Saddle up: Saddleback Forum open thread; Obama on abortion: “Above my pay grade,” attacks Clarence Thomas

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 16, 2008 07:08 PM

For those of you watching the Rick Warren/Obama/McCain show tonight, here’s your open thread.

Watch online here.

Wake me up if anything interesting happens.

Like I said before, I’m not holding my breath…

***

Obama on abortion: It’s “above his pay grade.” What the…

Obama on which Supreme Court justice he wouldn’t have nominated: Clarence Thomas.

Disturbingly, commenters note, the Saddleback audience cheered.

RACIST!

(Update): Allah’s got the near-gaffetastic video of Obama’s Thomas remarks.

Mark Levin: “On Obama’s best day he can’t hold a candle to Thomas’s intelligence.”
***

McCain on when babies are entitled to human rights: “At the moment of conception…this presidency will have pro-life policies.”

Define marriage: “A union between a man and a woman. One man and one woman.”

Warren asks about California marriage preservation proposition and Calif. Supreme Court. “California Supreme Court was wrong.”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Saddle up: Saddleback Forum open thread — The 2008 Elections
  2. Up North Mommy Talks Politics » Rick Warren Forum
  3. Good For You, John McCain « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  4. Vetting Obama-Your Right To Know - Page 12 - World Affairs Board
  5. PAXALLES
  6. Rick Warren isn't worth a used dip of snuff | The TIW Blog
  7. McCain v. Obama at the Saddleback Church Civic Forum « Axis of Right
  8. Is THIS Question “Above Obama’s Pay Grade”? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
  9. Top 10 reasons Obama voted against the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act : BigMouthFrog
  10. Right Voices » Blog Archive » “On Obama’s best day he can’t hold a candle to {Clarence} Thomas’s intelligence.”
  11. Rick Warren Interviews Obama and McCain on Christian Faith Matters - Video and Reviews « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  12. Obama’s Abortion Alliance: « Riggword Weblog
  13. “The Justice Nobody Knows”: 60 Minutes Interview with Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #412008
    On August 18th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I agree that McCain was very impressive at this forum. Obama’s performance was bad to awful. Dodging and weaving…. Man, I thought he was going to break out into “The Hustle” at one point.

    I know that Obama was lying his butt off on every point (except for his contempt for the brilliant and honorable Justice Thomas).

    The only problem is that I no longer think McCain is being straight with us either. He knows what he has to say to draw conservatives back into the fold. But, 10 years of his RINOism has convinced me that he is not sincere when he talks like this.

    I will not be voting for John McCain this year.

  2. #412262
    On August 18th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, Bill Grant said:

    “RINO”

    Main Entry:
    1 ri·no· \rii-ˈnoo\
    Function:
    noun
    Date:
    1989

    1: A DNC wedge phrase to split the republican party and elect a socialist.

  3. #412300
    On August 18th, 2008 at 7:04 pm, Send_Me said:

    On August 17th, 2008 at 11:12 pm, nyc123me said:
    Watch out Send_Me – according to jsmiddleton4 and Bill Grant, that makes you an Obama supporter.

    Here’s my reasoning for not voting for either candidate and voting my conscience.
    1. 2000: Honestly, how different were Bush and Gore? How large was the workable pool of voters (# of swing/moderate voters?)
    2. 2004: How different were Bush and Kerry? I mean, come on, how many liberal or incompetent policy proposals has Bush supported? Did that pool of workable voters increase or decrease in size?
    3. 2008: We see that McCain and Obama are very much alike, focusing not on their bases of support, but rather on the lukewarm crowd, the folks who are swayed by cheesy commercials, the ones who really don’t care about politics but want a good show. The far left is alienated, as well as the far right.
    2012 prediction: The candidates will be even more alike than they are now, and we’ll once again ask ourselves, “which of the evils should we choose?” The problem though is that the differences will not be as apparent.
    Conclusion: Unless we wish to continue down this road, where neither party cares to remain responsive to its base, we must make them realize that we are still sentient beings who vote with our brains and conscience, not out of convenience.
    So, if you really do care about the state of this country, you will vote your conscience when choosing a President, and you will vote the bums of the 14% Congress out of office.
    Also, consider this: “Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” ~John Quincy Adams

  4. #412327
    On August 18th, 2008 at 7:21 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I respectfully disagree. After watching the GOP race the Dems to socialism over the last 8 years your proposed definition just doesn’t match reality.

    National GOP leadership have split the party by trying to become the “other party of big govenment.”

    I wish it weren’t so a $3.1 Trillion proposed budget for FY 2009 is hard to argue with.

    On August 18th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, Bill Grant said:
    “RINO”

    Main Entry:
    1 ri·no· \rii-ˈnoo\
    Function:
    noun
    Date:
    1989

    1: A DNC wedge phrase to split the republican party and elect a socialist.

  5. #412413
    On August 18th, 2008 at 8:34 pm, Bill Grant said:

    I respectfully disagree.

    There is an ongoing movement out of the Democratic underground to split the Republican vote by going on to conservative websites and tossing out the word “RINO” referring to those who are supporting John McCain for president, as well as other canards about him not being conservative enough. The objective is to get the “conservative dupes” to “stay on their tractors” this election day by poisoning the well for John McCain. Be on guard and have your pitchforks, torches and nooses at the ready.

    “After watching the GOP race the Dems to socialism over the last 8 years your proposed definition just doesn’t match reality.”

    Buddy, have you looked at what Obama proposes to do? That’s socialism. Yes, government has grown too big under the republicans, McCain has been an advocate of limited government while other republicans acted like pigs at the trough. That is one of the reasons he has made enemies with other republicans.
    McCain is one of the only senators to forgo earmarks which has been one of the major budget busters and he has vowed to veto pork laden budgets if he becomes president.

    “I wish it weren’t so a $3.1 Trillion proposed budget for FY 2009 is hard to argue with.”

    Congress creates budgets, not the president and congress is controlled by the democrats. Additionally, Bush’s blunders are not McCains.

    Only 6 comments away from 800… Unfortunately I have run out of ways to say that electing Obama doesn’t have anything to do with conservative principals.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom