How long before the WACKED OUT LEFT FORCES THE MILITARY TO ARREST AND CHARGE THIS WARROR???

You for them the MILITARY SUCKS but they have lost this battle and they WILL not have this. They will force the VARY GROUP of MILITARY MEN THEY HATE TO RIGHT THIS WRONG FOR THEM…… I hope and pary that this is not a BATTLE WON BUT, THE WAR WON FOR THIS WARROR!!!!!

On August 29th, 2008 at 7:53 am, SoonerMarine said:

If there was some evidence that Nazario had violated the UCMJ then he should have been recalled to active duty and give a court martial where he could be judged by people familiar with the type of situation he was involved in.

I concur. In fact, I believe that all court martial proceedings should be juried by “people familiar with the type of situation” the accused was involved in – not just some random mixture of sailors and marines.

…and why you’re so concerned about these Marines talking to you?

Try to think clearly. I merely stated that I would want to speak with Marines that knew Nazario. I never stated that I wanted to speak with these Marines. Got that? Never.

You are talking an awful lot about this case

What’s your deal?

My deal is that someone irrationally misrepresented my statements. I had to correct those misrepresentations.

OJ may have escaped the criminal trial, but the DNA still convicted him.

Whatever happened on that battlefield (barring proof of intentional harm of civilians, which this case doesn’t seem to involve) I back our soldiers and Marines.

“It’s better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.”

In case you missed it from the article they had no bodies or even identities of who he was suppose to kill, so how could they even think about charging them with a crime with no evidence that a crime was even ever committed? Anyone say Mike Nifong? Yes both the Judge and Prosecutor in this case need to be charge after I saw the complete lack of facts in this case.

corkie said:

but I would still like to hear from Marines that knew Nazario.

I’ve often been able to get the straight scoop that way.

I’ve been able to get Marines to talk honestly about accused parties that they knew on many occasions. Sometimes, immediately following a court martial. As a result, I believe that I have an inside scoop about quite a few newsworthy incidents.

Great, we can meet and compare military resumes sometime – including investigation and court martial experience. I can tell you my inside scoops, and you can tell me if you think I’m full of it. BTW, I assume that you are not a Marine. Otherwise, you would have proudly stated that you were.

Again, you’re reactions have been irrational given that you know nothing about my background

Okay Corkie…you keep alluding to YOUR qualifications…why don’t you tell us what they are, and why you’re so concerned about these Marines talking to you? You are talking an awful lot about this case, seem to imply you know something, and seem to imply that you are a Marine, and that you somehow have some magical ability to cut through clutter.

What’s your deal?

If they were shot ‘execution style’ then gee, we followed the rules of the Geneva convention to the letter and Spirit. Shouldn’t you be celebrating the Marines for following the Conventions ratified by the US?