Now THAT is hilarious!

After listening to the interview it seems to me some of her answers are related to their relationship. She is also fawning over Edwards through the interview.

ShareThis
……

On August 8th, 2008 at 9:51 pm, Rusty said:

My problem with AZNethanderal is that he’s using the term “bastard” for the son. That punishes the son, not the dad. So, “crapweasel” is appropriate for Senator Edwards. Bastard is not acceptable for any child. They don’t choose their parents.

You need to read George Martin’s Fire and Ice series

Bastard:

1: an illegitimate child

illegitimate:

1: not recognized as lawful offspring; specifically : born of parents not married to each other

Now granted, your liberal eunuch personality of not calling the child a bastard by this standard…

2: something that is spurious, irregular, inferior, or of questionable origin
3 a: an offensive or disagreeable person —used as a generalized term of abuse

… is completely understandable. But you obviously don’t want to call a spade a spade to be your PC self. John Snow is such a cool name for the bastard of Eddard Stark, now I need to go read that series again.

I actually pity the mother as well. first, for having absolutely no common sense what-so-ever, second, for obviously having the IQ of common road kill for even sleeping with the dirt-bag in the first place, and finally, for everything she will now be going through and has gone through for the sake of this scum-bags “reputation” and mistaken belief that he would ever be President or Vice President.

How many more will there be?

On August 8th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, greenfairie said:

If John Edwards is indirectly supporting the baby and the baby mama without a paternity test, he’s the biggest freakin’ idiot on Earth. We can solve the mystery right now, Silky…bring in Maury Povich.

too funny.. had to be said again..

kinda sad when the supposedly ‘the most qualified’ among us running for the most powerful job in the world is fodder for daytime talk shows..

On August 8th, 2008 at 9:51 pm, Rusty said:

Good point.

Yet another Liberal who so speaks for women. Another Liberal who is all about “Women’s Rights”. yet one more Liberal who is such a “Femminist”.

Just how many more women have to be used and treated as whores by the Democrats and Liberals before women finally get smart and see that Liberals and Democrats do to them what they have been doing to Minorities for decades?

Keeping them subservient, making them their personal toadies, lying, cheating and stealing simply to ensure that these groups continue to support them based on what they say…not what they do.

A few more “Feminists” like this and I will never let my daighters leave the house again.

There was a time a man left his family he was a RAT; has had illegitimate children he was a RAT. Now he is to be understood.

Actually, I disagree with this. The men who screw around and run, who are unwilling to commit, etc. are merely doing what the feminists belligerently accused them of doing for years, while telling women they needed men as much as fish needed bicycles.

It became a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ties directly into the feminist breakdown of the traditional, nuclear family as an “oppressive tool of the patriarchy.”