Your MSM racial bean-counting contest

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 12, 2008 06:06 PM

When I first glanced at ABC News blogger Jake Tapper’s post this morning calling on his readers to count the number of young, white women in the latest McCain ad — because, you know, showing Obama with young, white women is RAAAAACIST — I thought it was a clever parody of nutroots racial paranoia.

But no, it seems he was perfectly serious. And his unhinged commenters took the warped ball and ran with it:

McCain’s campaign is so blatantly racist it isn’t funny. They obviously are employing Spike Lee’s theory of fear of the big black johnson.

***

Glad to see you catching on, Jake. Of course they’d feature white girls as a code for “black man wants your white daughter.” This is not rocket science, it’s subliminal messaging 101.

When McCain chose (he is responsible for any actions of his staff) Paris and Britney as two celebrities in the “Celebrities” ad when Oprah and Tiger are the two most well-known people in the U.S. while Paris and Britney are approach has-been status, you know it’s because comparing Obama with two amazingly talented black persons doesn’t convey the message intended. With Paris and Britney, “sex with white women” is the message. With Oprah and Tiger the message would be “Jeez, black people are brilliant.” Not the message McCain particularly wants to convey.

We are talking about dog whistles and coded racial messages. It’s blatant and it’s real.

***

McCain campaign trying to get their money’s worth of all those focus groups on how racially biased they could go w/ their ads.

The ad was pulled, but not because of the Leftist grievance-mongering. As Allahpundit notes, incompetent or oblivious boobs in the McCain campaign infringed copyright by including a clip of Wayne’s World in the ad.

But back to the subject at hand: If Tapper wants to play racial bean-counting games and make insinuations of bigotry based on them, let’s turn the tables.

How many black on-air reporters and marquee bloggers and “senior national correspondents” does ABC News have covering the presidential campaign?

Searching…high…and low…can you find them?

And what does that say about the attitude of ABC News towards black reporters? Huh?

I infer that ABC News believes black reporters are not as capable as white reporters!

I infer that ABC News is subliminally instructing its audience to distrust non-white journalists!

I infer that ABC News management does not believe that black faces are as attractive as white faces!

I infer that ABC News hates diversity!

ABC: All Bigots Cleared!

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. McCain Pulls Celebrity Ad Over Copyright ClaimHere’s The Original Ad : BigMouthFrog
  2. August 12th Link Roundup | THE HOT JOINTS
  3. Obama vs. MLK’s Dream « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  4. Sister Toldjah
  5. Your MSM racial bean-counting contest — The 2008 Elections

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #404588
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:29 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I wouldn’t care if my President has purple and blue spots. Obama politics, inability to make a tough decision, and inexperience scares the hell out of me.

    What scares me even more is that Obumble is getting his foreign affairs advice (especially about the Middle East) from a highly misinformed, pro-Palestinian, uneducated actor named George Clooney.

  2. #404593
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:34 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Yeah but, Obama really liked him in the movie Sarianna (sp)../sarc off

  3. #404604
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:40 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Clooney = Worst.Batman.Ever.

  4. #404612
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:49 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    More like…

    Clooney=Worst.Actor.Ever

    (after Nicholas Cage)

  5. #404615
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:53 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    code for “black man wants your white daughter.”

    Funny. The ads featured white women expressing their desire for a black guy, not the other way around. O doesn’t want them for anything but their votes. Definitely projecting his own racism onto McCain.

    The analysis is also disgustingly misogynist. Tapper implies women do not own their own sexuality, that women shouldn’t be allowed to choose their own partners. Even conservatives believe women can and should control who they spread their legs for–what century are we living in, again?

  6. #404616
    On August 12th, 2008 at 11:57 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    All your white grlz are belong to Obama.

  7. #404683
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:11 am, DaveCal said:

    This stuff drives me crazy. What would the article claim if there had been black women in the ads? “McCain is trotting out all the bad black women he can find to scare the voters?” Seems to me the MSM is the racist here; always inferring racist intent. Or do we have to make sure we have equal numbers of white, black, brown, red, yellow, green, pink and blue in every ad?

  8. #404685
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:33 am, jaaakemm said:

    ABC has censored my comments since early AM, August 12th.

    So … I will post them here.

    Hey Jackaxx er Jake ….

    You mean like all those stupid white women that get placed behind the leading Marxist presidential candidate for his various speeches, town hall meetings, interviews and photo ops?

    Fake but accurate; slick, sleazy & shifty but NO substance.

    DO NOT pass GO, DO NOT collect $200; just go buy a clue.

  9. #404696
    On August 13th, 2008 at 4:22 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Clooney=Worst.Actor.Ever

    (after Nicholas Cage)

    Please, Adam Sandler wants his due…

  10. #404709
    On August 13th, 2008 at 6:09 am, FilmLadd said:

    THIS is why America is going to collapse in the near future. Russia is making a comeback and there will be NO protests by Code Pinkos in their country. They would kill them, which is what we should do here. To be strong you have to BE strong.

    You’re trying to be Jonathon Swift. It’s not working.

    Right after 9/11 and the “Authorization of Use of Force” declaration passed in Congress, I got a call from a good friend in military intel. His analysis: “we just lost the war, and it hasn’t even begun.”

    No democracy ever wins a sustained “hot” war with its civilian populace at peace and its soldiers at war (Korea, Vietnam).

    Bush should have asked for a true Declaration of War. Then the damage caused by Code Pink, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, et. al. could have been dealt with in proper fashion, WWII style.

    By failing to request this, GWB sowed the seeds of our country’s destruction, which, at this point, seems imminent.

  11. #404758
    On August 13th, 2008 at 8:37 am, abstractmind said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 6:09 am, FilmLadd said:

    In respect to that, I’m not sure i’d go that far.

    while i completely see, and on a level agree, with what you’re saying, making things sound that grim doesnt help.

    Can we win the war on Terrorism?
    No.
    The best we can do is contain it, stay a step ahead, and prevent as much damage as possible.

    Now, in relation to the topic.

    When people cry racism today, my first reaction is to look at the situation and see if its justified. Far too often in our society, i believe people cry wolf with tags like this, in order to garner attention or sympathy, or to cast their opponent in a negative light.

    Are there racists still? yes. And there always will be. Thats how it is. But saying everything that even remotely might be offensive is automatically racist is stretching the term.

  12. #404804
    On August 13th, 2008 at 9:09 am, Paul Revere said:

    Gosh darn it! Those uber smart Lefties have caught onto us again! (tin)Foiled again!

  13. #404962
    On August 13th, 2008 at 10:29 am, mchristian said:

    Glad to see you catching on, Jake. Of course they’d feature white girls as a code for “black man wants your white daughter.” This is not rocket science, it’s subliminal messaging 101.

    What the hell? Aren’t white girls good enough for black men? Blatant bigotry.

  14. #405578
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, in_awe said:

    ABC’s enthusiasm for racial bean counting was limited to the McCain video it seems. The web master on the ABC blog site twice removed my comments which merely and unemotionally reported that in the dozens of campaign photos on the official Obama web site I was able to count only 18 blacks. There were hundreds (thousands?) of whites, maybe 6 Asians, no notable Hispanics and none dressed in the mode of a certain religion.

    Late this morning (long after traffic had waned)they finally posted a version of my third message that they had severely censored.

    So much for seeking the truth, eh ABC?

    Not unlike the SF Gate controversy about censorship, ABC lets you see that your message is posted, but then within 15 minutes they will remove it or edit it. Oddly, even the most outrageous anti-McCain or anti-conservative comments remained untouched…

  15. #406522
    On August 14th, 2008 at 2:03 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    I’m still waiting for Obama to make another “did I mention he’s black” or “don’t look like other Presidents on the dollar bills” remark.

    I know what you’re thinking, punk. You are thinking, ‘Can I get away with more race-baiting, or will the McCain camp have an effective retort?’ Well, to tell you the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement… but as being successfully called on race-baiting is very powerful, and would blow your campaign clean off the rails, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky?… Well, do ya, punk?!”

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The indelible whiteness of MSNBC

November 23, 2009 05:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Palin-bashers of pallor.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

Diversity engineers at the Naval Academy

November 11, 2009 06:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, John McCain, Media Bias, Race relations



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook