Biden flashback: Wrong on the surge
I noted this in my year-end essay last December on the surge, the military, and the media. Worth noting again as the Obama camp hypes Joe Biden’s great foreign policy and strategic expertise. They were both wrong. Phenomenally wrong.
Here’s a reminder of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s resolution opposing the surge, which passed 12-9 on Jan. 25:
Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., the panel’s chairman, said the legislation is “not an attempt to embarrass the president. … It’s an attempt to save the president from making a significant mistake with regard to our policy in Iraq.”
…Biden, who sponsored the measure with Hagel and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the measure is aimed at getting the administration’s attention. He noted that Bush has said he will be moving forward with his Iraq plans he outlined in a Jan. 10 address regardless of what Congress says.
The measure “is designed to let the president know that there are many in both parties, Democrats and Republicans, that believe a change in our mission to go into Baghdad — in the midst of a civil war — as well as a surge in ground troops … is the wrong way to go, and I believe it will have the opposite — I repeat — opposite effect the president intends,” Biden said.
And here’s a reminder of how Joe Biden’s running mate has changed his tune on the surge:
Obama Inadvertently Concedes Surge Achieves Key Administration Goal
STATEMENT: “Originally, the administration suggested that the key measure was whether it gave breathing room for political reconciliation. So far, I think we have not seen the kind of political reconciliation that’s going to bring about long-term stability in Iraq.” — Barack Obama, July 22, 2008EXPIRATION DATE: August 20, 2008: “Let’s be clear, our troops have completed every mission they’ve been given,” Mr. Obama said at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Orlando, Fla., where the likely Democratic presidential nominee courted military voters who are expected to play a pivotal role in several swing states. “They have created the space for political reconciliation.”
Wonder if Biden will start purging his websites like Obama did?
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Political Party Poop
- Obama/Bidden 2008: Defeatist Democrats Anoint Arrogant Socialist Senators « Pronk Palisades
- Out of the mouth of Biden, comes the truth, at least for once. « Republican Party of Jefferson County, TN
- Michelle Malkin » DNC Night 3 open thread: The serfs await
- Anonymous
- Obama Can Not Handle the Economy Crisis and Protect Our National Security « Obama who ?
- Peoples Press Collective » Obama’s Pick is Brilliant
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Barack Obama, Iraq
Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care CzarRiehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go UnexploitedLegal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No ReidThe Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysisThe Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to ConclusionsLegal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names
Biden has already started to purge his website, I documented it here and I have made screen shots of the search, the before, and the after. The new site redirects to a “welcome the new vice president page.” Senator, what are you hiding?
Biden is already purging his website, as I documented here regarding his foreign policy “experience”. I took screen shots of my search, of the old site (now cached) and the new site. (you gotta love CACHING!)
No this isn’t your usual “house party”
Joe Biden in the photo above wants to raise the roof?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8525qLC5TRQ
Biden’s mine field is so rich its gonna be blowback after blowback for this ticket. BO shows another example of lacking leadership amd judgement in this selection.
Well we really should give Odopey some credit he finally made a decision about something. Most of the time it’s just “Present”
You know it – Biden’s so-called “international experience” is limited to America’s recoil and retreat! The fact that he would dare come back into the public arena seeking national office after the bigoted, racist remarks he made just last year, shows how shameless he and the Democrat party are, and how desperate!
Mark Halprin on ABC just said something like: “No one in the Democrat party is saying Biden isn’t qualified to be President”
Well, actually, they spoke pretty clearly during the cauci/primaries – almost no one thought he was the right guy. The PUMA’s are steaming.
Are you kidding?
He’s probably cleaning out Everthing including his Glove Compartment in the SUV.
He’s great at reading foreign dignitaries’ speeches. And then repeating them.
McCain and Bush — wrong on the invasion.
Hammer, hammer, hammer the fact that our brave and courageous pulled victory from the jaws of defeat despite the treasonous efforts by these democrat leaders.
On August 24th, 2008 at 11:12 am, lgm said:
President Biden and Barack America: wrong on everything – including each other!
lgm – wrong on everything.
lgm, this is from the American Thinker:
I recommend you link over and read the entire article.
Biden should get major economic credit.
Did you see his housing compond.
He does that on less than $200K a year!
With less than $300 assets!
The guy must be brillent.
I don’t object to him being rich, but his filings show upper middile class.
File under compound envy.
Please dont feed the troll. Obama bin Biden fighting against America for a world free from freedom.
BTW LGM, the invasion was the right thing to do – it gave the U.S. a beach-head upon which to fight terrorists far from our shores; it secured for the West a valuable oil source, keeping it out of the hands Iran and/or Putin; and it re-established the U.S. will and ability to retaliate against all comers, giving us “street cred” as the world’s lone Super Power!
The left needs to face it, LGM: Iraq is off the table and we won! Because of President Bush, Iraqis have new lease on life and democracy has a firm grip in the Middle East.
Sorry that should be lees than $320K in assets.
Can I get a job with AP now?
current commentors – priceless (from the credit card commercial)
Tell it to the women who can vote (and work and drive and hold jobs and teach…) and the girls who can go to school because the USA is the leader of freedom in the world you IDIOT. Gawd we are sick of you and your narrow cosed-mindedness towards ANYTHING that could be good about removing the leading killer of Muslims in the ENTIRE WORLD. IDIOT!
Biden grew up, went to law school, then became a Senator. He has never earned a private sector dollar. Neither has Obama. Joe Biden has never served a day in the US Military, neither did Obama. Good ticket in wartime, Dems.
I wonder why Obama would craft a ticket that includes two men who have never given, nor merited a salute? I wonder why he has crafted a ticket that has never earned a private sector dollar or created a single private sector job? I wonder why he would craft a ticket where neither man has been in charge of anything, never been an executive of any kind?
BIDEN is a member of one of two groups… He is either a SURRENDER AT ANY COST DEM, or WE HATE GWB SO MUCH WE WILL SACRIFICE THE SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY TO MAKE GWB LOOK BAD DEM… In either case he is a LOSER. this will become more evident the closer to ELECTION DAY
The far left always come up with talking points, but can not seem to come up with facts that back up the talking points.
They talk about McCain and Bush being wrong on Iraq, but fail to talk about the House and Senate votes.
In my days we called it hypocrisy.
Some have that opinion. OK. But right or wrong, we went to war as a country, which was authorized by congress (no take-backs). If President Bush had caved to the enormous pressure from the people who grew tired of this action and the politicians seeking to enhance their own standing by bashing him and our soldiers, where would Iraq and the Middle East be today? Not better to be sure.
Being a critic is easy. Being steadfast is a noble character trait. George Bush will be remembered as a great President for this. Ironically, it’s thanks to people like you, lgm, that history will reflect the shining resolve of his decision to advance the ideals and values of the American people.
lgm
You’ve got a lot of balls for a drive by.
This is primary. All the subsequent gaffes and gotchas should be mentioned without losing focus on what this ticket truly is.
Well put, sir!
Doing the right thing is seldom popular and never easy. Dems only seem to want to do the popular and easy thing.
Biden is already acting the part he was hired for…. I hear he’s doing a Birthday party later today also, and going to borrow rev. wrights clown suit for 70 days.
Just saw queen bee Pelosi on Disgrace the Nation or Meet the Depressed, not sure but Brokjaw was moderating. She figided, fumed and fumbled badly, especially when Brokaw gave her poll numbers indicating Americans favor McCain over Obama for Commander in Chief 50% to 39. She tried the argument that the worst decision America made was going into Iraq and McCain supported it. Brokaw interrupted her and said but the poll is taken now and people have apparently supports McCain’s leadership as Commander in Chief over Obama. It was then she had an Obama moment when her talking points and telepromter went to hell in a handbasket. She was totally unglued and inarticulate.
Fideted & teleprompter-sorry spell check inop
The Dems finally have someone on the ticket who can honestly claim they are qualified. So if Biden can run the country from the back-seat does it really matter to them the qualifications of the face sitting in the front seat?
Oh… and, about this “change” we need, what exactly will change? I’m still trying to figure that one out.
Other than solid Socialism, “unbeholden to anyone” such as Ken Salasar D-CO, says… oh… wait… unbeholding to who? I thought our president was supposed to be beholding to someone, like the voters, but I guess “change” in this case first means a president that doesn’t feel he is beholding to anyone.
Yipes. If I recall some history, the last guy on the world stage who implemented “change” by instituting Socialism “unbeholden to anyone”… I believe his initials are A.H. and he had a lot to do with initiatil WWII.
Soap #18 I Agree, Good job putting in words what needs to be said…
sorry for the double posts up top, the first one never showed up and I had presumed there was a glitch…
Let’s see, Biden, a northeastern ultra liberal, Obambi, a Chicago ultra liberal. What a ticket! Hillary is going to give her acceptance speech for 2012 this Wednesday. Yeehaa!!
Biden and Obama – will obviously be pressed to explain their stances against the surge – during the next few months.
As been pointed out in other postings in this blog, they have both supported surges for Afghanistan.
I have strong feelings about Iraq as most of you have – but I’m not going to get into some stupid academic debate or name-calling about it with some other commentor with an opposing view who is just trying to egg me on anyway – who has made an opposing comment of about five words.
By the way, Michelle, good find on the Biden quote.
These two pictures are actually the same person.
Sock
Puppet
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/408/Default.aspx
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/429/Default.aspx
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/431/Default.aspx
What, even under the best of conditions the US military can achieve, can the US expect to “get” out of its immeasurable investment of blood and treasure in Iraq?
If the answer is “an ally,” please explain how this can be so.
If the answer is “a bulwark against Iran,” please explain how this can be so.
If the answer is “another Kuwait,” please explain why we bothered. (If the explanation includes reference to the Bush administration’s complete misunderstanding of the chances for Western concepts of freedom to succeed, or even be desired, in an Islamic culture, pass Go and proceed straight to the Oval Office.)
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryID/430/Default.aspx
Michelle, I’m really fed up with the pro-Obaman media slinging the catch phrase “Don’t you think Iraq was a mistake (too)?” Please, one and all, inject and carry on this rebuttal to that so it reaches Fox and the others, and that is “Was freeing 30 million bodies and souls from tyranny a ‘mistake’? Was helping 30 million people regard America — and the world in a very different light than before a ‘mistake’? Was freeing millions of girls and women from a suppressive anti-Western thought police a ‘mistake’? Was saving millions of kids you never gave a rat’s behind about before from a tyrant’s mindset of hate a ‘mistake’? Was helping France and England in WWII a ‘mistake’?”
Please everyone, pass this logo on!!
James Greenidge
Jamaica NY
The only think the Surge has really achieved, is less U.S. Deaths. That’s great for what it’s worth, but if You Study Islam and ISLAMIC LAW, then we did nothing worthwhile.
Biden Sucks, Obama Sucks, and most assuradly, McCain Sucks.
WERE SCREWED 08…..
“Was freeing 30 million bodies and souls from tyranny a ‘mistake’?
Yes, because we instilled Islamic Law in their constitution! Study!
If we infidels ever leave, it will all fall apart.
Do you want to stay indefinetly? That is the only way it stays peaceful.
Neocons try to confuse the criteria for winning a war of defense with that of winning a war of aggression.
If we were defending our nation, killing the enemy and occupying their country would be “winning the war,” but since this was a war of aggression against a nation that had no wish to fight us, winning should mean getting something for us, and Bush is merely killing our soldiers, spending our money in the trilions for no benefit for our country, and a stretch of the imagination seeing any benefit for Iraq. Initially a WMD fiasco, Bush has doubled up and tripled up our losses to try to get something for his ego in the end.
DBNinKY, Re: #17 Very well done, especially “…and it re-established the U.S. will and ability to retaliate against all comers…”
Funny how lgm tends to bring out the best in people.
What was Afghanistan?
Funny, I do not recall either of these rationales being brought up by Bush in the lead up to the war. Probably because the public would have never supported a war to protect our interest in oil and/or puff ourselves up to Putin. Now if you are saying that these are favorable consequences of the war, that is one thing, but the discussion is whether or not we were right to go in in the first place.
And a lot of good our supposed gain in street cred as the lone super power did in Georgia. Seems Russia has its own ideas.
Biden will be invaluable to any future president’s foreign policy.
Biden should be calling them, telling them what they should do in that realm of foreign policy. The correct course of action would then be to do the opposite of what Biden wanted.
Wrong sir. Read it again. This discussion was about Bidet being against the surge. “The Idiot” thread-jacked it and said it was “wrong to invade” and needed reminding that 50% of the population in Iraq deserves to be free and freedom has ALWAYS COST AMREICANS BLOOD. I know lgm has been given some weight here (WTH???), but it WAS a typical thread-jack and he will get his usual pass.
:listens in background
usa usa Usa Usa USa USa USA USA USA!!!
:stands and places hand over heart with great pride
If Obambi/Obiden and the left were honest then go over to Iraq before the people and apologize to them for taking out their murderous dictator/warlord along with his murderous sons/heirs. Withdrawn all support for the democracy they now have, divide the country into three countries, as Biden wants, each one ruled by Saddam’s relatives now in hiding. The twerp said Friday that we have been poor examples to the world as in Russia’s invasion of a Democratic country in Georgia. That’s the Black Liberation Theology coming out of him it’s not freedom loving Americanism.
I’ll bet that the total of ALL the primary votes Biden received, beginning with the ‘88 election, won’t come close to Hillary’s millions of votes. The true test for the BO veep had to be the ability of MO to get along with the veep’s wife. No strong women need apply!
Soap, did you just call him Bidet?? freakin brilliant!
Credit where credit is due. AJmontana was the first (I think).
AJ’s motto for the ticket:
Opoopy/Bidet 08 The Toilet Ticket
Soap’s:
Barak O’Bidet N08
Sounds like a bumper sticker contest to me! LOL
Fair point, I should have said DBN’s comment was about the invasion, not the surge.
Regarding Joe Biden for VP, I believe that nominating anyone who has withdrawn a previous candidacy on the grounds of plagiarism and lying about academic achievement is risky business.
I’m also puzzled by the choice of a guy who dropped out of his latest candidacy after placing only fifth in Iowa.
In effect, weren’t the people of Iowa judging Biden as a competent executive when they placed him so low?
Self-reflection is not usually a politician’s strong suit. Realizing they were wrong and admiting it would be nearly impossible. Both Obama and Biden were wrong on the surge, but birds of a feather do flock together.
Ummm… Chap, have you ever bothered to look at a map of the Middle East? I’m not talking about a pseudo-palestinian propaganda map that shows a “Greater Palestine” and not any Israel, but an actual map.
Would you have invaded Switzerland on D-Day 1944 rather than France?
chap,
You have been found guilty of being an lgm, nyk, mj [fill in brain dead liberal troll here] sympathizer. Your penalty is to drink a case of Miller or Miller lite 12 oz. in one sitting and repeat “I will not agree with the trolls” a thousand times. I can form my own wrong opinions.
This is my 15th presidential election.We have never had such dismal choices. McCain was about my fifth choice of possible Republican nominees but we are stuck with him. I come here to find comfort in the knowledge that there are at least a few other rational people left. Someone please reassure me that people of this great nation are not ignorant enough to elect Obama/Biden.
Trying to cordinate their outrage been there done that this is from the National Review Online.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN
Joe Biden, Obama’s Ambassador to Imus
More fun for an Obama-Biden ticket, if it comes to pass…
Obama, when the whole Don Imus controversy flared up:
“I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,” Obama told ABC News, “but I would also say that there’s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.”
Obama said he appeared once on Imus’ show two years ago, and “I have no intention of returning.”
Biden, of course, is one of Imus’ most frequent guests (as is McCain). He offered a disapproving statement at that time, of course, but it will be a fun question for that first press availability: Was Obama right to call for your friend Don Imus to be fired?
08/20 10:00 AM
Yeah, Do I have to wait till the National Enquirer finds out and prints it! Democrats sigh….
Biden is the ultimate Washington, DC insider. Gotta love Obama’s view of “change”.
McCain’s campaign ads should be really interesting. There seems to be a wealth of topics to choose from in order to identify Obama or Biden as the substance-lacking airbags that they really are.
I know it will take some time, lgm, but if you just keep on repeating that phrase over and over, eventually you will come to believe it. Whatever you do, don’t let facts get in the way of supporting those things you want to believe in.
Nancy Pelosi was on 60 Minutes today talking about how the surge has failed because it basically succeeded in ways that were not intended – or something to that effect. That would be like calling someone a failure at investing because they bought a safe stock instead of a high-performing stock, and then made a fortune on it.
But the comment that really drew my attention was this one she made about why she likes natural gas:
And all this time I thought natural gas WAS a fossil fuel. Is Nancy going senile or has she always had her bulb on dim?
You first.
You answered/resolved your own question/statement:
C’mon, Chap, do you really think the “public” would have tolerated a non-military response to 9/11, given the state of raw nerves and emotional over-load we were experiencing in the months following the attacks? This country wanted revenge against a political enemy and Iraq fit the bill. We did the right thing there, for the Iraqis and ourselves.
Putin is allowing his greed to cause him to over play his hand. He thinks he can get away with bullying the old satellites back into the foal because the U.S. is preoccupied; he is about to learn differently.
Stupid man. Nice hair-do though.
Well I would say that in your words, it gave the U.S. a beach-head upon which to fight terrorists far from our shores.
There was a military response to 9/11, in Afghanistan, which every sane minded person in the US supported.
I hope you’re right.