What if they held a riot and no one came?

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 27, 2008 08:33 AM

My second syndicated column of the week sums up the Recreate ‘68 flameout. We’ve been having fun mocking the motley assortment of clowns and cads here in Denver for the week, but I’ll add this caveat: Law enforcement in the Twin Cities should remain on guard. A lot of these malefactors are headed down there to join Leftists who have caused serious trouble there. Don’t forget the havoc they have wrought attacking ROTC offices on campuses and recruitment centers across the country. As I got to see up close the other day, many of these grievance-mongers are swelling with unhinged anger. The lesson of the Seattle WTO riots was “Be prepared.” Still operative.

***

What I saw at the discombobulation
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

DENVER — Never was so much hype created by so few to simulate the appearance of so many.

The hard-core Left vowed to turn out 50,000 protesters for the Democratic National Convention this week. They pledged to “Recreate ‘68″ and cause the kind of tear-gas-infused revolutionary havoc that marked the DNC in Chicago four decades ago. Police prepared for the worst riots. Media from around the world anticipated the best pictures.

But when rhetorical push came to real-life shove, the nostalgic, Marx-adoring organizers of Recreate ‘68 seem to have mustered no more than, oh, 68 bodies. Their presence here is dwarfed by the massive show of police, press, and camera-toting looky-loos. You can’t take a picture without someone else taking pictures of everyone else taking pictures of not much else getting in your frame.

The chaos-inducers’ mouths were a mile wide. Their crowds have been an inch deep. What’s left of the leftover ’60s movement is all sizzle and no steak. Or veggie burger. Deep-fried tofu. Whatever.

At an abortion protest/counter-protest on Saturday in front of a Planned Parenthood mega-facility, I counted less than a dozen pro-abortion activists milling about with three times as many media. The majority of demonstrators were more exercised about the war in Iraq than about the vaunted woman’s right to choose death for her unborn child — the stated focus of the demonstration.

And while Democrat Party chair Howard Dean excoriates the Republican Party as the “white” party, I saw only one-non-white agitator among the pro-abortion gaggle. (This goes for the rest of the Recreate ‘68 populace, too. It’s as pale and colorless as a Colorado snowfall.) Across the street from the Planned Parenthood event, however, were many incensed black- and brown-skinned moms. Incensed, that is, that an abortion mill had been built right across from the park where their children practice football and swing on the playground set.

One of the moms, Priscilla said bluntly: “I don’t want a f**king abortion clinic in my neighborhood!” A Hispanic mother added: “It’s against the Catholic Church.” (Are you listening, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi?) When asked about her views on abortion, another black mother of three I spoke to while sitting in her minivan told me simply: “I don’t believe in it.”

Speaking of disbelief, behold the dregs of the self-pitying anti-war movement. The white flag crowd had so much trouble getting coverage of its worn-out, giant puppet-toting, drum-beating, ratty lingerie-flashing Bush-cursing antics on Sunday that a sympathizer at the Associated Press devoted an entire sob story to the apathy. “CodePink faces tough odds for public’s attention,” the AP’s Christine Simmons mourned. Perhaps if more than 10 of them actually showed up at one time to do something other than scream about BusHitler or bawl about detained Gitmo jihadists, they’d have better luck.

At Denver’s City Center on Monday night, law enforcement authorities encountered about 100 aimless grievance-mongers — self-described as “anti-capitalist, anti-fascist, anti-war”– who finally fixed on something concrete to protest when their friends were arrested for refusing to disperse. “My freedom of speech was suppressed,” one protester complained as she spoke freely to the media and acknowledged that she hadn’t been arrested or asked to show identification.

In the melee, a few responsible adults were accidentally hit with pepper spray. Otherwise, Denver blogger Charlie Martin, who was covering the scene for Pajamas Media, quipped: “It was the world’s most boring riot.”

Finally, in a sorry attempt to recreate Abbie Hoffman’s satirical stunt aimed at levitating the Pentagon, a dozen Recreate ‘68 stragglers dressed up like the cast of Harry Potter, wielded magic wands, and joined hands to float the Denver Mint. The Mint stayed firmly on the ground. To salvage the abysmal turnout, an unhinged contingent of 9/11 conspiracy theories started barking at me. One buffoon shouted “Kill Michelle Malkin” while the levitation experts chanted “Peace and Justice!” and a wizard paraded around in his “Arrest Bush” t-shirt with Che Guevara-promoters tossing fake quarters in the air.

To paraphrase a favorite left-wing bumper sticker slogan, discombobulation is the highest form of patriotism. Blame bankrupt ideology, not the altitude.

Posted in: 2008 campaign, Moonbats

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Other McCain: Day 3: Roll call
  2. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Michelle on the Alex Jones confrontation and levitating the Mint
  3. A Pretty Mess » Blog Archive » A Conservative View of the DNC
  4. Aside: Michelle M On Missing Riots » Pirate’s Cove — Shiny Distractions!
  5. Life as a Monty Python Skit « Colorado Right
  6. Michelle Malkin » RNC protest update: Spitting, rock-throwing, poison-spraying, and Cub Scout-harassing
  7. Sarah Palin Will Shine At Rebublican Convention: « Riggword Weblog
  8. Obama, All Brag No Bounce: « Riggword Weblog
  9. Shot in the Dark » Blog Archive » Cognitive Dissonance?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #423171
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:33 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    :oops:

  2. #423172
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:35 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    The libs are conflicted. I think they are coming to realize that Obama’s change may translate into them being kept out of the White House for at least another 4 years….thus the lack of activity

  3. #423173
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:36 am, ACHefty said:

    They’d still be wrong.

  4. #423175
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:39 am, almeehan said:

    Thanks for your service to the country Michelle. But please don’t put yourself into such a dangerous position as you did with that mob. Your kids, husband and we need you in one piece. I’ve offered my services as a security professional for you as have others. Please take us seriously.

  5. #423176
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:42 am, tre said:

    Obviously it’s cuz the Army and Marines snuck in and arrested them and sent them to those secret prisons the Denver Police built. They’re being water boarded by that Big Foot that was captured a couple of weeks ago. After the Police is finished with them the aliens from Area 51 will take them back to Mars to perform experiments on them.

    Goodness, you people are just SO naive you’ll believe ANYTHING the government tells you!

  6. #423177
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:45 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    Michelle,

    You touched on very intense topic. My worries are if the Obama party loses in November, I feel a nation wide riot would be the case and many law enforcement people will stand by and watch it happen ( i.e., SF USMC recruitment center). After watching the DNC so far I can’t believe the most powerful country in the world still has whining politics for the ticket of the presidency. When are we going to step up and out of this crap. I am ready for a third political party to step up to the plate.

  7. #423178
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:45 am, Thunderbird 1 said:

    Che Guevara-promoters tossing fake quarters in the air.

    …because they have to live off of the real ones they can scrounge up from time to time.

  8. #423179
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:45 am, guitarplayer said:

    Barak Obama’s supporters at their finest.

  9. #423180
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:46 am, twofoot said:

    Sorry, anyone of voting age who dresses up like a character from Harry Potter at any other time of the year than Oct 31st doesn’t need to be allowed anywhere near a voting booth.

  10. #423181
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:46 am, Bittertruth said:

    An endless(not so much)parade(not so much) of human( hmmm, not so much) debris(bingo). we have a winner!

  11. #423184
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:50 am, ajmontana said:

    Give the protesters a break they probably…
    Forgot their Meds.
    Went to Public Schools and Berkeley
    Are just having a bad day
    Had a lil to much re-creat 68′ pre game acid.
    Miss their mommies.

  12. #423186
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:52 am, Auggie Dog said:

    One buffoon shouted “Kill Michelle Malkin”

    I’m surprised they knew who you were. I don’t think most of them know how to read. Must have caught you on T.V.

  13. #423188
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:54 am, jangar said:

    Democrat Party = Moral Vacancy.

  14. #423189
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:55 am, Goldwater Knight said:

    One buffoon shouted “Kill Michelle Malkin”

    That was the guy dressed in the jester costume.

  15. #423190
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:55 am, ajmontana said:

    Auggie dog, you’re right, steve duecy’s son was interviewing Denver locals and they didnt have a clue who the curent VP is among others such as Pelosi, Reid etc…. I looked for a link but can’t find it yet. It was on Fox and Friends this morning, a real eye opener. clueless morons.

  16. #423193
    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:57 am, ajmontana said:

    Green shirt/BlackHat guy and the lead dipstick in that dust-up should have been arrested.

  17. #423196
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:03 am, englishqueen01 said:

    My worries are if the Obama party loses in November, I feel a nation wide riot would be the case and many law enforcement people will stand by and watch it happen ( i.e., SF USMC recruitment center).

    Yeah. I think that’s a real possibility.

  18. #423199
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:08 am, guitarplayer said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:03 am, englishqueen01 said:

    My worries are if the Obama party loses in November, I feel a nation wide riot would be the case and many law enforcement people will stand by and watch it happen ( i.e., SF USMC recruitment center).

    Yeah. I think that’s a real possibility.

    First, it would only be half the nation. Second, the side the isn’t rioting has larger numbers of NRA members. ;-)

  19. #423202
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:15 am, legendx3 said:

    seen you on fox this morning your ACES (-; give them hell out there

  20. #423204
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:18 am, Mr Michael said:

    My worries are if the Obama party loses in November, I feel a nation wide riot would be the case and many law enforcement people will stand by and watch it happen ( i.e., SF USMC recruitment center).

    If that riot consists of as many disaffected voters as the Recreate 68 rallies do… you’ll be safe enough, I’d say. It’s good to be prepared for the actions of the extreme few; but DO remember that they are a fringe on the edge of a minority of the political opposition…

  21. #423206
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:20 am, DaveC said:

    I was watching part of the live feed that one of the networks has going on outside monitoring the ‘Rioters’..

    the bullhorn chick was saying, ‘Remember, the cops are human beings too. We have to change the system from the top down’.

    I wasn’t around in 68 but I WAS around East Lansing in 98 when THOSE riots occurred..

    those are sorry excuse for rioters..

    not lamenting the fact, mind you..

  22. #423208
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:21 am, BemusedLib said:

    There are three reasons that the demonstrations fizzled.

    First, there is no hardcore left anymore — despite what you read hear, there are no Marxists, no Anarchists, no socialists or other activists who cannot work through democratic channels. It’s not than nobody came, it’s that EVERYBODY came, who still thinks levitating the mint is the way to bring change.

    Second, unlike LBJ’s foreign policy fiasco, Bush’s doesn’t touch many people. No one pays for it, no one goes there unless they volunteer. The apathetic are safe in their apathy.

    Third, most important, unlike 1968, in 2008 progressives believe that what’s happening inside the convention center can bring real change, so they don’t have to demonstrate outside.

  23. #423209
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:22 am, sonofdy said:

    reality interfered with thier fantacies.

  24. #423210
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:24 am, jangar said:

    but DO remember that they are a fringe on the edge of a minority of the political opposition…

    And they are busy aborting themselves out of existence. Leave them be and they may go the way of the do-do bird.

  25. #423212
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:26 am, ajmontana said:

    Third, most important, unlike 1968, in 2008 progressives believe that what’s happening inside the convention center can bring real change, so they don’t have to demonstrate outside.

    pretty early in the morning for the Kool-aid isn’t it?

  26. #423214
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:27 am, sonofdy said:

    First, there is no hardcore left anymore
    ————-
    Thats complete BS right there.

    Second, unlike LBJ’s foreign policy fiasco, Bush’s doesn’t touch many people.
    ————————-
    More BS.

    Third, most important, unlike 1968, in 2008 progressives believe that what’s happening inside the convention center can bring real change, so they don’t have to demonstrate outside.
    —————–
    Actualy what is happening is that the real radicals are runing the DNC convention. Do you know what change they want? Marxism. Stalin would be change, hitler would be change. So be carefull what you ask for, you might get it. Anyway, Obama has peaked and the more people look into him the less they support him.

  27. #423215
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:28 am, swmbo said:

    First, it would only be half the nation. Second, the side that isn’t rioting has larger numbers of NRA members.

    And they would be well advised to remember that.

    I for one am sick to death of the unwashed welfare addicted loonies being stupid in the streets I have paid for by working and earning my keep.

  28. #423218
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:32 am, reine.de.tout said:

    I saw the video, Michelle, of that guy stalking and trying to terrorize you. I’m glad you’re safe.

  29. #423225
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:35 am, bedje said:

    Just to show how up-to-date and relevant, the protesters and their ideas are, they have to drag out of the closet, dust off and trot out every election cycle the same old tired dog and pony show. Recreate 68…hmmm, 40 years of???????

  30. #423227
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:35 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Once again the Libs Over-Promise and Under-Deliver.

    Michelle, Vegas Loves ya and you would be safe here, no moonbat spittle guaranteed

  31. #423228
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:35 am, jangar said:

    I wanna know what the polls say today after Hillary’s speech.

  32. #423234
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:37 am, dpt said:

    “the Recreate ‘68 flameout.”

    Of course it was a flameout, as the romanticized version 1960s is based on an empty shell. Some believe it was an ideal time where the young witnessed against war and were the bearers of peace.

    However, following the fall of Saigon, we saw where these so-called peace activists stood while tens upon tens of thousands of Vietnamese faced oppression. The silence of the peace crowd during the killing fields of Cambodia showed that peace was not a concern for this crowd.

    They are really about self-indulgence, and it makes them feel good about themselves to stand up and protest against the US.

    Just a bunch of spoiled, simple children with no basis for hanging their hat on.

  33. #423239
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:41 am, concretebob said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:42 am, tre said:
    Obviously it’s cuz the Army and Marines snuck in and arrested them and sent them to those secret prisons the Denver Police built. They’re being water boarded by that Big Foot that was captured a couple of weeks ago. After the Police is finished with them the aliens from Area 51 will take them back to Mars to perform experiments on them.

    Goodness, you people are just SO naive you’ll believe ANYTHING the government tells you!

    Sounds suspiciously like the Chancellor Manuscript. Perhaps you need to come in and speak to these gentlemen about what you know, how you know it and when you knew it.

    Resistance is futile all your base belonga us

  34. #423241
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:41 am, pueblo1032 said:

    Great coverage MM… “Recreate 68″??? The protester of today would not make a PIMPLE on the FANNY of the 68 CREW… Todays protester is aimless and without leadership… Although I did not agree with their views, the 68 CREW at least had some BALLS… Something lacking in the WUSSES called protesters today…

  35. #423252
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:49 am, OneofThem said:

    It just makes you wonder: If a bunch of hippie-libs held a riot, and no media was around to cover it, would it make a sound? :P

  36. #423260
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:52 am, sonofdy said:

    Well they wanted to protest, really they did, but they had to pass the “legalize weed” tent who were giving out free joints and well one thing lead to another and it is such a LONNNGGG walk to the riot site and if you look just right at that tree it looks like a unicorn… Well anyway a box of cheez-its and a pizza later they just didn’t see the point anymore because pepper spray is soooo bogus when you are high… ;-)

  37. #423261
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:53 am, bedje said:

    Ask Alex.

  38. #423265
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:56 am, jangar said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 8:42 am, tre said:
    Obviously it’s cuz the Army and Marines snuck in and arrested them and sent them to those secret prisons the Denver Police built. They’re being water boarded by that Big Foot that was captured a couple of weeks ago. After the Police is finished with them the aliens from Area 51 will take them back to Mars to perform experiments on them.

    Goodness, you people are just SO naive you’ll believe ANYTHING the government tells you!

    This is what free love and acid gave birth to. Screws up the chromosomes.

  39. #423268
    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:57 am, sonofdy said:

    Alex is busy blaming the government stooges in the recreate68 crowd and the conintpro agents sent there to provoke the entire thing. Then he rambles on about the puppy issue and fema camps etc etc etc.

    Im not kidding, I just read his website. Paranoia doesn’t even begin to describe this guy. Everything is a neocon zionist illuminati cia dia nsa plot. wackado!!!

  40. #423275
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:01 am, sonofdy said:

    I forgot the mossad. Apparantly mossad was running the 9/11 operattion. :rolleyes:

  41. #423277
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:02 am, cheapseat said:

    todays leftist protesters are building levitating crazies and pansies. bemused lib said they lack the justification of the illegal war and the draft. the u.n. got us into both vietnam and iraq, so it must just be the draft. how many women bomb throwers were in the 68 riots, and none of them were up for the draft. but i loved the man on the street interviews where these morons couldn’t identify harry reid, san fran nanny, howard dean, even vp cheney. you have to love that these morons get to vote.

  42. #423279
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:03 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:35 am, jangar said:
    I wanna know what the polls say today after Hillary’s speech.

    She was a big help. /sarc

    Latest Poll

  43. #423284
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:07 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 9:27 am, sonofdy said:

    First, there is no hardcore left anymore
    ————-
    Thats complete BS right there.

    Second, unlike LBJ’s foreign policy fiasco, Bush’s doesn’t touch many people.
    ————————-
    More BS.

    Third, most important, unlike 1968, in 2008 progressives believe that what’s happening inside the convention center can bring real change, so they don’t have to demonstrate outside.
    —————–
    Actualy what is happening is that the real radicals are runing the DNC convention. Do you know what change they want? Marxism. Stalin would be change, hitler would be change. So be carefull what you ask for, you might get it. Anyway, Obama has peaked and the more people look into him the less they support him.

    You can’t be serious: Marx, Stalin and Hitler?

    Yeah, I noticed that when Clinton was president, he abolished private property, collectivised the farms and put millions of dissenters into concentration camps.

    Oh, right. He didn’t, and you are a certifiable paranoid.

  44. #423285
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:07 am, sdillard said:

    Let them “riot”. No one cares. I live in the SF Bay Area and we have seen this idiocy first-hand for years. Twelve people show up for a “protest” and we hear from the SF Chonicle that this is a “major event”. It is not. The sixties are dead and buried.

  45. #423287
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:07 am, jangar said:

    Thanks Soap-
    The numbers should really tank with 2 more days left for drivvel.

  46. #423291
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:08 am, sambo said:

    How ironic is this…the Libtards rally cry against McCain is he’s stuck in the past. Obama brings change we can believe in…and they come up with Recreate 68???

  47. #423293
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:09 am, bedje said:

    There we go. Let’s trot out Clinton again. Yawn.

  48. #423300
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:11 am, sambo said:

    BemusedLib said:

    First, there is no hardcore left anymore

    sonofdy said:
    Actualy what is happening is that the real radicals are runing the DNC convention.

    Head of nail…meet hammer!

  49. #423302
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:12 am, sonofdy said:

    Yeah, I noticed that when Clinton was president, he abolished private property, collectivised the farms and put millions of dissenters into concentration camps.

    —————-
    Clinton isn’t running. At this point I would prefer clinton. Obama is. A follower of a radical black liberation church for 22 years. Black liberation theology is race based marxism. No paranoia there, all facts supported by obamas past. And I was quoting those people as a change from bush which they would be. Again no paranoia. I don’t think Obama would be hitler or stalin or even marx. He would be Obama. A person with a 22 year history of black liberation theology. I am not pretending to know the future, but I have a good idea based on applying history to the current situation.

  50. #423310
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:17 am, jangar said:

    How ironic is this…the Libtards rally cry against McCain is he’s stuck in the past. Obama brings change we can believe in…and they come up with Recreate 68???

    Obamania is doing everything they can to recreate ‘64.

  51. #423321
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:20 am, jangar said:

    Oops…’63

  52. #423327
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:22 am, FamilyMan said:

    We must be very careful to have every scrap of evidence that will tie Ayers and Obama together. The MSM will have a field day if this begins to look like McCarthyism witch-hunt.

  53. #423330
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:25 am, FamilyMan said:

    Opps wrong thread

  54. #423333
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:27 am, riggword said:

    I watched the video of Michelle getting mauled, I was appaled.

    I have an Asian wife who stands at 5′0″ and I just wanted to jump that guy.

    Michelle Malkin is a courageous woman.

    Obama errs on Ayers

  55. #423340
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:30 am, sonofdy said:

    If Obama loses will there be violence and riots? Don’t know, that depends on the lefties. It wouldn’t suprise me. Alot of people on the left are just a little too radical at this point.

  56. #423341
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:30 am, mchristian said:

    The riot would have been better attended had it been held online.

  57. #423350
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:36 am, 7thson said:

    The hippies of 1968 all got haircuts after the Chicago convention and went to work in the schools and government where they have been doing their mischief from the inside ever since. Most of them are ready to retire with the rest of the baby boomers and the rejects in Denver will take the ‘68 generation’s secure place in the beaurocracies and tenured teaching positions to spawn another generation of leftist idiots.

  58. #423353
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:38 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:30 am, mchristian said:
    The riot would have been better attended had it been held online in Germany.

  59. #423356
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:39 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:12 am, sonofdy said:

    Yeah, I noticed that when Clinton was president, he abolished private property, collectivised the farms and put millions of dissenters into concentration camps.

    —————-
    Clinton isn’t running. At this point I would prefer clinton. Obama is. A follower of a radical black liberation church for 22 years. Black liberation theology is race based marxism. No paranoia there, all facts supported by obamas past. And I was quoting those people as a change from bush which they would be. Again no paranoia. I don’t think Obama would be hitler or stalin or even marx. He would be Obama. A person with a 22 year history of black liberation theology. I am not pretending to know the future, but I have a good idea based on applying history to the current situation.

    I point to Clinton merely to illustrate the general tendencies of Democratic government. In case you haven’t noticed, the old guard hasn’t exactly been overthrown by the Obama team. One can safely predict a slightly more liberal and –one hopes — forceful liberalism from Obama and his crew.

    You were the one who brought Stalin, Marx and Hitler into the conversation, remember?

    And what in Barak’s years in the legislature and the senate indicates a tendency towards “black liberation theology?” You know, that church serves much of Chicago’s black elite — and yet Wrigley Field has not yet been sold off to pay for reparations, and the South Side has not declared itself an independent state.

    In fact, what is it exactly about black liberation theology that disturbs you, aside from its scary-sounding name?

  60. #423361
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:40 am, jbh45 said:

    recreate 68: the only thing they recreated was mary jane clouds of smoke. These tards can’t even compare to the real 1968 mob. At least the mob back in 1968 was unified under one banner. This group of mental marshmallows hate Bush so much didn’t know which protest to pick.

  61. #423365
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:41 am, bedje said:

    But mchristian, they wouldn’t be able to model their pointy hats and tinfoil capes. That might distress those those poor little despots.

  62. #423378
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:47 am, sonofdy said:

    In fact, what is it exactly about black liberation theology that disturbs you, aside from its scary-sounding name?

    I sugest you lok it up like I did.

  63. #423383
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:49 am, bedje said:

    Exactly sonofdy.

  64. #423395
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:53 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    Obviously, bemused lib doesn’t actually LISTEN to what Obama and Hillary have been saying they will do once in office.

    If bemused thinks their words AREN’T Marxist, bemused has no understanding of that philosophy.

  65. #423397
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:54 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:47 am, sonofdy said:

    In fact, what is it exactly about black liberation theology that disturbs you, aside from its scary-sounding name?

    I sugest you lok it up like I did.

    I did. I thought this was a nice, brief, summary.

    “The Rev. James Cone is the founder of black liberation theology. In an interview with Terry Gross, Cone explains the movement, which has roots in 1960s civil-rights activism and draws inspiration from both the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, as “mainly a theology that sees God as concerned with the poor and the weak….”

    Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.”

    Ooooooh. Scary. I suppose Obama should apologize for being one or the other?

    Interestingly, one of the goals of the early BLT movement was to keep African Americans from moving to Islam, a goal I assume you support.

  66. #423415
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:59 am, sonofdy said:

    Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.”

    Now post the rest

  67. #423418
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:00 am, mchristian said:

    On-my-soap-box said: mchristian said:
    The riot would have been better attended had it been held online in Germany.

    I guess that would depend on the band and the free beer.

  68. #423422
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:01 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:53 am, RogerCfromSD said:

    Obviously, bemused lib doesn’t actually LISTEN to what Obama and Hillary have been saying they will do once in office.

    If bemused thinks their words AREN’T Marxist, bemused has no understanding of that philosophy.

    OK: Give me a quote from Marx, and a policy statement from Barry or Hill that proves their deep philosophical connections. Have they called for a dictatorship of the proletariat? Are the atheists? Will either abolish private property or collectivize the farmland? Do they work phrases like “dialectical materialism” or “lumpenproletariat” into their speeches? How medicine? Oh yeah, they forgot to socialize in their platforms (though they do bring the government into the picture). Has there been talk of imprisonment and executions?

    Or have you just misplaced your meds?

  69. #423431
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:04 am, sonofdy said:

    Black Liberation Theology as Marxist Victimology
    Black Liberation Theology actually encourages a victim mentality among blacks. John McWhorters’ book Losing the Race, will be helpful here. Victimology, says McWhorter, is the adoption of victimhood as the core of one’s identity — for example, like one who suffers through living in “a country and who lived in a culture controlled by rich white people.” It is a subconscious, culturally inherited affirmation that life for blacks in America has been in the past and will be in the future a life of being victimized by the oppression of whites. In today’s terms, it is the conviction that, 40 years after the Civil Rights Act, conditions for blacks have not substantially changed. As Wright intimates, for example, scores of black men regularly get passed over by cab drivers.

    Reducing black identity to “victimhood” distorts the reality of true progress. For example, was Obama a victim of widespread racial oppression at the hand of “rich white people” before graduating from Columbia University, Harvard Law School magna cum laude, or after he acquired his estimated net worth of $1.3 million? How did “rich white people” keep Obama from succeeding? If Obama is the model of an oppressed black man, I want to be oppressed next! With my graduate school debt my net worth is literally negative $52,659.

    The overall result, says McWhorter, is that “the remnants of discrimination hold an obsessive indignant fascination that allows only passing acknowledgement of any signs of progress.” Jeremiah Wright, infused with victimology, wielded self-righteous indignation in the service of exposing the inadequacies Hilary Clinton’s world of “rich white people.” The perpetual creation of a racial identity born out of self-loathing and anxiety often spends more time inventing reasons to cry racism than working toward changing social mores, and often inhibits movement toward reconciliation and positive mobility.

    McWhorter articulates three main objections to victimology: First, victimology condones weakness in failure. Victimology tacitly stamps approval on failure, lack of effort, and criminality. Behaviors and patterns that are self-destructive are often approved of as cultural or presented as unpreventable consequences from previous systemic patterns. Black Liberation theologians are clear on this point: “People are poor because they are victims of others,” says Dr. Dwight Hopkins, a Black Liberation theologian teaching at the University of Chicago Divinity School.

    Second, victimology hampers progress because, from the outset, it focuses attention on obstacles. For example, in Black liberation Theology, the focus is on the impediment of black freedom in light of the Goliath of white racism.

    Third, victimology keeps racism alive because many whites are constantly painted as racist with no evidence provided. Racism charges create a context for backlash and resentment fueling new attitudes among whites not previously held or articulated, and creates “separatism” — a suspension of moral judgment in the name of racial solidarity. Does Jeremiah Wright foster separatism or racial unity and reconciliation?

  70. #423432
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:04 am, cicerokid said:

    “In fact, what is it exactly about black liberation theology ethnocentism that disturbs you, aside from its scary-sounding name?”

    This should help.

  71. #423434
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:04 am, sonofdy said:

    sorry for the length

  72. #423435
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:04 am, cicerokid said:

    sorry. “ethnocentrism”

  73. #423441
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:07 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:59 am, sonofdy said:

    Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.”

    Now post the rest

    That sums up what I found on any website that seemed remotely objective. Why don’t you post. And post your source, please.

  74. #423444
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:10 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:54 am, BemusedLib said:

    Nice cherry picking.

    God as concerned with the poor and the weak

    …is turned into black poor and weak. What does race have to do with poor and weak?

    in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil

    Who made this definition? Are Je$$ie Jack$son and Al $harpton doing anything to change that image? Is the wrong Rev. Wright who said, and I quote, “Jesus was a po black man”?

    to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks

    Because it was not before? The Gospel is relevant to all peoples regardless of color.

    and to help black people learn to love themselves

    Sounds like a personal problem to me. I see people, like Bill Cosby, who love themselves without BLT.

    “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.”

    Ummm, seems a bit racist to me being a “white” Christian. Interestingly, it is still blacks (some) who want America to apologize for slavery and they want to be seen as “unapologetically black”. Sounds conflicted to me.

    I guess I see your point. /sarc

  75. #423463
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:24 am, BemusedLib said:

    love themselves without BLT.

    “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.”

    Ummm, seems a bit racist to me being a “white” Christian. Interestingly, it is still blacks (some) who want America to apologize for slavery and they want to be seen as “unapologetically black”. Sounds conflicted to me.

    I missed the part where anyone said it was wrong to be unapologetically white. One can certainly apologize for a wrong, and still be proudly and unapologetically oneself. As for apologizing for slavery, I think if, as Americans, we take pride in and credit for the many accomplishments of our nation (as we should) we should be big enough to acknowledge our mistakes as well. I don’t mind if you don’t want to apologize for the massive stain on our national character, just don’t brag about liberating France (unless you’re at leat 80 years old).

    McWhorter raises some good points. But, fiorst, I’d suggest that BLTist are hardly the only group playing the victim card today. Why, I’ll bet if I said “straight white males are the only people you can discriminate against today and get away with it,” 80% of the males on this board would agree. Victimology indeed. As for the Marxist bit, that seems a little heavy handed. In fact, churches like Trinity and parishoners like the Obamas are pretty capitalist-focused. Yes, they believe in social programs that help the poor. But they also believe in good old-fashioned capitalist success. So what does Obama’s church mean — that he’s going to seize his own house and give it to the masses? Or does it mean that he and she and the other thousands are growing sufficiently comfortable in their own skin and in their own country (which, in turn, has changed dramatically and for the better in this regard since Wright took the pulpit in 1971) to the benefit of all. I think the latter.

    But, regardless, give me the policy details that show how Obama’s BLT (getting hungry) will turn America communist or whatever. And links to the portions of Obama’s website or the current Democratic Party Platform that support your contention.

  76. #423465
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:27 am, sonofdy said:
  77. #423468
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:29 am, sonofdy said:

    bemusedlib, are you really going to believe what he says to get elected??? REALLY??? I don’t even believe McCain for that :lol:

  78. #423483
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:36 am, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:29 am, sonofdy said:

    bemusedlib, are you really going to believe what he says to get elected??? REALLY??? I don’t even believe McCain for that :lol:

    Well, we do have that separation of powers thing. Just in case.:lol:

  79. #423489
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:38 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    But, regardless, give me the policy details that show how Obama’s BLT (getting hungry) will turn America communist or whatever.

    I am getting hungry too! I do not think people believe that at all. Interestingly, Obama threw BLT under the bus with his pastor. That being said, I do not think Obama has anything aginst bacon either (if he is indeed a closet Muslim). ;)

  80. #423493
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:42 am, cheapseat said:

    we solved the racism question yesterday bemused. now we are on the question of will there be riots in the street when obumbo loses. my bet is yes, based upon loses in sporting events in black dominated cities (detroit). but burning down and trashing their areas every now and again is simply urban renewal in the democrat party. we spent a fortune rebuilding and relocating katrinaville, and it looks like we will begin again next week. all you white racist conservatives better contact your flood insurance agent today. all you nonracist blacks contact reverand al and jessee to get your black power protest signs about hurricane gustav is bush’s fault too!

  81. #423500
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:47 am, BrianNY said:

    #59 bemused lib said:

    In fact, what is it exactly about black liberation theology that disturbs you, aside from its scary-sounding name?

    I’m not disturbed by the name, I’m just opposed to a racist, political movement disguising itself as Christianity.

    According to “Black Liberation Theology:”

    -Christ’s message is interpreted as encouraging “black power.”

    -Christ’s intrinsic nature and spiritual activity receive little or no attention.

    -Some even deny Christ’s role as the atoning sacrifice for the world’s sins and provider of eternal life.

    -Only the experience of black oppression is the authoritative standard.

    -Salvation is freedom from the oppression and pertains to blacks in this life. In other words, salvation is physical liberation from white oppression, or “the white enemy” (Cone) rather than freedom from the sinful nature and acts of each individual person.

    -Presenting heaven as a reward for following Christ is seen as an attempt to dissuade blacks from the goal of real liberation of their whole persons.

    -Intricate and largely philosophical views of God are largely ignored in preference for the concerns of the oppressed.

    -White Christian concepts taught to black persons are to be disregarded or ignored.

    -Immanence is stressed over transcendence, and as a result God is seen to be “in flux” or “always changing”.

    I don’t have a problem with a select group of people identifying themselves on racial terms for the intended purpose of identifying and seeking remedy for select racial grievances…just don’t call it Christianity.

    The New Testament is complete with instances of Pharisees, and others, who constantly bumped heads with Christ on a host of social and political matters. In all accounts, Christ’s message was clear – an individual’s freedom from the sinful nature and acts of this world, coupled with a contrite heart, is the path towards heavenly reward and eternal salvation.

    For black liberation theology to downplay heavenly reward as a “white” concept and redefine salvation as racial liberation in this world is a complete misunderstanding and bastardization of Christ’s teaching.

  82. #423505
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:51 am, Little Ma said:

    sonofdy,

    Well said!!!

    BemusedLib said: “That sums up what I found on any website that seemed remotely objective….”

    Hilarious – for reasons that are clear to everyone but you!

  83. #423523
    On August 27th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, sonofdy said:

    bemusedlib: Well, we do have that separation of powers thing. Just in case.:lol:

    Not right now. You have radical leftists in charge of both houses of congress and if obama gets in, the whitehouse abd probably the supreme court in a few years. The exact situation the seperation of powers is meant to prevent.

  84. #423525
    On August 27th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, sonofdy said:

    someone send me spell check, sigh… abd = and

  85. #423539
    On August 27th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, sonofdy said:

    So far the plan to recreate68 has been mostly met with a resounding YAWNN!!!!

  86. #423584
    On August 27th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, Batman said:

    Never was so much hype created by so few to simulate the appearance of so many

    If they’ve outdone Ron Paul supporters that’s saying a lot! ;)

  87. #423655
    On August 27th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, BemusedLib said:

    On August 27th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, sonofdy said:

    bemusedlib: Well, we do have that separation of powers thing. Just in case.:lol:

    Not right now. You have radical leftists in charge of both houses of congress and if obama gets in, the whitehouse abd probably the supreme court in a few years. The exact situation the seperation of powers is meant to prevent.

    Well, you’ve still got the filibuster (unless we do really well)which you wield too damned effectively imho, and all the old Supreme Court justices are libs, so we’re not going to have five pinkos in black robes (think I’ll trademark that one) for decades.

    BrianNY: a lot of different descriptions of BLT on the web. I think it’s clear though, that it is not anti-white, but anti-white racist (Wright’s church was noted for it’s outreach and cooperation with majority white congregations).

    And, why is anyone surprised that a theological movement that was born the year King was murdered, after the racist brutality of the Civil Rights era, pushes back? But, as in every church, every movement, every philosophy, there are variations. Heck, there are some Baptist Churches that would probably burn me at the stake. But I don’t see Trinity churning out black separatists or armed communists. Surely LGF would have identified one by now.

    And why have you so little faith in the power of America, our ideals and our people, that you jump at every shadow. We thrive on the clash of ideas. Buck up, dude.

    And, as for everyone preparing for an armed insurrection: did you have a basement full of canned goods, distilled water, gold and shotgun shells ready for Y2K, too? The people who riot after basketball games care about basketball, not politics, and besides, they use the cover of the tens of thousands of normal drunken idiots who take the streets as cover.

  88. #423669
    On August 27th, 2008 at 1:06 pm, jdubya said:

    The problem with the Recreate Fecalate Loons is that they are all a bunch of pot smoking slackers, living in their parents basements, sponging off of them for dough, playing video games instead of acquiring a real education or gainful employment, hanging out at the coffee house playing hacky sack or mock sword fights, or being indoctrinated by the Marxists Residue of the 60’s Generation.

    [NOTE: The Marxist Residue of the 60's Generation typically have jobs, pay taxes, drive environmentally friendly vehicles that seat four and have enough cupholders for all that chai]

    So the slackers love to hear about how it was done back in the heyday. “Man, it was like, you know, we were ready to change the world“. And now these dinosaurs thought they could pass the torch to the failed generation they created. These people are dumber than I previously thought.

    Time to clean house!

  89. #423743
    On August 27th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, thebronze said:

    I guess I’ll have to change my motto of “Less Hippies – More Stick-Time” to “More Hippies – More Stick-Time”…

  90. #423879
    On August 27th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, denver republican said:

    Last night I was serenaded on the 16th Street Mall by a group of people singing anti-Bush slogans and mourning their lost free speech rights. The irony was delicious.

  91. #424587
    On August 27th, 2008 at 10:48 pm, travlinman said:

    MM, If I had known you might be physically accosted, I would have volunteered to be your bodyguard in Denver. I’m 6′-3″ and a solid 285 lbs. I doubt whether many of those limp-wristed sissies would have given me too much lip. At least not after I sent the first one to night-night land.

  92. #424673
    On August 27th, 2008 at 11:59 pm, joromima said:

    tripe

  93. #424971
    On August 28th, 2008 at 11:22 am, Storm Chaser said:

    The protesters’ pathetic display was almost enough to get William Ayres mad enough to call his Weathermen out of retirement.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Charlie Sheen demands meeting with Obama on ‘9/11 cover-up’

September 9, 2009 03:37 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Wild thing

How to dress like an “authentic” grass-roots activist

August 6, 2009 04:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

112 Comments | 31 Trackbacks

Fashion statement.

More on the fake Marine anti-war poster boy

May 15, 2009 04:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The road to hell…

April 1, 2009 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

G20 thugs impersonate police, break into bank

April 1, 2009 09:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Berkeley libs fight over nuclear-free-zone law

December 5, 2008 05:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: 2008 campaign, Moonbats



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom