See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On August 24th, 2008 at 12:39 am, tamarah180 said:

   Why do you think people like lgm can’t see the core of their religion? The uniqueness of each of us is so incredible. The laws of country and the foundations of religions must be preserved to foster and protect the growth of all humans.

   I think it is because there is a backlash against the rigidity of traditional/Orthodox rabbis and also because Judaism is being so watered down by liberal rabbis that the teachings of some synagogues are indistinguishable from the Democratic Platform. In fact, I was excoriated by “elderly folks” at one temple for saying that I was supportive of the war in Iraq and thought W would one day be proven to be a great president.

   It appears to me that many people are so into “individuality” and caught up in their own “ideas” that they have not taken time to research the validity of their beliefs and have no moral compass on which to base their life’s decisions.

   It is very sad to me that there are Jews for whom Hebrew is a foriegn language, Israel is a place far away with no importance and who couldn’t name even 10 of the 613 commandments. And Hebrew school is a place to get rid of the kids for 3 hours so they can go home and sleep.

   /stepping offa my soap box/

2. #102
   On August 24th, 2008 at 1:40 am, tgusa said:

   And speaking of art what the hell happened to the black culture such as but not limited to music? Some of the most uplifting of art in our history, obliterated, by what, this new downer stuff? Dammit, I’m sick of it, yes I’m darn mad and I’m not going to take it anymore! How bout you, Americans?

3. #103
   On August 24th, 2008 at 1:42 am, Republicanvet said:

   On August 23rd, 2008 at 6:57 pm, JT said:

   On August 23rd, 2008 at 6:51 pm, ajmontana said:

   Dimsdale , thats why they don’t do townhalls…. can’t answer a straight question with a straight answer…
   McCain should do a 3a.m. commercial with a teleprompter next to Odumbo’s bed.

   aj,

   This has to happen. What a great friggin idea. Conservatives are smart.

   I can see the commercial now…

   Starting with dark screen, phone ringing. Words on screen says, “It’s 3am”
   First scene: WH bedroom, light turns on, Obama fumbles for the phone while MO is asking loudly, “Who the hell is that?” Don’t they know 3am calls don’t help my kids sleep?”
   Obama picks up the phone, voice on the other end says, “Sir this is General BigDaddy in the Situation Room. Iran is fueling missiles pointed at Israel.”

   Obama: “Uuh, Ummm, hang on”.

   General on phone: “Sir, what are our orders.”

   Obama: “What’s the rush? I said hang on!”

   Obama fumbling with remote, turns on teleprompter, selects guide, and chooses Middle East.

   Lines scrolling, Obama, in a voice that is obvious that something is being read, “Uum, uh, Call…State…the State Department…to arrange talks…talks with Damascus….”.

   Teleprompter screen goes dark, scary music starts.

   Obama at a loss for “words”, suddenly bitter at the CEO’s of teleprompter companies because he wants to cling to his so badly.

   Obama: Uuh, hey ah…, ummm, tell State I’ll call in the morning.”

   Hangs up phone, turns to MO, tells her it’s nothing, but he’ll check the kids anyway.

4. #104
   On August 24th, 2008 at 1:50 am, Republicanvet said:

   On August 23rd, 2008 at 7:54 pm, ajmontana said:

   one reason they waited till friday early a.m to announce…. they are Chickens…..
   still laughing @ the Morons who were waiting for the “magic text”

   It guaranteed sloppy wet kisses from the drive-bys all weekend with little counter response.

5. #105
   On August 24th, 2008 at 2:01 am, Republicanvet said:

   On August 23rd, 2008 at 8:33 pm, lgm said:

   I was disappointed that you have to be Jewish to be offended at being depicted as a Nazi. I would think a Christian would be offended as well.

   LGM, can you point to each of the posts where Bush or someone in his administration or Republican or in the military have been depicted as Nazi’s by the left over the last 8 years and you have denounced it in the comments?

   I have been offended numerous times over that period by that exact depiction and others, yet I cannot point to a single instance where ANYONE on the left denounced the comments.

6. #106
   On August 24th, 2008 at 2:01 am, tgusa said:

   We’ve come a long way from this
   baby.

7. #107
   On August 24th, 2008 at 4:30 am, powerpro said:

   Didn’t you get the memo?

   Anything Biden said pre-acceptance speech is “in the past” and “old news”. All that matters now is what he says and does as the other half of hopenchange.

8. #108
   On August 24th, 2008 at 4:57 am, RetFireman said:

   Lgm’s ancestors were no doubt the ones worshiping the golden calf.

   And, with his support for B. Hussein O., he apparently still is worshipping The Golden Calf.

   If it would not be too much trouble, could someone direct me to the thread that contains this mess between the owner of the glass navel and Blind_Mule? I seem to have missed it and am competely in the dark as a result.

   I enjoyed reading BM’s posts, and if he is indeed gone as a result of a troll, well I am beside myself. There has been a bit of an exodus of some of my favorite posters lately, and I need to see what happened so as to guarantee that I not have the same happen to me.

9. #109
   On August 24th, 2008 at 7:26 am, Grunt said:

   People should not feed the troll.

10. #110
    On August 24th, 2008 at 7:51 am, 4USA said:

    An apology that says,

    “I’m sorry if some were offended by my remarks,”

    is not an apology at all in my opinion. An apology is,

    “I’m sorry for being so wrong and accusing heroes of crimes they did not commit.”

11. #111
    On August 24th, 2008 at 8:21 am, satcong said:

    ajmontana comment #78;
    

    “Biden has a son set to deploy to Iraq soon”…

    I doubt Biden’s son “Beau” the current Attorney General of Delaware and a shoe-in to become the next U.S. senator of Delaware if Obama-Biden wins will have any hands-on front-line duties…being a reserve Captain in the armys Advocate Generals Office and a bullet magnet to anyone around him !
    Sat Cong

12. #112
    On August 24th, 2008 at 8:30 am, ajmontana said:

    The point is satcong, his son IS serving which was your complaint in the first place, now you question how he’s serving based on being a “bullet magnet”….
    If you’ve been around here you know I’m not a fan of the Dems.

13. #113
    On August 24th, 2008 at 9:03 am, satcong said:

    ajmontana comment #112
    Do you know how many good men & woman it will take to make sure this dem. liberal attorney does not come to any harm!
    But I guess what we really need is another PC lawyer currently connected to our government for lots of photo ops in Iraq to make sure our front line troops don’t run astray!
    PS ajmonatana…I never doubted your intent…just the political correctness of “IS”.
    Sat Cong

14. #114
    On August 24th, 2008 at 9:09 am, ajmontana said:

    We can hear you stop yelling.
    entire posts in bold = not good.

15. #115
    On August 24th, 2008 at 9:35 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    satcong,

    Using all bold will get you some attention from Michelle.

    AJ,

    All caps is YELLING! Luv ya “bra”. LOL

    Did lgm say something after #90 that got deleted? It appears he said something to offend the Polish people. If so (and I am sorry I missed it) add it to #7.

    It appears Biden is something from the shallow end of the gene pool.

    Barak O’Biden 08 NEVER!

16. #116
    On August 24th, 2008 at 9:50 am, derel3433 said:

    These elite Dems have no respect for the military. They hate the military.

17. #117
    On August 24th, 2008 at 10:37 am, FamilyMan said:

    Biden accuses the military of atrocities for political points. He thinks we won’t remember.
    WRONG

18. #118
    On August 24th, 2008 at 11:03 am, chapoutier said:

    Ever since you libs took control of the arts do you not recognize that art has disappeared? The movies, where’s the John Wayne, the painters, where’s Leonardo, the sculptors, where’s Michael Angelo, the music, where’s led zeppelin, sports, where’s the Roger Staubach? No where that’s where, thanks for nothing and….please don’t do us any more favors. Good art, Americans love it, that’s why we spent billions to repatriate the great art to the undeserving countries of Europe after WWII. Art that will soon be burned in an islamists bonfire, but nevermind you prolly have a bad copy.

    What are you babbling about?
    AJ said it looked photoshopped. I said it wasn’t a photo. Was I making any value judgments as to the piece?

    And the examples you give are nonsensical.

19. #119
    On August 24th, 2008 at 11:11 am, lgm said:

    FamilyMan said (#117):

    Biden accuses the military of atrocities for political points. He thinks we won’t remember.

    No. He accused Rumsfeld and a few others of a coverup. Follow the links. That’s what they say.

    With Biden’s help, at the end of the day the right thing happened. Rumsfeld resigned partly for his role in the coverup and the soldiers had a fair trial and were acquitted.

20. #120
    On August 24th, 2008 at 11:15 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    UGH, it’s still around.

21. #121
    On August 24th, 2008 at 11:50 am, DBNinKY said:

    With Biden’s help, at the end of the day the right thing happened. Rumsfeld resigned partly for his role in the coverup and the soldiers had a fair trial and were acquitted.

    You have got to be kidding!

    Biden spewed nothing but hate and contempt towards every military person that testified before his committee, and for what? Nothing but to score political points for his failed presidential bid, by creating an air of failure around the Surge before it even got off the ground!

    And believe me, Rumsfeld resigned because he lost the President’s support – not because of perpetually peeved Biden’s tirade before a Democrat led lynch-mob committee. Likewise, the fact that those soldiers were justly acquitted occurred in spite of Biden’s best efforts to black list them, not because of what you’re spinning as his demand for accountability and clarity.

22. #122
    On August 24th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, billcollier said:

    I can only repeat this often, until we figure it out: for liberals Facts are symbols that are open to interpretation, namely THEIR interpretation and ONLY their interpretation and all other “interpretations” are “taking it out of context.”

23. #123
    On August 24th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, Grunt said:

    Biden’s son is serving in the capacity the Army thinks is best. I salute him for his service. Do not disparage his service because he has liberal leanings or is not a front line troop. With out all jobs being performed expertly the military would fall apart. It is a sign of progress that we need more lawyers and less snipers in Iraq.

24. #124
    On August 24th, 2008 at 1:12 pm, Bruce said:

    I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across..

    When a TROLL like lgm and others comes into a thread with their garbage … IGNORE them and continue.

    If you bother trying to refute their arguments – they win. They have done what Kos and Huff want them to do, and you have fallen for the tactic.

    IGNORE THEM!

25. #125
    On August 24th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across..

    I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.

26. #126
    On August 24th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, Bruce said:

    I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.

    That is an idiotic statement. Did you not read the reasoning behind my comment? It is not a question of “discourse”, nor is it a question of “convictions”. Rather, it is a question of feeding the trolls! Do you not GET that point?

    Sheesh…

27. #127
    On August 24th, 2008 at 1:49 pm, chapoutier said:

    Rather, it is a question of feeding the trolls! Do you not GET that point?

    Oh I get it. It just seems to me that your idea of what is a trollish comment and one which is simply disagreeable to you is skewed.

    No one needs to get a signed permission slip from you to post here, Bruce. And you are welcome to ignore any and all comments posted by the “trolls” or directed at them.

28. #128
    On August 24th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Bruce,

    I was on the front edge of the

    I G N O R E
    H I M

    line. It never worked. I just put the hammer down when a lie springs up – and they do with almost every post from some of the local trolls. Sadly, some are tagged with the lable with no good reason and some earn it with ever post.

29. #129
    On August 24th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, derel3433 said:

    it was proven those marines didn’t kill unarmed civilians. they were found not guilty after a fair trial.

30. #130
    On August 24th, 2008 at 5:21 pm, RetFireman said:

    With Biden’s help, at the end of the day the right thing happened. Rumsfeld resigned partly for his role in the cover-up and the soldiers had a fair trial and were acquitted.

    Biden had nothing…repeat NOTHING to do with ANY of that.

    Rumsfeld did not resign because of ANY cover-up. If you think so, again, provide proof. I won’t hold my breath for it as you NEVER provide proof.

    As for them being aquitted after receiving a fair trial, they were EXONERATED BEFORE going to trial, and at last look, only one member was still being INVESTIGATED

    I swear to God, you have got to be one of the most ridiculous, immature idiots floating around the comment sections of the Blogosphere. You make inane comments and pull statistics and make statements based on nothing more than your emotional feelings and imagination.

    I seriously doubt that you are a teacher, for if you are, then the requirements for getting a Teacher’s Credential in this day and age have surely slipped below the requirements of becoming a Street Sweeper following behind the elephants in a circus parade. I can’t believe that the parents of your supposed students have not lodged a campaign to have you removed because of teaching their children falsehoods and nonsensical hoopla instead of facts and truths.

31. #131
    On August 24th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, ArmsnAmmo said:

    NEVER! THAT IS WHEN… Even it he does it wont be for anything exept his gain! So the anwser is NEVER!

    I am hoping and praying that this is just another nail in the coffin of Obama 2008 and 2016 and 2016 and so on! If not like the T-SHIRT say’s 2008 WERE SCREWED!

32. #132
    On August 24th, 2008 at 6:56 pm, satcong said:

    comment #114 & 115,
    Sorry guys for being so loud…but politicians, lawyers & soldiers in war are very touchy subjects for me…
    here in the states the average person(non-soldier)is considered innocent until proven guilty…but once you become apart of the military your considered guilty until your proven innocent(in the military you fall under a different set of laws & justice…the “Uniform Code of Military Justice”)…you can forget about that one phone call, you can forget about a lawyer until your assigned one…and don’t even ask to find out what your accused of…you can be held incommunicado until they get around to you, in another words Forget-About-It !…and if your on a ship you fall under Admiralty Law (let me not get into this one…cause it will blow your mind !).
    Now you put this soldier in a war zone and tell them that not only do they have to follow the laws of our country but also the Military Laws(UCMJ/Admiralty Law)& they may also be accountable to the laws of the country they are in…
    Now throw in the Geneva Convention(Laws of conduct in war), And finally lets throw in The World Court who may put you on trial for War Crimes if you don’t follow all-the-above !!!
    And GRUNT in comment #122 said that we need MORE lawyers and LESS snipers…Hey GRUNT (Ya Think)

    Sat Cong(Vietnamese slang for “Kill Communists”)

33. #133
    On August 24th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, Grunt said:

    satcong, I think it is a sign of progress on the war front that we need less snipers and more lawyers. The JA move in generally after the wars have been won in order to train the host country in proceduresof law. You do not lead with the bureaucrats rather they follow up on a victory to create a society that knows and abides by local and international law.

34. #134
    On August 24th, 2008 at 9:13 pm, satcong said:

    GRUNT comment #132
    So I guess Bill Clinton didn’t have enough lawyers on hand when the CIA had ground eyes on Osama Bin Laden in the late 1990′s…and even when that ground team who were close enough to see Bin Laden & his crew with their own eyes… pleaded & waited, and pleaded & waited “We Have Him In Our Sights” “We Can Get Him” that still wasn’t enough justification for the Lawyers-Turned-Politicians !
    Why do we send in such brave Special Forces to places like this & ask them to risk their lives doing what we trained them to do, and don’t let them do their job ???

    Sat Cong

35. #135
    On August 24th, 2008 at 11:09 pm, Grunt said:

    It is very nice of you not to read my posts.