lgm said:

Al jazeera for all its faults, is more accurate, and balanced, than Fox.

Yup. They accurately predict all terrorists attacks and have a camera right there when it happens. Wonder why that is?

On August 15th, 2008 at 5:11 pm, neocon527 said:

And each of them, to one extent or another and for whatever time, have made decisions that have changed nations and the world for the better, while simultaneously reasserting America’s dominance and will to remain free and unimpeded. Can the same be said of clinton?

* MIT and Stanford
Which proves what, that you’re a trust fund naif with no real-world experience? We all guessed as much from your super-lib posts.

Don’t feel too bad. I mean, for one, you went where Condi was a professor and then provost. And there are plenty of trust fun naifs with no real world experience who’ve made something of themselves.

George W. Bush – Yale (preceded by his time in Andover)

Dick Cheney – Yale (though he did “flunk out”)

Wolfowitz – Cornell and U. Chicago

Doug Feith – Harvard and Georgetwon

Donald Rumsfeld – Princeton

Some answers:

* I’m sure the Economist also will cover the Democratic convention.

To the detriment of their readership, you’re probably right. There is nothing to be learned at Obama’s Denver Revival.

* MIT and Stanford

Which proves what, that you’re a trust fund naif with no real-world experience? We all guessed as much from your super-lib posts.

* Fox reported the discovery of WMDs in Iraq every day for a year and never retracted a single claim.

And all that aluminum tubing was intended for what – toothpaste?

* I’m a big opponent of fuzzy math, both in education and in politics (e.g. Reagan, Bush, Bush, McCain all claim they will balance the budget by cutting taxes while Clinton did balance the budget by raising them)

Again, the Republicans and Dick Morris tied clinton’s hands on the budget and taxes and excess spending; in fact, had clinton not over taxed the U.S. economy during that time, the dot com bubble burst might never have been so dramatic and its affects so severe.

Al jazeera for all its faults, is more accurate, and balanced, than Fox.

As much as we all know that’s a false statement, please keep in mind, LGM, that the Muslims you the rest of the secularists defend will NOT be coming to your rescue, but plotting your destruction.

And you’re gullible enough to help them right along.

Also, have you even seen al-Jazeera or Fox News? I mean, the unedited, non-you tube/media matters version?

Because if you haven’t it’s like grabbing in the dark, and nearly every liberal I know who hates FOX has never even seen it in the full context.

On August 14th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, ajmontana said:

Guess who’s going to be in RNC?

ROFLMAO What did you expect, AJ?

On August 14th, 2008 at 4:18 pm, lgm said:

Al jazeera for all its faults, is more accurate, and balanced, than Fox.

Well, lgm, I have to hand it to you. You surprised me. I didn’t think you could get any farther out there than you already were.

Al Jazeera.

You expect any less for coverage of the “citizen of the world?”

Bows in the direction of The Idiot.

We’re not worthy to be in the presence of such stupidity. UGH

On August 14th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, Fineous Reese said:

You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.

Love the movie but had to fix that!