See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. We need Obama to appoint more judges like this one? No thank! « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, RedDog said:

   The Politburo has spoken. Next!

   This is what you will get with total Dem control of the US government.

2. #2
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, wighttrasch said:

   I say drag him on a sandbar.

3. #3
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, emjem24 said:

   This judicial “finding” makes absolutely no sense. This will surely be appealed and perhaps, hopefully pardoned. The judge interfered in the trial when she decided to tell the jury to “dismiss” or not consider certain evidence during their deliberations.

   This case stinks… justice really is blind.

4. #4
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, John Ansell said:

   May all the Clinton Appointees get splinters in their arses while sitting on the bench.

5. #5
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Instructed by this notoriously activist judge to ignore facts, reason and legal history, the jury returned with a guilty verdict, finding Mr. Moses guilty of “discharging” “pollutants” into one of the “waters of the United States.”

   His conviction ignores the fact that no evidence was ever presented in court that Mr. Moses “discharged” anything into the stream bed at all. He only removed sand and gravel bars that were already there and which he was contractually obligated to remove. He was extracting material from the channel, not discharging material into it.

   Facts - what are those? Oh yeah an inconvenience in the way of Progressives. If Obama wins, look out…

6. #6
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, Jerry said:

   When Judges turn a cold shoulder to justice they are embracing a coming revolution. This country was founded by blood, it has been defended by blood, and I fear one day it will need to be redeemed through blood.

7. #7
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, Silkyinfamous said:

   Before the jury was dismissed to enter into deliberations at the conclusion of his trial, Judge Lynn Winmill instructed the jury, believe it or not, to disregard every bit of information from 1980 to 2002, including the Corps’ denial of jurisdiction and the mandate from local government for Mr. Moses to maintain the flood channel.

   So basically the jury was left with,

   “I like his shirt enough to see he’s not guilty”, or
   “Did he give me a weird look, he’s frying for that.”

   Activists belong in the Hague, not in our judicial system. Ask Michael Elston and Esther McDonald about that.

8. #8
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, nyc123me said:

   Do not act to help fellow citizens. Do not work. Do not act responsibly with finances. Do not speak out against liberals. Do not question liberals’ moral superiority. Do not contribute in any way to society. In fact, just don’t do anything at all. The dems have got your back, as long as you follow these simple guidelines.

9. #9
   On August 6th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, puhiawa said:

   No doubt this Judge believes in anthropogenic global warming also.

10. #10
    On August 6th, 2008 at 1:59 pm, shooter said:

    Can you imagine nothing but old Clinton Judges and some new additions appointed by BLT obama???

    I have NEVER been so afraid for my country as I am today.
    From California in bed with illegals to lefty judges telling jurors of your PEERS to disregard the FACTS.

    We have no Justice system, only a liberal legal system.

11. #11
    On August 6th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, shooter said:

    to disregard every bit of information from 1980 to 2002,

    That does seem oddly similar to one of the presidential candidates.

12. #12
    On August 6th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, mchristian said:

    Silkyinfamous said: So basically the jury was left with,
    “I like his shirt enough to see he’s not guilty”, or
    “Did he give me a weird look, he’s frying for that.”

    Nothing says guilty like plaid.

13. #13
    On August 6th, 2008 at 2:25 pm, Lifeofthemind said:

    This reduces the Petit Jury to the same level of farce as a Grand Jury. If the Judge wants to be a prosecutor he should step down from the bench and take the job.

14. #14
    On August 6th, 2008 at 2:33 pm, Barry F. said:

    And, they are concerned about detainees in Guantanamo not getting a fair trial under the Bush Administration?

15. #15
    On August 6th, 2008 at 2:39 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Sounds like the judge is bucking for Speaker of the House, to me.

16. #16
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, ajmontana said:

    He was for windmills before he was against them…
    oh! Winmill, neveeeeeeeeeeevermind.
    We must get up for McCain 08′
    No way No how can we have Odopey in the White House.
    The Country was smart enough to dump Hillary,
    now it’s time to dump Sen. er,uh,um.

17. #17
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, Papa Louie said:

    lefty judges telling jurors of your PEERS to disregard the FACTS.

    Disregarding facts is the only way leftists can get the outcome they want. They love it when judges frame people - until it happens to them.

18. #18
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, sonofdy said:

    So he got convicted for doing his job. Sound familiar border patrol guys?

    Next we will see programmers convicted for properly debuging thier programs!!!

19. #19
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, Marc said:

    Let’s not forget that Clinton also appointed the infamous Harold Baer to the federal bench in New York. Jusge Baer is the guy who ruled that it was reasonable for “minorities” to flee when a police officer approached them and if the person dropped a sack of narcotics while fleeing, the police can not use it as evidence against the guy who flee. Clinton also nominated a Judge in New York named Denny Chin, who pretty much overturned the Patriot Act and ruled that anybody taken into custody in Afghanistan gets the same rights as American citizens. Let’s also not forget that Clinton nominated a really radical judge in California named Florence Cooper who ruled that the US Navy can not have submarine drills in the Pacific Ocean. Judge Cooper did not care about the safety and training of our submariners. Instead, she said the Navy was harming the whales. There should be a list of outrageous decisions by Clinton judges.

20. #20
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    Either there is more to this story than we see here or reality has finally caught up to The Onion or the People Cube.

21. #21
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, tre said:

    I think this one will certainly be overturned on appeal.

    She deserves one of Readers Digests “Broken Gavel Award”.

22. #22
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:43 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    SO
    What are WE going to do about it!!

    This Slippery -Slide didn’t just happen!

    AISB- We have allowed the “officials” in gvt to believe that they are ROYALTY!

    As for me-and I join the mandate of the Founders-I will have no KING but KING JESUS!!!!!

    The “royal” courts are among the gvt officials >>>>>>>>

23. #23
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, prendad said:

    This is getting scarey. Sounds like federal judge Lynn Winmill is trying to emulate Nancy Pelosi’s “Führer” style of leadership by personally running everything in classic meglomaniac style.

24. #24
    On August 6th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Before the jury was dismissed to enter into deliberations at the conclusion of his trial, Judge Lynn Winmill instructed the jury, believe it or not, to disregard every bit of information from 1980 to 2002, including the Corps’ denial of jurisdiction and the mandate from local government for Mr. Moses to maintain the flood channel.

    Hopefully that will be enough for a successful appeal. But any U.S. Attorney prosecuting this case would most likely be a Bush Appointee and equally dirty as HerrReichJudge Lynn Winmill.Power is the problem. Fascism run rampant and I could be next, or you. These Federal Agencies do no need to be reformed; they need to be abolished as all they are doing is creating Reich Fuhers all over the damn place.
    Valley Forge
    Trenton
    Saratoga
    Kings Mountain
    the Cow Pens
    —
    His Messiahship be mocked
    Allie OOP OOP be praised

25. #25
    On August 6th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, DaveC said:

    that made me sick..

26. #26
    On August 6th, 2008 at 5:41 pm, zorro said:

    Wow. This Lynn Winmill character takes the cake. Does he think he’s an Emperor? This fool needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.

    The Klinton legacy will be a plague upon us for a long, long time.

27. #27
    On August 6th, 2008 at 5:52 pm, zorro said:

    PS- That screen cap is the perfect image of Komrade Klinton.

28. #28
    On August 6th, 2008 at 7:53 pm, Boomer said:

    Folks in my part of Idaho are fuming over this gross injustice by a runaway bloated arrogant Federal Government System. If this keeps up we just might have to reopen that little argument a certain block of states had with what they saw as an intrusive Federal Government in the 19th Century over states rights.

29. #29
    On August 6th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, simcoe said:

    Reminiscent of CA’s ex-governor (who wants to run again) Jerry “The Hippie” Brown’s appointment to the CA Supreme Court of far left activist judge, Rose Bird in the 1980’s. The citizens of CA got rid of her and a couple of her cronies.

    Buck up, ID. Do your research and follow our lead. Course it might be a bit more difficult now, 20 years on.

30. #30
    On August 6th, 2008 at 10:03 pm, lance said:

    Isn’t the punishment a bit harsh?
    Even if he was guilty (which is only in bizarro world), isn’t 18 months in prison excessive for ‘discharging’?
    What about just imposing a fine so they could clean up the “pollutants”

31. #31
    On August 6th, 2008 at 11:55 pm, EWTHeckman said:

    tre,

    I think this one will certainly be overturned on appeal.

    It was appealed. Both the 9th Circuit Appeals Court and the Supreme Court turned down the case.

32. #32
    On August 7th, 2008 at 1:14 am, traveler49 said:

    At what point do you pick up arms and make a stand? Taxation without representation is nothing compared to this. The fascist 9th court has to change or we are heading toward a revolution.

33. #33
    On August 7th, 2008 at 9:50 am, sonofdy said:

    That picture on the front page looks like clinton is looking at me like I am monica. (shudder)

34. #34
    On August 7th, 2008 at 11:12 am, Tuesday said:

    On August 6th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, John Ansell said:
    May all the Clinton Appointees get splinters in their arses while sitting on the bench.

    …and every other judge who acts the same as this Judge!