See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Michelle Malkin » Is McCain going to screw conservatives (again)?
2. Invasion « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)
3. John McCain Watch: Pro-Choice Vice President? | FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
4. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Was the pro-choice trial balloon about Rudy?
5. Watching the Candidates Play “Wheel of Vice Presidents” | The Sundries Shack
6. The Other McCain: Republican ticket from Hell
7. McRudy??? Michelle Malkin doesn’t like … « The Daily Elephant
8. And the hits just keep on coming: McRudy » Pursuing Holiness
9. VP Rumor Roundup : Stop The ACLU

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

101. #101
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, Oxybeles said:

     Perhaps this would put NY into play?

102. #102
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, atheling said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, Oxybeles said:

     Perhaps this would put NY into play?

     Yes. And it would also alienate the South and the Midwest.

103. #103
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, Scooter36 said:

     this makes sense, the only person uglier than McLame is Tudy

104. #104
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:19 pm, atheling said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, Scooter36 said:

     Who let the peanut gallery in?

105. #105
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, Laree said:

     Pick Rudy? Is this like online Shopping okay

     Tom Ridge NO I don’t care what color or sizes he comes in.

     Rudy NO thanks, Repeat Wash and Rinse again:)

     I like Duncan Hunter, I can live with Mitt Romney..well figuratively.

106. #106
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, dakine said:

     Love that ticket. Yes, mj, I did indeed just high five myself a la Andrew Bogut.

107. #107
     On August 19th, 2008 at 3:48 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

     No. No. No.

     McCain / Schmidt ‘08
     There ain’t no second place in war

108. #108
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Dandapani said:

     We needed 4 years of a Carter to bring us a Reagan. Perhaps 4 years of Nobama will do us likewise. No, I’m not voting for Nobama, but neither am I voting for the other Democrat in the race, McCan’t!

109. #109
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

     I’m still praying for a longshot…Fred Thompson
     
     HEY! I can dream can’t I?

110. #110
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, EWTHeckman said:

     There’s already one nutty shifty tough guy on the ticket.

     I know. But so far, no one has been able to convince Obama to quit.

     Does anyone know if McCain is considering Hunter, Tancredo or any other actual conservative?

111. #111
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, TiminPhx said:

     As I said, not voting for McCain is like a hetro male deciding the only woman in the bar is too ugly for his tastes so he might as well turn gay that moment.

     Now some of you are saying, “what the heck, I’ll just abstain and stay pure of heart.”

     Yeah, you do that. And you then watch Obama appoint Supreme Court Justices who will take away your firearms, limit free speech, have drive thru late term abortions, and give in to the terrorists.

     But hey, what can happen in 4 years? I mean, so what. Just think how good you will feel saying how you didn’t vote for anyone. Why you were too delicate, too much the little princess to soil your delicate fingers with voting for someone like McCain.

     Yes Sir, you are wonderful.

     And yes, it will still be like the Hetro male who didn’t go with the ugly girl, because in the end, under Obama the Messiah, we will all understand the Homosexual viewpoint.

     Bent over that is.

112. #112
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:30 pm, Floyd R. Turbo said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, James Felix said:

     “I don’t like McCain…

     But Obama would unquestionably be worse.”

     And:
     

     On August 19th, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Knife-n-Dork said:

     “…Actually, that’s a ticket for which I could work up some enthusiasm. I know Rudy doesn’t thrill social cons, but where we all agree (economy and national defense) I think we can be confident that [McCain/Giuliani] will be effective”

     Exactly, both counts. No matter how much we (all groups) may have problems with both men, WHAT ARE THE ALTERNATIVES? No matter who Obama chooses as a running mate, NO MATTER, the two would be disastrous for US. As a Christian and a conservative, of course, I don’t approve of Rudy’s pro choice stance or his lifestyle. BUT. He and John have proved themselves under pressure. What has Obama proved? Just how incompetent he is/and will be as POTUS. We CANNOT afford another Jimmah Cawtah or Billy Jeff. No way, no how. Yes, McCain can screw up in office, just as any one can. I choose to believe his screwups would be far less damaging than Obama’s. We have to get away from emotions and look at the whole picture. Warts and all. It has to be McCain and whoever he chooses. Can we at least agree on that? Hello? Anyone there? Hello, common sense, please???!!! Otherwise, that old cliche’, we WILL throw the baby out with the bathwater. Just to prove a point that could bite us in the a**, like a runaway missle that U-Turns and flies up our tailpipe. THINK!

113. #113
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, Floyd R. Turbo said:

     Ok, to further expand TiminPhx’s last line, if we don’t go with McCain, we are headed, as The Black Avenger used to say, for the BOHICA file. I. E., “bend over, here it comes again”. Simple.

114. #114
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, Bill Grant said:

     Not that I think for a second that there is anything to this story but let me say; when I first moved back to NYC it was under the control of Mayor Dinkins, a complete disaster on every level. The city was broke, the subways were on fire, the garbage just piled up, there were homeless aggressively panhandling, companies were moving out…

     Rudy turned it around in a matter of months.

     There has been a noticeable slide under Bloomberg.

115. #115
     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:59 pm, Bill Grant said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Dandapani said:

     We needed 4 years of a Carter to bring us a Reagan.

     People were calling Reagan the equivalent of a “RINO” back when he ran against Carter.

     Perhaps 4 years of Nobama will do us likewise.

     Again, that little gem has been brought to you by the opposition in order to give people the illusion that you may actually win influence by losing elections. It doesn’t work that way. 4 years of Obama (it could be 8 years) will socialize entire industries and create gigantic, defect busting entitlement programs. Tell you what, Ill shut up about McCain if you can name an established entitlement program that was ever successfully taken away from the American public?
     Obama wants to start these programs in order to get people dependent on government and keep the democrats in power.

     No, I’m not voting for Nobama…

     Well….

116. #116
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:06 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

     Maybe I was reading this thread too fast, but if the issue is whether or not to have sex with Helen Thomas, I would have to know exactly how much of a tax cut I would be getting, and whether or not to cover her in paper bag or plastic…perhaps both.

     Respectfully,

     eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

117. #117
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

     Oh, and it was G. Gordon Liddy that coined the phrase “Suicide Bomber Republicans.”

     Respectfully,

     eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

118. #118
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, Floyd R. Turbo said:

     As Bill Grant put it so well about 4 years of Obama bringing us an improvement in his successor…HELLO?! Anyone remember the first 4 years of Clinton? Most everyone thought he was toast, he was so incompetent. And what happened? Us stupid ‘muricans RE-ELECTED HIM! HELLO!? Are we connecting to history and reality here?

119. #119
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, John the Libertarian said:

     Send Me said: No, I’m choosing to abstain to prove the point to both parties that they need to put forth some worthy candidates based upon principle, not expediency, aesthetic value, or electability among the moderates… Tactical patience, my friend.

     Tactical stupidity is more like it. All of your principles will go to hell in a bucket with 4 years of Obama and a Democrat congress. Radical revisionist judges will dismantle every one of your lofty principles.

120. #120
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:33 pm, athena said:

     I would LOVE for him to pick Rudy, but unfortunately that would be a smart move and I have no faith in McCain making smart moves.

     My top 3 are Rudy, Sarah Palin, or Bobby Jindal and it’s not looking like it will be any of the above.

121. #121
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:41 pm, zorro said:

     We are screwed no matter who these two losers choose as running mates.

     I’ll be voting for congress and local issues. But nothing has changed at the top of the ticket since Juan “floated” to the top. I’d rather be waterboarded…

122. #122
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:46 pm, swmbo said:

     I wouldn’t even have to hold my nose if he chose Fred Thompson. Fred wants to whip the NEA union, what more do you need. Teachers need a whippin’

123. #123
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, asheman said:

     It does not really matter who the VP is. It is not going to change how McCain governs. You just to pick someone who would be competent if McCain dies. Therefore in my opinion Rudy is an acceptable pick. I would pick him over McCain. I really do not think in most cases who is picked as VP has much effect on the election.

124. #124
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:54 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

     In this particular election, the VP will count for BOTH parties because:

     1. McCain’s age
     2. Odumbo’s inexperience

125. #125
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:58 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

     Wow - look at this, turns out McCain is also a gambler: “Over time he (McCain) gave up the drinking bouts, but he never quite kicked the periodic yen for dice. In the past decade, he has played on Mississippi riverboats, on Indian land, in Caribbean craps pits and along the length of the Las Vegas Strip.

     What kind of Christian could support this man?

126. #126
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pm, atheling said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:58 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

     Oh shut up, you idiot.

127. #127
     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pm, purplepeep said:

     swmbo said:
     I wouldn’t even have to hold my nose if he chose Fred Thompson. Fred wants to whip the NEA union, what more do you need. Teachers need a whippin’

     Fred would be a good selection. And the NEA should be run outta Dodge altogether. But there might be a problem of a perception of “2 old guys” running.

128. #128
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, Floyd R. Turbo said:

     It comes down to competence and experience under pressure. Obama has none of it. That’s how…

129. #129
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:04 pm, purplepeep said:

     Ilovemycountry said:
     In the past decade, he has played on Mississippi riverboats, on Indian land, in Caribbean craps pits and along the length of the Las Vegas Strip.

     My only response would be that I hope he had a great time and took home all the chips! (that’s the idea, y’know)

130. #130
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:25 pm, nyc123me said:

     Fred Thompson for VP.

131. #131
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, Joy said:

     The babies are now under the bus! Congrats to those of you willing to throw them there. Now all we need is a Photoshop of a million dead babies under a bus with the caption, ‘Hey, at least we’re not voting for Obama!‘ under it.

132. #132
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:31 pm, Joy said:

     And all those dead babies should be wearing a McCain green onsie…

133. #133
     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, Joy said:

     Onesie that is…

134. #134
     On August 19th, 2008 at 7:20 pm, skysoljr82 said:

     I heard Rush suggest Rick Santorum today. Sounds like a winner to me.

135. #135
     On August 19th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, brooklyn red said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, asheman said:
     …”You just to pick someone who would be competent if McCain dies. Therefore in my opinion Rudy is an acceptable pick”.

     Yeah, got to agree… Rudy has issues but he knows what he is doing, plus he could deliver NY, NJ & Conn. That’s a lot of electoral college.

136. #136
     On August 19th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, atheling said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 7:20 pm, skysoljr82 said:

     I heard Rush suggest Rick Santorum today. Sounds like a winner to me.

     Oh man, that would make me jump for joy! I LOVE Rick Santorum. But what are the odds of that happening?

137. #137
     On August 19th, 2008 at 8:05 pm, joromima said:

     Duncan Hunter would be my pick.
     But I think it might end up being someone from Ohio….

     (Stop Comment Abuse - After 4 go out the door)

138. #138
     On August 19th, 2008 at 8:31 pm, Bill Grant said:

     On August 19th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, Joy said:

     The babies are now under the bus! Congrats to those of you willing to throw them there. Now all we need is a Photoshop of a million dead babies under a bus with the caption, ‘Hey, at least we’re not voting for Obama!‘ under it.

     You need a tranquilizer dart.

139. #139
     On August 19th, 2008 at 10:29 pm, erikwhittington said:

     Lord have mercy…

140. #140
     On August 19th, 2008 at 11:22 pm, faithnomore said:

     being the right end of a left bound maverick that he is i think j-mac will choose mrs. bill clinton so he can go to their convention where he’ll be appreciated

141. #141
     On August 19th, 2008 at 11:50 pm, Kurgan said:

     I’m sorry, but I am more concered with our security and anti-terrorism defense.

     We need to come off of our single focus personal crusades and look at the bigger picture.

142. #142
     On August 20th, 2008 at 9:10 am, misterbee241 said:

     Frankly, I couldn’t care less as I have given up on the GOP and will be voting 3rd party this year. Enough is enough.

     That’s where I am.

143. #143
     On August 20th, 2008 at 9:27 am, GladzKravtz said:

     Of course, McCain would have to be elected first, but I’d like to see Rudy as USAG! He would be much more effective there.

144. #144
     On August 20th, 2008 at 9:34 am, RedRover said:

     McRudy is slightly better than McLieberman. McThompson, McHunter, or McRomney would get me excited again.

145. #145
     On August 20th, 2008 at 9:39 am, TxSkirt said:

     Seriously? This is the best we can do? Holy crap. We. Are. In. Trouble.

146. #146
     On August 20th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

     Kurgan,

     Exactly!

     We are at war. That is what matters.

     Respectfully,

     eric aka the Tygrrrr Express

Comment pages: « 1 [2]