What a slap in the face one way but necessary justice another.

They found him guilty of helping someone try to commit a crime!

And the legal term for someone who does that is?

And the sentance for someone who does that…especially when the crime said individual is convicted of helping another person commit is a terrorist act (you know…murdering innocent civilians, car bombs, suicide bombs..etc.) is?

If you do not know the answer to those questions…well then you really should not comment on whether or not what they did was wrong.

How can such a thing go on in this country? In this day and age? It’s all that Bushitler guy’s fault. Where is this guy’s Constitutional Rights?

It’s a conspiracy I tells ya…a C-O-N…spiracy!!!

August 6th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, Wile E Coyote

Are you sure about that? I could have sworn I read that term in there (as well as the associated punishment). Admittedly, it’s been a few years, so maybe I need to go back and re-read them.

The demon who drove the al Qaeda terror leader’s vehicles has been convicted by a military tribunal…

Wile E Coyote said:

Also, how come our hand picked prosecutors, selected secret evidence and military tribanul couldn’t find him guilty of actually committing any crime? They found him guilty of helping someone try to commit a crime!

Oh that’s right. Liberals don’t consider “providing material support for terrorism”, aiding and abetting, or driving the get-away-car as ACTUAL crimes. That’s because they (especially the New York Times) have been getting away with such things for so long, they have come to think it is a right, not a crime, to be an accessory to terrorism.

“Your honor, I didn’t do anything wrong. I only loaded the gun, handed it to my buddy and drove him home. I wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger!”

Also, how come our hand picked prosecutors, selected secret evidence and military tribanul couldn’t find him guilty of actually committing any crime? They found him guilty of helping someone try to commit a crime!

lgm said:
A secret trial with secret evidence is not “due process” and accomplishes nothing. It does not legitimize his detention. Those who wanted him in jail will be happy (see above comments). But they didn’t need any stinkin’ trial.

How so? Because it wasn’t done to your liberal specifications then it must have been a Kangaroo Court, right? Are you insinuating that the military justice system isn’t fair? Or, perhaps, that JAG officers and those presiding didn’t go to Law School like the rest of the civilian attorneys, right?

Your comment just exposes how you and many Americans wilfully remain ignorant about the military and how it operates. In your estimation, people like my husband (a military officer) are nothing more than secret police. You are way off base but this is nothing more than we expect from you, Math Man.

This comment is one of many examples (from you) of a person who says how Conservatives are the real haters but then goes ahead and says pretty hateful things against Christians, Conservatives, and the military.

You really need to get a clue and leave you insular chamber of ignorance.