The lost China Olympics mascot
The soft-and-cuddly Communist p.r. operatives designed five lovable mascots for the Olympics, including “YingYing the Tibetan antelope:”
Doug Powers strips off the whitewash and redesigns the logos the right way:
Posted in: Repression
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Little Miss Attila
- The Revenge of 3 to Chew On… « Chockblock’s blog
- Michelle Malkin » The Party Pulls The Trigger
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Repression
Power Line
» More From the East Anglia Archives
Sister Toldjah
» Obama plans to announce troop decision on Afghanistan next weekPundit & Pundette
» Various and sundryStop The ACLU
» Obama To Hold Another Prime Timer To Explain Our Afghanistan Strategy To Islamic ExtremistsRedstate
» Put Me in the No Camp on the Purity TestAmSpecBlog
» Lieberman Says He's "Stubborn" on Gov't PlanWeekly Standard
» Dowd on Palin
Hey – one of them is stuck in Guantanamo Bay! Oh no..it’s okay.. it’s China abusing human rights this time…move on…
Sausage, you’re pathetic.
Sausage, you’re accurate.
gotta agree with sausage
Nice shot..ok, not so much.
I dont think you can logically make a case that compares how gitmo detainees are treated to China’s human rights record.
But feel free to try, if you like exercises in futility.
And Let Taiwan fly her own flag.
So you think that Gitmo represents America abusing human rights?
Like I said, pathetic.
ying ying is probably climbing a mountain 30 feet high and they can’t see her through the smog.
There is no smog in China. The Chinese government said so.
Hey Sausage, how many terrorist acts have Tibetan monks committed as opposed to the combatants we captured on the battle fields of iraq and Afghanistan?
Sausage, not only do we not want to see how you’re made, we just don’t like to see you.
The trials are underway, Sausage, what more do you want? And you can bet, Hamdan got off a lot easier going before the Gitmo tribunal committee than he would have most U.S. court systems, or at least those outside NY and CA.
I’m almost willing to bet good money that a month after he’s “repatriated” Hamdan is either killed or captured in Afghanistan.
That’s assuming of course, that we don’t give him political asylum along with a taxpayer funded house and a job here in the U.S., since we can’t find anyone to take him without promising to not torture him. /sarc
Oh, and I agree, sausage is giving the Chinese government way too much credit if he’s comparing treatment in Gitmo with treatment in a Chicom prison camp.
I wonder how many Chinese political prisoners are gaining weight and reading the Bible?
#1 sausage said:
Except that a Chinese, cartoon mascot never murdered a great kid who started his first job, on the same day, at the same firm that I did, but then later, moved on to work at a firm on the 105th floor of Tower One at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
I’m also referring to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed down at Gitmo, and before I forget to mention it…thanks sausage, you’re a real class act.
And just like Al Pacino said it in ‘A Scent of a Woman:’
What bugs me is that the media, El Presidente Boosh, even Drudge are focusing — as was no doubt intended — on Olympic Glory and are letting the Chicoms slide on human rights, pollution, economic sabotage and a host of other little nasties.
Has nothing to do with Gitmo. We have treated our enemies like we treat illegal aliens: with more care than many Americans get.
i ment the coverage not the inmates or reason for being inmates…
What’s with the stupid assertion that all prisoners are the same. In China virtually everyone posting here would be eligible for prison and torture just for what we are writing. Think about that: if right now you had to worry that Bush would be ordering someone to come get you and haul you away for what you’re writing. Not a concern is it? Don’t trivialize how freedom loving people live under the Chinese thumb. Gitmo prisoners are accused of trying to kill Americans, not just speak out. And they will get real trials not pretend ones with predetermined outcomes.
I thought sausages’ comment was a sarcastic jibe about how the world will ignore it because it’s China…
I could be mistaken tho.
No, his post was a jab at the US and Gitmo.
Context, Khyris, context.
same here lol
w00ps
“Hey – one of them is stuck in Guantanamo Bay! Oh no..it’s okay.. it’s China abusing human rights this time…move on…”
It does seem to stupid to be serious.
If it sarcasm: Great point, I agree, and my previous post is for all the moonbats who often make that silly relativistic point.
If not, then we have a moonbat.
On August 8th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, sausage said:
Hey – one of them is stuck in Guantanamo Bay! Oh no..it’s okay.. it’s China abusing human rights this time…move on…
Uhhh, sausage do Tibetans fly air plane into office buildings?
I think what Sausage was pointing out, sarcastically, was that the MSM would have been all over it, if “one of them is stuck in Guantanamo Bay!” But, since it is China…well…the MSM always gives them a pass.
Lefties can’t tell the difference between a convicted child molester or murderer and an innocent unborn child, how should we expect them to be able to discern between a TERRORIST and an innocent Chinese person having their basic human rights stolen from them?
#1 sausage said:
It’s the “this time” part that set me off.
#17 trailortrash said:
Then I apologize for referring to you and misrepresenting your comment, TT. I should have clicked on your web link first.
What say you, rignerd?
Nice try, except for this little jewel:
As we all know, the last time human rights were being abused was in Gitmo, right? Right, at least, in Sausage’s version of reality.
I don’t condone China’s real (not perceived) human rights abuses, but saying that Gitmo even comes close to constituting human rights violations, especially relative to China, is absurd.
Plus, let’s not forget that this is “Sausage” we’re talking about. It’s funny how liberals never seem to hold actual criminals accountable for actual crimes. Many liberal heroes are mass murderers and criminals of various ilks. No, they expend inordinate amounts of energy villifying people (and governments) whose only real “crime” is disagreeing with far left, socialist ideals.
Let us also not forget the gross persecution of Christians in China.
http://www.persecution.com
Quick, outsource the southern border security to the Commies. They don’t give a dam about rights. Perfect!
To compare the detention of captured terrorist and illegal combatants to the atrocities committed against Tibet by Communist Red China is pathetic.
Liberals see the two as equivalent examples. Facts don’t really ever get in the way of liberal “logic”.
I’ll give you a “B” for demonstrating the tu quoque fallacy, but you fell short of an “A” due to the lack of actual human rights abuses at Gitmo.
SFB
I gotta go with Sausage being wholly sarcastic about the world-wide pass the Chinese get for their well documented abuse of human rights…. as compared to the unsubstantiated reports of alleged abuse at Gitmo.
I also find it ironic, that the press gives more of a damn about so-called abuse at Gitmo, when on the other side of the fenceline, Cuba will beat and jail anybody for anything….and we rarely hear about it.
Hearing the chinese officials swear there is no smog is rather reminiscent of “Baghdad Bob” telling us that the americans are nowhere in sight in Iraq!
Same here, Brian NY. It read – and still reads – like Sausage is equating our treatment of Gitmo detainees to the treatment China exacts on its dissidents, which cannot be made: China murders its “detainees.”
#1 Sausage? How aptly named. Its that discarded goo-waste thats shoveled up off the floor at the end of the shift and oozed into some sort of membrane.
I think you mean, “…move on.org…“.