the country legally or illegally doesn’t affect the treaty. So, yeah, apples and apples.

  73. #395360
    On August 5th, 2008 at 12:26 am, Jet Jaguar said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 8:36 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    No human being is illegal…unless they’re on death row. Only then do they want to be found as an illegal alien.

    Excellent point!

  74. #395361
    On August 5th, 2008 at 12:27 am, Tantor said:

    Jose Medellin didn’t even tell anyone his nationality for quite some time after his arrest, so this is the fault of the murderer for clamming up to the authorities, not the fault of the State of Texas.

    Rusty, could you please provide an example where Mexico paid for the attorneys of any of its criminals in the US? If anything, this would have been another opportunity for Mexican nationalists to bash America for the death penalty. Mexico doesn’t give a damn about Mexicans. That’s why Mexicans flee Mexico for America.

    You might want to check out the situation of American citizens when gratuitously arrested in the developing world. Basically, Americans are regarded as targets for extortion by the “legal” system. You can spend a long time in a nasty jail until you pay the bribes needed to spring you, even if you are completely innocent or falsely charged.

    Last of all, it’s ludicrous for a World Court to impose its rule on us. The last I heard, America elects its government. We do not outsource our legal system to some arrogant European World Court which seeks to undermine our sovereignty. That goes double for Texas. Should the World Court want to impose its contemptible law upon us, they best bring enough guns to back it up and prepare for a fight they will lose.

  75. #395364
    On August 5th, 2008 at 12:39 am, twofoot said:

    Wait, I thought those on the left didn’t want police asking if a person was here illegally?

  76. #395421
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:29 am, Ignatius Reilly said:

    I am SO looking forward to this! Party time is “after” 6 p.m. CDT, Tuesday.

    It would not be right to take joy in this man’s execution for peripheral reasons, if he did not thoroughly deserve it. Not a problem. The scumbag is completely deserving.

    But the needle being pushed into his vein gives me no more pleasure than the thumb that will be metaphorically jammed into the eye of the international law crowd and their running dog, Jorge Bush. And I really appreciate the convenient scheduling. I hate those Monday night football games that go on past mid-night, and, similarly, I like to enjoy this sort of affair at a civilized hour.

  77. #395423
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:39 am, redc1c4 said:

    God Bless Texas.

    maybe we can import some of that will to the PRC and start executing the scum in San Quentin?

  78. #395452
    On August 5th, 2008 at 5:17 am, sausage said:

    It’s arrogant to think that every treaty needs to be specifically tailored to American needs.

    Americans arrogant? Never! ;)

    On the main issue.. this guy has been proven to be guilty…and I understand the need for punishment for his most evil crimes.

    I just disagree with the death penalty and some of the blood-thirsty comments on this thread pretty much reinforce my view on the matter.

    Spilling blood as revenge… just seems so barbaric.. not many steps away from Islamic “revenge” which causes many members here much foaming of the mouth.

    Hard labor… lots of it… make the bugger work every single day hacking the biggest rocks in the world… but to take another life to avenge the life taken? So middle ages… America doesn’t deserve to be on that list with Iran, China and Saudi Arabia…

  79. #395484
    On August 5th, 2008 at 7:26 am, sfcmac said:

    On August 5th, 2008 at 5:17 am, sausage said:
    It’s arrogant to think that every treaty needs to be specifically tailored to American needs.
    Americans arrogant? Never!

    On the main issue.. this guy has been proven to be guilty…and I understand the need for punishment for his most evil crimes.

    I just disagree with the death penalty and some of the blood-thirsty comments on this thread pretty much reinforce my view on the matter.

    Spilling blood as revenge… just seems so barbaric.. not many steps away from Islamic “revenge” which causes many members here much foaming of the mouth.

    Hard labor… lots of it… make the bugger work every single day hacking the biggest rocks in the world… but to take another life to avenge the life taken? So middle ages… America doesn’t deserve to be on that list with Iran, China and Saudi Arabia…

    Right. And you’re just arrogant enough to value the life over a criminal miscreant over his victim. There isn’t one damned thing wrong with giving this scumbag the death he so richly deserves. He EARNED it. Nice try on the moral relativism. Typical liberal crap.

  80. #395485
    On August 5th, 2008 at 7:27 am, sfcmac said:

    Correction: “…the life of a criminal”….typo

  81. #395490
    On August 5th, 2008 at 7:33 am, sfcmac said:

    On August 4th, 2008 at 6:10 pm, Rusty said:
    The amount of ignorance on this thread is shocking. Constitution > treaties? What!? President Bush’s treaty? Huh!? The detained foreign national must request to speak to a consulate?

    All of those things are wrong.

    The Vienna Convention compels states to inform the foreign consulate when a foreign national is arrested. Medellin didn’t need to ask for diddly-squat. Texas denied him this right.

    This treaty was completely Constitutional. No one has ever argued that except for some harebrained commenters.

    The Supreme Court argued that the treaty was not “self-executing” and therefore not enforceable. This is madness. The 10th Amendment didn’t apply since treaties were already explicitly mentioned in Article II of the Constitution. Furthermore, most treaties aren’t “self-executing.” The Supreme Court managed to nullify a slew of international treaties based on a new reading of Constitutional law. And yet it’s always the liberals who are referred to as the activists?

    This lack of support for international treaties is a slap in the face to countries that have honored their obligations. It puts American civilians at risk. Why should a country that hates America bother informing a consulate if an American citizen is accused of a crime on their soil?

    167 countries signed the VCCR. I bet there are quite a few enemies in there.

    That’s funny, because Medellin doesn’t deserve diddly squat, since he’s here ILLEGALLY and not an American citizen. When an amendment giving illegals the same rights as citizens is added to the Constitution, let us know.

  82. #395491
    On August 5th, 2008 at 7:34 am, sfcmac said:

    Rusty:

    That’s funny, because Medellin doesn’t deserve diddly squat, since he’s here ILLEGALLY and not an American citizen. When an amendment giving illegals the same rights as citizens is added to the Constitution, let us know.

  83. #395510
    On August 5th, 2008 at 8:11 am, Jimmie said:

    There is a message here…If you want to pleasure yourself by taking the lives of two little girls…DON’T DO IT IN TEXAS…Try California they have a much higher tollerance for child molesters and killers.

  84. #395524
    On August 5th, 2008 at 8:38 am, hayroller15 said:

    It’s not often I can say this about this sanctuary state, but I will be a proud Texan come wednesday morning.

  85. #395576
    On August 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am, Rusty said:

    Last of all, it’s ludicrous for a World Court to impose its rule on us. The last I heard, America elects its government.

    No it isn’t. It’s ludicrous to expect the World Court to enforce treaties that America hasn’t signed on to. But since President Kennedy (elected) and the Senate (elected) ratified this treaty, then, yes, an international authority should enforce it. We can’t, or at least shouldn’t, break treaties whenever we feel like it.

    That’s funny, because Medellin doesn’t deserve diddly squat, since he’s here ILLEGALLY and not an American citizen.

    This is shockingly stupid. The treaty applies to foreign nationals.

    Just more people on this thread that have no idea what they are talking about. Just a knee-jerk reaction to the idea of a World Court and people who want to kill another human being.

    In the future, if you don’t like a treaty, urge the president to back out of it formally. That’s the right way to go about something like this.

  86. #395585
    On August 5th, 2008 at 10:09 am, sunandsteel said:

    F the world court. The same UN and the same World Court that looks the other way as actual genocide goes on around the world. Where are they when Iran hangs people off of cranes for being gay or not wearing the scarves? They are too busy trying to tell Texas what they can and cant do. To hell with them.

    I propose we here in Texas fire up Ol’ Sparky one more time for this pile of excrement named Jose. Just to piss off the world court.

  87. #395594
    On August 5th, 2008 at 10:15 am, sunandsteel said:

    And on top of all that, this mother*&#$%* has had 15 years to appeal, he has had 15 years of eating food that my taxes paid for, 15 years of sleeping in a bed that my taxes paid for, 15 years of being willingly sodomized in a prison that my taxes paid for. I want some return on my investment.

  88. #395610
    On August 5th, 2008 at 10:30 am, DBNinKY said:

    This is shockingly stupid.

    In the future, if you don’t like a treaty, urge the president to back out of it formally. That’s the right way to go about something like this

    Noted, chief! Btw, how do socks work? I’m having trouble keeping mine tied.

  89. #395650
    On August 5th, 2008 at 10:53 am, SalsaNChips said:

    What happens in Texas, stays in Texas.

    Good riddance and a lesson to others who may believe their (illegal) alien status somehow shields them from the U.S. Justice System, in the event they commit horrific acts like this sub-human did.

  90. #395681
    On August 5th, 2008 at 11:07 am, Solo said:

    AYE!

  91. #395708
    On August 5th, 2008 at 11:26 am, JT said:

    Hurry up Rusty and lgm. Visiting hours are almost over.

  92. #395749
    On August 5th, 2008 at 11:56 am, Miss_Anthrope said:

    Hell, forget the rope. Give me a cheese grater for the bastard.

    (I lost my brother last year to a murdering POS, and they still haven’t found him. I’m angry enough.)

  93. #395869
    On August 5th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Any word on when this rapist and murderer goes to meet his maker today?

  94. #395872
    On August 5th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    The BBC’s just-updated report ends with the following paragrah:

    Medellin’s legal team are still hoping the Supreme Court will grant a stay of execution that would give Congress time to enact new legislation compelling US states to abide by ICJ decisions.

    My fellow Americans: Do not look for lanterns hung in a church steeple to announce that the time has arrived to come with your guns. When the congress does this, then you will know that it is time.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7542794.stm

  95. #395874
    On August 5th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, abstractmind said:

    It just bugs me so much since SCOTUS ruled that an international treaty has to very carefully fit under state law. It’s arrogant to think that every treaty needs to be specifically tailored to American needs.

    Rusty, I’ve taken some time to read the verdict from the SCOTUS. Their main point was that the verbage of the treaty, and the judgment of the World Court, could -not- superceed, alter, dictate, or amend current state or federal laws. The argument was that Medellin didn’t get his consular visit. While him not receiving this boon originally was an oversight, it changes neither the facts, nor his guilt.

    But that was what the SCOTUS was saying…that other foreign powers don’t have the right to dictate how we handle our own affairs. To do so would sign over our sovereignty to basically whoever wants it outside of our own borders.

  96. #395877
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    On August 5th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Any word on when this rapist and murderer goes to meet his maker today?

    “After” 6 p.m. CDT. (I assume that that means ~at~ 6 p.m., allowing wriggle room for last-minute glitches.)

  97. #395881
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 5th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:
    The BBC’s just-updated report ends with the following paragrah:

    Medellin’s legal team are still hoping the Supreme Court will grant a stay of execution that would give Congress time to enact new legislation compelling US states to abide by ICJ decisions.

    Wouldnt that be running backwards, based on what the SCOTUS ruled? Seems odd to me if they did something like that.

    On my clock, 4:54 minutes until Medellin is executed.

    For his crimes, this is still years overdue.

  98. #395891
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:19 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, abstractmind said:

    Wouldnt [a SCOTUS stay] be running backwards, based on what the SCOTUS ruled? Seems odd to me if they did something like that.

    It certainly seems to me that it would. And yet, it is incredible that the SCOTUS has such a moment of lucidity in this case.

    It would truly be remarkable to me if they ruled that the law did not support what they wanted just at the moment so they were going to forbid the execution to give lawmakers an opportunity to pass a law that they like. Such a thing, of course, would not really surprise me. It would merely ignite my violent rage.

  99. #395898
    On August 5th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, zeroangel said:

    Rusty:

    Abstractmind beat me to it.

    I’ll add though:

    Let’s be honest here. This hand-wrangling over his consular visit is just a ploy by the anti-death penalty crowd. Are you seriously suggesting that the rest of the world will decide it will no longer treat Americans fairly because they didn’t give a loathsome POS like this his consular visit? Come on man. First off, a sizeable portion of the world wouldn’t treat American fairly in their courts under any circumstances. Secondly, out of the civilized nations, I don’t think either side’s government will loose sleep over whether or not a rapist and murderer’s case stuck to the exact letter of a treaty; treaties often being somewhat “flexible” anyway by their nature.

    Good thing SCOTUS did the right thing this time. What’s up with them? First the DC gun thing, now this? Good for them.

    It should be only moments now before aforementioned POS is permanently removed from existence… sweet.

  100. #395982
    On August 5th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, abstractmind said:

    agreed zero :)

    and ignatius…lucid now, but lets see if they stay that way.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Airline insecurity tale of the morning

May 18, 2009 09:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Latinos to Obama: You still owe us more

December 4, 2008 10:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Pay up.

Juan Hernandez is bummed

December 1, 2008 03:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

It’s not just ACORN: La Raza partner caught red-handed

October 9, 2008 09:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Yes, they can.

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Curb your enthusiasm.

Update: Judge says English-only is not “hostile”

August 16, 2008 08:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Speak the language.

Your NEA cultural tax dollars at work

August 12, 2008 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 1 Trackback

National Endowment for (other countries’) Arts.


Categories: Open Borders Lobby



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Gay Patriot

» The O So Hip Obama
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook