<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An invitation for pro-drilling Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Calling the Democrats&#8217; energy bluff, Pt III</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-403357</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Calling the Democrats&#8217; energy bluff, Pt III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-403357</guid>
		<description>[...] August 5: An invitation for pro-drilling Democrats  Posted in: GOP, Nancy Pelosi  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments (0)&#160;&#160;&#160;trackbacks (0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 5: An invitation for pro-drilling Democrats  Posted in: GOP, Nancy Pelosi  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments (0)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;trackbacks (0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Republicans Call &#8220;Ollie Ollie Oxen Free!&#8221; &#124; The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-398052</link>
		<dc:creator>House Republicans Call &#8220;Ollie Ollie Oxen Free!&#8221; &#124; The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-398052</guid>
		<description>[...] week, Minority Leader Jim Boehner invited the Democrats who are for more domestic oil production to put their signatures on paper in support of getting a vote on the Republicans &#8220;all of the above&#8221; energy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, Minority Leader Jim Boehner invited the Democrats who are for more domestic oil production to put their signatures on paper in support of getting a vote on the Republicans &#8220;all of the above&#8221; energy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Calling the Democrats&#8217; bluff, Part II</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-397936</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Calling the Democrats&#8217; bluff, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-397936</guid>
		<description>[...] Republican House leader John Boehner called the Democrats bluff the other day by calling on those who say they support drilling to put it in writing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Republican House leader John Boehner called the Democrats bluff the other day by calling on those who say they support drilling to put it in writing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rip Ford</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396841</link>
		<dc:creator>Rip Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396841</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve informed my Democrat Representative that if he wants to drill for oil but Nancy Pelosi is blocking the vote then I have no choice but to vote to remove Pelosi as Speaker of the House by voting to restore a Republican majority in the House, i.e. vote for his Republican opponent.  I figure that&#039;s the best way there is to tell them that letting Pelosi take the heat isn&#039;t going to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve informed my Democrat Representative that if he wants to drill for oil but Nancy Pelosi is blocking the vote then I have no choice but to vote to remove Pelosi as Speaker of the House by voting to restore a Republican majority in the House, i.e. vote for his Republican opponent.  I figure that&#8217;s the best way there is to tell them that letting Pelosi take the heat isn&#8217;t going to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396405</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396405</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On August 5th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, abstractmind said: 
Eagle,

I’ll have to dig the reference links back up, but the reports I was reading showed there were approximately 260 Billion barrels of oil we could have access to…just in ANWR, there is approximately 80-90 billion barrels…enough oil for our entire country for the next 8 years.

The problem is, we dont keep oil. We end up sending alot of it overseas in exports to other countries. Its the same mistake, in respects, that Iran makes…they have all of those oil reserves, and no refineries. We refine it, and send it elsewhere. Were we to not send all of that overseas, we’d have enough oil in total to last approx. 35-40 years. But we wont. we’ll send it overseas and not keep it for ourselves, and the process continues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You sure, the sources I have looked up on this say over 99% of domestic oil is used in the USA...only a small amount of &quot;oil products&quot; not generally produced in other countries are sent out.

What difference does it make? We are spending about 1.7 billion dollars/day on imported oil. Even if we drill and put our oil on the world market, (which we don&#039;t), the benefit of keeping billions of dollars in the USA would still be there, along with hundreds of thousands of new jobs, having the capability to withstand an interruption of imported oil without destroying the economy, drastically reducing the trade imbalance, etc.

&lt;strong&gt;The reason the &quot;don&#039;t drill&quot; people can never come up with a logical reason not to drill is because there isn&#039;t one....so they just make stuff up and some people believe it. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On August 5th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, abstractmind said:<br />
Eagle,</p>
<p>I’ll have to dig the reference links back up, but the reports I was reading showed there were approximately 260 Billion barrels of oil we could have access to…just in ANWR, there is approximately 80-90 billion barrels…enough oil for our entire country for the next 8 years.</p>
<p>The problem is, we dont keep oil. We end up sending alot of it overseas in exports to other countries. Its the same mistake, in respects, that Iran makes…they have all of those oil reserves, and no refineries. We refine it, and send it elsewhere. Were we to not send all of that overseas, we’d have enough oil in total to last approx. 35-40 years. But we wont. we’ll send it overseas and not keep it for ourselves, and the process continues.</p></blockquote>
<p>You sure, the sources I have looked up on this say over 99% of domestic oil is used in the USA&#8230;only a small amount of &#8220;oil products&#8221; not generally produced in other countries are sent out.</p>
<p>What difference does it make? We are spending about 1.7 billion dollars/day on imported oil. Even if we drill and put our oil on the world market, (which we don&#8217;t), the benefit of keeping billions of dollars in the USA would still be there, along with hundreds of thousands of new jobs, having the capability to withstand an interruption of imported oil without destroying the economy, drastically reducing the trade imbalance, etc.</p>
<p><strong>The reason the &#8220;don&#8217;t drill&#8221; people can never come up with a logical reason not to drill is because there isn&#8217;t one&#8230;.so they just make stuff up and some people believe it. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simcoe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396272</link>
		<dc:creator>simcoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396272</guid>
		<description>Ordinarily CNN wouldn’t be my first choice for Iraq objectivity but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/05/iraq.oil/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN.com reports&lt;/a&gt;: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;Despite Iraq earning billions of dollars in oil revenue in the past five years, U.S. taxpayer money has been the overwhelming source of Iraq reconstruction funds,&quot; Warner said in a joint statement with Levin. &quot;It is time for the sovereign government of Iraq, using its revenues, expenditures and surpluses, to fully assume the responsibility to provide essential services and improve the quality of life for the Iraqi people.&quot;

Sen. Carl Levin says the U.S. shouldn&#039;t &quot;be paying for Iraqi projects while oil revenues continue to pile up.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It seems that the Bush Whitehouse knows the citizens of the U.S. wouldn’t stand for our money going to reconstruction in Iraq for many reasons. 

So, is it an end run around the citizen’s objections to let oil prices rise and pay for it that way? Are we, the American people, getting hosed to pay off one man’s debt??

I wonder….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ordinarily CNN wouldn’t be my first choice for Iraq objectivity but <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/05/iraq.oil/index.html" rel="nofollow">CNN.com reports</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Despite Iraq earning billions of dollars in oil revenue in the past five years, U.S. taxpayer money has been the overwhelming source of Iraq reconstruction funds,&#8221; Warner said in a joint statement with Levin. &#8220;It is time for the sovereign government of Iraq, using its revenues, expenditures and surpluses, to fully assume the responsibility to provide essential services and improve the quality of life for the Iraqi people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sen. Carl Levin says the U.S. shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;be paying for Iraqi projects while oil revenues continue to pile up.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems that the Bush Whitehouse knows the citizens of the U.S. wouldn’t stand for our money going to reconstruction in Iraq for many reasons. </p>
<p>So, is it an end run around the citizen’s objections to let oil prices rise and pay for it that way? Are we, the American people, getting hosed to pay off one man’s debt??</p>
<p>I wonder….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO2 Producer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396245</link>
		<dc:creator>CO2 Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396245</guid>
		<description>Would Nancy actually throw herself under the bus in order for her fellow Dems to save face with their constituents?

&lt;em&gt;Really?&lt;/em&gt;

I suppose she might. She&#039;s probably confident that she&#039;ll come out of all this unscathed. No need to worry, her party&#039;s safe as long as they play along, until the next vote comes up. They&#039;ve got five weeks to figure things out. Well, four and a half weeks now. Nice stall tactics, Blueys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would Nancy actually throw herself under the bus in order for her fellow Dems to save face with their constituents?</p>
<p><em>Really?</em></p>
<p>I suppose she might. She&#8217;s probably confident that she&#8217;ll come out of all this unscathed. No need to worry, her party&#8217;s safe as long as they play along, until the next vote comes up. They&#8217;ve got five weeks to figure things out. Well, four and a half weeks now. Nice stall tactics, Blueys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396240</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396240</guid>
		<description>Thank God for Michelle Malkin. Is there anyone else covering the &quot;revolt&quot;? Why aren&#039;t McCain and Bush trumpeting their support of the conservative House Republicans to put it in the news? I&#039;ll tell you why. They only support drilling so far as there is no chance it will happen. Now that they have leverage, they disappear. It&#039;s all about amnesty and Cap and Trade &quot;my friends&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for Michelle Malkin. Is there anyone else covering the &#8220;revolt&#8221;? Why aren&#8217;t McCain and Bush trumpeting their support of the conservative House Republicans to put it in the news? I&#8217;ll tell you why. They only support drilling so far as there is no chance it will happen. Now that they have leverage, they disappear. It&#8217;s all about amnesty and Cap and Trade &#8220;my friends&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An invitation for pro-drilling Democrats &#8212; The 2008 Elections</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396237</link>
		<dc:creator>An invitation for pro-drilling Democrats &#8212; The 2008 Elections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396237</guid>
		<description>[...] Put it in writing, pals. [...] Read the rest &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Put it in writing, pals. [...] Read the rest &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Them Eat Cake &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396212</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Them Eat Cake &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396212</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaker&#8217;s plan may backfire yet. John Boehner, the GOP minority House leader calls her bluff by asking Democrats to cross the aisle and vote for drilling. Sign their names to the discharge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaker&#8217;s plan may backfire yet. John Boehner, the GOP minority House leader calls her bluff by asking Democrats to cross the aisle and vote for drilling. Sign their names to the discharge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allrsn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396173</link>
		<dc:creator>allrsn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396173</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When the oil companies - you know, the one’s who drill for the oil- are asked, they say we can expect to start seeing oil in less than 2 years from some of the easier spots, with major production in less than 7 years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Add 5 years and tens of millions of dollars spent in the courts before they can start to drill. Now it is 7 to 12 years to oil, If they win permission from the courts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When the oil companies &#8211; you know, the one’s who drill for the oil- are asked, they say we can expect to start seeing oil in less than 2 years from some of the easier spots, with major production in less than 7 years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Add 5 years and tens of millions of dollars spent in the courts before they can start to drill. Now it is 7 to 12 years to oil, If they win permission from the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pabarge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396172</link>
		<dc:creator>pabarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396172</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12304.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;giggle giggle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12304.html" rel="nofollow">giggle giggle</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396162</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396162</guid>
		<description>ack. . .susect should read &#039;suspect&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ack. . .susect should read &#8216;suspect&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concretebob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396163</link>
		<dc:creator>concretebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396163</guid>
		<description>As much as I would love to see Boehner on the ticket, I would love to see MY congressman more. 
McCain/Cantor. 
A Virginian in the White House in 2012.
Put Delegate Bill Janis in for the 7th District of VA, then he gets to be Governor, then, in 20 years, ANOTHER Virginian in the White House.
Sounds like a plan to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would love to see Boehner on the ticket, I would love to see MY congressman more.<br />
McCain/Cantor.<br />
A Virginian in the White House in 2012.<br />
Put Delegate Bill Janis in for the 7th District of VA, then he gets to be Governor, then, in 20 years, ANOTHER Virginian in the White House.<br />
Sounds like a plan to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/an-invitation-for-pro-drilling-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-396160</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13192#comment-396160</guid>
		<description>wrcnossen,
It&#039;s possible that the oil companies are not including the time they will be wrapped up in court fighting lawsuits from environmental groups.  I susect those figures are from the time they are able to start drilling, with no court injunctions staring them in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrcnossen,<br />
It&#8217;s possible that the oil companies are not including the time they will be wrapped up in court fighting lawsuits from environmental groups.  I susect those figures are from the time they are able to start drilling, with no court injunctions staring them in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

