/sarc

On August 29th, 2008 at 11:05 am, NJ-Aviator said:

Amen to that. I thank god for the internet. For the longest time I thought I was the only one that saw the complete idicoy of this illegal issue. It really isn’t that complicated. Just the libs and msm make it out to be to confuse the people. Glad to know there are others out there that are sick of this as I am.

Agreed. IMHO, the anchor baby nonsense is the very first thing that needs to be addressed.

Yeah… and Boo Friggin’ Hoo that they have kids here. Take them back to your homeland where they have citizenship because they are your kids. Don’t come crying to us that you’re afraid to take your kids born here back to Mexico or where ever you illegally migrated from. That was YOUR choice to break the law. YOU deal with it. Adios.

n August 28th, 2008 at 9:39 pm, K2 said:

Agreed. IMHO, the anchor baby nonsense is the very first thing that needs to be addressed. That is because that little “bundle of joy” is what assures the illegals the very greatest odds of being given citizenship. They use the baby for sympathy and sob story, which is nothing more than a con game of playing on our sympathies, but of course the msm and libs eat it up. It’s easy enough to deport someone who has no attachment other than a job, but it is becomes infinitely more complicated when an anchor baby is invovled (not for me but for the rest of hte suckers ) to deport. The next thing to tackle is elimination of all entitlements to illegals. No assistance of any kind should be given to someone here illegally. Jobs, must also be eliminated for them, but in terms of priorites, at least htose wiht a job are contributing something, but anchor babies and entitlemetn payments are sucking the life blood from the country. Once these actions ar ecompleted, we can then watch the illegal crossing virtualyl disappear wihtout having to sepnd $B’s on more BP, fences, or courst cases to deprot them. The additional benefit is ATTRITION of those here. This is hte best and only long term solution to the problem. Just my thoughts.

Yes he shoudl fire any illegals he cna prove but I see his point. Once you have a good trained worker (that training is not cheap), which you know on a personal level (and friends to some degree) it makes it more difficult.

We will never solve this problem if we keep making excuses. My neice is in jail right now because she kept stealing things from her brother…practically bankrupted him and her dad. It was a hard thing to do but she is where she belongs. Hopefully she will learn a lesson. Tough choices have to be made.

I agree 100%, but there will be great gnashing of teeth and the sob stories (real and not)will be deafening.

Please call McCain, he needs it.

On August 28th, 2008 at 5:05 pm, bagoh20 said:

Understand, but I am unequivocally against amensty. For any reason. That will effectively drown the US in new immigrants (20-30M amnestied who then bring 2-3 more immigrants each via chain migration). It will break the treasury without punitive taxes (95% of the new citizens will be unskilled and/or illiterate). So long cultural cohesion. So long english as dominant language……

I undestand a business point of view, as long as they are trying to do the right thing, but I adhere to 2 principles. 1) DRY UP THE MAGNETS that draw and keep them here. No jobs. No welfare. No ANCHOR BABIES (my pet peeve). No hope of citizenship. Make it uncomfortable to live here illegally. No need to come illegally if there is no economic benfit to it. 2) ATTRITION of the illegals here. Once you dry up the magnets, over time those here will leave. Give employers 1 year to verify the status of their employees and and find nad hire AMerican replacements. After that grace period hefty fines and potential loss of business will follow for repeat egregious offenders. It’s an orderly exit and allows them to get their affairs in order as well as giving businesses the opprtunity to come clean.