See-Dub’s guide to Islamic fashion

By see-dubya  •  August 13, 2008 12:58 PM

It’s difficult to reconcile modern dress with the demands of a seventh-century religion. This weekend, walking through Georgetown, I saw an attractive young woman wearing a colorful hijab. She also wore a boldly-lettered T-Shirt that advised everyone reading it:

LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST

She can dress as she’d like, and I wish her well; I just think it’s an oddly mixed message. (I wonder whether they sell those shirts at Abercrombie and Fitch)?

Speaking of which, on the more radical end of things, here’s another interesting clash between modern, global culture and Islam. Sometimes you’ve got to dress up like a menacing terrorist and pose for the Reuters cameras, but your good keffiyeh’s at the cleaners.

So…you gotta improvise.

_________________

{Post by See-Dubya.}

Posted in: Islam

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. UNCoRRELATED
  2. See-Dub’s guide to Islamic fashion — The 2008 Elections

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #405343
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Necessity is the mofo of invention. Should a used a Care Bear shirt for additional irony points.

  2. #405346
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, WestCoastCoconut said:

    No not a sailor moon T-shirt? Death to the cartoonists!!!

  3. #405355
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I always thought the photos of Islamic youth celebrating on the streets after 11SEP01 were strange in that a majority of them were wearing US football jerseys and American-branded clothing.

  4. #405356
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, guitarplayer said:

    You’re giving me a headache with this one, see-dubya. I’m trying to understand how she can wear that shirt and still believe what she does. I need some asprin.

  5. #405368
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:11 pm, tre said:

    Did she have a bomb under it?

  6. #405371
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, b-cat said:

    What is truly bizarre is that the “protester” went through the trouble to keep the licensed image centered over the face.

  7. #405380
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    She also wore a boldly-lettered T-Shirt that advised everyone reading it:

    LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST

    Was she also wearing a pair of designer sweatpants that said “J U I C Y” across the butt?

  8. #405387
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, walterc said:

    b-cat said:

    What is truly bizarre is that the “protester” went through the trouble to keep the licensed image centered over the face.

    Maybe that’s how he sees himself. . .a cartoon fighting for allah.

    The Religion of Irony.

  9. #405389
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    So…you gotta improvise.

    “Manga Muslim” has a ring to it.

  10. #405390
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    How does one “live life to the fullest” when one is a second class person by mere fact of gender as ruled by her so called faith? Anti Islamic insult claimed in 5…4….3

  11. #405393
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:

    It’s difficult to reconcile modern dress with the demands of a seventh-century religion.

    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south who force their women to cover their legs and ankles… keep long hair…have separate male/female church events and keep submissive to the man (it’s in the bible, you see!)

    Note – I am talking about “dress codes” here only…well.. female dress codes, as it’s mainly the women that end up suffering….

  12. #405395
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    My first thought when I saw the little picture is, now they’re putting Burkhas on their mules.

  13. #405398
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, CyberCipher said:

    It’s a ploy to make us think that these people are harmless. Don’t buy into it unless you want to be a victim of a suicide bombing.

    My collie says:

    Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t mean they’re not out to get ya’, eh?

  14. #405401
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south who force their women to cover their legs and ankles…

    Please past a photo as proof that Christian fundamentalists force women to cover their ankles. I’ll even give you credit for an oddball sect.

  15. #405402
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:

    lovely equivalence argument. not really the same thing, since i dont remember alot of “honey, you didnt cover your legs, so i’m going to have to honor kill you and throw your corpse in the street” issues happening in the south, which is where i grew up.

    But hey, who cares? its just people asking for modesty, right? its not like we’re asking them to cover every square inch of their body, including the face, under threat of death…oh wait, thats right. We’re not.

  16. #405404
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Note – I am talking about “dress codes” here only…well.. female dress codes, as it’s mainly the women that end up suffering….

    Yeah, but you know what – if a woman decided to leave that church or wear pants, it’s highly unlikely (read: impossible) that she’d be gang-raped and murdered by her male relatives.

    Perspective, sausage. Perspective.

  17. #405406
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:
    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south

    So, do these evil Christian Fundamentalists walk around wearing pop culture tees that espouse lifestyles in direct contradiction to their own?

  18. #405410
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, b-cat said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:

    What south do you live in?

  19. #405412
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, Barry F. said:

    So…you gotta improvise.

    ROFLMAO

    That is tooooo funny! :lol:

  20. #405413
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:
    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south who force their women to cover their legs and ankles… keep long hair…have separate male/female church events and keep submissive to the man (it’s in the bible, you see!)

    Yes, there are some fundamentalist churches that espouse these views. The difference is that women aren’t honor-killed when they don’t dress to some arbitrary code. They can also leave that church without worring that they’ll get beheaded for doing so.

  21. #405414
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, b-cat said:
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:
    What south do you live in?

    He lives in “Caricature, AL”. It is a town known for its distinctively Deliverance-like qualities.

    He is a math teacher at the local K-12 schoolhouse.

  22. #405416
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:
    It’s difficult to reconcile modern dress with the demands of a seventh-century religion.
    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south who force their women to cover their legs and ankles… keep long hair…have separate male/female church events and keep submissive to the man (it’s in the bible, you see!)

    Islam: Multiple wives
    Christianity: marriage between one man and one woman

    Islam: Hijab, cannot drive let alone work outside of the home
    Christianity: Women have no such restrictions.

    Islam: Women submit to their husbands
    Christianity: Women are to submit to their husbands and likewise (you left this part out) husbands are to submit to their wives.

    I have the freedom to wear whatever I want being a Christian and that should entail for many Christian women dressing respectfully. You confuse dressing modestly with being forced to wear and outfit that puts Darth Vader to shame. Nice try. You lose.

  23. #405420
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, John Ansell said:

    AlohaGuy said #12, I thought the same thing when I looked at that picture. :lol:

  24. #405421
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    30pcs well said…. and thanks for causing me to smile…..sausage pwnd again

  25. #405423
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, sausage said:

    Not in the South in which I was born, raised and still live.

    I’m with AG…

    Please past a photo as proof that Christian fundamentalists force women to cover their ankles. I’ll even give you credit for an oddball sect.

    From what section of the South do you hail? :roll:

  26. #405425
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    What south do you live in?

    Sausage is right in the fact that there are some Protestant, evangelical/fundamentalist Christians who believe women should wear dresses and not cut their hair. It’s called “modesty” and given what passes for fashion in most of pop culture today, it’s refreshing to see women dress in ways that respect their bodies and their dignity.

    But there’s a vast difference between this (a fundamentalist woman’s outfit) and this (a burqua clad Muslim woman). You can see her arms, her hands, her face, her hair!

    The most noticeable difference that if a fundamentalist woman is raped, the blame lies with the man and the punishment will be directed at the rapist – not the woman. A jury will hear the woman’s testimony without her having to provide four credible male witnesses and she will not be found guilty of adultery and stoned.

    And, as I pointed out above, a woman who leaves the church or wears pants will not be ritualistically murdered for bringing “dishonor” to her family.

    Then again, I don’t expect sausage to wrap his head around the not-too-subtle differences between women under Islam and women under Christianity. Indeed, some level the charge there’s no difference between a burqua and a chapel veil (mantilla).

    There is a point where one gets so open minded, they’ve got no mind left at all.

  27. #405426
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:44 pm, abstractmind said:

    You confuse dressing modestly with being forced to wear and outfit that puts Darth Vader to shame

    .

    i’m not sure if some really hot girl wearing a vader helmet would be creepy, hott, or creepy hott. ;)

  28. #405428
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:45 pm, ajmontana said:

    the way they make them cover up, how would they even be able to recognize a virgin? and as poorly as they treat women on earth whats the big deal about having 72 of them? bassackwards dipsticks. :roll:

  29. #405429
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Creepy, just like those “Christian Fundamentalists” that populate Sausage’s village.

  30. #405432
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, warden said:

    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south…

    You’re right that the subjugation of women doesn’t belong and any modern culture and should have a bright light shown on it by right thinking journalists. Where your analysis falls short, though, is in comparing the practices of a seventh century death cult to those of a religion.

  31. #405434
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, b-cat said:

    He lives in “Caricature, AL”. It is a town known for its distinctively Deliverance-like qualities.

    Hey PBoilermaker, I’m sorry I thought that was where Daisy Mae and Daisy Duke live. It’s hard keeping these Southern caricatures straight!

  32. #405435
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    i’m not sure if some really hot girl wearing a vader helmet would be creepy, hott, or creepy hott.

    abstract,

    For sure that comment right there borders on creepy. But we luv ya anyway. ;-)

  33. #405436
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Creepy, just like those “Christian Fundamentalists” that populate Sausage’s village.

    Huh? It takes a village to raise a sausage? Quick! Someone alert Hillary! :lol:

  34. #405445
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, TXGator said:

    As a lifer from the South, it always amazes me that people from other places, having never spent any time here, know so much about it. When I left Georgia for college in California, I was quickly informed just how backwards, racist, and homophobic I actually was. I had no idea. Thank God the tolerant left never makes assumptions and/or believes in wild caricatures and stereotypes.
    I’ve never met people who have more of a crush on minorities than people from Vermont. Sure, they don’t know any black people, but they just knew that I had been oppressing them in the deep South. By the way, most of my family is black. We truly integrate down here.
    Good to be in Texas.

  35. #405448
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, tre said:

    We are Southern Baptists. My wife used to be Buddhist, but converted to Christianity.
    There are Christian sects where women dress in long dresses and wear no jewelry or makeup. But, I’ve never heard of any being “honor killed” if they were caught doing so. There’s no “Christian modesty police” whipping them if they are caught doing so.

    My wife wears shorts and tee shirts. She wears jeans to Church. And no one says anything.

  36. #405450
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, wighttrasch said:

    If you want to pretend you know (Christian)scripture, sausage, at least get it right. Women are to submit to their husbands, and husbands are commanded to love their wives.(Eph. 5:22-25)

    Thus spake Paul.

  37. #405451
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:44 pm, abstractmind said:

    i’m not sure if some really hot girl wearing a vader helmet would be creepy, hott, or creepy hott.

    What? She’s not part of your harem, abstract? ;-) :lol:

    P.S.
    My boots are on standby for another day like yesterday
    . ;-)

  38. #405452
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Its not creepy unless i dress up like the Emperor ;)

  39. #405455
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:59 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    tre,

    If libs like sausage don’t have their prejudices… what do they have? Don’t rob him of the one thing that keeps him going… please! For the sake of Michelle O’s kids, man.

  40. #405457
    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:59 pm, abstractmind said:

    Oh, not yet Barry…
    not yet.

    She’ll join the AbstractDark Side as well…

  41. #405458
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:00 pm, Bess said:

    A few christian sects do require women to wear seriously ugly clothing –like friends or amish. The difference is in islam women are required to wear head to toe black hijabs in a 100 degree heat–that is not fasion–that is a form of torture and a way to control the breeding livestock.Also I never seen an amish girl beeing taken out and beaten with axe handles for showing a wrist or an ancle in public.
    Sick and tired of all this” but these evil christian fundamentalists ” bull.

  42. #405462
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Sausage would like to remind you all that whenever a truly heinous act is committed by a person or group, remember that “Christians” have always done something even more heinous.

    Also, it should be noted that the creepiest of all Christians (the pesky-but-quaint “Fundamentalist” terrorist-sects) live “in the South” with Sausage.

  43. #405466
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:03 pm, wighttrasch said:

    My point is that I think the women are getting the best deal…all we have to do is submit. The guys have to do the hard part.

  44. #405472
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:05 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:57 pm,

    wighttrasch said:

    If you want to pretend you know (Christian)scripture, sausage, at least get it right. Women are to submit to their husbands, and husbands are commanded to love their wives.(Eph. 5:22-25)

    Thus spake Paul.

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:03 pm, wighttrasch said:

    My point is that I think the women are getting the best deal…all we have to do is submit. The guys have to do the hard part.

    Especially if you consider what the rest of that scripture says about Christ laying down His life for the church and how husbands should do the same for their wives.

  45. #405474
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, tre said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:59 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    tre,

    If libs like sausage don’t have their prejudices… what do they have? Don’t rob him of the one thing that keeps him going… please! For the sake of Michelle O’s kids, man.

    Alright 30.
    You’re absitively, posolutely right, Sausage. Every day I hold a gun to my wifes head and force her to wear a thick wool blanket over her head. I finally had a little mercy and allowed her to cut eyeholes in it.

  46. #405477
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, wighttrasch said:

    guitarplayer—that’s why I don’t mind sleeping on the wet spot every now & then…! ;)

  47. #405478
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, BrianNY said:

    True.. but the same can be said for the Christian fundamentalists here in the south…

    The true can be said of ANY radical offshoot of a larger organization.

    For instance, some legitimate political parties have radical members who vote against restricting the practice of placing newborn babies into supply closets to die of starvation and deprivation.

    The larger question is, aside from their limited compounds, where else do you see Southern Christian fundamentalists subjecting women on the comparable scale of global Islam?

  48. #405479
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:09 pm, JamieD said:

    Where your analysis falls short, though, is in comparing the practices of a seventh century death cult to those of a religion.

    Very well stated Warden #29.

    I also agree (being from a background of a religion often called “holy rollers”) that the only retribution for choosing to deviate from “accepted” modest dress is a public disapproval, and possibly disassociation if the practice continues.

    And, of course, one always has the option to seek a different place of worship without fear of ANY physical harm or harassment (unlike the actions of the Demon-crats when you disagree with their “religion”).

  49. #405481
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, b-cat said:

    Alright 30.
    You’re absitively, posolutely right, Sausage. Every day I hold a gun to my wifes head and force her to wear a thick wool blanket over her head. I finally had a little mercy and allowed her to cut eyeholes in it.

    Brilliant.

  50. #405482
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, BrianNY said:

    true s/b same

  51. #405483
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, JamieD said:

    OOPs! that was #30, NOT #29. :)

  52. #405485
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, tre said:

    Especially if you consider what the rest of that scripture says about Christ laying down His life for the church and how husbands should do the same for their wives.

    I mentioned that to my wife when she was asking about how Christians treat their wives. Malaysia is an officially Islamic country. I told her that the Bible says:
    Ephesians 5:25
    25Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her

    Thus, I should love her enough to be willing to die to protect her.

  53. #405500
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, KitFox said:

    It’s difficult to reconcile modern dress with the demands of a seventh-century religion.

    In some cases it seems quite easy. A couple was walking in just as I was leaving work the other day, in 90-degree weather. The wife was swathed in fabric from head to foot, walking several paces behind her husband, and carrying their probably 5-year-old son. The husband? Jeans and a short-sleeved shirt emblazoned with the words “Some men are stupid. The rest are bachelors.” You know, just in case the casual observer might miss the misogyny without a witty t-shirt slogan.

  54. #405503
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:21 pm, wolverine20 said:

    I don’t get it – I saw a muslim women the other day wearing a hijab and meanwhile as she goes up the steps from the subway to the street, she’s got the top of a thong coming up over the waste of her pants!

  55. #405506
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, tre said:

    Alright 30.
    You’re absitively, posolutely right, Sausage. Every day I hold a gun to my wifes head and force her to wear a thick wool blanket over her head. I finally had a little mercy and allowed her to cut eyeholes in it.

    ROFLMAO :lol:

  56. #405513
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:25 pm, mom2jack said:

    I was out with my 2 kids Sunday, at a Ross store, looking at shoes. We turned down one aisle and there were 2 women, fully clad in black Muslim garb, with only their eyes showing (this is in Beaverton, OR). My 3-year-old (we all know how 3yo simply blurt out whatever they observe), with her eyes wide, pointed to them and said, “Mommy…GHOSTS!”

  57. #405520
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:25 pm, mom2jack said:
    My 3-year-old (we all know how 3yo simply blurt out whatever they observe), with her eyes wide, pointed to them and said, “Mommy…GHOSTS!”

    So, your 3-yr old is a racist “Fundamentalist Christian” who intimidates mooslims in public?

    Is Oregon in “the South”?

  58. #405525
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:28 pm, sonofdy said:

    kind of ruins the whole killer look ;-)

  59. #405526
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    He is a math teacher at the local K-12 schoolhouse.

    And part-time banjo player.

  60. #405529
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, guitarplayer said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:12 pm, tre said:

    I mentioned that to my wife when she was asking about how Christians treat their wives. Malaysia is an officially Islamic country. I told her that the Bible says:
    Ephesians 5:25
    25Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her

    Thus, I should love her enough to be willing to die to protect her.

    Very true. Although, I think there is more to it than just be willing to die for her. I think it’s all about every day putting her needs ahead of your own. I’m no Biblical scholar, but I think the two parts of wives obeying husbands and husbands being willing to die for them all come together in Jesus’ message of self-sacrifce.

  61. #405533
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Omu said:

    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

  62. #405535
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:25 pm, mom2jack said:

    My 3-year-old (we all know how 3yo simply blurt out whatever they observe), with her eyes wide, pointed to them and said, “Mommy…GHOSTS!”

    So, your 3-yr old is a racist “Fundamentalist Christian” who intimidates mooslims in public?

    :lol:

    Depends – does her three-year-old like ethnic food?

  63. #405539
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:32 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

    Prove it.

  64. #405540
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I don’t get it – I saw a muslim women the other day wearing a hijab and meanwhile as she goes up the steps from the subway to the street, she’s got the top of a thong coming up over the waste of her pants!

    You didn’t do anything violent to her for your thoughts did you? BTW, when underwear first caught on (pun intended) it was only brazen hussies who wore them. Modest women apparently (or not) went without.

  65. #405544
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Christianity has always taught that men and women are different, yes. Men have inherent traits that women will never have (no matter how hard some feminists try to emulate them) and women have inherent traits men will never have (no matter how hard some feminists try to castrate them).

    But – in God’s eyes – we’re deserving of equal respect and love.

    So nice try, but theology really isn’t your forte.

  66. #405551
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought Jesus said the commandments could be boiled down to “Love God, Love your neighbor as yourself”. Don’t see the gender inequality.

  67. #405552
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, abstractmind said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Omu said:
    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

    yawn.

    Still the equivalence argument. As useless as it is redundant.

    Tell me, what’s your opinion on the topic at hand? :)

  68. #405562
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, englishqueen01 said:
    Depends – does her three-year-old like ethnic food?

    I still can’t believe that there are “adults” who think babies can be profiled as “racists” based on food preference.

    Seriously, c’mon now.

  69. #405564
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    He is a math teacher at the local K-12 schoolhouse.

    And part-time banjo player.

    Hmmmm? Sounds familiar, huh? I wonder if I’ve seen him before, somewhere. :lol:

  70. #405571
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, b-cat said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Omu said:
    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

    Is that a southern or a western-type caricature now?

  71. #405576
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Hmmmm? Sounds familiar, huh? I wonder if I’ve seen him before, somewhere.

    Now Barry, lgm has already warned you about posting links to his pic in other threads.

  72. #405583
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, b-cat said:
    Is that a southern or a western-type caricature now?

    I thought you knew. Christians all talk like Yosemite Sam. Omu is just trying to communicate effectively.

    Everyone in “the South” talks that way.

  73. #405600
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Barry F. said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Hmmmm? Sounds familiar, huh? I wonder if I’ve seen him before, somewhere.

    Now Barry, lgm has already warned you about posting links to his pic in other threads.

    Hmmmm? I guess that was a pre-Hair Club for Men photo. Do you suppose they consider it a success story? ;-)

  74. #405602
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, TXRose said:

    Hey, I’m still slack jawed about something that I saw in
    Forwarded Funnies August 4, 2008 called a red neck
    tank top. Apparently, even women from Alabama have
    to improvise once in a while. She was wearing a pair
    of men’s briefs ( heather or denim blue in color),
    backwards, with the crotch cut out ( for her neck and
    head to fit through). This was a picture of a woman,
    in Alabama, leaving one store ( a Wal Mart, I think) and
    heading for a flea market. One of my counselees
    brought it in to show me.

  75. #405603
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, Barry F. said:

    Enough fun for today. Got to run and pick up the kids.

    Have fun, all! :-)

  76. #405604
    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, John Deaux said:

    What did you expect from an angry muslim? There was no way he was cutting up his Powerpuff Girls shirt.

    BTW, sausage needs to come to South Beach to see all of the fundamentalist women frolicking.

  77. #405662
    On August 13th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, JamieD said:

    OMG! Gender inequality.. no way!

    WAY DUDE. Its inherent in the physical makeup (literal, not additive).

    What the left fails to realize is the actual TRUTH of physical, emotional and chemical differences (from bone mass, bone development, hormones, muscle mass and etc). A little physical hack job and changes in external appearance can not, and will not ever change the gender of an individual.

    But..back to the topic at hand…:)

    Christianity can only be compared to the radical muslims when one remembers the Crusades or our own country’s shame of witch hunts that resulted in burning people alive.

    Yes, unfortunately some radical Americans once performed these heinous acts in the name of religion, but have since learned of the greater good of compassion, patience and respect for an individuals right to have their own beliefs as long as they do not harm or interfere with the rights of others.

    I have no problem with stopping radicals from harming the innocent even if it means using our military force. As an innocent victim of radical abuse, I can empathize with the victims of radical Islam and do everything within my power to stop them, even if it means bloodshed.

  78. #405788
    On August 13th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, Little Ma said:

    SAUSAGE

    It’s a little late, but I have to get into this discussion. Since I’ve lived in the South most of my entire, long life, I’m qualified to ask you this question:

    Sugar, have you just completely lost your mind?

  79. #405827
    On August 13th, 2008 at 4:08 pm, tre said:

    LittleMa

    The fact that he reads this blog shows he still has enough good sense to try to learn.
    Don’t give up on him yet, there’s still hope for him.

  80. #405868
    On August 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I still can’t believe that there are “adults” who think babies can be profiled as “racists” based on food preference.

    Neither can I. But such is the nature of liberalism…

  81. #405924
    On August 13th, 2008 at 4:55 pm, DaveC said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And part-time banjo player.

    .. And he noticed that you have a real purdy mouth, Aloha Guy..

  82. #406145
    On August 13th, 2008 at 7:12 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought Jesus said the commandments could be boiled down to “Love God, Love your neighbor as yourself”. Don’t see the gender inequality.

    I think you’ll just have to put him down as a closet Rusty. So far their talking points have been very closely mirrored. Calls himself a “skeptical conservative” and a “Christian” but everything he has spoken on in his short 1 day since joining this blog has proven contrary to that. He also has a really really hard time understanding the whole hate the sin love the sinner part of it. The whole respect but don’t coddle and condone thing flies right over his head. Trying to describe to him that I could show compassion to illegal aliens by (like what my church already does) helping build a food and water shelter a few miles back on the Mexican side of the border for those who have been turned away so they don’t die in the desert is compassionate. But at the same time pushing for legislation that gets more of them deported immediately and for tougher laws on businesses that are using them to avoid paying taxes and breaking the law and pushing for a fence (a real one with guards that are not hand tied by our government’s pandering to Mexico). But hey, he’s only been here a day. Maybe he’ll do better with a little more practice :D

  83. #406190
    On August 13th, 2008 at 7:42 pm, atheling said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 2:31 pm, Omu said:

    Christianity, by and large, is also based on gender inequality. So you may all kindly remove yourselves from that thar high horse.

    You show me any other group throughout history where women have risen in society and have shared in education, public life, sciences, etc… to the degree that women have from the Judeo-Christian West.

    Any time. Any where.

    Ignoramus.

  84. #406500
    On August 14th, 2008 at 1:05 am, zombywolf said:

    My minor was in Women’s Studies (two majors English and History) and sometimes I have a hard time not yelling at women in hijabs to throw off the chains of their oppressors–it just overcomes me and I have to bite my lip–the worst are the ones totally covered while their husbands and sons barely have shorts and shirts on–in the Middle Tennessee heat and humidity
    My fundamentalist Christian relatives show ankles–they just don’t wear overly revealing clothes and a few cut their hair–One of them (dead now) used to be one of those girls that walked on the wings of bi-planes in the 20s/30s

  85. #407971
    On August 14th, 2008 at 8:49 pm, twofoot said:

    On August 13th, 2008 at 1:44 pm, abstractmind said:

    i’m not sure if some really hot girl wearing a vader helmet would be creepy, hott, or creepy hott.

    Wow… Not another Star Wars geek?

    As for the topic at hand, I am not even going to bother answering any nonsense that suggests treatment of modern Christian women is even remotely akin to treatment of modern Muslim women. Anyone who honestly believes such drivel isn’t worth the time.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

9/11 families issue call to action

November 23, 2009 10:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Never forget. Act now.

Gitmo detainees will use trials as “platform” to bash America

November 22, 2009 10:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

“Their assessment is negative.”

Barbie meets sharia

November 22, 2009 10:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

76 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Diversity engineers at the Naval Academy

November 11, 2009 06:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The 14th murder victim of the Fort Hood jihadi massacre

November 11, 2009 02:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Islam



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook