Comments on: When will Biden apologize for Haditha smear? http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:32:37 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Grunt http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419478 Grunt Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:09:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419478 It is very nice of you not to read my posts. It is very nice of you not to read my posts.

]]> By: satcong http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419454 satcong Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:13:23 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419454 GRUNT comment #132 So I guess Bill Clinton didn't have enough lawyers on hand when the CIA had ground eyes on Osama Bin Laden in the late 1990's...and even when that ground team who were close enough to see Bin Laden & his crew with their own eyes... pleaded & waited, and pleaded & waited "We Have Him In Our Sights" "We Can Get Him" that still wasn't enough justification for the Lawyers-Turned-Politicians ! Why do we send in such brave Special Forces to places like this & ask them to risk their lives doing what we trained them to do, and don't let them do their job ??? Sat Cong GRUNT comment #132
So I guess Bill Clinton didn’t have enough lawyers on hand when the CIA had ground eyes on Osama Bin Laden in the late 1990’s…and even when that ground team who were close enough to see Bin Laden & his crew with their own eyes… pleaded & waited, and pleaded & waited “We Have Him In Our Sights” “We Can Get Him” that still wasn’t enough justification for the Lawyers-Turned-Politicians !
Why do we send in such brave Special Forces to places like this & ask them to risk their lives doing what we trained them to do, and don’t let them do their job ???

Sat Cong

]]> By: Grunt http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419440 Grunt Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:18:53 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419440 satcong, I think it is a sign of progress on the war front that we need less snipers and more lawyers. The JA move in generally after the wars have been won in order to train the host country in proceduresof law. You do not lead with the bureaucrats rather they follow up on a victory to create a society that knows and abides by local and international law. satcong, I think it is a sign of progress on the war front that we need less snipers and more lawyers. The JA move in generally after the wars have been won in order to train the host country in proceduresof law. You do not lead with the bureaucrats rather they follow up on a victory to create a society that knows and abides by local and international law.

]]> By: satcong http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419420 satcong Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:56:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419420 comment #114 & 115, Sorry guys for being so loud...but politicians, lawyers & soldiers in war are very touchy subjects for me... here in the states the average person(non-soldier)is considered innocent until proven guilty...but once you become apart of the military your considered guilty until your proven innocent(in the military you fall under a different set of laws & justice...the "Uniform Code of Military Justice")...you can forget about that one phone call, you can forget about a lawyer until your assigned one...and don't even ask to find out what your accused of...you can be held incommunicado until they get around to you, in another words Forget-About-It !...and if your on a ship you fall under Admiralty Law (let me not get into this one...cause it will blow your mind !). Now you put this soldier in a war zone and tell them that not only do they have to follow the laws of our country but also the Military Laws(UCMJ/Admiralty Law)& they may also be accountable to the laws of the country they are in... Now throw in the Geneva Convention(Laws of conduct in war), And finally lets throw in The World Court who may put you on trial for War Crimes if you don't follow all-the-above !!! And GRUNT in comment #122 said that we need MORE lawyers and LESS snipers...Hey GRUNT (Ya Think) Sat Cong(Vietnamese slang for "Kill Communists") comment #114 & 115,
Sorry guys for being so loud…but politicians, lawyers & soldiers in war are very touchy subjects for me…
here in the states the average person(non-soldier)is considered innocent until proven guilty…but once you become apart of the military your considered guilty until your proven innocent(in the military you fall under a different set of laws & justice…the “Uniform Code of Military Justice”)…you can forget about that one phone call, you can forget about a lawyer until your assigned one…and don’t even ask to find out what your accused of…you can be held incommunicado until they get around to you, in another words Forget-About-It !…and if your on a ship you fall under Admiralty Law (let me not get into this one…cause it will blow your mind !).
Now you put this soldier in a war zone and tell them that not only do they have to follow the laws of our country but also the Military Laws(UCMJ/Admiralty Law)& they may also be accountable to the laws of the country they are in…
Now throw in the Geneva Convention(Laws of conduct in war), And finally lets throw in The World Court who may put you on trial for War Crimes if you don’t follow all-the-above !!!
And GRUNT in comment #122 said that we need MORE lawyers and LESS snipers…Hey GRUNT (Ya Think)

Sat Cong(Vietnamese slang for “Kill Communists”)

]]> By: ArmsnAmmo http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419363 ArmsnAmmo Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:32:18 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419363 NEVER! THAT IS WHEN... Even it he does it wont be for anything exept his gain! So the anwser is NEVER! I am hoping and praying that this is just another nail in the coffin of Obama 2008 and 2016 and 2016 and so on! If not like the T-SHIRT say's 2008 WERE SCREWED! NEVER! THAT IS WHEN… Even it he does it wont be for anything exept his gain! So the anwser is NEVER!

I am hoping and praying that this is just another nail in the coffin of Obama 2008 and 2016 and 2016 and so on! If not like the T-SHIRT say’s 2008 WERE SCREWED!

]]> By: RetFireman http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419353 RetFireman Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:21:18 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419353 <blockquote>With Biden’s help, at the end of the day the right thing happened. Rumsfeld resigned partly for his role in the cover-up and the soldiers had a fair trial and were acquitted.</blockquote>Biden had nothing...repeat <strong><em>NOTHING</em></strong> to do with ANY of that. Rumsfeld did not resign because of ANY cover-up. If you think so, again, provide proof. I won't hold my breath for it as you NEVER provide proof. As for them being aquitted after receiving a fair trial, they were EXONERATED <strong>BEFORE</strong> going to trial, and at last look, only one member was still being <em>INVESTIGATED</em> I swear to God, you have got to be one of the most ridiculous, immature idiots floating around the comment sections of the Blogosphere. You make inane comments and pull statistics and make statements based on nothing more than your emotional feelings and imagination. I seriously doubt that you are a teacher, for if you are, then the requirements for getting a Teacher's Credential in this day and age have surely slipped below the requirements of becoming a Street Sweeper following behind the elephants in a circus parade. I can't believe that the parents of your supposed students have not lodged a campaign to have you removed because of teaching their children falsehoods and nonsensical hoopla instead of facts and truths.

With Biden’s help, at the end of the day the right thing happened. Rumsfeld resigned partly for his role in the cover-up and the soldiers had a fair trial and were acquitted.

Biden had nothing…repeat NOTHING to do with ANY of that.

Rumsfeld did not resign because of ANY cover-up. If you think so, again, provide proof. I won’t hold my breath for it as you NEVER provide proof.

As for them being aquitted after receiving a fair trial, they were EXONERATED BEFORE going to trial, and at last look, only one member was still being INVESTIGATED

I swear to God, you have got to be one of the most ridiculous, immature idiots floating around the comment sections of the Blogosphere. You make inane comments and pull statistics and make statements based on nothing more than your emotional feelings and imagination.

I seriously doubt that you are a teacher, for if you are, then the requirements for getting a Teacher’s Credential in this day and age have surely slipped below the requirements of becoming a Street Sweeper following behind the elephants in a circus parade. I can’t believe that the parents of your supposed students have not lodged a campaign to have you removed because of teaching their children falsehoods and nonsensical hoopla instead of facts and truths.

]]> By: derel3433 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419297 derel3433 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:03:07 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419297 it was proven those marines didn't kill unarmed civilians. they were found not guilty after a fair trial. it was proven those marines didn’t kill unarmed civilians. they were found not guilty after a fair trial.

]]> By: Biden and Murtha? | BitsBlog http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419285 Biden and Murtha? | BitsBlog Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:54:55 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419285 [...] (Bit) I see Michelle noting the same angle, apparently inspired by someone named David [...] [...] (Bit) I see Michelle noting the same angle, apparently inspired by someone named David [...]

]]> By: On-my-soap-box http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419229 On-my-soap-box Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:43:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419229 Bruce, I was on the front edge of the I G N O R E H I M line. It never worked. I just put the hammer down when a lie springs up - and they do with almost every post from some of the local trolls. Sadly, some are tagged with the lable with no good reason and some earn it with ever post. Bruce,

I was on the front edge of the

I G N O R E
H I M

line. It never worked. I just put the hammer down when a lie springs up – and they do with almost every post from some of the local trolls. Sadly, some are tagged with the lable with no good reason and some earn it with ever post.

]]> By: chapoutier http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419188 chapoutier Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:49:01 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419188 <blockquote>Rather, it is a question of feeding the trolls! Do you not GET that point?</blockquote> Oh I get it. It just seems to me that your idea of what is a trollish comment and one which is simply disagreeable to you is skewed. No one needs to get a signed permission slip from you to post here, Bruce. And you are welcome to ignore any and all comments posted by the "trolls" or directed at them.

Rather, it is a question of feeding the trolls! Do you not GET that point?

Oh I get it. It just seems to me that your idea of what is a trollish comment and one which is simply disagreeable to you is skewed.

No one needs to get a signed permission slip from you to post here, Bruce. And you are welcome to ignore any and all comments posted by the “trolls” or directed at them.

]]> By: Bruce http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419177 Bruce Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:33:53 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419177 <blockquote>I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.</blockquote> That is an idiotic statement. Did you not read the reasoning behind my comment? It is not a question of "discourse", nor is it a question of "convictions". Rather, it is a question of <strong>feeding the trolls!</strong> Do you not <strong>GET </strong>that point? Sheesh...

I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.

That is an idiotic statement. Did you not read the reasoning behind my comment? It is not a question of “discourse”, nor is it a question of “convictions”. Rather, it is a question of feeding the trolls! Do you not GET that point?

Sheesh…

]]> By: chapoutier http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419174 chapoutier Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:28:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419174 <blockquote> I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across..</blockquote> I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.

I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across..

I guess others here have enough faith in their convictions to be able to debate and defend them. Sorry that you do not. But echo chambers are not hard to find on the internet if you are dissatisfied with the discourse here.

]]> By: Bruce http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419166 Bruce Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:12:14 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419166 I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across.. When a <b>TROLL</B> like lgm and others comes into a thread with their garbage ... <b>IGNORE</b> them and continue. If you bother trying to refute their arguments - they win. They have done what Kos and Huff want them to do, and you have fallen for the tactic. <b>IGNORE THEM!</b> I have said the following innumerable times and have never been able to get the point across..

When a TROLL like lgm and others comes into a thread with their garbage … IGNORE them and continue.

If you bother trying to refute their arguments – they win. They have done what Kos and Huff want them to do, and you have fallen for the tactic.

IGNORE THEM!

]]> By: Grunt http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419165 Grunt Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:10:48 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419165 Biden's son is serving in the capacity the Army thinks is best. I salute him for his service. Do not disparage his service because he has liberal leanings or is not a front line troop. With out all jobs being performed expertly the military would fall apart. It is a sign of progress that we need more lawyers and less snipers in Iraq. Biden’s son is serving in the capacity the Army thinks is best. I salute him for his service. Do not disparage his service because he has liberal leanings or is not a front line troop. With out all jobs being performed expertly the military would fall apart. It is a sign of progress that we need more lawyers and less snipers in Iraq.

]]> By: billcollier http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/23/when-will-biden-apologize-for-haditha-smear/comment-page-2/#comment-419145 billcollier Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:43:59 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/?p=13497#comment-419145 I can only repeat this often, until we figure it out: for liberals Facts are symbols that are open to interpretation, namely THEIR interpretation and ONLY their interpretation and all other "interpretations" are "taking it out of context." I can only repeat this often, until we figure it out: for liberals Facts are symbols that are open to interpretation, namely THEIR interpretation and ONLY their interpretation and all other “interpretations” are “taking it out of context.”

]]>