<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black pro-lifers to protest at DNC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:55:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Obama is a Genocidal Anti-Black Racist &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-416830</link>
		<dc:creator>How Obama is a Genocidal Anti-Black Racist &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-416830</guid>
		<description>[...] August 2008: The Black Pro-Lifers have caught on to the genocidal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 2008: The Black Pro-Lifers have caught on to the genocidal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin.musculus(jr.)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-416481</link>
		<dc:creator>martin.musculus(jr.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-416481</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
#88
On August 20th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, englishqueen01 said: 
Cool - just curious: is there any difference between a black pro-lifer and a white pro-lifer?

No - no difference. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Untrue! Black PLs, like Black Conservatives have the amazing power of invisibility to Liberals and the MSM.

Why, its rumored that once Bill Moyers tried filming a few, and when the film was processed, &lt;i&gt;there was no image on the film!&lt;/i&gt;

Then, there&#039;s the rumor that Katey Curic can&#039;t see their reflection in mirrors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
#88<br />
On August 20th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, englishqueen01 said:<br />
Cool &#8211; just curious: is there any difference between a black pro-lifer and a white pro-lifer?</p>
<p>No &#8211; no difference.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Untrue! Black PLs, like Black Conservatives have the amazing power of invisibility to Liberals and the MSM.</p>
<p>Why, its rumored that once Bill Moyers tried filming a few, and when the film was processed, <i>there was no image on the film!</i></p>
<p>Then, there&#8217;s the rumor that Katey Curic can&#8217;t see their reflection in mirrors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-416348</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-416348</guid>
		<description>I am just trying to picture all these black anti abortion folks being segregated into cages like the other protesters.  

And by Howard Dean&#039;s lily white DNC leadership, no less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just trying to picture all these black anti abortion folks being segregated into cages like the other protesters.  </p>
<p>And by Howard Dean&#8217;s lily white DNC leadership, no less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erikwhittington</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415839</link>
		<dc:creator>erikwhittington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415839</guid>
		<description>I love Alan Keyes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Alan Keyes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415789</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415789</guid>
		<description>garydt - Barbara Boxer has floated that position already. As have several others. It is a reality. And while it&#039;s shocking and revolting, it isn&#039;t surprising. How tragic is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>garydt &#8211; Barbara Boxer has floated that position already. As have several others. It is a reality. And while it&#8217;s shocking and revolting, it isn&#8217;t surprising. How tragic is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garydt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415641</link>
		<dc:creator>garydt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415641</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be surprized when the government makes all post abortions legal. After all if a parent changes their mind on whether to keep their baby they can terminate it even after its born. I know this sounds extreme but after the way things have slidden down the slippery slope, nothing will surprize me. The excuse will be its still a mother&#039;s choice to abort the baby even after its born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be surprized when the government makes all post abortions legal. After all if a parent changes their mind on whether to keep their baby they can terminate it even after its born. I know this sounds extreme but after the way things have slidden down the slippery slope, nothing will surprize me. The excuse will be its still a mother&#8217;s choice to abort the baby even after its born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: englishqueen01</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415578</link>
		<dc:creator>englishqueen01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415578</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Catholic teaching always protects the rights of parents against big government.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

People who want to kill their children are not &quot;parents&quot;, and Catholic teaching has &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; opposed abortion with no exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Catholic teaching always protects the rights of parents against big government.</p></blockquote>
<p>People who want to kill their children are not &#8220;parents&#8221;, and Catholic teaching has <strong><em>always</em></strong> opposed abortion with no exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415462</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415462</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;First, the BAIPA would have immediately usurped the rights of the parents without any hearing or legal process.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, as I understand it, by the very act of being born, i.e. separated from the mother&#039;s body, a &quot;fetus&quot; achieves &quot;personhood&quot; and is, at least in legal terms, afforded all the rights and privileges as such.  If the parents wanted to kill him/her, their opportunity ended when the baby left the vaginal canal.  So it is not that the parent&#039;s rights are usurped, but that the infant, now a patient at the hospital, gains his/hers. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Second, the act would have mandated taxpayer funds be used for the health care as long as the needy child was alive, administered by still another government bureaucracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So Obama came out &lt;em&gt;against&lt;/em&gt; universal health care?  Interesting.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Third, it gave a green light to trial lawyers to sue just about everybody on two legs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting again, considering Obama&#039;s support from the legal community.  Since when is the Democrat party against trial lawyers?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Catholic teaching always protects the rights of parents against big government.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is this guy seriously trying to say that the Catholic church would fight for the rights of the parent to kill the baby after an unsuccessful abortion?

You have to be kidding me!  As a &quot;recovering Catholic,&quot; I think I can tell you it just ain&#039;t so.  It may fly with readers of the WaPo, but it does not gibe with reality.

&lt;blockquote&gt; On August 20th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Rusty said:

    &lt;blockquote&gt;Margaret sanger would be thrilled to know how well her little eugenics program worked out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She’d probably be pretty disappointed that Planned Parenthood allows minority women to get mammograms and OB/GYN visits at a greatly reduced cost.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Probably so, yet the good that such an organization does can&#039;t launder the bad.

Perhaps federal and state funding should be prohibited, and a purely donation based approach should be considered for institutions like this, just as the liberals have done to the Boy Scouts.

Given the amount of money being thrown at Obama, the free cash clearly exists, and nobody will feel that they have been forced to support something they don&#039;t agree with.

And then, the government can get back to the job it is supposed to do: protecting the country and fixing the roads, or whatever the Constitution mandates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>First, the BAIPA would have immediately usurped the rights of the parents without any hearing or legal process.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, as I understand it, by the very act of being born, i.e. separated from the mother&#8217;s body, a &#8220;fetus&#8221; achieves &#8220;personhood&#8221; and is, at least in legal terms, afforded all the rights and privileges as such.  If the parents wanted to kill him/her, their opportunity ended when the baby left the vaginal canal.  So it is not that the parent&#8217;s rights are usurped, but that the infant, now a patient at the hospital, gains his/hers. </p>
<blockquote><p>Second, the act would have mandated taxpayer funds be used for the health care as long as the needy child was alive, administered by still another government bureaucracy.</p></blockquote>
<p>So Obama came out <em>against</em> universal health care?  Interesting.</p>
<blockquote><p>Third, it gave a green light to trial lawyers to sue just about everybody on two legs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting again, considering Obama&#8217;s support from the legal community.  Since when is the Democrat party against trial lawyers?</p>
<blockquote><p>Catholic teaching always protects the rights of parents against big government.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is this guy seriously trying to say that the Catholic church would fight for the rights of the parent to kill the baby after an unsuccessful abortion?</p>
<p>You have to be kidding me!  As a &#8220;recovering Catholic,&#8221; I think I can tell you it just ain&#8217;t so.  It may fly with readers of the WaPo, but it does not gibe with reality.</p>
<blockquote><p> On August 20th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, Rusty said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Margaret sanger would be thrilled to know how well her little eugenics program worked out.</p></blockquote>
<p>She’d probably be pretty disappointed that Planned Parenthood allows minority women to get mammograms and OB/GYN visits at a greatly reduced cost.</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably so, yet the good that such an organization does can&#8217;t launder the bad.</p>
<p>Perhaps federal and state funding should be prohibited, and a purely donation based approach should be considered for institutions like this, just as the liberals have done to the Boy Scouts.</p>
<p>Given the amount of money being thrown at Obama, the free cash clearly exists, and nobody will feel that they have been forced to support something they don&#8217;t agree with.</p>
<p>And then, the government can get back to the job it is supposed to do: protecting the country and fixing the roads, or whatever the Constitution mandates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama voted No on Born Alive Legislation : BigMouthFrog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415453</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama voted No on Born Alive Legislation : BigMouthFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415453</guid>
		<description>[...] foes are now accusing Obama of being an abortion-rights extremist. In recent days, the NRLC has charged that Obama is misrepresenting his record to broaden his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] foes are now accusing Obama of being an abortion-rights extremist. In recent days, the NRLC has charged that Obama is misrepresenting his record to broaden his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415368</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415368</guid>
		<description>chapoutier - I can&#039;t apologize for atheling, but I can say I&#039;m sorry that there are people who speak such vile things in the name of Christ. She does not speak for all people of faith or for Christ. 

I understand coming to the conclusion there is no God. I came to that same conclusion myself once upon a time. I&#039;m now a person of deep faith in God. Although I most certainly don&#039;t always act like it. I won&#039;t attempt to change your mind. I just want you to know that there are people of faith who wince at the words she typed to you. 

I don&#039;t know what else to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chapoutier &#8211; I can&#8217;t apologize for atheling, but I can say I&#8217;m sorry that there are people who speak such vile things in the name of Christ. She does not speak for all people of faith or for Christ. </p>
<p>I understand coming to the conclusion there is no God. I came to that same conclusion myself once upon a time. I&#8217;m now a person of deep faith in God. Although I most certainly don&#8217;t always act like it. I won&#8217;t attempt to change your mind. I just want you to know that there are people of faith who wince at the words she typed to you. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what else to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianNY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415349</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415349</guid>
		<description>#148 rusty said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Atheling has kidnapped and assaulted people she didn’t agree with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I admit that I&#039;m just nit-picking here - but in some polite circles, what atheling described doing to her friend, in an earlier post, is often called an &quot;intervention,&quot;  isn&#039;t it?  I thought her friend ended up thanking her a few years later?

My only other comment here is, although he is not to be admired, &quot;Steve456&quot; is a great name for a garage band.

There, I said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#148 rusty said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Atheling has kidnapped and assaulted people she didn’t agree with.</p></blockquote>
<p>I admit that I&#8217;m just nit-picking here &#8211; but in some polite circles, what atheling described doing to her friend, in an earlier post, is often called an &#8220;intervention,&#8221;  isn&#8217;t it?  I thought her friend ended up thanking her a few years later?</p>
<p>My only other comment here is, although he is not to be admired, &#8220;Steve456&#8243; is a great name for a garage band.</p>
<p>There, I said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415336</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415336</guid>
		<description>And just as an aside, I just now noticed atheling&#039;s little &quot;spiritually lazy&quot; comment.  She has no idea how much I have studied and struggled with issues of faith and religion.  She has no idea how many nights that, as a teenager who grew up surrounded by devout Catholics and Mennonites, I laid awake, feeling awful that I did not believe in God and thinking how much easier it would be if I did.  How much easier it is to be a moral person when you think there is reward or how much more palatable the thought of death is when you believe that it is not the end or how one can make sense of seemingly insensible and horrible things as being part of a greater plan.  

But, in the end I decided, as a matter of &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; conscience, that my uncomfortableness with the idea of there being no God did not outweigh my sincere belief that there is none.

So I will take whatever lumps come my way from people who in good faith disagree with my ideas, but I will not stand for an intellectually lightweight hack like atheling, QUESTIONING MY INTELLECTUAL &quot;LAZINESS&quot; WHEN IT COMES TO RELIGION BECAUSE SHE DOES NOT LIKE MY CONCLUSION.

Go to hell atheling.  And by the way that was irony and sarcasm in case you couldn&#039;t process that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just as an aside, I just now noticed atheling&#8217;s little &#8220;spiritually lazy&#8221; comment.  She has no idea how much I have studied and struggled with issues of faith and religion.  She has no idea how many nights that, as a teenager who grew up surrounded by devout Catholics and Mennonites, I laid awake, feeling awful that I did not believe in God and thinking how much easier it would be if I did.  How much easier it is to be a moral person when you think there is reward or how much more palatable the thought of death is when you believe that it is not the end or how one can make sense of seemingly insensible and horrible things as being part of a greater plan.  </p>
<p>But, in the end I decided, as a matter of <em>my</em> conscience, that my uncomfortableness with the idea of there being no God did not outweigh my sincere belief that there is none.</p>
<p>So I will take whatever lumps come my way from people who in good faith disagree with my ideas, but I will not stand for an intellectually lightweight hack like atheling, QUESTIONING MY INTELLECTUAL &#8220;LAZINESS&#8221; WHEN IT COMES TO RELIGION BECAUSE SHE DOES NOT LIKE MY CONCLUSION.</p>
<p>Go to hell atheling.  And by the way that was irony and sarcasm in case you couldn&#8217;t process that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415333</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415333</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you providing e-analysis or e-therapy?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are you providing e-analysis or e-therapy?</p></blockquote>
<p>That was funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mchristian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415328</link>
		<dc:creator>mchristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415328</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rusty said:  But I really think something happened to you that made you such an unreasonable person. Care tell us what that was?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you providing e-analysis or e-therapy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rusty said:  But I really think something happened to you that made you such an unreasonable person. Care tell us what that was?</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you providing e-analysis or e-therapy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/black-pro-lifers-to-protest-at-dnc/comment-page-2/#comment-415319</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13451#comment-415319</guid>
		<description>Oh, please let me jump on the anti-Atheling train.

If you disagree with her, then you&#039;re every mean word in the book. I have personally been called a racist and a misogynist.

I think the best example of her idiocy is in this thread. When Chap made a joke about being an atheist, she didn&#039;t laugh or play along or anything. And it&#039;s not like anyone is asking her to agree with atheism.

But the way she reacts to an atheism is to call him a morally bankrupt Pharisee.  

(By the way, I am shocked no one has called her out for her anti-Semetism. Pharisee refers to a social movement of Jews from 536BC-70AD. Ironically, the group is known for their following religious rules instead of social justice. A crime Atheling is guilty of. But I digress.)

Atheling has kidnapped and assaulted people she didn&#039;t agree with. And her assault against lawyers is all sorts of crazy.

Atheling, there all sorts of crazies. Look at, for example, Soap Box. Here&#039;s a guy who I&#039;m constantly butting heads with here. But he&#039;s dedicating his life to helping others and even when we&#039;re in heated exchanges manages some sort of politeness. Sometimes it&#039;s strained, but it&#039;s there.

I just have to know...what exactly is your problem? No one is asking you to be  pro-choice. No one is asking you to vote against your conscience. You seem like the kind of person who would disown their child if they voted Democrat. What does that accomplish?

Chap jokes about being stood up by a lawyer during prom. But I really think something happened to you that made you such an unreasonable person. Care tell us what that was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please let me jump on the anti-Atheling train.</p>
<p>If you disagree with her, then you&#8217;re every mean word in the book. I have personally been called a racist and a misogynist.</p>
<p>I think the best example of her idiocy is in this thread. When Chap made a joke about being an atheist, she didn&#8217;t laugh or play along or anything. And it&#8217;s not like anyone is asking her to agree with atheism.</p>
<p>But the way she reacts to an atheism is to call him a morally bankrupt Pharisee.  </p>
<p>(By the way, I am shocked no one has called her out for her anti-Semetism. Pharisee refers to a social movement of Jews from 536BC-70AD. Ironically, the group is known for their following religious rules instead of social justice. A crime Atheling is guilty of. But I digress.)</p>
<p>Atheling has kidnapped and assaulted people she didn&#8217;t agree with. And her assault against lawyers is all sorts of crazy.</p>
<p>Atheling, there all sorts of crazies. Look at, for example, Soap Box. Here&#8217;s a guy who I&#8217;m constantly butting heads with here. But he&#8217;s dedicating his life to helping others and even when we&#8217;re in heated exchanges manages some sort of politeness. Sometimes it&#8217;s strained, but it&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>I just have to know&#8230;what exactly is your problem? No one is asking you to be  pro-choice. No one is asking you to vote against your conscience. You seem like the kind of person who would disown their child if they voted Democrat. What does that accomplish?</p>
<p>Chap jokes about being stood up by a lawyer during prom. But I really think something happened to you that made you such an unreasonable person. Care tell us what that was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
