<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain refuses to defuse rumors about pro-choice VP pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:31:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-431434</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-431434</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Danceswithdachshunds said:

How is his choice difficult? If he picks Joe Lieberman - it’s over; he’ll lose. If he picks Sarah Palin as VP he’d win by a LANDSLIDE.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Weeeeeeeeeeeeee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Danceswithdachshunds said:</p>
<p>How is his choice difficult? If he picks Joe Lieberman &#8211; it’s over; he’ll lose. If he picks Sarah Palin as VP he’d win by a LANDSLIDE.</p></blockquote>
<p>Weeeeeeeeeeeeee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent voter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-417521</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-417521</guid>
		<description>If you are anti-abortion, don’t get one. If you are anti-homosexuality, don’t be one. 
There, problem solved!!!!!

Republicans are going to go down THAT road again? Be forewarned, by rallying the BASE, they lose the Independents, and with the exponential rise is Democratic voters, if you alienate the swing voters, YOU LOSE. 
Abortion and Homosexuality are circular arguments that will never have resolution. Think of it, if these two activities were “controlled by the government”, then what? There will still be abortions and Homosexuality. Do you want to construct prisons for all the women who get illegal abortions? Prisons for Gay couples that participate in a Marriage ceremony? 
GET REAL PEOPLE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are anti-abortion, don’t get one. If you are anti-homosexuality, don’t be one.<br />
There, problem solved!!!!!</p>
<p>Republicans are going to go down THAT road again? Be forewarned, by rallying the BASE, they lose the Independents, and with the exponential rise is Democratic voters, if you alienate the swing voters, YOU LOSE.<br />
Abortion and Homosexuality are circular arguments that will never have resolution. Think of it, if these two activities were “controlled by the government”, then what? There will still be abortions and Homosexuality. Do you want to construct prisons for all the women who get illegal abortions? Prisons for Gay couples that participate in a Marriage ceremony?<br />
GET REAL PEOPLE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro-Choice Veep? Simmer down</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-416675</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro-Choice Veep? Simmer down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-416675</guid>
		<description>[...] down, Michelle. McCain&#8217;s White House would be more pro-life than Obama&#8217;s. Take what you can get.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down, Michelle. McCain&#8217;s White House would be more pro-life than Obama&#8217;s. Take what you can get.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-416364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-416364</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is a pro-military war hero who has 50 years of service to the USA
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
true, but john f’ing kerry is a ‘war hero’ too…..&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No he wasn’t and he isn’t running. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;uh yeah sure with the mccain/lieberman gun show bill. which would basically shut down gun shows. Nice”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No it didn’t shut gun shows down and my rights as a gun owner are not infringed by someone else getting a background check. Indeed, if it were instantaneous like the bill called for my rights would be increased. I could buy a handgun during lunch. Obama has voted for the DC and Chicago gun bans. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;“really? are you sure about that???”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;“link”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
From the online equivalent of a poorly mimeographed Bob Barr tract. Look, Bob Barr isn’t going anywhere. If conservatives would take the time to learn that this guy is running on a platform that is pro Abortion. Pro isolationism, anti military and pro-legalizing drugs from pot to heroin Bob Barr would get even less attention here which is more then he deserves. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“in contrasting your career to the business career of Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, you said, “I led the largest squadron in the United States Navy. And I did it out of patriotism, not for profit.””&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Since you haven’t been in the Navy I would guess that you think the 2 aren’t roughly equivalent. I have been in both the USN and the business world and there is a lot that is true about what he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>McCain is a pro-military war hero who has 50 years of service to the USA
</p></blockquote>
<p>true, but john f’ing kerry is a ‘war hero’ too…..</p></blockquote>
<p>No he wasn’t and he isn’t running. </p>
<blockquote><p>uh yeah sure with the mccain/lieberman gun show bill. which would basically shut down gun shows. Nice”</p></blockquote>
<p>No it didn’t shut gun shows down and my rights as a gun owner are not infringed by someone else getting a background check. Indeed, if it were instantaneous like the bill called for my rights would be increased. I could buy a handgun during lunch. Obama has voted for the DC and Chicago gun bans. </p>
<blockquote><p>“really? are you sure about that???”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes. </p>
<blockquote><p>“link”</p></blockquote>
<p>From the online equivalent of a poorly mimeographed Bob Barr tract. Look, Bob Barr isn’t going anywhere. If conservatives would take the time to learn that this guy is running on a platform that is pro Abortion. Pro isolationism, anti military and pro-legalizing drugs from pot to heroin Bob Barr would get even less attention here which is more then he deserves. </p>
<blockquote><p>
“in contrasting your career to the business career of Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, you said, “I led the largest squadron in the United States Navy. And I did it out of patriotism, not for profit.””</p></blockquote>
<p>Since you haven’t been in the Navy I would guess that you think the 2 aren’t roughly equivalent. I have been in both the USN and the business world and there is a lot that is true about what he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-416334</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-416334</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; would most likely nominate judges like souter, who would support his mccain-feingold bill.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You see, this has been shown to you to be false, Yet you sill repeat it as if you were following someones talking points: 
&lt;em&gt;
&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/06/politics/main4073792.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My nominees&lt;/a&gt; will understand that there are clear limits to the scope of judicial power, and clear limits to the scope of federal power,&quot; McCain said Tuesday in a speech at Wake Forest University.

McCain, the eventual GOP nominee, promised to appoint judges in the mold of Roberts and Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, saything they would interpret the law strictly to curb the scope of their rulings. While McCain didn&#039;t mention abortion, the far right understands that such nominees would be likely to limit or perhaps overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.

Obama, on the other hand, voted against Roberts and Alito. So did Obama&#039;s rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, but McCain focused on Obama. &quot;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-06-mccain-judges_N.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
McCain: Roberts, Alito are model judges&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;em&gt;
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito are the models for the type of judges Republican John McCain said Tuesday he would appoint to the federal bench if elected president.

Roberts, the chief justice, and Alito were President Bush&#039;s two appointees to the high court and represent &quot;the proper role of the judiciary&quot; that McCain said will be a major issue this fall.
&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> would most likely nominate judges like souter, who would support his mccain-feingold bill.</p></blockquote>
<p>You see, this has been shown to you to be false, Yet you sill repeat it as if you were following someones talking points:<br />
<em><br />
&#8220;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/06/politics/main4073792.shtml" rel="nofollow">My nominees</a> will understand that there are clear limits to the scope of judicial power, and clear limits to the scope of federal power,&#8221; McCain said Tuesday in a speech at Wake Forest University.</p>
<p>McCain, the eventual GOP nominee, promised to appoint judges in the mold of Roberts and Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, saything they would interpret the law strictly to curb the scope of their rulings. While McCain didn&#8217;t mention abortion, the far right understands that such nominees would be likely to limit or perhaps overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.</p>
<p>Obama, on the other hand, voted against Roberts and Alito. So did Obama&#8217;s rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, but McCain focused on Obama. &#8220;</em><br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-06-mccain-judges_N.htm" rel="nofollow"><br />
McCain: Roberts, Alito are model judges</a><br />
<em><br />
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito are the models for the type of judges Republican John McCain said Tuesday he would appoint to the federal bench if elected president.</p>
<p>Roberts, the chief justice, and Alito were President Bush&#8217;s two appointees to the high court and represent &#8220;the proper role of the judiciary&#8221; that McCain said will be a major issue this fall.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-416320</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-416320</guid>
		<description>On August 21st, 2008 at 11:47 am, right4life said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;    McCain is for victory in the war against the islamist pigs who want to kill you.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
but he also accuses the US of ‘torture’ and wants to close gitmo.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So better to turn over Iraq and Afghanistan to the islamists that want to kill you because you are a kuffar. 

John McCain was right about the boots on the ground, he was right about listening to Shinseki, he was right about the up-armored humvee’s he was right about the body armor, he was right about the ammunition, he was right about Rumsfeld, he was right about calling for counterinsurgency tactics long before anyone was willing to recognize the problem as an insurgency for political reasons, he was right about David Petraeus, Ryan Crocker, David Kilcullen, Michael Mullen when everyone else was wrong. He was one of the first to call for a surge and while it was working the democratic “leadership” that YOU WANT TO ENNABLE was calling it a “failure” and our soldiers “terrorists” who were “loosing their heads” and killing women and children. 

You are out to support genuine and I do not use the word lightly “traitors” like John Murtha and Harry Reid who buy their words and actions got Americans killed. 

Read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://obama.senate.gov/press/070130-obama_offers_pl_1/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“Iraq War De-Escalation Act of 2007”&lt;/a&gt; that Obama proposed and tell me what kind of mess we would be in if this IDIOT had been able to have his way. We would have lost the war on islamist terrorism . We would have LOST if obama were in charge and we just might WIN because of the actions of John McCain. 

I was here in NY on 9/11. I saw what they did. I walked through the debris and saw the shoes with feet still in them. Selling out to the terrorists by electing appeasers, traitors and idiots because you are wetting your panties over whatever puts you in the same book with those you wish to enable in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 21st, 2008 at 11:47 am, right4life said:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>    McCain is for victory in the war against the islamist pigs who want to kill you.
</p></blockquote>
<p>but he also accuses the US of ‘torture’ and wants to close gitmo.</p></blockquote>
<p>So better to turn over Iraq and Afghanistan to the islamists that want to kill you because you are a kuffar. </p>
<p>John McCain was right about the boots on the ground, he was right about listening to Shinseki, he was right about the up-armored humvee’s he was right about the body armor, he was right about the ammunition, he was right about Rumsfeld, he was right about calling for counterinsurgency tactics long before anyone was willing to recognize the problem as an insurgency for political reasons, he was right about David Petraeus, Ryan Crocker, David Kilcullen, Michael Mullen when everyone else was wrong. He was one of the first to call for a surge and while it was working the democratic “leadership” that YOU WANT TO ENNABLE was calling it a “failure” and our soldiers “terrorists” who were “loosing their heads” and killing women and children. </p>
<p>You are out to support genuine and I do not use the word lightly “traitors” like John Murtha and Harry Reid who buy their words and actions got Americans killed. </p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://obama.senate.gov/press/070130-obama_offers_pl_1/index.php" rel="nofollow">“Iraq War De-Escalation Act of 2007”</a> that Obama proposed and tell me what kind of mess we would be in if this IDIOT had been able to have his way. We would have lost the war on islamist terrorism . We would have LOST if obama were in charge and we just might WIN because of the actions of John McCain. </p>
<p>I was here in NY on 9/11. I saw what they did. I walked through the debris and saw the shoes with feet still in them. Selling out to the terrorists by electing appeasers, traitors and idiots because you are wetting your panties over whatever puts you in the same book with those you wish to enable in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-416265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-416265</guid>
		<description>On August 21st, 2008 at 10:54 am, alaskangrizzly said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“Not Europe but he’ll gladly sell us out to Mexico”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well then, what to do? Roll over and spread em for Obama who will enact a true open borders agenda or elect someone who will listen to the fuss you make. But the only fuss you are going to make is here… right? 

The other side takes to the streets by the hundreds of thousands but any attempt to organize an opposition to them meets with indifference. If these supposed conservatives don’t learn to get off their rear ends we are going to be neck deep in Mexicans and it wont be any ones fault but our own. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;“and before you shout out the “but he promised fence/border enforcement first” bunch of bs why don’t do you your homework on how much he has stumped for enforcement here in his home state of Arizona.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And before you toss that straw man out why don’t you tell me whose responsibility it is to enforce the territorial sovereignty of the USA? The federal governments or the states? The fact is HE HAS promised enforcement first which is equals time to push back.. Not that that is something that generates a whole lot of internist here... 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“I have never seen McCain even once praise Sheriff Joe”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So there is a good reason to help elect Obama. No love for “Sheriff Joe”.  Maybe he isn’t dazzled by pink underwear stunts. Or getting stabbed in the back by someone who was working for Romney in his state. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“and all his actions thus far says he will sell this country to Mexico faster than Bush is already trying to.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well I guess it is all over since the alternative viable candidate has an even more open borders stance. Tell you what, it probably &lt;strong&gt;IS all over&lt;/strong&gt; because the people who are opposed to amnesty only seem to want to get off their rear ends long enough to shoot themselves in the foot. 
I have posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the link to an effective an anti amnesty pro enforcement PAC&lt;/a&gt; a dozen times here, not once have I heard “gee, this is something I could get on board with” or, “that’s not a good idea, why don’t we try this” or anything other then waaah waah waah, McShamnasty(tm) waah waah waah.
With the general laziness, indifference, short sightedness shown here by the people who supposedly want to fight this hardest you are going to be neck deep in Mexicans because the people who want that simply out worked you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 21st, 2008 at 10:54 am, alaskangrizzly said:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“Not Europe but he’ll gladly sell us out to Mexico”</p></blockquote>
<p>Well then, what to do? Roll over and spread em for Obama who will enact a true open borders agenda or elect someone who will listen to the fuss you make. But the only fuss you are going to make is here… right? </p>
<p>The other side takes to the streets by the hundreds of thousands but any attempt to organize an opposition to them meets with indifference. If these supposed conservatives don’t learn to get off their rear ends we are going to be neck deep in Mexicans and it wont be any ones fault but our own. </p>
<blockquote><p>“and before you shout out the “but he promised fence/border enforcement first” bunch of bs why don’t do you your homework on how much he has stumped for enforcement here in his home state of Arizona.</p></blockquote>
<p>And before you toss that straw man out why don’t you tell me whose responsibility it is to enforce the territorial sovereignty of the USA? The federal governments or the states? The fact is HE HAS promised enforcement first which is equals time to push back.. Not that that is something that generates a whole lot of internist here&#8230; </p>
<blockquote><p>
“I have never seen McCain even once praise Sheriff Joe”
</p></blockquote>
<p>So there is a good reason to help elect Obama. No love for “Sheriff Joe”.  Maybe he isn’t dazzled by pink underwear stunts. Or getting stabbed in the back by someone who was working for Romney in his state. </p>
<blockquote><p>
“and all his actions thus far says he will sell this country to Mexico faster than Bush is already trying to.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Well I guess it is all over since the alternative viable candidate has an even more open borders stance. Tell you what, it probably <strong>IS all over</strong> because the people who are opposed to amnesty only seem to want to get off their rear ends long enough to shoot themselves in the foot.<br />
I have posted <a href="http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer" rel="nofollow">the link to an effective an anti amnesty pro enforcement PAC</a> a dozen times here, not once have I heard “gee, this is something I could get on board with” or, “that’s not a good idea, why don’t we try this” or anything other then waaah waah waah, McShamnasty(tm) waah waah waah.<br />
With the general laziness, indifference, short sightedness shown here by the people who supposedly want to fight this hardest you are going to be neck deep in Mexicans because the people who want that simply out worked you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-2/#comment-415674</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because he wont create gargantuan entitlement programs that will push our national debt over the GDP and render our dollar worthless&lt;/blockquote&gt;

really?  are you sure about that???

U.S. News reported last December that part of your economic plan includes a new entitlement program for the unemployed. You&#039;ve said that the federal government should make up part of the salary of workers who are forced to take lower-paying jobs. Economists estimate your plan will cost $4-5 billion per year, but as a longtime legislator, you should know that new entitlements tend to become more generous and more comprehensive over time. Should your plan eventually emulate the Danish worker security plan it&#039;s modeled after, it will likely cost $400 billion or more each year. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/news/show/127584.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;

from the same article, he does seem to have contempt for free markets...


In your January primary debate, you referred to &quot;greedy&quot; Wall Street stockbrokers, and in contrasting your career to the business career of Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, you said, &quot;I led the largest squadron in the United States Navy. And I did it out of patriotism, not for profit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because he wont create gargantuan entitlement programs that will push our national debt over the GDP and render our dollar worthless</p></blockquote>
<p>really?  are you sure about that???</p>
<p>U.S. News reported last December that part of your economic plan includes a new entitlement program for the unemployed. You&#8217;ve said that the federal government should make up part of the salary of workers who are forced to take lower-paying jobs. Economists estimate your plan will cost $4-5 billion per year, but as a longtime legislator, you should know that new entitlements tend to become more generous and more comprehensive over time. Should your plan eventually emulate the Danish worker security plan it&#8217;s modeled after, it will likely cost $400 billion or more each year. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/127584.html" rel="nofollow">link</a></p>
<p>from the same article, he does seem to have contempt for free markets&#8230;</p>
<p>In your January primary debate, you referred to &#8220;greedy&#8221; Wall Street stockbrokers, and in contrasting your career to the business career of Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, you said, &#8220;I led the largest squadron in the United States Navy. And I did it out of patriotism, not for profit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415661</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415661</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because he wont take your guns away.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

uh yeah sure with the mccain/lieberman gun show bill.   which would basically shut down gun shows.  nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because he wont take your guns away.</p></blockquote>
<p>uh yeah sure with the mccain/lieberman gun show bill.   which would basically shut down gun shows.  nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415650</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415650</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is for victory in the war against the islamist pigs who want to kill you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

but he also accuses the US of &#039;torture&#039; and wants to close gitmo.

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is a free market capitalist. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I really don&#039;t know where you get this at, with his SPONSORSHIP of cap and trade. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is anti abortion and has a record to prove it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

mccain is also for embryonic stem cell research.  and would most likely nominate judges like souter, who would support his mccain-feingold bill.

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is a pro-military war hero who has 50 years of service to the USA&lt;/blockquote&gt;

true, but john f&#039;ing kerry is a &#039;war hero&#039; too.....

&lt;blockquote&gt;Wrong. He has promised to make Alito and Roberts his role models for his judicial appointments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

he voted for ginzberg.  and given how many times he has turned his back on conservatives...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McCain is for victory in the war against the islamist pigs who want to kill you.</p></blockquote>
<p>but he also accuses the US of &#8216;torture&#8217; and wants to close gitmo.</p>
<blockquote><p>McCain is a free market capitalist. </p></blockquote>
<p>I really don&#8217;t know where you get this at, with his SPONSORSHIP of cap and trade. </p>
<blockquote><p>McCain is anti abortion and has a record to prove it. </p></blockquote>
<p>mccain is also for embryonic stem cell research.  and would most likely nominate judges like souter, who would support his mccain-feingold bill.</p>
<blockquote><p>McCain is a pro-military war hero who has 50 years of service to the USA</p></blockquote>
<p>true, but john f&#8217;ing kerry is a &#8216;war hero&#8217; too&#8230;..</p>
<blockquote><p>Wrong. He has promised to make Alito and Roberts his role models for his judicial appointments.</p></blockquote>
<p>he voted for ginzberg.  and given how many times he has turned his back on conservatives&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alaskangrizzly</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415571</link>
		<dc:creator>alaskangrizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because he wont sell us out to the UN, or the EU, or any other internationalist organization just to be “liked” in europe&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not Europe but he&#039;ll gladly sell us out to Mexico. And before you shout out the &quot;but he promised fence/border enforcement first&quot; bunch of bs why don&#039;t do you your homework on how much he has stumped for enforcement here in his home state of Arizona. There are lots of things he *could* have pushed for here without federal aid and gotten the job done just like Sheriff Joe is doing despite organized resistance from the Demotard mayor of Phoenix who is an open borders nut and orgainized resistance from the governor and even federal government themselves. I have never seen McCain even once praise Sheriff Joe for his not coddling illegal aliens and arresting them and deporting them back to Mexico. But I guess that would make McCain look like a total hypocrite when he attends La Raza (The Race) conventions. Actions speak louder than words, and all his actions thus far says he will sell this country to Mexico faster than Bush is already trying to. Obama has already said flat out he will sell us to Mexico, the only difference with McCain is put out a disclaimer &lt;strong&gt;saying&lt;/strong&gt; he wants a fence with enforcement despite as his &lt;strong&gt;actions&lt;/strong&gt; proving otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because he wont sell us out to the UN, or the EU, or any other internationalist organization just to be “liked” in europe</p></blockquote>
<p>Not Europe but he&#8217;ll gladly sell us out to Mexico. And before you shout out the &#8220;but he promised fence/border enforcement first&#8221; bunch of bs why don&#8217;t do you your homework on how much he has stumped for enforcement here in his home state of Arizona. There are lots of things he *could* have pushed for here without federal aid and gotten the job done just like Sheriff Joe is doing despite organized resistance from the Demotard mayor of Phoenix who is an open borders nut and orgainized resistance from the governor and even federal government themselves. I have never seen McCain even once praise Sheriff Joe for his not coddling illegal aliens and arresting them and deporting them back to Mexico. But I guess that would make McCain look like a total hypocrite when he attends La Raza (The Race) conventions. Actions speak louder than words, and all his actions thus far says he will sell this country to Mexico faster than Bush is already trying to. Obama has already said flat out he will sell us to Mexico, the only difference with McCain is put out a disclaimer <strong>saying</strong> he wants a fence with enforcement despite as his <strong>actions</strong> proving otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danceswithdachshunds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415425</link>
		<dc:creator>Danceswithdachshunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415425</guid>
		<description>How is his choice difficult?  If he picks Joe Lieberman - it&#039;s over; he&#039;ll lose.  If he picks Sarah Palin as VP he&#039;d win by a LANDSLIDE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is his choice difficult?  If he picks Joe Lieberman &#8211; it&#8217;s over; he&#8217;ll lose.  If he picks Sarah Palin as VP he&#8217;d win by a LANDSLIDE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atheling</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415384</link>
		<dc:creator>atheling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415384</guid>
		<description>Bill:

These people are obtuse.

They are the types who voted for Ross Perot and gave us Bill Clinton for 8 years.

Don&#039;t waste your breath.  It&#039;s hopeless.  They refuse to see or use reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:</p>
<p>These people are obtuse.</p>
<p>They are the types who voted for Ross Perot and gave us Bill Clinton for 8 years.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t waste your breath.  It&#8217;s hopeless.  They refuse to see or use reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415350</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415350</guid>
		<description>On August 20th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, Dandapani said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Remind me again, why conservatives should support McCan’t?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because he wont surrender to the islamist scum that attacked us.Because he is a free market capitalist who wont socialize entire industries. Because he wont create gargantuan entitlement programs that will push our national debt over the GDP and render our dollar worthless. Because he wont sell us out to the UN, or the EU, or any other internationalist organization just to be &quot;liked&quot; in europe, which anyone with a brain wouldn&#039;t care about anyway. Because he wont sell out our allies in the middle east to appease the Arabs/Iranians. Because he is a war hero with 50 years of service to the USA. Because he would punch some yapping filthy creep who was saying &quot;God damn America&quot; in the nose. Because his wife doesn&#039;t resent the USA. Because his kids are serving the country. Because he is 3rd generation Navy. Because he doesn&#039;t hang with domestic terrorists who like to have their photo taken stomping on the US flag. Because he wont take your guns away. Because he wont waste your money on parasites. Because he didn&#039;t vote to allow partial birth abortions or abortion survivors die. Because he didn&#039;t take kickbacks from convicted felons. Because he never attended Koran studies in Indonesia.&lt;strong&gt; Because it would be a kick in the nuts to George Soros and Kos.&lt;/strong&gt; Because an Obama presidency would reward the likes of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi for trying to lose us a war and getting Americans killed. 

I could go on here with very little prodding. 

It is spelled &quot;McCain&quot; by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 20th, 2008 at 8:41 pm, Dandapani said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Remind me again, why conservatives should support McCan’t?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Because he wont surrender to the islamist scum that attacked us.Because he is a free market capitalist who wont socialize entire industries. Because he wont create gargantuan entitlement programs that will push our national debt over the GDP and render our dollar worthless. Because he wont sell us out to the UN, or the EU, or any other internationalist organization just to be &#8220;liked&#8221; in europe, which anyone with a brain wouldn&#8217;t care about anyway. Because he wont sell out our allies in the middle east to appease the Arabs/Iranians. Because he is a war hero with 50 years of service to the USA. Because he would punch some yapping filthy creep who was saying &#8220;God damn America&#8221; in the nose. Because his wife doesn&#8217;t resent the USA. Because his kids are serving the country. Because he is 3rd generation Navy. Because he doesn&#8217;t hang with domestic terrorists who like to have their photo taken stomping on the US flag. Because he wont take your guns away. Because he wont waste your money on parasites. Because he didn&#8217;t vote to allow partial birth abortions or abortion survivors die. Because he didn&#8217;t take kickbacks from convicted felons. Because he never attended Koran studies in Indonesia.<strong> Because it would be a kick in the nuts to George Soros and Kos.</strong> Because an Obama presidency would reward the likes of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi for trying to lose us a war and getting Americans killed. </p>
<p>I could go on here with very little prodding. </p>
<p>It is spelled &#8220;McCain&#8221; by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dandapani</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/20/mccain-refuses-to-defuse-rumors-about-pro-choice-vp-pick/comment-page-1/#comment-415292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dandapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13449#comment-415292</guid>
		<description>Remind me again, why conservatives should support McCan&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remind me again, why conservatives should support McCan&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
