See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Riehl World View
2. I’m with you, Michelle Malkin. « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
3. Blogs of War: Is John McCain Considering a Pro-Choice VP Pick?
4. John McCain is floating idea of Pro-Choice V.P., Base is PISSED!!! – Political Byline
5. Watching the Candidates Play “Wheel of Vice Presidents” | The Sundries Shack
6. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » The amazing McCain self imploding campaign?
7. JABbering Stooge :: ROTFLMAO! What a bunch of schmucks! :: August :: 2008
8. McCain Gets It (Hopefully) « Mountain Shout
9. UNCoRRELATED
10. McCain Goes And Ticks Off The Conservative Base Again « Beltway Snark
11. Michelle Malkin » McCain refuses to defuse rumors about pro-choice VP pick
12. Playing Politics With Abortion | The Daily Conservative
13. Questions Mitt Romney Hasn’t Answered - How Can This Man Be McCain’s VP of “Choice”? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

601. #601
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm, right4life said:

     zero, you’ve already made the case that evolution is a faith, not science.

     as far as intelligence…your evaluation of your intelligence is about as good as your defense of your hairygod darwin.

602. #602
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 4:16 pm, right4life said:

     btw: how does your evolved sense of morality feel about supporting a theory with such a long history of racism and eugenics?

     I’m sure you’re very proud of that legacy!!

603. #603
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 5:02 pm, zeroangel said:

     evolution is a faith Theory

     evaluation of your intelligence

     long history of racism and eugenics genocide

604. #604
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 9:00 pm, right4life said:

     victims of atheism

     victims of darwinism

     let me guess you’re also pro-abortion!

605. #605
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 9:06 pm, right4life said:

     but I do feel sorry for you, such stupidity has to hurt!! and you are in a great deal of pain.

     but hey thats typical for a darwiniac!! even your ‘best’ and ‘brightest’ like dawkins are so easily made fools of!! perhaps you darwiniacs need to evolve some intelligence.

     your posts reveal you have a lot of ‘evolving’ ahead of you!

606. #606
     On August 22nd, 2008 at 9:54 pm, zeroangel said:

     but I do feel sorry for you

     such stupidity has to hurt!! and you are in a great deal of pain.

     easily made fools of!!

     evolve some intelligence.

     FSM

     Prove it!

     there have been human footprints found by dinosaur tracks

607. #607
     On August 23rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm, right4life said:

     PZ Myers, noted athiest/darwiniac, with a typically evolved sense of morality!!

     after the muslim cartoons:

     There is a genuine social concern here, I think. Muslims represent a poor and oppressed underclass, and those cartoons represent a ruling establishment intentionally taunting them and basically flipping them off. They have cause to be furious!

     yes, the poor oppressed muslims!! such a kind, ‘concerned’ atheist about religous sensitivies….

     christians on the other hand:

     . Recently, he desecrated the Eucharist by obtaining a consecrated Host, nailing it, throwing it in the garbage, and posting a photograph of it on Pharyngula

     so much for evolved ethics.

     and on those who dare disagree with his hairygod darwin:

     I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It’s time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots

     Sounds like the good atheist professor Myers has a final solution in mind for christians and those who disagree with evolution.

     I’m sure you do to zerodemon

608. #608
     On August 23rd, 2008 at 11:48 pm, zeroangel said:

     He also drove a nail through the Koran and a copy of Dawkins’ “The God Delusion” in the same stunt.

     BTW, I fought in the Iraq War, how about you?

609. #609
     On August 24th, 2008 at 9:40 am, right4life said:

     George William Hunter’s A Civic Biology: Presented in Problems (1914) was the book that sparked the controversy. Condemned as heretical in 1925, today it would seem to be a manual for enlightenment’s battle against religion’s perceived mysticism. Yet if John Scopes were to teach the very same Civic Biology in a modern classroom, he would probably be put on trial again. Because buried under the dust of history is the fact that this progressive, pro-evolution text was also quite racist.

     Take, for example, these lines from page 196 of Hunter’s original version:

     At the present time there exist upon the earth five races or varieties of man, each very different from the other in instincts, social customs, and, to an extent, in structure. These are the Ethiopian or negro type, originating in Africa; the Malay or brown race, from the islands of the Pacific; the American Indian; the Mongolian or yellow race, including the natives of China, Japan, and the Eskimos; and finally, the highest type of all, the Caucasians, represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe

     Hunter was also a proponent of eugenics. “[T]he science of being well born,” his text instructed, is an imperative for sophisticated society. “When people marry there are certain things that the individual as well as the race should demand,” he wrote, arguing that tuberculosis, epilepsy, and even “feeble-mindedness are handicaps which it is not only unfair but criminal to hand down to posterity.”

     “If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading,” Hunter lamented in Civic Biology. “Humanity will not allow this but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.”

     link

     Black people ‘less intelligent’ scientist claims

     Science has often been used as a justification to propose, project, and enact racist social policies. The philosophical and political underpinnings of ideas associated with racial superiority and inferiority were first given scientific legitimacy and credence with the publication of Charles Darwin’s (1859) revolutionary book, The Origin of Species. In more recent times, the controversy surrounding the publication of Herrnstein and Murray’s (1994) presumably scientific study, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, and the reintroduction to the national conversation of powerful arguments about race and human abilities, provide yet another opportunity to focus on questions pertinent to the origins, maintenance, and consequences of human abilities and potential. In the main, however, such studies and debates reveal far more about those proposing and advocating racist arguments than about the groups toward whom they are directed.

     link

     On the Origin of Species
     Subtitle or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

     Author Charles Darwin

     ‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’

     Reference
     Keith, A., Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, NY, USA, p. 230, 1947.

610. #610
     On August 27th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, cheapseat said:

     god what a blog line. to those no abortions under any circumstances i ask you how many nonforeign children you have adopted? to those who say abortion on demand at all times, how can you condone partial birth abortion and say hang the mother who puts her newborn into the trash. catholics need to reconcile their pedophile priests and their restocking the alterboy ranks with illegal aliens and stop sellectively applying which laws they will obey. the catholic marriage specifically has the father of the bride hand over his daughter to the husband, so when a spouse says their spouse is dead, catholics get over it.

Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]