ECS

And I suppose you have no problem if I visit “day labor” locations so I can hand out flyers telling all those good citizens that they will face jail time if they try and vote and are not found to be qualified.

I mean, I am doing them a favor, after all, just keeping them from breaking the law.

And while I am at it, I suppose I could go to SE DC (with heavily armed police escort, of course), and warn all those good citizens that they would be breaking the law if they voted and were violent convicted felons.

No intimidation there, just trying to keep people honest.

Oh, heck, why don’t I just put flyers on all cars in a parking lot, school, day-care center, etc., and warn every one to make sure they are citizens and have a right to vote, otherwise they will face prosecution.

Yup.

You know, that’s not intimidation at all, just doing my honest duty to keep people out of jail. . . right lgm.

And before I forget, despite our political differences, I wish you a rewarding fall semester! I am sure it is no easy thing to deliver college level instruction in mathematics on a daily basis, so my best for the new term.

Bush was elected to sit in the big chair.

A lib is actually saying that Bush didn’t STEAL the election?

On August 11th, 2008 at 11:57 am, lgm said:

Threatening legal action (i.e. within the law) against a conservative lowlife is not the same as threatening to burn his house.

Libs know a thing or two about burning someone’s home with whom they don’t agree or like, huh?

On August 11th, 2008 at 11:57 am, lgm said:
Threatening legal action (i.e. within the law) against a conservative lowlife is not the same as threatening to burn his house.

Again with the name-calling. What makes the recipients of these letters scumbags and lowlifes?

Intimidation is intimidation.

No. When Lance Armstrong or Michael Jordan play head games with their opponents, that’s part of the game.

Threatening legal action (i.e. within the law) against a conservative lowlife is not the same as threatening to burn his house.

Now have to take my turn with lgm…

On August 10th, 2008 at 9:41 pm, lgm said:
I said brownshirts were worse than someone mailing an angry but harmless letter to a scumbag. The thread turns that into me defending brownshirts. Is is dislexia or ADD or an inability to keep words in order?

First of all, I missed the part where it was shown that the Accountable America idiot was sending a letter “to a scumbag.” How are the recipients scumbags?

Secondly, it is utterly laughable that you can moan over the thread turning into something off topic when you somehow thought a thread about Iowahawk’s satire of the AA letters equalled a thread about Russia and Georgia. You are the king of threadjacking and deflection. Maybe we wouldn’t all be so ready to laugh in your face if you at least tried to stick to discussion of the topic at hand. (I said maybe.)

Accountable America terrorizes by sending letters warning them to follow the law.

Which differs from the brownshirts breaking store-front windows…?

Intimidation is intimidation.

#4 lgm said:

Please stop comparing anyone you don’t like to Nazis. Not all of them are.

AH HAH!!!!! I KNEW some of them were!!!!!!