<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sore loser: Obama and Obamedia accuse McCain of &#8220;cheating&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:14:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Palin saca a la luz al verdadero Obama (y VI) &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-515910</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin saca a la luz al verdadero Obama (y VI) &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-515910</guid>
		<description>[...] misma, a los dos. El Senador Obama comete varios errores en dicha&#160; entrevista televisada. La campaña de Obama acusa la campaña de McCain de recibir de antemano las preguntas que le hizo al Senador McCain el Pastor Rick Warren y se asegura de que la reportera de la NBC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] misma, a los dos. El Senador Obama comete varios errores en dicha&nbsp; entrevista televisada. La campaña de Obama acusa la campaña de McCain de recibir de antemano las preguntas que le hizo al Senador McCain el Pastor Rick Warren y se asegura de que la reportera de la NBC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Column &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can You Hear Me Now?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-424019</link>
		<dc:creator>The Column &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can You Hear Me Now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-424019</guid>
		<description>[...] conservative response is pretty much summed up by Michelle Malkin: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conservative response is pretty much summed up by Michelle Malkin: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupid Is As Stupid Does &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413871</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupid Is As Stupid Does &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413871</guid>
		<description>[...] and on point. So on target, in fact, Obama&#8217;s minions immediately called foul and claimed he cheated. Figures. Those without answers always wag their fingers at those who do and complain about how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and on point. So on target, in fact, Obama&#8217;s minions immediately called foul and claimed he cheated. Figures. Those without answers always wag their fingers at those who do and complain about how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight_Talk_Luigi</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413788</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight_Talk_Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413788</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LGM&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;We should hold Presidential candidates at least to the standard we hold athletes — play by the rules or get the boot. McCain broke a rule designed to make sure he was clean. He came late. He had the opportunity to cheat. He should have some consequences.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course! He may have had an slight advantage over the great Barack! We can&#039;t have that! Barack has been oppressed his whole life because of his inner city roots and dark skin! Whoop-de -doo! We must use government intervention and more tax money to punish McCain even though the Constitution says :

Innocent until proven guilty! 

And you just said, LGM, &quot;we don&#039;t know!&quot; 

But in this post, you assume that McCain did listen in, just like you said he had a TV. 

Do you know that for sure as well?

No, you don&#039;t! 

Typical liberal bias, on a conservative blog of all places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LGM</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>We should hold Presidential candidates at least to the standard we hold athletes — play by the rules or get the boot. McCain broke a rule designed to make sure he was clean. He came late. He had the opportunity to cheat. He should have some consequences.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course! He may have had an slight advantage over the great Barack! We can&#8217;t have that! Barack has been oppressed his whole life because of his inner city roots and dark skin! Whoop-de -doo! We must use government intervention and more tax money to punish McCain even though the Constitution says :</p>
<p>Innocent until proven guilty! </p>
<p>And you just said, LGM, &#8220;we don&#8217;t know!&#8221; </p>
<p>But in this post, you assume that McCain did listen in, just like you said he had a TV. </p>
<p>Do you know that for sure as well?</p>
<p>No, you don&#8217;t! </p>
<p>Typical liberal bias, on a conservative blog of all places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight_Talk_Luigi</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413782</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight_Talk_Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413782</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LGM&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Nice comeback, but I don’t agree. This entire flap was caused by McCain people going ballistic over one sentence spoken by a news person on TV. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

ONE sentence, A (as in single newsperson)? 

Come on, LGM! Rush had playback of almost 10 different journalists talking about the &quot;cone of silence.&quot; 

The liberal MSM is scrambling to defend Obama because let&#039;s face it: He lost this round, okay? 

They propped him up into something he isn&#039;t and now that the REAL Obama is showing himself, now they must come to the rescue! 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama did not offer it as an excuse. Obama supporters agree that his answers were not influenced by McCain listening in (if he was).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The reason why Obama isn&#039;t making it an excuse is so he doesn&#039;t further discredit himself. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if he was told to keep his mouth shut so the media can do all the defending for him.  



&lt;blockquote&gt;If the McCain people had said: “Yes, he was supposed to be in isolation, though he was not in the beginning. We apologize for our failure to comply with this aspect of the agreement. We state for the record that John McCain did not listen in nor was he given any information about the questions.” That would (might) have been true. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, and then what? You&#039;d just say you wouldn&#039;t believe him, then or talk about some other republican scandal. You&#039;d never say &quot;how nice of the republicans to do that.&quot;


&lt;blockquote&gt;Instead they made themselves look foolish by blaming Obama for their violation of the agreement.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LGM, who&#039;s blaming Obama? We&#039;re talking about the media here. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s “might” instead of “would” because McCain’s people have not actually denied that they listened and provided their candidate with information.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So what if he did? Is Barack Obama, the guy you AND the media have been defending for months now, Mr. Tough who&#039;s gonna meet with all the foreign dictators, really going to scream that McCain may have had a slight advantage?

What do you think will happen when he goes to Caracas or Tehran? Do you think they&#039;ll level the playing field for him, lgm?

All your whimpering proves is that Barack Obama isn&#039;t fit to be in any sort of role in the government, and it&#039;s mainly his skin color and age and looks that driving the show. 

Howard Dean, you can quote me on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LGM</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Nice comeback, but I don’t agree. This entire flap was caused by McCain people going ballistic over one sentence spoken by a news person on TV. </p></blockquote>
<p>ONE sentence, A (as in single newsperson)? </p>
<p>Come on, LGM! Rush had playback of almost 10 different journalists talking about the &#8220;cone of silence.&#8221; </p>
<p>The liberal MSM is scrambling to defend Obama because let&#8217;s face it: He lost this round, okay? </p>
<p>They propped him up into something he isn&#8217;t and now that the REAL Obama is showing himself, now they must come to the rescue! </p>
<blockquote><p>Obama did not offer it as an excuse. Obama supporters agree that his answers were not influenced by McCain listening in (if he was).</p></blockquote>
<p>The reason why Obama isn&#8217;t making it an excuse is so he doesn&#8217;t further discredit himself. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he was told to keep his mouth shut so the media can do all the defending for him.  </p>
<blockquote><p>If the McCain people had said: “Yes, he was supposed to be in isolation, though he was not in the beginning. We apologize for our failure to comply with this aspect of the agreement. We state for the record that John McCain did not listen in nor was he given any information about the questions.” That would (might) have been true. </p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, and then what? You&#8217;d just say you wouldn&#8217;t believe him, then or talk about some other republican scandal. You&#8217;d never say &#8220;how nice of the republicans to do that.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead they made themselves look foolish by blaming Obama for their violation of the agreement.</p></blockquote>
<p>LGM, who&#8217;s blaming Obama? We&#8217;re talking about the media here. </p>
<blockquote><p>It’s “might” instead of “would” because McCain’s people have not actually denied that they listened and provided their candidate with information.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what if he did? Is Barack Obama, the guy you AND the media have been defending for months now, Mr. Tough who&#8217;s gonna meet with all the foreign dictators, really going to scream that McCain may have had a slight advantage?</p>
<p>What do you think will happen when he goes to Caracas or Tehran? Do you think they&#8217;ll level the playing field for him, lgm?</p>
<p>All your whimpering proves is that Barack Obama isn&#8217;t fit to be in any sort of role in the government, and it&#8217;s mainly his skin color and age and looks that driving the show. </p>
<p>Howard Dean, you can quote me on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tettes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413753</link>
		<dc:creator>tettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Conspiracy crap is conspiracy crap, no matter what syle you wrap it in, it is still just paranoia.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Who defines what is paranoia though? I feel I&#039;m making a legitimate point, but no one here will address it. Sadly, that reaction only bolsters my belief. I&#039;m open minded here...but I&#039;m new to this site and I guess I&#039;m realizing if you don&#039;t agree with everyone else&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s difficult to have an actual conversation. I&#039;ll keep trying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Conspiracy crap is conspiracy crap, no matter what syle you wrap it in, it is still just paranoia.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who defines what is paranoia though? I feel I&#8217;m making a legitimate point, but no one here will address it. Sadly, that reaction only bolsters my belief. I&#8217;m open minded here&#8230;but I&#8217;m new to this site and I guess I&#8217;m realizing if you don&#8217;t agree with everyone else&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s difficult to have an actual conversation. I&#8217;ll keep trying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413378</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413378</guid>
		<description>Conspiracy crap is conspiracy crap, no matter what syle you wrap it in, it is still just paranoia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspiracy crap is conspiracy crap, no matter what syle you wrap it in, it is still just paranoia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tettes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-413248</link>
		<dc:creator>tettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-413248</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did you not read? Are you incapable of understanding the English language? They BOTH had access to some of the questions beforehand. That has been freaking established in an interview with the REv. following the event.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Instead of hurling insults, perhaps you should take the time to read my comment more carefully. My comment has to do with the McCain response, which isn&#039;t a blanket &quot;no, we did not hear any questions while the Obama portion of the event was taking place.&quot; That&#039;s all McCain had to say. But instead, he parses words, saying &quot;we had no live broadcast&quot; or some other generic phrase that does not rule out anything. My comment has nothing to do with the fact that some questions were made available to the candidates before hand. But nice try at deflecting my point (as did everyone who responded to me....figures). Actually responding to my point would force you to admit McCain is parsing. Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did you not read? Are you incapable of understanding the English language? They BOTH had access to some of the questions beforehand. That has been freaking established in an interview with the REv. following the event.</p></blockquote>
<p>Instead of hurling insults, perhaps you should take the time to read my comment more carefully. My comment has to do with the McCain response, which isn&#8217;t a blanket &#8220;no, we did not hear any questions while the Obama portion of the event was taking place.&#8221; That&#8217;s all McCain had to say. But instead, he parses words, saying &#8220;we had no live broadcast&#8221; or some other generic phrase that does not rule out anything. My comment has nothing to do with the fact that some questions were made available to the candidates before hand. But nice try at deflecting my point (as did everyone who responded to me&#8230;.figures). Actually responding to my point would force you to admit McCain is parsing. Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412770</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412770</guid>
		<description>its there just not on front page, you have to scroll through the lead stories now....  his pic is up after the hurricane story.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its there just not on front page, you have to scroll through the lead stories now&#8230;.  his pic is up after the hurricane story.  <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danimal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412761</link>
		<dc:creator>danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412761</guid>
		<description>In defense of the nutroots, that mysterious bulge they saw on Bush was a &lt;em&gt;backbone&lt;/em&gt;. I&#039;m not surprised they wouldn&#039;t recognize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense of the nutroots, that mysterious bulge they saw on Bush was a <em>backbone</em>. I&#8217;m not surprised they wouldn&#8217;t recognize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412760</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412760</guid>
		<description>AJ,

Your link didn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ,</p>
<p>Your link didn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412682</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know which is funnier:

&lt;blockquote&gt; On August 19th, 2008 at 7:55 am, ajmontana said:

“Faux News Alert” that Obambi is blaming his poor showing on the &quot;shrinkage factor,&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Purplepeep&#039;s

&lt;blockquote&gt;Soft bigotry of low expectations.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

or any of lgm&#039;s desperate attempts at grasping at straws to defend Obambi and call McCain a cheater and a liar.


All of them are howlers, but lgm is consistently hilarious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know which is funnier:</p>
<blockquote><p> On August 19th, 2008 at 7:55 am, ajmontana said:</p>
<p>“Faux News Alert” that Obambi is blaming his poor showing on the &#8220;shrinkage factor,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Purplepeep&#8217;s</p>
<blockquote><p>Soft bigotry of low expectations.</p></blockquote>
<p>or any of lgm&#8217;s desperate attempts at grasping at straws to defend Obambi and call McCain a cheater and a liar.</p>
<p>All of them are howlers, but lgm is consistently hilarious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff Worth Lookin&#8217; At &#171; The Tizona Group</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412661</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff Worth Lookin&#8217; At &#171; The Tizona Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412661</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin has the scoop on how desperate the Obama camp is getting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin has the scoop on how desperate the Obama camp is getting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the urge to defend John McCain and attack Barack Obama? &#171; Cowardly political musings&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412657</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the urge to defend John McCain and attack Barack Obama? &#171; Cowardly political musings&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412657</guid>
		<description>[...] Why the urge to defend John McCain and attack Barack&#160;Obama?  Jump to Comments Let me start by saying that in the grand scheme of thing, this cone story is really not that important (why am I blogging about it?). What annoys me the most though are posts like Michele Malkin&#8217;s (and comments on the similar HotAir thread) that use this story and Obama&#8217;s response to write posts like: Sore loser: Obama and Obamedia accuse McCain of “cheating” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why the urge to defend John McCain and attack Barack&nbsp;Obama?  Jump to Comments Let me start by saying that in the grand scheme of thing, this cone story is really not that important (why am I blogging about it?). What annoys me the most though are posts like Michele Malkin&#8217;s (and comments on the similar HotAir thread) that use this story and Obama&#8217;s response to write posts like: Sore loser: Obama and Obamedia accuse McCain of “cheating” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/18/sore-loser-obama-and-obamedia-accuse-mccain-of-cheating/comment-page-4/#comment-412634</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13403#comment-412634</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;“Faux News Alert”&lt;/strong&gt;

 This just in!!!!! 
Odumbo camp now claiming 
Poor performance on 
“shrinkage factor “ 
From swimming in the ocean in Hawaii for a week!!

Odimblubs wee wee is only this big and 

Made him lose all concentration.

Film at 11:00



 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rr.com/index.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;m Blaming my Penis&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>“Faux News Alert”</strong></p>
<p> This just in!!!!!<br />
Odumbo camp now claiming<br />
Poor performance on<br />
“shrinkage factor “<br />
From swimming in the ocean in Hawaii for a week!!</p>
<p>Odimblubs wee wee is only this big and </p>
<p>Made him lose all concentration.</p>
<p>Film at 11:00</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.rr.com/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;m Blaming my Penis&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
